Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-04-21
12:32:00 sfinucan mdbooth: Cool. Looking now
12:33:25 ralonsoh sfinucan: I'll talk to jaypipes
12:34:20 ralonsoh sfinucan: I'll see if we can optimize the code related to resource providers
12:34:37 ralonsoh sfinucan, thank you!
12:35:07 sfinucan ralonsoh: Definitely. I'm sure Jay would be ecstatic to have someone working on that :)
12:37:35 efried sdague Thanks for watching the PowerVM changes :)
12:38:57 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: PowerVM Driver: spawn/destroy #3: TaskFlow https://review.openstack.org/438729
12:39:30 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: PowerVM Driver: spawn/destroy #4: full flavor https://review.openstack.org/391288
12:39:59 sfinucan mdbooth: done and done. Thanks for addressing that small comment
12:40:27 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: PowerVM Driver: console https://review.openstack.org/409402
12:41:01 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: PowerVM Driver: SSP emphemeral disk support https://review.openstack.org/443189
12:41:26 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Specify keymap on server boot (1/2) https://review.openstack.org/458752
12:41:27 efried sdague ^^ Rebased up through "SSP ephemeral disk support".
12:41:54 leakypipes ralonsoh: hey, I'm here :)
12:42:38 sfinucan oops
12:42:45 ralonsoh leakypipes: I was talking to Stephen about a patch I submitted https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427145/
12:43:29 ralonsoh leakypipes: it's an small optimization. The point is if the memoize function could be useful to store in cache and optimize some parts of resourde providers
12:43:43 sdague efried: ok, cool, I'll back through them in a minute
12:43:54 efried sdague Awesome.
12:43:59 ralonsoh leakypipes: let me know if you know any interesting place to use it
12:44:32 johnthetubaguy sfinucan: +1
12:45:05 leakypipes ralonsoh: will do. :)
12:45:22 zioproto dansmith: I have been in meetings the all day... later I hope to find time to clean that broken database we have seen yesterday, I will keep you updated
12:45:23 ralonsoh leakypipes: thanks!
12:52:39 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: configure trust mode for vfs https://review.openstack.org/458514
12:52:40 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova master: network: add command to configure trusted mode for VFs https://review.openstack.org/458513
12:52:40 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova master: network: update pci request spec to handle trusted tags https://review.openstack.org/458820
12:53:21 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Always disconnect_volume after rebase failures https://review.openstack.org/458807
12:54:42 lyarwood mdbooth: posted some comments in the change, basically I was going to follow up with another change for resize failures as we can't just disconnect the new volume at that point.
12:56:09 sdague efried: there is an oslo_utils method for something in patch #4
12:58:28 mdbooth lyarwood: That's an excellent point.
13:00:20 openstackgerrit Andy McCrae proposed openstack/nova master: Allow CONTENT_LENGTH to be present but empty https://review.openstack.org/455710
13:12:09 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/458834
13:13:02 efried andymccr For the love of all that is holy, at some point you gotta tell us to bugger off and merge your patch already.
13:16:44 mriedem o/
13:18:31 rpodolyaka mriedem: hey! could you please take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/458837/? Am I missing something or "?h=stable/newton" part was just missed in the original change?
13:19:57 mriedem was probably just missed, and i bet newton was master when that was added to novaclient
13:20:34 rpodolyaka ack, thanks!
13:23:08 mriedem cdent: johnthetubaguy: congrats on your TC glory
13:23:30 mriedem as PTL i will promise to fight your TC decisions at every turn
13:23:45 johnthetubaguy mriedem: I wouldn't want anything less
13:25:40 cdent mriedem: from the fires of conflict truth will rise
13:26:15 mriedem it'll be like those looney toons characters that clock in each day to fight each other
13:26:21 mriedem but are buddies before and after
13:26:52 dansmith zioproto: cool
13:27:42 mriedem clarkb: i don't suppose we ever backported your nova fix for the live migration job setup to stable/ocata
13:27:55 cdent mriedem: perfect
13:28:26 mriedem clarkb: here we go https://review.openstack.org/#/c/458843/
13:28:27 cdent https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kerUbfOQTW0
13:29:16 mriedem one of you can be the weird hairy english sheep dog,
13:29:24 mriedem and i can be the american coyote
13:29:31 mriedem who gets his ass handed to him daily
13:31:40 mriedem johnthetubaguy: dansmith: leakypipes: has anyone proposed the concept of dedicated hosts in nova before? i have to assume it's come up, but i don't remember
13:31:54 johnthetubaguy yeah, HP folks did
13:32:08 mriedem do you remember a spec for it?
13:32:43 johnthetubaguy it was all aggregate wrangling if I remember, it might be pre-specs?
13:32:47 mriedem https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multi-tenancy-isolation-only-aggregates
13:32:52 mriedem ^ was cern
13:32:57 mriedem https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/whole-host-allocation
13:32:59 mriedem ^ was HP
13:33:17 johnthetubaguy ah, the second one is what I thought you meant
13:33:32 mriedem https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multi-tenant-exclusion-filter
13:33:34 johnthetubaguy yeah, I think it was phil talking about that
13:33:49 mriedem https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/hide-exclusive-availability-zone
13:33:50 mriedem ha
13:33:53 mriedem the list goes on
13:34:14 johnthetubaguy we did something like the cern and last one downstream
13:34:15 mriedem https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/support-dedicate-hosts-when-boot
13:34:25 johnthetubaguy yeah, thats the whole-host-allocation one
13:34:33 johnthetubaguy there are two separate issues mixed in there
13:34:49 mriedem i figured this could be done with dedicated aggregates/AZs and filters
13:35:07 johnthetubaguy "I want only my VMs on each hypervisor", "assign some hosts to a sub-set of tenants"
13:35:21 johnthetubaguy depends how dynamic you want it
13:35:45 cdent andymccr, efried: that code is going to be the shiniest thing ever
13:35:51 johnthetubaguy the HP plan (memory is fuzzy) was that you pick the host by the first instance that lands there "owns" that box
13:36:56 mriedem johnthetubaguy: interesting, but what if the box isn't big enough for all of the instances the tenant wants to take over on that box? delete and find a new one? or create server groups to do this?
13:37:08 cdent johnthetubaguy, mriedem : ironic wants a similar kind of thing for baremetal
13:37:08 cdent i linked the spec in the latest rp update
13:37:22 johnthetubaguy mriedem: it was simpler than that
13:37:45 johnthetubaguy cdent: but when you get an ironic host, you get all the resources regardless, or do you mean reserving some for a particular tenant?
13:38:03 mriedem cdent: not seeing it
13:38:15 johnthetubaguy mriedem: well, by simpler, I mean, you cheat, if it doesn't fit on the host, you then get another host to pay for
13:38:23 mriedem johnthetubaguy: oh i see
13:38:36 cdent mriedem: I'll find the real link
13:38:41 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Specify keymap on server boot (1/2) https://review.openstack.org/458752
13:39:12 johnthetubaguy mriedem: there was talk of per project flavors being allowed, so the divide the hosts they pay for up however they want... got super messy really fast
13:39:17 mriedem so apparently phil's proposal was accepted at one point
13:39:52 mriedem HP public cloud wanted it, rax public cloud had it, and huawei public cloud has something too downstream, which is why i'm asking about it
13:39:52 cdent mriedem, johnthetubaguy https://review.openstack.org/#/c/415512/
13:40:14 cdent figleaf and I had some fairly meandering comments and then leakypipes came along and set everyone straight
13:40:27 leakypipes saw ah?
13:40:33 leakypipes say wha?
13:40:45 johnthetubaguy cdent: ah... right
13:41:06 johnthetubaguy cdent: thats similar to the host assignment case
13:41:41 johnthetubaguy mriedem: I am missing the business context on some of this, it sounds like better quotas would fix the ironic case
13:42:39 mriedem i think it could be solved with tenant isolation filters and image meta,
13:42:53 mriedem i.e. your tenant has access to these images which are configured to only work on certain host aggregates
13:43:06 mriedem thereby you can only boot servers in those hosts
13:43:20 mriedem phil says similar in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38156/
13:43:25 mriedem it puts a burden on the operator

Earlier   Later