| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-04-14 | |||
| 20:34:17 | feeblepipes | mriedem: and the answer could easily be "we didn't have microversions then"... I just honestly don't know. | |
| 20:34:20 | feeblepipes | ah, ok. | |
| 20:34:20 | mriedem | that was like havana or icehouse | |
| 20:34:26 | feeblepipes | sdague: any memory of above? | |
| 20:34:32 | feeblepipes | mriedem: k. | |
| 20:34:48 | mriedem | i remember talking about that at the first midcycle in provo utah | |
| 20:34:49 | feeblepipes | mriedem: I'm going to approve this then. | |
| 20:34:50 | mriedem | which was icehouse | |
| 20:35:24 | mriedem | yeah https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/ce936ea5f3ae0b4d3b816a7fe42d5f0100b20fca | |
| 20:35:35 | mriedem | f man, to the t | |
| 20:35:37 | mriedem | icehouse it was | |
| 20:35:58 | feeblepipes | mriedem: +W'd. | |
| 20:36:34 | feeblepipes | mriedem: any more high-priority specs you need reviewed? | |
| 20:37:06 | feeblepipes | mriedem: what about the "use service catalog for glance" one? I think that's actually a really good one to do and is a relatively small amount of work. | |
| 20:37:38 | feeblepipes | mriedem: well, technically it's not just glance, but all services. | |
| 20:37:39 | mriedem | there was a spec for that? | |
| 20:37:47 | mriedem | i thought we were just doing that | |
| 20:37:49 | mriedem | and had been | |
| 20:37:53 | feeblepipes | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/454983/ | |
| 20:38:08 | feeblepipes | looks new :) | |
| 20:38:15 | mriedem | heh, i don't think we really need a spec for that, | |
| 20:38:16 | feeblepipes | still has that new car smell. | |
| 20:38:20 | mriedem | that's been part of the move to ksa for awhile now | |
| 20:38:23 | feeblepipes | ya | |
| 20:38:53 | mriedem | let me read quick | |
| 20:41:10 | feeblepipes | mriedem: cburgess has responded positively on your suggestion for not limiting migrations in the listing. I say based on that feedback, we don't do it. :P | |
| 20:42:22 | mriedem | ha | |
| 20:42:24 | mriedem | oh chet | |
| 20:42:27 | mriedem | always the punching bag | |
| 20:42:50 | feeblepipes | indeed. | |
| 20:44:18 | mriedem | i'm going to pull the service catalog one down and fix some nits then +2 | |
| 20:51:39 | feeblepipes | mriedem: k, lemme know when you do and I'll review. | |
| 20:53:04 | feeblepipes | cfriesen: nice "does anyone actually use shelve?" :) | |
| 20:53:11 | feeblepipes | cfriesen: my feelings precisely. | |
| 20:53:14 | feeblepipes | should die in a fire :) | |
| 20:53:46 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Use service catalog to get endpoint URLs https://review.openstack.org/454983 | |
| 20:53:46 | mriedem | feeblepipes: ^ | |
| 20:53:53 | feeblepipes | danke | |
| 20:54:16 | mriedem | sdague: yeah nova-manage is probably what we have to use since we can't list instance actions out of the api for all tenants | |
| 20:55:03 | mriedem | sdague: if you wanted to brain dump ideas for an interface in a blueprint it could be hacked on | |
| 20:55:16 | mriedem | like, list total number of all actions or something | |
| 20:55:25 | mriedem | maybe provide a time window | |
| 21:02:22 | feeblepipes | mriedem: actually, -1 from me. see review.. | |
| 21:06:47 | mriedem | i commented on some of that in PS1 | |
| 21:07:25 | mriedem | looking something up | |
| 21:08:22 | mriedem | i guess ksa doesn't provided endoint_override | |
| 21:08:32 | mriedem | i know we have api_endpoint for ironic conf in nova and i thought that was coming from ksa | |
| 21:11:35 | mriedem | replied | |
| 21:11:42 | mriedem | feeblepipes: your turn to update that one? | |
| 21:12:00 | mriedem | i'm good with no endpoint_override backdoor, but also want to see the old options deprecated when we're using the service catalog | |
| 21:15:44 | cburgess | feeblepipes Have I wronged you in some way recently? :P | |
| 21:16:13 | cburgess | feeblepipes Yes shelve should die in a fire, preferably a very very hot one. | |
| 21:17:20 | mriedem | cburgess: you know, the lowest level of hell is actually ice | |
| 21:17:40 | cburgess | Hmmm I missed that. | |
| 21:17:43 | cburgess | Dante? | |
| 21:17:45 | mriedem | yup | |
| 21:17:59 | cburgess | Huh... not sure how I missed that. Didn't read it that closely though. | |
| 21:18:57 | cburgess | I haven't looked yet... is there any type of agenda for Boston? | |
| 21:19:05 | cburgess | I know its not typical summit format... | |
| 21:19:30 | mriedem | yes | |
| 21:19:41 | efried | cburgess If you get the app, you can see (and flag) all the sessions. | |
| 21:19:57 | mriedem | http://forumtopics.openstack.org/ are the sessions, but yeah they are in the schedule too now | |
| 21:21:43 | efried | So - a bp to deprecate and ultimately remove shelve? | |
| 21:21:51 | efried | And see who screams? | |
| 21:22:09 | efried | And if anyone gripes after we remove it, we can say we warned 'em? | |
| 21:22:35 | mriedem | i don't think we're there yet | |
| 21:22:57 | efried | Just at the point where we can spend literally all day hatin on it. | |
| 21:23:10 | mriedem | i've only spent 1/8 of my day hating it | |
| 21:23:17 | mriedem | 3/8 yesterday | |
| 21:23:17 | efried | You multitasker, you. | |
| 21:23:48 | mriedem | cburgess: this is what you want i think https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/global-search?t=Forum%3A%2BFishbowl%2BDiscussion | |
| 21:23:57 | mriedem | those are the things that take the place of the design summit now | |
| 21:24:44 | cburgess | mriedem Ahh cool thanks | |
| 21:25:16 | cburgess | mriedem Is its just 1 track of all of it now? Its all "The Forum" no break outs by project at all in this format? | |
| 21:26:23 | mriedem | right | |
| 21:26:33 | mriedem | so think of how monday and tuesday used to work before | |
| 21:26:35 | cburgess | Hmmm I don't think I can afford donuts for that many people. | |
| 21:26:38 | mriedem | 2-3 tracks at a time | |
| 21:26:38 | cburgess | Yeah | |
| 21:26:43 | mriedem | but now it's 4 days | |
| 21:26:50 | mriedem | no vertical design summit | |
| 21:27:13 | feeblepipes | mriedem: yeah, gimme sec, will update in a bit. | |
| 21:27:23 | feeblepipes | cburgess: :P | |
| 21:27:54 | cburgess | feeblepipes What happened to leaky? Got tired of it? | |
| 21:28:07 | feeblepipes | cburgess: been sick as a pug of late :( | |
| 21:28:20 | cburgess | Lame. Sorry to hear. | |
| 21:28:36 | feeblepipes | cburgess: ya | |
| 21:48:12 | efried | mriedem Since I'm new to this bug triaging thing, can you please let me know whether I've done the right thing here, and/or if I could/should do more? https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1682195 | |
| 21:48:12 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1682195 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Unexpected API Error" [Undecided,New] | |
| 21:48:29 | efried | I don't think I have permission to change the status. Also didn't see a way to mark a dup in an actual field. | |
| 21:48:52 | efried | ah, there it is. | |
| 21:55:29 | feeblepipes | mriedem: with the cinderv2 thing, they have the service_type as cinderv2 :) | |
| 22:09:26 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Use service catalog to get endpoint URLs https://review.openstack.org/454983 | |
| 22:09:27 | feeblepipes | mriedem: ^ | |
| 22:27:19 | mriedem | efried: ok, i don't know that https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1682195 is a duplicate of the other bug because the other bug is related to showing consoles | |
| 22:27:19 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1678493 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "duplicate for #1682195 oslo_messaging.exceptions.MessagingTimeout" [Undecided,Incomplete] | |
| 22:27:33 | mriedem | the former is just some error when launching an instance | |
| 22:28:12 | mriedem | bug 1682195 is using nova-network | |
| 22:28:15 | mriedem | probably not setup properly | |
| 22:28:28 | efried | mriedem Okay. Is it legal to mark as Incomplete out of hand when they don't have logs & configs attached? | |