Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-04-11
17:05:26 sfinucan the no man_pages thing can be fixed by removing same from Sphinx's conf.py or setting 'builders = html' in '[build_sphinx]' of 'setup.cfg'
17:06:03 sfinucan blame pbr being too clever for its own good :(
17:06:31 sfinucan https://github.com/openstack-dev/pbr/blob/master/pbr/builddoc.py#L66
17:07:08 dansmith sfinucan: are you saying that something has changed in some package such that we're dead until we start doing that?
17:07:58 sfinucan dansmith: Depends on what project the issue is happening in. This isn't nova, is it?
17:08:11 dansmith sfinucan: it's neutron, we're just talking about it in the nova channel
17:08:17 dansmith sfinucan: kidding, yes nova :P
17:08:46 dansmith actually, melwitt, mine seems to still be the py3 thing
17:09:09 sdague yeh, the known broken thing was python3 going on by default
17:09:15 melwitt hmm
17:09:20 dansmith one of my changes is working though so maybe the puppet didn't propagate fully yet
17:09:57 jaypipes sdague: done.
17:10:28 sfinucan dansmith: Yeah, it shouldn't happen for nova. All 'source/conf.py's (doc, api-ref, api-guide) have 'man_page' removed or set to something
17:10:42 sfinucan Hence "this isn't nova" :)
17:15:13 melwitt sfinucan: my failure is happening in nova-specs
17:16:21 melwitt I see 'man_pages = []' under doc/source/conf.py
17:16:42 melwitt so it seems like it shouldn't be failing
17:16:51 melwitt it's not failing locally, only in the gate
17:17:01 melwitt and I rebased it already
17:18:08 melwitt ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
17:18:27 jaypipes melwitt: yeah, I had the same reaction looking at your spec amendment's docs failure :(
17:24:18 openstackgerrit Mario Villaplana proposed openstack/nova master: virt/ironic: Implement rescue and unrescue https://review.openstack.org/416487
17:38:48 cdent sdague: hiccup on mod_proxy_uwsgi: we need this version https://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Changelog-2.0.13.html to get unix socket support, xenial is 2.0.12
17:39:12 cdent do we have a usual solution to such issues?
17:41:44 clarkb cdent: you can ask ubuntu to backport, but generally if its not a bug I don't think they do. The other option is to get it into cloud archive (and then use cloud archive). Or maybe just use tcp?
17:42:17 cdent clarkb: not using tcp is a design goal
17:42:28 cdent clarkb: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/devstack-uwsgi
17:42:51 openstackgerrit Andy McCrae proposed openstack/nova master: Allow CONTENT_LENGTH to be present but empty https://review.openstack.org/455710
17:43:08 clarkb cdent: to avoid the port allcoation madness?
17:43:15 cdent in part yeah
17:43:34 clarkb another option may be to use not apache if another tls terminator has better uwsgi support?
17:44:26 cdent clarkb: yeah, nginx was the original plan, but we're doing discovery on apache options to see about limit the surface of the change
17:55:25 sdague cdent: we have a certain amount of flexibility in making it a reasonable dev environment, even if it means more change. I'm totally find with the nginx cut over at the same time
17:58:07 clarkb can I selfishly ask that https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1676363 and its associated changes get reviews/input/etc? This is the sort of issue in the pike release that will break us (us being infra) when the noav change that precipitated this hits clouds
17:58:07 openstack Launchpad bug 1676363 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "The network metadata should be more useful" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Dr. Jens Rosenboom (j-rosenboom-j)
18:05:56 jaypipes clarkb: looking now.
18:16:13 cdent sdague: added some notes on the hackarounds I did to get mox_proxy_uwsgi working, going to switch to some other things for a while: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/devstack-uwsgi
18:18:28 openstackgerrit Gábor Antal proposed openstack/nova master: Transform instance.volume_attach.error notification https://review.openstack.org/455801
18:29:04 prabhuraj Hi all, Warm Greetings, someone could review my code https://review.openstack.org/#/c/397471/
18:29:14 prabhuraj https://review.openstack.org/#/c/397459/
18:29:34 mriedem prabhuraj: wrong channel?
18:29:36 mriedem those are fuel patches
18:29:37 mriedem this is nova
18:34:18 clarkb jaypipes: tldr on glean was cloud init couldn't configure rax interfaces and monty went off and made a thing that could. But also cloud init has historically made some very bad choices for us so I think mordred was just looking for an excuse at that point. (distro specific users, mounting volumes in places where we did not wnat them mounted are the two big ones that I recall)
18:34:56 jaypipes clarkb: hey, cool by me. I wasn't complaining about NIH or anything. was genuinely learning about a new thing :)
18:35:08 clarkb ya, just thought I'd explain after seeing your comment :)
18:35:54 clarkb jaypipes: there are days I am grumpy about it (especially when something breaks due to sillyness in glean) but then there are times when we don't break due to something cloud init would have done when I am happy
18:35:56 clarkb :)
18:36:17 jaypipes no worries clarkb :)
18:36:33 clarkb but its become quite common with ironic uses I guess because it groks vlans and stuff
18:36:57 jaypipes clarkb: doesn't cloud-init grok vlans as well? I think it does...
18:37:21 clarkb I think it didn't for a long time?
18:38:01 jaypipes clarkb: ok, done with reviews on that series.
18:38:15 jaypipes clarkb: only thing I'd like to see is prefixlen be an int not a string.
18:38:16 clarkb this is mostly second hand I don't actually do ironic things. VLANs and link aggregation were the two big features they like
18:38:22 jaypipes clarkb: otherwise, looks fine to me.
18:38:27 clarkb jaypipes: awesome thank you for taking a look
18:38:30 jaypipes any time.
18:39:39 jaypipes clarkb: link agg: https://git.launchpad.net/cloud-init/tree/cloudinit/sources/helpers/openstack.py#n590 and vlans: https://git.launchpad.net/cloud-init/tree/cloudinit/sources/helpers/openstack.py#n614 :)
18:44:40 mordred jaypipes: yah -so - when we started in on glean, cloud-init was on a very explicit freeze not accepting new things becaue they were working on a v2
18:44:53 mordred jaypipes: which meant adding support for the network_info.json stuff was a no-go
18:45:03 mordred they have since unfrozen, which is great for everyone
18:45:09 jaypipes cool beans.
18:45:54 mordred so at this point the main difference is size - glean assumes the only thing you want it to do is get networking set up and inject ssh keys - and that you NEVER want to talk to non-config-drive metadata service
18:46:12 mordred cloud-init is much more flexible and lets you inject arbitrary scripts
18:46:20 mordred which some people think is cool
18:47:05 mordred and I support them in that - I, for myself, _never_ want to run scripts via cloud-init because I can run scripts over ssh much more easily and more debuggably :)
18:47:07 dansmith mordred: orly, glean is configdrive-only?
18:47:15 mordred dansmith: yup
18:47:18 dansmith interesting
18:47:34 mordred we have had nothing but terrible experiences with the ec2-style metadata service
18:47:42 mordred crashing clouds and instances not booting and instances timing out and whatnot
18:47:50 mordred so we avoid it like the plague
18:48:12 mordred config-drive is teh ossum
18:48:30 dansmith mordred: yeah, especially when you have puppet running every 15 minutes on every instance against central metadata services
18:48:44 mordred dansmith: yup
18:49:07 dansmith and when I say every fifteen minutes I mean "for 14 minutes total until smoke"
18:49:47 mordred dansmith: since cloud-init does support config-drive, i'd LOVE it if nova just defaulted config-drive to on, removed the option to turn it off, and then removed the ec2 metadata service
18:50:07 dansmith yeah, the only problem is the staticness of it
18:50:12 mordred dansmith: but I suppose that's at odds with my stance about not changing things, so maybe I'm a hypocrit :)
18:50:16 dansmith i.e. volume attach and nic attach
18:50:40 mordred right- so ...
18:50:55 jaypipes lmao
18:51:21 mordred network attach should just work, since clouds should just be offering dhcp, which means there is no need for config-drive to be updated (unless the cloud is broken)
18:51:36 dansmith mordred: unless you want/need metadata about that nic
18:52:06 mordred but if you're adding a NIC after boot, you're adding the nic, so you as the orchestrator likely already know you're doing it and should be able to direct the instance to do something different,no?
18:52:37 dansmith unless you have an agent that looks for nics with tags of "multipath-to-db" and enslaves them into a bond,
18:52:40 mordred I mean, the only reason we need config-drive for network info anyway is for clouds without dhcp - for the rest I recommend using your orchestration tool to talk to the nova api
18:52:50 dansmith not necessarily
18:52:53 jaypipes mordred: right, unless you're a VNFM or MANO system that is dynamically swapping metadata about your workload's vNICs at runtime and having the workload reconfigure service function chains.
18:53:07 dansmith that ^
18:53:50 mordred I'm still not sure why that isn't just an API call on the service API - which would of course be hard because we haven't bothered with per-instance credentials :)
18:53:50 dansmith jaypipes: it does kinda sound like a chemical
18:54:24 jaypipes mordred: bingo.
18:54:29 mordred but ec2 metadata services is a poor workaround for having an agent in an instance just make API calls to the control plane in a sane fashion
18:54:46 jaypipes mordred: also correct.
18:55:30 dansmith so you want the instance to hit the api, find out the ports that are on the instance, and corellate them all by mac address to know what to do with which actual device in the OS?
18:55:56 mordred dansmith: well, the list ports call also lists the mac addresses of the ports
18:56:02 mordred but yah - I do that for every instance we spin up in nodepool
18:56:16 mordred because I have to to figure out if the instance needs a floating ip or not

Earlier   Later