Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-03-28
05:33:44 openstackgerrit Béla Vancsics proposed openstack/nova master: Adding tags field to InstancePayload https://review.openstack.org/407228
05:35:40 openstackgerrit Béla Vancsics proposed openstack/nova master: Transform instance.trigger_crash_dump notification https://review.openstack.org/396225
06:12:39 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Add description to policies in server_groups.py https://review.openstack.org/449486
07:49:35 openstackgerrit xuan0802 proposed openstack/nova master: Implements: bug/1234 https://review.openstack.org/450604
08:29:36 openstackgerrit xuan0802 proposed openstack/nova master: Test Implements: bug/1234 https://review.openstack.org/450604
08:34:08 johnthetubaguy gmann: sweet, thanks gmann!
08:39:49 openstackgerrit Radoslav Gerganov proposed openstack/nova master: VMware: serial console log (completed) https://review.openstack.org/450636
08:51:33 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Add description to policies in server_groups.py https://review.openstack.org/449486
08:59:40 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Add description to policies in lock_server.py https://review.openstack.org/448468
09:00:28 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Add description to policies in evacuate.py and rescue.py https://review.openstack.org/450059
09:11:03 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Add description to policies in server_metadata.py https://review.openstack.org/450538
09:20:44 Kevin_Zheng gmann: could you quick check this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/449903/
09:22:00 alexey_weyl bauzas: Hi, I have another question about the host aggregates and the AZs.
09:22:35 alexey_weyl bauzas: Can there be two different AZs with the same name?
09:23:19 alexey_weyl bauzas: for example, if i have one host aggregate called HA1 with zone1 in it, and another host aggregate called HA2 with zone1 in it as well.
09:23:35 gmann Kevin_Zheng: thanks done
09:23:44 alexey_weyl bauzas: is it the same zone1? or are those 2 different AZs?
09:23:58 gcb sfinucan, hope https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446898/ can be merged , then we can merge oslo one https://review.openstack.org/446899
09:24:41 sfinucan gcb: Thanks for the ping - I'd missed that. +2
09:25:50 gcb sfinucan, cool thanks
09:25:52 gabor_antal Hey, would someone please check https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448655/ ? I've hit this bug in another patch
09:26:09 mdbooth kaisers: Sucks about systemd-run :( I'm interested to know what problems you saw with the forking type, and what OS you're using.
09:28:02 mdbooth kaisers: IIUC, the behaviour of that unit type is that any failure of the top-level process will be reflected in the exit code of systemd-run, so if the process fails before it forks we'll know about it.
09:28:24 Kevin_Zheng gmann: thanks
09:28:28 mdbooth I guess mount.quobyte might fail after the fork, which would be disappointing.
09:29:54 bauzas alexey_weyl: hola
09:30:14 alexey_weyl bauzas: hi :)
09:30:23 bauzas alexey_weyl: not sure, lemme verify
09:30:46 bauzas AFAIR, it's not possible, but I don't remeber where it's verified
09:31:09 alexey_weyl bauzas: I have created such an example as I described for you on my system, but I am just trying to understand if those are 2 different AZs.
09:33:41 bauzas alexey_weyl: yup, it's not possible
09:34:08 bauzas alexey_weyl: because of nova.compute.api.is_safe_to_update_az
09:34:45 bauzas alexey_weyl: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/compute/api.py#L4583-L4586
09:34:52 alexey_weyl bauzas: please explain. Because as I said I have created on my devstack a host sggregate called HA1 with zone1 and another host aggregate HA2 with zone1 as well.
09:35:26 bauzas alexey_weyl: do you have hosts in the aggregates yet?
09:35:35 alexey_weyl bauzas: no
09:35:51 bauzas alexey_weyl: okay, so please add one host into HA1
09:36:02 bauzas alexey_weyl: and then add a second host into HA1
09:36:05 bauzas HA2*
09:36:20 bauzas then, it should be kaboom for adding the second host into HA2
09:36:34 alexey_weyl bauzas: you are saying that if i'll add hosts to those host aggregates and AZs then it will through an exception?
09:36:40 bauzas yup
09:36:53 alexey_weyl bauzas: great, thanks very much!!! :)
09:37:03 alexey_weyl bauzas: very helpful! )
09:37:06 bauzas you can technically create two aggregates having same AZ metadata, but only one could have hosts in there
09:37:06 alexey_weyl bauzas: :)
09:37:20 bauzas alexey_weyl: please verify it tho :)
09:37:21 alexey_weyl bauzas: Thanks :)
09:37:44 alexey_weyl bauzas: ahhhhhhh, that is quiet a problem for me.
09:37:58 openstackgerrit Gábor Antal proposed openstack/nova master: Transform instance.volume_attach notification https://review.openstack.org/401992
09:38:08 alexey_weyl bauzas: because it is quite a procedure where I work to do such a thing.
09:39:04 bauzas alexey_weyl: well, adding a host into the second HA2 aggregate would return you an exception saying "One or more hosts already in availability zone(s)"
09:40:01 gabor_antal sfinucan: thanks for the review! :)
09:40:06 alexey_weyl bauzas: ok, great
09:42:00 openstackgerrit John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Use HostAddressOpt for opts that accept IP and hostnames https://review.openstack.org/445782
09:42:58 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Add description to policies in lock_server.py https://review.openstack.org/448468
09:48:05 openstackgerrit Silvan Kaiser proposed openstack/nova master: Switch Nova Quobyte volume driver to mount via systemd-run https://review.openstack.org/432344
09:52:07 rabel hi everyone. someone here with quota-knowledge? ;) i don't understand quota classes, default quota, etc. so i'd like to ask some questions
09:53:06 openstackgerrit John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Add description to policies in used_limits https://review.openstack.org/447710
09:53:27 rabel first of all: what is a quota class? is that just a collection of quotas? so if i change the quotas for a project, that means there is a quota class assigned to that project in the background and i actually change the quotas in that class?
09:53:40 rabel is "default" also a quota class or something different?
09:54:23 rabel and what are default quotas for a project? since i thought the default quotas are those assigned to a new project. is this for creating new projects with --parent option?
09:59:47 kaisers mdbooth: Hi! I tested on centos 7.3 and in a xenial vm. The tests returned exit code 0 in all variants (except when i had a systemd-run parameter typo) and all tested sleep calls returned immediately
10:01:05 kaisers mdbooth: right now i'm looking into another option, mount.quobyte does send a systemd ready notification upon successful mount, possibly this is a simple solution. But currently i'm looking into retrieving possible error information in such a variant
10:01:29 mdbooth kashyap: On centos 7.3?
10:02:11 mdbooth kashyap: That was for kaisers :)
10:02:18 mdbooth kaisers: Confirmed here :(
10:02:28 mdbooth Behaviour is different on F25
10:04:38 openstackgerrit Moshe Levi proposed openstack/os-vif master: Explain why we bring up the lb in hybrd mode https://review.openstack.org/450692
10:05:48 openstackgerrit Moshe Levi proposed openstack/os-vif master: Explain why we bring up the lb in hybrd mode https://review.openstack.org/447269
10:08:45 kaisers mdbooth: yep, just re-verified: http://paste.openstack.org/show/604445/
10:09:12 kaisers mdbooth: ok, I'll get back when i've looked into using systemd notify...
10:10:17 mdbooth kaisers: You could solve it with the post-verify method, but I think it would be much better if you didn't have to
10:23:18 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add 'move-nova-cmds-to-cliff' spec https://review.openstack.org/433603
10:37:50 mdbooth kaisers: I suspect this is what we really want: https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/4ypb2g/systemd_rolls_out_its_own_mount_tool/d6qicwi/
10:37:53 mdbooth Bit new, though :(
10:38:01 mdbooth It's not even in Fedora
10:43:56 openstackgerrit Sergey Nikitin proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] PIC NUMA policy PoC https://review.openstack.org/390520
11:01:23 openstackgerrit Jianghua Wang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: XenAPI: support for VGPU https://review.openstack.org/450122
11:29:30 openstackgerrit Sergey Nikitin proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] PIC NUMA policy PoC https://review.openstack.org/390520
11:52:12 kaisers mdbooth: yeah! This keeps on dangling fobidden ('cos too fresh) fruits in front of my face... :-D
12:04:08 gabor_antal bausas, sfinucan: would someone please readd WF+1, I had to rebase the patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448655/
12:04:19 gabor_antal oops, bauzas
12:04:57 jaypipes gabor_antal: done
12:05:17 gabor_antal thanks, Jay! that was quick :)
12:05:40 jaypipes gabor_antal: heh, well I was actually just reviewing that patch :)
12:10:50 openstackgerrit John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add policy-remove-scope-checks spec https://review.openstack.org/433037
12:35:53 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Explicitly specify arguments of server_groups creation https://review.openstack.org/450763
12:42:35 openstackgerrit John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add spec to use cinder's new attachment API https://review.openstack.org/373203
12:43:13 johnthetubaguy mdbooth: would be awesome if you get chance to double check I didn't break anything with my fixes for mriedman's comments
12:53:12 openstackgerrit John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Use HostAddressOpt for opts that accept IP and hostnames https://review.openstack.org/445782
12:54:11 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Explicitly specify arguments of server_groups creation https://review.openstack.org/450763
13:08:07 kaisers mdbooth: I'm changing this to rely on the sd_notify approach and i'm moving the systemd mount to a separate method as it becomes a completely separate mount/verify code path. This will take a bit, i'll ping you here once it's up for review, if that's ok...
13:08:57 mdbooth kaisers: Sounds good. Are you going to use the systemd-notify cmdline tool?
13:09:47 kaisers mdbooth: Nope, the mount.quobyte client is sending this, so the call will stay mostly the same
13:10:16 mdbooth kashyap: Does it send a notification on failure?
13:10:58 mdbooth kashyap: That was for kaisers (again)
13:11:14 kashyap Yeah, no worries, I know the tab-complete snafu all too well
13:11:16 kaisers mdbooth: no, only a success notification
13:11:33 kaisers mdbooth: but i'm adding a check for this

Earlier   Later