| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-03-23 | |||
| 08:09:10 | openstackgerrit | Mikhail Feoktistov proposed openstack/nova master: Remove fstype param from ploop init https://review.openstack.org/444970 | |
| 08:18:55 | openstackgerrit | Sivasathurappan Radhakrishnan proposed openstack/nova master: Raise general error message when volume attach fails https://review.openstack.org/320163 | |
| 08:19:33 | openstackgerrit | Danfly proposed openstack/nova master: remove mox from unit/api/openstack/compute/test_flavor_manage.py https://review.openstack.org/448581 | |
| 08:25:09 | Kevin_Zheng | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1675276 seems quite a Bug | |
| 08:25:09 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1675276 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Volumes attached to shelved instance may contain incorrect device_name" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Zhenyu Zheng (zhengzhenyu) | |
| 08:38:29 | openstackgerrit | Hironori Shiina proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Fix rendering sub-directories in README https://review.openstack.org/449000 | |
| 08:47:07 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: return a CPU overhead if isolate emulator threads requested https://review.openstack.org/385364 | |
| 08:47:07 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: numa: fit instance NUMA node with cpus reserved onto host NUMA node https://review.openstack.org/400875 | |
| 08:47:09 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: virt: update overhead to take into account vCPUs https://review.openstack.org/385024 | |
| 08:47:15 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: make emulator threads to run on the reserved pCPU https://review.openstack.org/400878 | |
| 08:47:16 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: numa: take into account cpus reserved https://review.openstack.org/400876 | |
| 08:47:17 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: numa: update numa usage to include reserved CPUs https://review.openstack.org/400877 | |
| 08:49:16 | Jack_Iv | Why does trove rewrite PG access rules? | |
| 08:49:20 | Jack_Iv | postgres@psql8:~$ psql | |
| 08:49:20 | Jack_Iv | psql: FATAL: role "postgres" is not permitted to log in | |
| 08:53:53 | openstackgerrit | Mikhail Feoktistov proposed openstack/nova master: Add is_vz_container function https://review.openstack.org/445947 | |
| 09:03:53 | openstackgerrit | Mikhail Feoktistov proposed openstack/nova master: Remove fstype param from ploop init https://review.openstack.org/444970 | |
| 09:14:13 | sfinucan | Jack_Iv: That sounds like a question of #openstack-trove or #openstack | |
| 09:14:25 | Jack_Iv | oh, sorry, wrong channel | |
| 09:29:47 | openstackgerrit | Mikhail Feoktistov proposed openstack/nova master: Remove fstype param from ploop init https://review.openstack.org/444970 | |
| 09:49:35 | openstackgerrit | Yoshihiko Atsumi proposed openstack/nova master: Add confirm resized server functional negative tests https://review.openstack.org/421074 | |
| 10:02:27 | kevinbenton | johnthetubaguy: yo | |
| 10:10:46 | kevinbenton | johnthetubaguy: nova/neutron vif_type issue if you have some time https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1675343 | |
| 10:10:47 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1675343 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "vif_type='tap' fails with permission error on /dev/net/tun" [Undecided,New] | |
| 10:11:36 | openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.openstack.org/449041 | |
| 10:30:31 | openstackgerrit | Danfly proposed openstack/nova master: remove mox from unit/api/openstack/compute/test_disk_config.py https://review.openstack.org/449054 | |
| 10:46:41 | johnthetubaguy | kevinbenton: hey, just taking a peak | |
| 10:47:46 | snecklifter | Hello, any chance of getting this nudged along: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/393489 | |
| 10:47:47 | snecklifter | Thanks | |
| 10:47:56 | snecklifter | CI is green | |
| 10:48:51 | johnthetubaguy | snecklifter: I haven't done my look through stuff that needs a nudge, that looks like one I should take a peak at | |
| 10:49:08 | johnthetubaguy | kevinbenton: I don't think I have the context around that one, I remember some chatter yesterday | |
| 10:49:52 | snecklifter | johnthetubaguy: many thanks | |
| 11:03:46 | johnthetubaguy | mdbooth: are you are around, there was that patch I was looking at late yesterday I wanted to ask you about | |
| 11:04:03 | mdbooth | johnthetubaguy: Sorry, I've been very downstream focussed for a few days | |
| 11:04:13 | johnthetubaguy | mdbooth: no worries, that happens | |
| 11:04:15 | mdbooth | Got a link? | |
| 11:04:30 | johnthetubaguy | mdbooth: I think its this one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/437597/ | |
| 11:04:58 | johnthetubaguy | mdbooth: I couldn't think when we would fetch by attachment_id, I think I am missing something | |
| 11:05:56 | mdbooth | johnthetubaguy: It just seems inevitable to me if we've got apis creating by attachment | |
| 11:06:11 | mdbooth | However, my point was really higher level than that | |
| 11:06:30 | mdbooth | Which is that I don't think it's worth adding a db schema change for code we haven't seen yet | |
| 11:06:40 | johnthetubaguy | mdbooth: so if the index didn't have a cost, I would totally be up for adding it anyways | |
| 11:06:53 | mdbooth | I don't see a problem merging the code before the user | |
| 11:07:07 | mdbooth | I just think it's premature to merge it when we haven't even seen the user | |
| 11:07:26 | mdbooth | There's no reason we can't merge it quickly later | |
| 11:07:44 | mdbooth | Merging it early just risks potentially needing another db migration | |
| 11:08:03 | mdbooth | And it has (a small) cost when we're not using it | |
| 11:08:11 | johnthetubaguy | thats totally fair, no harm in waiting for that | |
| 11:08:48 | mdbooth | I was really just -1 because there's no follow up. The patch may be good. | |
| 11:09:00 | johnthetubaguy | I think we pass instance_uuid and volume_uuid to look up a BDM, then we check if the attachment_id is present or not, and use the new flow or not, but it would be good to see that code first | |
| 11:09:44 | johnthetubaguy | mdbooth: yeah, thats totally fair, I like your idea of waiting for the follow, it should answer our questions for us | |
| 11:09:58 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: [placement] Idempotent PUT /resource_classes/{name} https://review.openstack.org/448791 | |
| 11:10:12 | johnthetubaguy | mdbooth: I think I managed to miss that bit of your comment, my bad | |
| 11:32:26 | openstackgerrit | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: WIP/DNM: Destroy the ReqSpec object when deleting the instance https://review.openstack.org/391060 | |
| 11:33:28 | openstackgerrit | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Destroy the ReqSpec object when deleting the instance https://review.openstack.org/391060 | |
| 11:43:28 | tojuvone | johnthetubaguy, Hi, do you have a minute | |
| 11:47:51 | tojuvone | johnthetubaguy, Just wondering new host_maintenance_events table vs. using services table | |
| 11:49:00 | tojuvone | johnthetubaguy, services table already exposed to servers that suits me, but event would need duplicate on each service | |
| 11:54:08 | tojuvone | brb in an hour or get hit by major traffic jam | |
| 12:02:17 | openstackgerrit | Maxim Nestratov proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: honor disk_format=ploop image metadata property https://review.openstack.org/429745 | |
| 12:03:56 | mnestratov | mdbooth: hi, could you please take a look at ^ ^ and say what you think now? | |
| 12:10:38 | openstackgerrit | Mikhail Feoktistov proposed openstack/nova master: Remove fstype param from ploop init https://review.openstack.org/444970 | |
| 12:18:12 | openstackgerrit | Alexander Baranin proposed openstack/nova master: Add allocation ratios to hypervisor api. https://review.openstack.org/449107 | |
| 12:19:45 | sbezverk_ | johnthetubaguy: ping | |
| 12:22:03 | openstackgerrit | Maxim Nestratov proposed openstack/nova master: tests: fix uefi testcases https://review.openstack.org/449109 | |
| 12:22:33 | johnthetubaguy | tojuvone: sbezverk_: sorry, on a call, about to grab lunch, I should be around in 30 mins or so if thats OK | |
| 12:26:37 | sbezverk_ | johnthetubaguy: sure thing, bon apetit!! | |
| 12:39:23 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: [placement] Don't use floats in microversion handling https://review.openstack.org/449119 | |
| 12:40:19 | cdent | johnthetubaguy, bauzas, jaypipes : that's ^ probably reasonably important enough to merge soonish | |
| 12:44:43 | sbezverk_ | cdent: do you have a second for qq? | |
| 12:45:07 | cdent | sbezverk_: I can try | |
| 12:46:14 | sbezverk_ | cdent: in ocata, the doc sais that we need to have two cells cell0 and cell1, but on the other hand I am running ocata with just cell0 and everything is working. SO there is an inconsistency. Could you please clarify? | |
| 12:46:15 | tojuvone | johnthetubaguy, No problem :) | |
| 12:46:37 | sdague | cdent: could you put a test that tries to set the decorator with a float to ensure that explodes really early? | |
| 12:46:44 | cdent | sdague: sure | |
| 12:46:55 | sdague | because I would be concerned by someone doing that accidentally | |
| 12:47:07 | sbezverk_ | cdent: is it really mandatory to have both cells? | |
| 12:47:24 | Dinesh_Bhor | Hi all, can someone take a look at a small patch? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445782/ It's already having a +2. | |
| 12:47:34 | cdent | sbezverk_: As I understand it, yes, so something is likely not what it appears, but that's an area I'm not very familiar with | |
| 12:48:02 | sbezverk_ | cdent: could you suggest local cell expert ;) ?? | |
| 12:48:59 | sbezverk_ | cdent: cause as I said I have a test bed functioning normal with single cell0. | |
| 12:49:18 | cdent | sbezverk_: dansmith is probably the final word there and melwitt as well but I think neither of them is around yet | |
| 12:49:48 | EmilienM | jroll: fyi, the ironic/nova thing is fixed for us. Thanks again for your patch! | |
| 12:49:55 | cdent | sbezverk_: are you sure you haven't named the thing which would be cell1 'cell0'? I believe you should have three database tables? | |
| 12:49:58 | EmilienM | dansmith, bauzas ^ | |
| 12:50:20 | bauzas | EmilienM: coolio | |
| 12:50:41 | sbezverk_ | cdent: positive, I wrote a job and it creates a single cell0 | |
| 12:51:15 | sbezverk_ | cdent: so I have now 3 databases only nova, nova-api and cell0 | |
| 12:51:35 | sbezverk_ | cdent: I will follow up with these folks to confirm, thank you very much for your help | |
| 12:52:02 | cdent | sbezverk_: I think what you've got there is correct | |
| 12:52:25 | cdent | but like I said, I've not done much poking in this area, and I don't currently have a running system | |
| 12:52:56 | cdent | sbezverk_: actually, i do have database tables though and I have 'nova', 'nova_api' and 'nova_cell0'. only | |
| 12:53:13 | cdent | the table named 'nova' is cell1 | |
| 12:54:07 | sbezverk_ | cdent: ahhh, so nova became kind of cell1, got it | |
| 12:54:40 | bauzas | cdent: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/449119/1 had sdague's comment that I agree with | |
| 12:54:50 | cdent | bauzas: yeah, just working on that now, thanks. | |
| 12:54:51 | bauzas | just add this and I'm +2 | |
| 12:55:09 | bauzas | cdent: FWIW, thanks for fixing that | |
| 13:02:10 | jroll | EmilienM: \o/ | |