| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-03-13 | |||
| 11:06:33 | johnthetubaguy | dakhmetov: I would rather we get the patch in that uses instance.project_id and instance.user_id first, thats an important fix (we could use the context) | |
| 11:07:02 | johnthetubaguy | mdbooth: a combination of all of those really, plus security around every compute node having those permissions, and setting that up correctly | |
| 11:07:56 | johnthetubaguy | mdbooth: matching uuids to current names feels like something the monitoring systems could do | |
| 11:08:07 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Trivial Fix https://review.openstack.org/442310 | |
| 11:09:49 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Add description for Image location in snapshot https://review.openstack.org/440379 | |
| 11:16:32 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: check hw:mem_page_size when change extra_spec https://review.openstack.org/408610 | |
| 11:18:17 | bauzas | johnthetubaguy: oh, just saw https://review.openstack.org/#/c/442387/1/resolutions/20170307-compute-platform.rst | |
| 11:18:42 | bauzas | johnthetubaguy: I haven't seen any ML discussion around this | |
| 11:18:57 | bauzas | johnthetubaguy: is this something you discussed in ATL ? | |
| 11:19:09 | johnthetubaguy | bauzas: I haven't started any, its something I have been wanting to suggest for a while | |
| 11:19:32 | bauzas | johnthetubaguy: oh okay | |
| 11:19:44 | bauzas | fine by me, just wanted to make sure people were happy with it | |
| 11:20:03 | johnthetubaguy | bauzas: I suspect people hate it, but I think its needed | |
| 11:20:45 | cdent | johnthetubaguy: it's gonna rub some people funny, but I agree it is important | |
| 11:21:51 | johnthetubaguy | I think we keep avoiding difficult conversations for two long on this kind of thing | |
| 11:22:04 | bauzas | ++ | |
| 11:22:13 | bauzas | anyway, /me goes offline | |
| 11:22:26 | cdent | johnthetubaguy: hell yes | |
| 11:23:13 | johnthetubaguy | cdent: I like your idea, frame the problem, not the people, I am going to go do that now | |
| 11:24:04 | cdent | that's mostly for conflict avoidance. I think everyone is aware there is a problem... | |
| 11:24:37 | johnthetubaguy | yeha | |
| 11:32:51 | dakhmetov | johnthetubaguy: mdbooth: guys, thank you for the advice! I'll add unit test for missing keys in system metadata. | |
| 11:35:46 | VAhl | Openstack [Newton]: When deploying new instance on Nova. I got the following error. Running privsep helper: ['sudo', 'nova-rootwrap', '/etc/nova/rootwrap.conf', 'privsep-helper', '--config-file', '/etc/nova/nova.conf', '--config-file', '/etc/nova/nova-compute.conf', '--privsep_context', 'os_brick.privileged.default', '--privsep_sock_path', '/tmp/tmpcWGEib/privsep.sock'] | |
| 11:35:46 | VAhl | etc/nova/rootwrap.conf is own by root:root. etc/nova/nova.conf + nova-compute.conf is own by nova:nov | |
| 11:43:35 | sfinucan | gmann: Comments left on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/431038/ | |
| 11:44:09 | sfinucan | alex_xu: If you're looking for easy config-opt patches to review, you might look this way --> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/431039/ :) | |
| 11:45:31 | alex_xu | sfinucan: thanks :) | |
| 12:23:06 | artom | sfinucan, thanks for the tagged attach reviews :) I'll get to websocket proxy security, I promise. In my defense, it's harder to get full context for the latter than the former, and I don't feel like just reviewing patch by patch and writing nits | |
| 12:23:59 | artom | I had an idea about removing the tag=None param to the driver interface, let me respin that first | |
| 12:25:21 | artom | Building device metadata is probably not a huge deal, optimization-wise, but the DB call hidden in instance.save definitely is. So I'm thinking build the new device metadata, compare it to the old one, and only save if there's a difference | |
| 12:25:33 | artom | Get rid of the driver interface change, still no useless DB queries | |
| 12:26:29 | artom | Wait... | |
| 12:26:40 | artom | Doesn't save() call obj_what_changed() or whatever it's called? | |
| 12:26:54 | artom | Does it still call the database if nothing has changed? | |
| 12:28:45 | sfinucan | artom: Yeah, no (immediate) panic :) the websocket proxy stuff /is/ tougher to review than other stuff, seeing as it's not just glue like other nova code | |
| 12:29:09 | sfinucan | I'd be interested in seeing the approach to removing the tag parameter though, if it works out | |
| 12:29:19 | sfinucan | Steadily working through the rest of the series now | |
| 12:29:40 | sfinucan | sahid: RE: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/400875/, this is the issue I have with it https://review.openstack.org/#/c/400875/23/nova/virt/hardware.py@848 | |
| 12:29:44 | artom | Based on ^^^ I think we can just remove with no other changes/repercussions? | |
| 12:29:58 | sfinucan | For N calls of _numa_fit_instance_cell_with_pinning, you will only ever have one where num_cpu_reserved is anything but 0 | |
| 12:30:04 | sfinucan | That, to me, is overloading | |
| 12:30:18 | artom | dansmith can confirm when he wakes up, but if instance.save() is smart about how it calls the database, which I think it is, we're good | |
| 12:30:31 | sfinucan | artom: looking | |
| 12:32:35 | openstackgerrit | Sergey Nikitin proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] PIC NUMA policy PoC https://review.openstack.org/390520 | |
| 12:35:33 | artom | https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/objects/instance.py#L721 https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/objects/instance.py#L663 | |
| 12:36:19 | artom | ^^ that pretty conclusively indicates that if device_metadata has not changed, there will be no useless DB calls | |
| 12:42:42 | sfinucan | artom: That would be reading of it to | |
| 12:42:44 | sfinucan | Good spot | |
| 12:42:47 | sfinucan | So | |
| 12:43:30 | sfinucan | We can just call it every single time with negligible performance impact | |
| 12:46:04 | artom | sfinucan, pretty sure | |
| 12:46:51 | artom | sfinucan, the little ones are waking up, let me drive them to daycare and I'll continue after | |
| 12:47:02 | sfinucan | artom: (y) | |
| 12:56:11 | erol | hi everyone, I wonder Is there any way to flush Nova Schedular RetryFilter count? I hit max attempt. What can i do now? | |
| 12:56:16 | sean-k-mooney | sc68cal: if you get a chance can you review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/444788 it will fix our third party ci after https://review.openstack.org/#/c/435575/ added a test requirement that break ovs compilation | |
| 12:57:01 | sean-k-mooney | sc68cal: it should also give a speed up in the ci jobs as less stuff needs to be downloaded which is a nice side effect | |
| 12:58:19 | sean-k-mooney | erol: usually you delete the instance and try again but if you hit max attempts its often because there was a problem with the request | |
| 12:58:48 | sean-k-mooney | erol: either no host satifies the request or you have an infra issue that is stoping the cloud from working correctly | |
| 13:03:37 | erol | sean-k-mooney: Thanks. I try to run Ironic and have an issue on provisioning. After I attempted several times. I came a cross with these output in schedular log http://paste.openstack.org/show/602488/ | |
| 13:12:39 | openstackgerrit | Rafael Folco proposed openstack/nova master: DELETE all inventory for a resource provider https://review.openstack.org/416669 | |
| 13:12:40 | openstackgerrit | Rafael Folco proposed openstack/nova master: Raising http codes on old microversion https://review.openstack.org/444497 | |
| 13:41:58 | openstackgerrit | Sergey Nikitin proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] PIC NUMA policy PoC https://review.openstack.org/390520 | |
| 13:48:55 | mriedem | o/ | |
| 13:51:55 | dansmith | alex_xu: you still around? | |
| 13:55:15 | bauzas | oh, you US folks already had DST shift ? | |
| 13:55:20 | edleafe | Scheduler subteam meeting in 5 minutes in #openstack-meeting-alt | |
| 13:55:35 | leakypipes | rfolco: were you working on adding error codes (in addition to error messages) to the placement API? can't remember if that was you or diga... | |
| 13:55:35 | mriedem | bauzas: that was this weekend | |
| 13:55:36 | edleafe | bauzas: yep - yeaterday | |
| 13:56:10 | mriedem | leakypipes: neither https://review.openstack.org/#/c/418393/ | |
| 13:56:22 | leakypipes | mriedem: ah! | |
| 13:56:30 | leakypipes | it was _gryf | |
| 13:57:17 | bauzas | mriedem: edleafe: cool then, France is now closer to the US :) | |
| 13:58:01 | rfolco | leakypipes, morning. Not me. | |
| 13:59:45 | leakypipes | rfolco: np :) thanks! | |
| 14:00:40 | edleafe | leakypipes: time to plug the leak | |
| 14:00:49 | jaypipes | :) | |
| 14:04:43 | _gryf | yup, I did that bp | |
| 14:05:35 | markus_z | mriedem: JFYI, the VNC issue we talked about 1w ago will be fixed with: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/444164/ | |
| 14:07:34 | markus_z | mriedem: I also have to pester you about: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/406898/ All info you asked for is added to that review. | |
| 14:08:06 | mriedem | ok | |
| 14:09:10 | openstackgerrit | dane-fichter proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Trusted flavors https://review.openstack.org/312225 | |
| 14:10:01 | sfinucan | jaypipes: Might you be so kind as to stick this on your review backlog for this week? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/361140/ | |
| 14:10:31 | sfinucan | johnthetubaguy too ^, if you could | |
| 14:12:30 | dane-fichter | mriedem , sdague : Could you guys take a look at my change adding the security tempest tests as an experimental check in Nova? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/443167/ | |
| 14:13:59 | mriedem | dane-fichter: sure | |
| 14:14:11 | dane-fichter | mriedem: thanks! | |
| 14:18:57 | jaypipes | sfinucan: ya | |
| 14:19:19 | sfinucan | jaypipes: Thank you, sir | |
| 14:19:35 | jaypipes | sfinucan: np. you know I love my numa. :P | |
| 14:20:11 | sfinucan | jaypipes: I saw numa'y stuff and decided to r̶u̶i̶n̶ make your day | |
| 14:22:43 | mriedem | markus_z: the multinode vnc fix looks good to me, that's even called out in the devstack multinode docs | |
| 14:24:04 | jaypipes | sfinucan: :) | |
| 14:25:33 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: trivial: Add a note about 'cells_api' https://review.openstack.org/444926 | |
| 14:26:18 | dansmith | johnthetubaguy: alex_xu: I'm totally lost.. where does cachingscheduler override things in HostManager? | |
| 14:26:52 | johnthetubaguy | dansmith: it uses get_all_hosts() basically | |
| 14:27:02 | johnthetubaguy | rather than get_by_uuid | |
| 14:27:07 | johnthetubaguy | s | |
| 14:27:42 | johnthetubaguy | dansmith: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/scheduler/caching_scheduler.py#L75 | |
| 14:28:09 | johnthetubaguy | dansmith: might be time to deprecate that thing soon, although I was hoping to wait until we do allocations in the conductor really | |