Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-02-26
12:14:23 openstackgerrit Sean Dague proposed openstack/nova master: api/metadata/vendordata_dynamic: don't import Requests for its constants https://review.openstack.org/434339
15:36:01 miss_hypothermia mriedem: I fixed the issues and added a small test too for the service version check
15:36:33 miss_hypothermia mriedem: smcginnis had a question about when to clean up the code, I hope that's the last issue we need to figure out there and otherwise the fix is good to go :)
15:39:46 mriedem ok i'll take a look
15:43:46 mriedem miss_hypothermia: you're right, it's pike-eol
15:44:53 miss_hypothermia mriedem: ok, cool, tnx
15:56:57 openstackgerrit Kevin Benton proposed openstack/os-vif master: [wip] https://review.openstack.org/438272
16:13:12 mriedem miss_hypothermia: found some test issues
16:15:50 miss_hypothermia mriedem: I'll check the patch if you added comments about it there
16:16:27 mriedem yup still going
16:20:49 miss_hypothermia mriedem: did you find anything that's complicated enough to talk about it here?
16:21:08 mriedem it's not really complicated, just an oversight, but actually something i brought up long long ago i think
16:21:20 mriedem cinder.API.check_attach would raise InvalidVolume,
16:21:41 mriedem we're now calling cinder.API.reserve_volume, which raises InvalidInput if cinder gives a 400
16:22:03 mriedem the tests were mocked to raise InvalidVolume from reserve_volume, but that's not actually what would happen in reality
16:22:23 mriedem so _validate_bdm needs to handle both InvalidVolume and InvalidInput
16:23:38 miss_hypothermia mriedem: oh, ok, so one extra error handling and fix mock in the test
16:23:55 miss_hypothermia mriedem: I will fix it in the afternoon, when I get to the airport
16:24:13 miss_hypothermia thanks for pointing it out
16:25:58 smcginnis mriedem, miss_hypothermia: Commented on there, but if we only care about Ocata talking to newer versions, I'm having a brain block as to why we need to wait for pike-eol.
16:27:15 mriedem smcginnis: you know master is pike now right?
16:27:23 smcginnis mriedem: Yes.
16:27:25 mriedem smcginnis: this is a change to the nova api in pike
16:27:37 mriedem so ocata computes won't have the change introduced here
16:27:45 smcginnis mriedem: And we need to support pre-pike that does not have this change.
16:27:46 mriedem but pike computes will
16:28:03 smcginnis mriedem: So once pre-pike is gone, it's all on the new api.
16:28:24 mriedem which would be ocata-eol, i get what you're saying now
16:28:39 smcginnis mriedem: OK, so I'm not completely insane?
16:28:44 mriedem no
16:28:47 mriedem just partialy
16:28:50 mriedem *partially
16:28:53 smcginnis I can live with that.
16:29:40 mriedem i acked in the review
16:29:43 mriedem miss_hypothermia: comments are in
16:32:49 mriedem i'm going to go numb my brain in front of the tv for awhile now
16:33:48 smcginnis I'm going to go numb my brain and work on my taxes.
17:02:37 miss_hypothermia mriedem: smcginnis: Tnx
17:03:20 miss_hypothermia mriedem: smcginnis: I'll numb my brain at airports and airplanes :)
17:17:22 smcginnis miss_hypothermia: Safe travels!
17:28:00 miss_hypothermia smcginnis: thanks!
18:45:11 openstackgerrit Ildiko Vancsa proposed openstack/nova master: Implement new attach/detach Cinder flow https://review.openstack.org/330285
18:45:12 openstackgerrit Ildiko Vancsa proposed openstack/nova master: Remove check_attach https://review.openstack.org/335358
23:31:15 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Handle VolumeBDMIsMultiAttach in os-assisted-volume-snapshots https://review.openstack.org/429413
23:31:15 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Handle conflicts for os-assisted-volume-snapshots https://review.openstack.org/429476
#openstack-nova - 2017-02-27
01:15:54 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/438309
01:40:55 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Implement new attach/detach Cinder flow https://review.openstack.org/330285
01:40:55 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove check_attach https://review.openstack.org/335358
01:41:34 mriedem johnthetubaguy: i'm +2 on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/335358/ remove check_attach now
01:41:35 mriedem let's do it
02:26:03 openstackgerrit ChangBo Guo(gcb) proposed openstack/nova master: Remove usage of config option verbose https://review.openstack.org/432271
02:35:16 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor a test method including 7 test cases https://review.openstack.org/395436
03:19:11 openstackgerrit Jianghua Wang proposed openstack/nova master: XenAPI: device tagging https://review.openstack.org/333781
03:41:31 openstackgerrit Nguyen Hung Phuong proposed openstack/nova master: Remove mox from nova/tests/unit/test_configdrive2.py https://review.openstack.org/322754
05:18:47 openstackgerrit foundjem proposed openstack/nova master: adding more stuffs in the first-file https://review.openstack.org/438331
08:40:47 openstackgerrit Kevin Benton proposed openstack/os-vif master: [wip] https://review.openstack.org/438272
10:26:30 openstackgerrit Sivasathurappan Radhakrishnan proposed openstack/nova master: Remove mox from nova/tests/unit/api/openstack/compute/test_create_backup.py https://review.openstack.org/435610
10:26:30 openstackgerrit Sivasathurappan Radhakrishnan proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Remove mox from unit/api/openstack/compute/admin_only_action_common.py https://review.openstack.org/438416
10:54:30 ildikov johnthetubaguy: o/
10:58:12 kashyap johnthetubaguy: Was the PTG productive?
11:00:27 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/438309
11:03:50 johnthetubaguy kashyap: I think it was
11:04:07 johnthetubaguy kashyap: easier to tell how successful after the specs and code starts to land
11:04:18 johnthetubaguy ildikov: warmer now I guess?
11:04:27 johnthetubaguy ildikov: I have your check_attach patch open
11:04:56 ildikov johnthetubaguy: I made it back to Europe so outside it's colder, but inside warmer :)
11:05:08 johnthetubaguy ildikov: same here, lol
11:05:27 ildikov johnthetubaguy: haha, that patch went through a few iterations over the weekend :)
11:05:51 ildikov johnthetubaguy: I'm optimistic ;)
12:17:27 openstackgerrit John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add live-migration-force-after-timeout spec https://review.openstack.org/438467
12:20:59 danpawlik Can someone take a look on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/436953/ ?
12:37:08 johnthetubaguy ildikov: when we detach a volume, that always does unreserve right?
12:38:29 ildikov johnthetubaguy: yes , it does
12:38:43 johnthetubaguy ildikov: thats in the Cinder API I assume?
12:40:24 zioproto hello there, there is a much of commits between the latest tag and stable/mitaka ... is there going to be a new mitaka release for nova ?
12:40:33 zioproto there is a bug that blocks the mitaka to newton upgrade for me
12:40:48 zioproto the fix is merged in stable/mitaka but never released in packaging
12:41:19 johnthetubaguy zioproto: lyarwood might now what the plans are there, I don't remember where we are with that now
12:43:09 zioproto lyarwood, let me know :) This is merged but out of any distro: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/382639/ and this is blocking for mitaka to newton upgrade for me.
13:08:52 satyar Hi Jeffrey4l
13:09:52 satyar Hi diana_clarke
13:10:33 diana_clarke satyar: hello?
13:11:01 satyar How are you diana_clarke
13:11:32 lyarwood zioproto / johnthetubaguy ; I would say soon given mitaka is about to hit EOL upstream, I'll talk to matt about it later today
13:11:42 diana_clarke satyar: Okay. Just getting the kids out the door to school. You?
13:11:56 satyar i am doing ok
13:12:00 lyarwood zioproto: that said if this is for RH OSP you can file a support case and we can look at getting this in a build for you ASAP
13:12:10 satyar just want to check have you checked the recent nova code
13:12:45 diana_clarke satyar: Do you have a specific nova question? There's lots of nova code ;)
13:13:13 satyar yes
13:13:37 satyar i created 20 vms(boot from volume) my quota for volume is 10
13:13:48 satyar so 10 VMs gone to error state
13:14:34 satyar after i delete all the VMs the quota for CPU/RAM/Instances are showing used 10
13:15:04 diana_clarke satyar: It sounds like your question might be a better fit for the #openstack channel (see channel description above).
13:15:09 satyar ideally it(used quota) should be 0 as all VMs are deleted
13:15:39 satyar i think its a issue with the quota code
13:15:45 satyar from nova
13:16:46 satyar if you can point me the the file which runs the code of releasing quota after VM deletion will help me to find the root cause and fix it
13:24:17 openstack Launchpad bug 1667667 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Rebuilding instance ignores image's property hw_disk_bus" [Low,Confirmed]
13:24:17 akijak hi, I've found a bug in nova concerning rebuilding and 'hw_disk_bus' image property (https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1667667), I'm looking for someone who could give me some directions how to fix that :) can you help?

Earlier   Later