| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-02-16 | |||
| 13:47:04 | BobBall | I've just fixed the key error (inline) can can push a patch - just running pep8 to make sure I haven't done something stupid | |
| 13:47:41 | BobBall | As we don't have a +2 from John and the CI will need a recheck anyway I'm quite happy to push this and replace the existing change? | |
| 13:48:14 | BobBall | Sorry for not spotting the CI had returned -1: The change is owned by a team member from PRC and I'm not getting CI vote reports | |
| 13:48:24 | BobBall | Happy to go with whatever route you recommend on this one ofc | |
| 13:52:17 | mriedem | BobBall: +2 on it now | |
| 13:52:26 | mriedem | i left comments but those can be dealt with in a follow up | |
| 13:52:32 | BobBall | I'll put the KeyError fix in a follow up. | |
| 13:52:33 | mriedem | johnthetubaguy: are you still happy with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/424428/ ? | |
| 13:53:03 | mriedem | BobBall: i'm good if you want to push that change up now too | |
| 13:54:33 | BobBall | mriedem: Do you want me to change the default driver as well in this follow on change? (i.e. is the follow-on destined for Pike, or do you want to try and approve for Ocata?) | |
| 13:54:57 | mriedem | BobBall: the default vif_driver change won't be backported | |
| 13:55:11 | mriedem | the keyerror thing could be for ocata, so i'd leave those separate | |
| 13:55:21 | BobBall | Will do. | |
| 13:56:45 | mriedem | bauzas: lyarwood: i'm going to request a newton release, it contains an online data migration (not a schema migration) to fix a bug when upgrading from mitaka. i was just going to version this as 14.0.4 but wanted to ask first since last time we had a db migration there was a frackus at red hat about it not being a minor version update | |
| 13:56:58 | mriedem | *fracas | |
| 13:57:24 | johnthetubaguy | mriedem: I duno, I dug into that whole 'nicira-iface-id' a few times, annoyed I didn't see the whole bridge thing, that makes more sense though, make the doubt whether I am happy with it | |
| 13:57:52 | mriedem | johnthetubaguy: sounds like BobBall has a fix locally for the keyerror thing which could go into that patch now if we want | |
| 13:57:56 | BobBall | BTW - we can't continue the loop if the network doesn't have a mapping - this must be fatal; we can return the exception No mapping from source network though | |
| 13:57:59 | mriedem | doesn't matter to me, might as well if it's ready | |
| 13:58:14 | johnthetubaguy | mriedem: yeah, duno, just a .get() would fix it | |
| 13:58:26 | mriedem | johnthetubaguy: that's true, it would result in the exception | |
| 13:58:35 | BobBall | I've added a .get() and then an "if neutron_id is None or neutron_id not in ..." as my fix, and a UT to make sure it raises. | |
| 13:58:47 | bauzas | p!spy | |
| 13:58:49 | johnthetubaguy | yeah | |
| 13:59:01 | mriedem | BobBall: the existing "if neutron_id not in vif_uuid_map.keys():" will handle the None case | |
| 13:59:19 | johnthetubaguy | +1 mriedem | |
| 13:59:21 | mriedem | i think the get() is all we need | |
| 13:59:33 | lyarwood | mriedem: hey sorry, yeah I think that was more because someone missed that the migration had already landed before we GA'd | |
| 13:59:42 | BobBall | Well a dictionary *could* have None in the keys... but I agree that's very unlikely. | |
| 13:59:58 | BobBall | and would be indicative of a totally different bug. | |
| 14:00:17 | mriedem | i don't think it would happen in this case because of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/424428/11/nova/virt/xenapi/vmops.py@2390 | |
| 14:00:19 | BobBall | I just like to be more verbose and be sure that we know that None is an error rather than two errors potentially resulting in a weird pass | |
| 14:00:50 | mriedem | i'm fine if you want to be cautious | |
| 14:01:16 | BobBall | So shall I post a follow-up or a replacement? | |
| 14:01:46 | lyarwood | mriedem: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/408725/ right? | |
| 14:02:17 | mriedem | lyarwood: yeah | |
| 14:02:25 | mriedem | BobBall: might as well do a replacement | |
| 14:02:32 | mriedem | new patch set on the existing change | |
| 14:02:42 | mriedem | i'll be around to shephard it into ocata | |
| 14:03:34 | bauzas | mriedem: well, not sure if it would be a .z version | |
| 14:04:04 | BobBall | Will do. Just running another couple of tests to make sure I didn't do something really stupid. | |
| 14:04:04 | mriedem | it's not a new feature | |
| 14:04:09 | bauzas | mriedem: in case we need more than just upgrading the packages | |
| 14:04:18 | bauzas | mriedem: yeah, I know | |
| 14:04:30 | mriedem | bauzas: it's basically there to catch any upgrade issues from mitaka to newton | |
| 14:04:33 | bauzas | mriedem: but I wonder how we could signal that just upgrading is not enough | |
| 14:04:36 | mriedem | not from upgrading from 14.0.3 to 14.0.4 | |
| 14:04:48 | mriedem | because if you hit this bug on upgrade to newton you're already broken | |
| 14:04:50 | lyarwood | bauzas: we can document this in our own releasenotes tbh | |
| 14:04:57 | bauzas | mmmm | |
| 14:05:07 | mriedem | bauzas: upgrading is enough, this is the 13.0.0->14.0.4 case | |
| 14:05:12 | mriedem | not 14.0.3->14.0.4 | |
| 14:05:16 | bauzas | I see | |
| 14:05:19 | bauzas | well | |
| 14:05:19 | lyarwood | yeah I'm fine with this being in a 14.0.4 release tbh | |
| 14:05:27 | bauzas | mriedem: then okay | |
| 14:05:29 | openstackgerrit | Thomas Bechtold proposed openstack/nova master: Log exception when hypervisor version check fails https://review.openstack.org/434927 | |
| 14:05:59 | bauzas | mriedem: if people just do 14.0.3 to .4, they don't need to call the online data migration, yup ? If so, +1 with me | |
| 14:06:24 | bauzas | sorry, I misunderstood the impact then | |
| 14:08:26 | mriedem | that's fine, this was a confusing one | |
| 14:13:00 | mriedem | BobBall: johnthetubaguy: i'm going to be away for awhile, would be good if john can be happy with the change once it's posted, then i'll handle the +W and backport stuff when i'm in the office later | |
| 14:13:32 | BobBall | Thanks mriedem. Should be posted in ~15 minutes I guess (just waiting for stack.sh to complete then I can test) | |
| 14:21:25 | nicodemus_ | hello | |
| 14:21:36 | openstackgerrit | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: Plumbing for tagged nic attachment https://review.openstack.org/415622 | |
| 14:21:38 | openstackgerrit | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: Libvirt support for tagged volume attachment https://review.openstack.org/418100 | |
| 14:21:41 | openstackgerrit | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: Plumbing for tagged volume attachment https://review.openstack.org/391941 | |
| 14:21:42 | openstackgerrit | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: API support for tagged device attachment https://review.openstack.org/376021 | |
| 14:21:44 | openstackgerrit | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: Libvirt support for tagged nic attachment https://review.openstack.org/415520 | |
| 14:21:54 | nicodemus_ | I have a question regarding https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1646181 | |
| 14:21:54 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1646181 in OpenStack Compute (nova) newton "NFS: Fail to boot VM out of large snapshots (30GB+)" [Medium,Fix committed] - Assigned to Kashyap Chamarthy (kashyapc) | |
| 14:22:46 | nicodemus_ | Is it possible/makes sense to increase cpu_time to a higher value than 8, in the case or really large images (80GB+)? | |
| 14:27:08 | bhagyashris | alex_xu: Hi, | |
| 14:30:42 | bhagyashris | alex_xu: I want to discuss regarding the backup api. have free time? | |
| 14:36:22 | kashyap | nicodemus_: If you have a test env. mind trying it and see? | |
| 14:36:45 | kashyap | nicodemus_: The current default isn't working for you? | |
| 14:38:16 | nicodemus_ | kashyap, it's not a test env, it's productive... but could give it a try | |
| 14:39:17 | nicodemus_ | I've applied the fix when the customer reported the issue, but the issue seems to still be present with very large images | |
| 14:39:48 | nicodemus_ | (it's a Mitaka deployment) | |
| 14:41:43 | kashyap | nicodemus_: Yeah, in that case, I'm curious what you'll see if you increase the timeout. | |
| 14:44:54 | nicodemus_ | kashyap, I'll give it a try and see what happens. Though it's failing on volume-backed instances, so maybe this is not the root cause. | |
| 14:45:13 | kashyap | nicodemus_: Can you please make a comment with full details in the bug, once you complete your test? | |
| 14:45:28 | nicodemus_ | kashyap, sure | |
| 14:59:28 | openstackgerrit | Bob Ball proposed openstack/nova master: Fix live migrate with XenServer https://review.openstack.org/424428 | |
| 14:59:50 | BobBall | Sorry that took so long johnthetubaguy ^^ my live migrate env got broke by upgrading devstack and the slave not being a placement-client... :) | |
| 14:59:58 | mriedem | johnthetubaguy: BobBall: wild thought, but we could take this opportunity to deprecate the xen vif_driver option in ocata | |
| 15:00:20 | mriedem | BobBall: johnthetubaguy: my thinking is, deprecate in ocata, remove in pike, and pick the vif_driver based on the use_neutron boolean | |
| 15:00:40 | mriedem | we should probably at least change the default to the xen ovs vif driver in ocata because we changed the default value of use_neutron=True in ocata | |
| 15:00:49 | mriedem | so the xen vif driver config default is broken (by default) | |
| 15:01:18 | johnthetubaguy | I would have through bridge and ovs work with both, I guess thats not true? | |
| 15:01:26 | johnthetubaguy | thought | |
| 15:02:25 | mriedem | like neutron + linuxbridge? | |
| 15:02:42 | mriedem | i'm told the xen vif bridge driver is deprecated and only for nova-net | |
| 15:04:42 | mdbooth_ | lyarwood: I'm also just looking at that DiskFilter change, btw. The if requested > 0 seems kinda arbitrary, as presumably the real problem is that the total is wrong? | |
| 15:06:05 | mdbooth | lyarwood: So IIUC you'd be able to create a BFV instance, but not an instance with ephemeral root disk smaller than the actual available space. | |
| 15:06:18 | owalsh | mriedem: FYI https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1665370 - the newton & ocata api db migrations conflict | |
| 15:06:18 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1665370 in tripleo "api db_sync fails on upgrade due to duplicate migration files" [Critical,Triaged] - Assigned to Steven Hardy (shardy) | |
| 15:06:23 | mdbooth | In either case you should be able to create, but the latter case would still be prevented. | |
| 15:06:39 | mdbooth | lyarwood: Unless I missed something, which is possible. Still looking. | |
| 15:07:24 | mriedem | owalsh: guh, pretty soon i'm in meetings for the next 2 hours | |
| 15:07:30 | mriedem | dansmith: melwitt: can you take a look at ^? | |