Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-01-28
03:12:12 mriedem i checked the git logs on devstack, grenade, nova, tempest and d-g
03:16:47 oomichi mriedem: I guess https://review.openstack.org/426461 can help
03:17:15 oomichi mriedem: but I still am not sure why this happens recently
03:17:36 mriedem superdan: so the nova changes are approved, what should we do about the grenade change?
03:17:51 mriedem i guess wait for sdague on monday?
03:20:25 oomichi mriedem: oh, mine is wrong
03:21:17 mriedem oomichi: d-g is setting it correctly http://logs.openstack.org/61/417961/40/check/gate-grenade-dsvm-neutron-multinode-live-migration-nv/8c363cd/console.html#_2017-01-27_23_16_09_271784
03:21:30 mriedem it's just that for whatever reason, it's not getting set in tempest.conf from within devstack
03:22:53 oomichi nice hint. Yeah that seems mystery..
03:29:07 mriedem i'm wondering if the devstack-tools thing is messing something up
03:29:13 mriedem but i don't know enough about that change
03:29:35 mriedem but for example, NOVA_ALLOW_MOVE_TO_SAME_HOST=False is in local.conf
03:29:40 mriedem http://logs.openstack.org/61/417961/40/check/gate-grenade-dsvm-neutron-multinode-live-migration-nv/8c363cd/logs/new/local.conf.txt.gz
03:29:52 mriedem but the other isn't for live migration
03:29:52 mriedem https://github.com/openstack-infra/devstack-gate/blob/master/devstack-vm-gate.sh#L541
03:30:03 mriedem and the difference is one uses export and the other doesn't
03:39:24 oomichi the other multinode tempest jobs set live_migration True correctly like http://logs.openstack.org/16/411816/5/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-multinode-live-migration-ubuntu-xenial/4a95eca/logs/tempest_conf.txt.gz
14:12:10 openstackgerrit ChangBo Guo(gcb) proposed openstack/nova: Enable more virt.xenapi tests on Python 3 https://review.openstack.org/414421
14:12:10 openstackgerrit ChangBo Guo(gcb) proposed openstack/nova: Skip unit tests for SSL + py3 https://review.openstack.org/426505
17:37:13 mriedem mikal: i see the vendordata v2 patches all merged and have release notes, which is cool. we should update the devref at some point (not an immediate issue) for the new features http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/vendordata.html
17:51:01 mriedem johnthetubaguy: i guess we'll just defer the rest of this to pike https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/prep-for-network-aware-scheduling-ocata+status:open
#openstack-nova - 2017-01-29
00:35:44 openstackgerrit David Medberry proposed openstack/nova: Explain how allow_resize_to_same_host is useful https://review.openstack.org/426531
00:39:20 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/nova: Revert "Move instance creation to conductor" https://review.openstack.org/426532
08:33:35 jschwarz hi
14:28:50 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova: Add more debug logging on RP inventory update failures https://review.openstack.org/414230
14:28:51 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova: Add more debug logging on RP inventory delete failures https://review.openstack.org/426290
15:00:03 openstackgerrit Emilien Macchi proposed openstack/nova: Revert "Move instance creation to conductor" https://review.openstack.org/426532
15:00:44 EmilienM superdan: I confirm https://review.openstack.org/#/c/319379/ breaks TripleO CI
15:01:10 EmilienM superdan: after this patch, we weren't able to spawn servers
15:10:17 openstackgerrit Ildiko Vancsa proposed openstack/nova: Implement new attach/detach Cinder flow https://review.openstack.org/330285
15:10:19 openstackgerrit Ildiko Vancsa proposed openstack/nova: Remove check_attach https://review.openstack.org/335358
15:11:21 openstackgerrit Ildiko Vancsa proposed openstack/nova: Implement new attach/detach Cinder flow https://review.openstack.org/330285
15:11:23 openstackgerrit Ildiko Vancsa proposed openstack/nova: Remove check_attach https://review.openstack.org/335358
17:04:40 superdan EmilienM: because you don't have cells records in place or something?
17:04:52 EmilienM superdan: we should have
17:05:06 EmilienM dansmith: I filed a bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1660160
17:05:06 openstack Launchpad bug 1660160 in tripleo "No host-to-cell mapping found for selected host" [Critical,Triaged]
17:05:28 dansmith EmilienM: that message means you don't
17:06:47 EmilienM we have nova-cell_v2-cell-default
17:06:57 EmilienM http://logs.openstack.org/31/426231/1/check-tripleo/gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-ha/915aeba/logs/undercloud/var/log/undercloud_install.txt.gz#_2017-01-27_18_24_40_000
17:07:02 EmilienM let me check what it executes
17:07:31 EmilienM http://logs.openstack.org/31/426231/1/check-tripleo/gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-ha/915aeba/logs/undercloud/var/log/undercloud_install.txt.gz#_2017-01-27_18_24_40_000
17:07:37 EmilienM damn, wrong link
17:07:40 EmilienM https://github.com/openstack/puppet-nova/blob/master/manifests/cell_v2/cell.pp#L45
17:07:44 EmilienM this is what we executed
17:08:00 EmilienM nova-manage ${extra_params} cell_v2 create_cell --name=default ${transport_url_real} ${database_connection_real}
17:08:35 dansmith EmilienM: the error message you linked in the bug about no compute node record is resource tracker, nothing to do with cellsv2
17:10:17 EmilienM dansmith: you know better than me, to be honest I don't know. I just know that something broke again for us with a very recent commit
17:10:22 EmilienM and you can see it here: http://logs.openstack.org/31/426231/1/check-tripleo/gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-ha/915aeba/logs/undercloud/var/log/nova/nova-compute.txt.gz#_2017-01-27_19_01_00_621
17:12:00 dansmith EmilienM: that message comes from resource tracker on compute
17:12:44 EmilienM dansmith: I tried to revert https://review.openstack.org/#/c/319379/ and run experimental pipeline, and tripleo worked again.
17:13:00 EmilienM so we'll just pin nova in RDO for now.
17:13:50 dansmith EmilienM: it passed multinode devstack and grenade, so it must be something in the tripleo job config that isn't set right.. why do you think just reverting the patch is the way to go?
17:14:30 EmilienM dansmith: it is not the way to go
17:15:17 EmilienM and we'll unpin when someone will help to figure what's wrong, we have zero clue at this time. We are not experts enough in Nova
17:20:05 EmilienM enjoy!
18:25:34 mriedem does anyone else enjoy doing taxes as much as i do?!
18:35:41 tbachman mriedem: clearly not, given how early you’ve started them ;)
18:54:10 amrith andreykurilin, ping. please take a look at http://logs.openstack.org/35/426535/3/check/gate-trove-scenario-dsvm-mysql-multi-ubuntu-xenial/16eaf0c/console.html#_2017-01-29_17_52_32_209313. something appears to be getting mixed up between novaclient and keystone and I'm not sure what that could be. this particular failure seems to be out of trove's direct control (I think). but something trove is doing may be the thing
18:54:10 amrith that is exacerbating this.
20:26:26 andreykurilin amrith: will contact you at trove channel
#openstack-nova - 2017-01-30
02:34:11 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova-specs: Enable cold migration with target host https://review.openstack.org/426636
02:38:57 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Enable cold migration with target host(1/2) https://review.openstack.org/408955
02:39:25 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Enable cold migration with target host(1/2) https://review.openstack.org/408955
02:40:05 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Enable cold migration with target host(2/2) https://review.openstack.org/408964
02:40:22 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Enable cold migration with target host(2/2) https://review.openstack.org/408964
02:41:57 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova-specs: Enable cold migration with target host https://review.openstack.org/426636
02:44:02 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: api-ref: Add parameters in cold migrate action https://review.openstack.org/410042
02:44:08 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: api-ref: Add parameters in cold migrate action https://review.openstack.org/410042
02:44:49 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/python-novaclient: Microversion 2.42 - Enable cold migration with target host https://review.openstack.org/406707
02:45:58 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Add functional tests for cold migration to same host https://review.openstack.org/414926
02:46:13 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Add functional tests for cold migration to same host https://review.openstack.org/414926
03:54:27 openstackgerrit David Medberry proposed openstack/nova: Explain how allow_resize_to_same_host is useful https://review.openstack.org/426531
04:03:45 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: api-ref: Fix parameters in os-hosts.inc https://review.openstack.org/416444
05:07:24 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Fix doc generation warnings https://review.openstack.org/425549
05:07:48 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Use ListOfIntegersField in oslo.versionedobjects https://review.openstack.org/423912
05:07:56 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Refactor a test method including 3 test cases https://review.openstack.org/394738
05:08:03 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: api-ref: Fix deprecated proxy API parameters https://review.openstack.org/416882
05:08:12 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: api-ref: Fix keypair API parameters https://review.openstack.org/420626
05:08:19 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Refactor a test method including 7 test cases https://review.openstack.org/395436
05:08:35 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: api-ref: Fix parameters and examples in aggregate API https://review.openstack.org/425512
05:08:43 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Avoid forcing translation on logging calls https://review.openstack.org/413876
06:19:21 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova-specs: xAbort Cold Migration https://review.openstack.org/334732
06:19:52 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova-specs: Abort Cold Migration https://review.openstack.org/334732
07:44:51 openstackgerrit Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/nova: Update pci device fields from deleted object https://review.openstack.org/426243
08:25:27 zer0c00l I don't know if i have to get my eyes checked, but it looks like _heal_instance_info_cache just going to refresh cache only once for the instance on top of the list
08:25:37 zer0c00l https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/compute/manager.py#L5881
08:26:06 zer0c00l We are getting the first instance that is 'okay' to healed and breaking off that loop
08:26:23 zer0c00l am i missing something that is obvious ?
08:33:11 openstackgerrit Oleg Bondarev proposed openstack/nova: Live migration: wait for vif-plugged event on pre live migration https://review.openstack.org/246910
09:45:58 openstackgerrit Feodor Tersin proposed openstack/nova: libvirt: Change condition of root disk snapshot handling https://review.openstack.org/382030
09:45:59 openstackgerrit Feodor Tersin proposed openstack/nova: libvirt: Remove backward compatibility checks for disk snapshots https://review.openstack.org/382031
09:45:59 openstackgerrit Feodor Tersin proposed openstack/nova: libvirt: Call snapshot operations for not file based backends only https://review.openstack.org/414710
09:46:00 openstackgerrit Feodor Tersin proposed openstack/nova: libvirt: Correct ploop imagebackend attribute https://review.openstack.org/414709
09:59:01 openstackgerrit Rikimaru Honjo proposed openstack/nova: Add checks for preventing unexpected detaching volume https://review.openstack.org/354617
10:07:26 sfinucan lyarwood: Morning. Interesting question on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/425087
10:07:49 sfinucan It appears the test I've added has highlighted a latent Python 3 issue, which has since been fixed on master
10:08:40 sfinucan Do I (a) modify the change to fix said Python issue, (b) backport the Python 3 issue fix first, or (c) remove the test from the patch?
10:10:17 lyarwood sfinucan: I'd go with a and document it as a conflict in the change
10:10:41 sfinucan lyarwood: and that is what I'll do. Cheers :)

Earlier   Later