Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-01-20
07:14:47 openstackgerrit zhangyanxian proposed openstack/nova-specs: Fix typos in docs https://review.openstack.org/412338
07:17:14 openstackgerrit Istvan Imre proposed openstack/python-novaclient: Pass relevant parameters to Token based authentication https://review.openstack.org/419441
07:20:29 openstackgerrit Sergey Nikitin proposed openstack/nova: do not merge https://review.openstack.org/422841
07:31:52 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Enable cold migration with target host(1/2) https://review.openstack.org/408955
07:32:17 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Enable cold migration with target host(2/2) https://review.openstack.org/408964
07:32:39 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Add functional tests for cold migration to same host https://review.openstack.org/414926
07:32:57 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Refactor a test method including 3 test cases https://review.openstack.org/394738
07:33:11 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Refactor a test method including 7 test cases https://review.openstack.org/395436
07:33:26 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Avoid forcing translation on logging calls https://review.openstack.org/413876
07:44:11 openstackgerrit Wang Qing wu proposed openstack/nova: Introduce base PowerVM driver (disk drv) https://review.openstack.org/409401
07:57:23 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova-specs: Extend tag length limit to 80 https://review.openstack.org/423112
08:01:45 tdurakov gibi: hi, are you around?
08:12:24 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova: numa: add numa constraints for emulator threads policy https://review.openstack.org/385023
08:12:27 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova: libvirt: return a CPU overhead if isolate emulator threads requested https://review.openstack.org/385364
08:12:28 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova: objects: add new field cpus_reserved in NUMACell https://review.openstack.org/400874
08:12:28 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova: numa: fit instance topology with cpus reserved onto cores https://review.openstack.org/400875
08:12:31 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova: virt: update overhead to take into account vCPUs https://review.openstack.org/385024
08:12:36 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova: libvirt: make emulator threads to run on the reserved pCPU https://review.openstack.org/400878
08:12:37 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova: numa: take into account cpus reserved https://review.openstack.org/400876
08:12:37 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova: numa: update numa usage incording the cpu reserved https://review.openstack.org/400877
08:31:05 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: Add sort_key white list for server list/detail https://review.openstack.org/415142
08:36:05 gibi tdurakov: hi
08:36:39 tdurakov gibi, could you take a look, please https://review.openstack.org/#/c/421981/
08:38:53 gibi tdurakov: looking...
08:45:05 gibi tdurakov: I'm wondering why this not cause any notification sample test to fail
08:45:44 tdurakov gibi, good question, I think we need to change functional tests that verify these templates
08:46:21 tdurakov I'd expect it compares 2 json objects, where timestamps are already converted to datetime.datetime objects
08:46:30 tdurakov or smth. like that
08:48:05 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova: Add ComputeNodeList.get_all_by_uuids method https://review.openstack.org/418134
08:48:06 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova: WIP: Scheduler calling the Placement API https://review.openstack.org/417961
08:49:14 tdurakov gibi: so, what do you think about this change?
08:49:41 tdurakov is it worth merging it, and then figure out what's wrong with tests
08:50:08 gibi tdurakov: direction is good. I'm worried about the test and we might have to look in not just the instance.update code path but the instance.<action> pathes as well
08:51:39 tdurakov gibi, could you please leave a comment with details?
08:51:56 gibi tdurakov: will do
08:53:00 tdurakov gibi: maybe you could explain me, why nova handles some fields explicilty? I'd expect it should be done by serializer
08:56:16 gibi tdurakov: what do you mean by explicitly in this context?
08:56:42 tdurakov gibi: conversion of datetime objects to string
08:56:49 tdurakov for example
08:57:44 tdurakov gibi: we briefly discussed this patch with mriedem yesterday, what do you think about version bump for this change
08:59:40 gibi the explicit conversion was part of the legacy notification (for example in case of audit fields) and during the versioned transformation we did not changed that
09:00:22 gibi I personally didn't want to change the legacy code path of the instance.update
09:00:32 gibi to avoid behavior change in the legacy
09:01:14 gibi unfortunately I also piggybacked on that legacy implementation so the explicitness become the part of the versioned path as well
09:01:27 gibi regarding the version bump
09:01:45 gibi as far as I understand we didn't use to bump api versions for bugfixes
09:02:01 gibi but here bumping a version is a lot cheaper
09:02:08 gibi than in the apu
09:02:09 gibi api
09:03:00 gibi btw you patch now changes the legacy instance.update as well
09:06:26 tdurakov gibi, should I worry about that?
09:06:37 tdurakov about the legacy instance.update
09:08:19 diga gibi: Hi
09:08:40 diga I am writting spec for placement notification now
09:08:53 diga gibi: have some questions on that
09:12:40 openstackgerrit Wang Qing wu proposed openstack/nova: Introduce base PowerVM driver (console) https://review.openstack.org/409402
09:15:31 diga gibi: I need to bring all the resource provider field inside the versioned objects, correct ?
09:16:27 openstackgerrit Claudiu Belu proposed openstack/nova: Hyper-V PCI Passthrough https://review.openstack.org/420614
09:22:03 gmann bauzas: just this merge will work on py35 failure - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/422323/
09:22:09 gmann no rebase i think
09:22:26 gibi tdurakov: this might cause pain for the legacy consumers as the date is now in different format
09:23:09 gibi tdurakov: but I think the legacy notification causes this kind of pain all the time so I think we can ignore it
09:23:14 tdurakov gibi, honestly I'd expect current approach cause more pain
09:23:33 tdurakov gibi: ++
09:23:37 gibi tdurakov: agree
09:24:05 gibi diga: hi! good question
09:24:33 gibi diga: I think we have to judge how usefull a field for the notification consumer
09:24:46 diga gibi: :) okay
09:25:08 gibi diga: I suggest propose what you think is usefull and then in the spec review the placement guys can suggest improvements there
09:25:28 diga gibi: Yep
09:25:34 diga gibi: I will send one WIP spec today, just have a look at it
09:25:42 gibi tdurakov: shall I look into the sample test problem or you will check that?
09:25:49 diga gibi: that will be good approach
09:25:54 gibi diga: good, I will try to check it
09:26:16 tdurakov gibi, I'll check, but I think it worth to do it separately
09:27:16 diga gibi: Thanks :)
09:27:56 gibi tdurakov: OK let's do that separately
09:29:34 tdurakov gibi, could you please +-1 the change with a fix
09:31:00 gibi tdurakov: just did +1 it :)
09:31:06 gibi with the comments we agreed
09:31:18 tdurakov gibi, thank you!
09:31:40 gibi tdurakov: thank you for fixing the bug! :)
09:53:09 gibi tdurakov: just checked the #2) comment and I can confirm that instance.<action> notifications are not affected
09:54:18 tdurakov ok, cool, thank you
10:01:37 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/422323
10:06:35 openstackgerrit Sergey Nikitin proposed openstack/nova: do not merge https://review.openstack.org/422841
10:06:40 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Avoid forcing translation on logging calls https://review.openstack.org/413876
10:10:10 openstackgerrit Duong Ha-Quang proposed openstack/nova: Stop using mox stubs in nova/tests/unit/cells/fakes.py https://review.openstack.org/342043
10:11:14 openstackgerrit Duong Ha-Quang proposed openstack/nova: Stop using mox stubs in nova/tests/unit/cells/fakes.py https://review.openstack.org/342043
10:20:14 openstackgerrit Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/nova: PoC: add hierarchy quota driver https://review.openstack.org/391072
10:26:56 openstackgerrit Pawel Koniszewski proposed openstack/nova: live-mig: Add claims and proper resource tracking https://review.openstack.org/244489
10:26:58 openstackgerrit Pawel Koniszewski proposed openstack/nova: libvirt: pass libvirt reference methods to migration https://review.openstack.org/328997
10:26:58 openstackgerrit Pawel Koniszewski proposed openstack/nova: libvirt: live-migrate updates NUMA and cpus in the XML https://review.openstack.org/286744
10:49:40 bauzas alex_xu: around ?
10:50:11 bauzas alex_xu: I was working on the scheduler change when I saw that we haven't yet a fixture for calling the placement api
10:50:38 bauzas so some of the functional tests are failing because we return NoValidHosts
10:51:32 bauzas alex_xu: I was thinking of very quickly writing a fixture, but given we don't run the WSGI app for placement the same than OSAPI, then I'm a bit sad
10:52:09 bauzas alex_xu: do you know if there is some way to hack that by having a WSGI server fixture able to deploy a WSGI app ?
10:52:52 bauzas and sean is off, I can't ask advice from him
10:53:08 sahid jaypipes: hello, i lost your +2 on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/400874/ because of a conflict if I can get it again that would be nice since next week (if i remember correclty) you will be out

Earlier   Later