| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-01-17 | |||
| 14:45:21 | tdurakov | acked, let me check it again | |
| 14:45:28 | markus_z | thanks! | |
| 14:49:23 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem just looking now | |
| 14:50:45 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: looking at the code the vhost-user socket name must = the name of the openvswitch port | |
| 14:51:27 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: if we called _get_vif_name() we would have to modify neutron to generate the socket path differently | |
| 14:52:19 | sean-k-mooney | my intention was to modify neutron to pass the name of the device in the port binding | |
| 14:52:36 | sean-k-mooney | and then nave nova use that if present or fall back to generating it if not set | |
| 14:54:32 | mriedem | ok so in other words this is fine | |
| 14:55:23 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: yes what is there is currently fine but i would like to decouple it in the future so that we dont have to ensure that neutron and nova generate the name with the same algoritim | |
| 14:56:06 | tdurakov | markus_z: done, thank you | |
| 14:56:24 | markus_z | tdurakov: yeah, thanks! | |
| 14:56:32 | tdurakov | mriedem, sdague hi, could you please take a look https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347471/43 | |
| 14:57:27 | jaypipes | sdague: well said, on the PWG thing. I won't say that publicly, of course, since I'd get my head chewed off internally. | |
| 14:58:43 | cdent | jaypipes: you must have very flexible teeth or jaw | |
| 15:03:18 | mriedem | sean-k-mooney: ok i've also gone through https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385061/ | |
| 15:10:29 | mriedem | alex_xu: your intel buddies might want to look at this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/420960/1/nova/objects/fields.py | |
| 15:10:36 | mriedem | pkoniszewski: ^ | |
| 15:12:33 | cdent | _gryf: I think that endpoint stuff is simply that I hadn't revisited that update_inventory code in a long time (perhaps 4 months?) | |
| 15:13:54 | _gryf | cdent, ok, cool | |
| 15:22:21 | alex_xu | mriedem: that sounds like that overlap with traits. in the future we can request specific trait in the image metadata, the requested trait can be cpu feature. there is the spec about request traits https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351063/3/specs/ocata/approved/request-standardized-capabilities.rst@66 | |
| 15:27:05 | pkoniszewski | thanks mriedem, i will take a look | |
| 15:31:50 | cdent | edleafe: I think you're on PTO, but if not I fixed that bug in gabbi and made a new one: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/gabbi | |
| 15:34:13 | openstackgerrit | Diana Clarke proposed openstack/nova: nova-manage docs: add cells commands prep https://review.openstack.org/421320 | |
| 15:48:26 | openstackgerrit | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova: Add ComputeNodeList.get_all_by_uuids method https://review.openstack.org/418134 | |
| 15:48:26 | openstackgerrit | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova: WIP: Scheduler calling the Placement API https://review.openstack.org/417961 | |
| 15:48:58 | bauzas | mriedem: jaypipes: folks I need to bail out for a few, but you can bite ^ | |
| 15:49:09 | openstackgerrit | Vladyslav Drok proposed openstack/nova: Generate necessary network metadata for ironic port groups https://review.openstack.org/388756 | |
| 15:53:59 | openstackgerrit | Diana Clarke proposed openstack/nova: nova-manage docs: cell_v2 simple_cell_setup https://review.openstack.org/421333 | |
| 15:54:34 | openstackgerrit | Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: Add query parameters white list for server list/detail https://review.openstack.org/408571 | |
| 15:56:39 | openstackgerrit | Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: Add sort_key white list for server list/detail https://review.openstack.org/415142 | |
| 15:57:50 | openstackgerrit | Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: Add new policy for server list/detail with all_tenants https://review.openstack.org/415330 | |
| 16:08:16 | mriedem | tdurakov: markus_z: for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347471/ i see it depends on a tempest patch to enable the test, do we have a patch up anywhere that depends on the nova change to see it all working and running the serial console tests in the live migration job? | |
| 16:08:43 | mriedem | or is it self-testing? | |
| 16:09:02 | markus_z | mriedem: it's self testing | |
| 16:09:31 | mriedem | oh really http://logs.openstack.org/71/347471/43/check/gate-grenade-dsvm-neutron-multinode-live-migration-nv/c427a53/console.html#_2017-01-17_13_10_19_246017 | |
| 16:09:59 | markus_z | http://logs.openstack.org/71/347471/43/check/gate-grenade-dsvm-neutron-multinode-live-migration-nv/c427a53/console.html#_2017-01-17_13_10_22_840459 | |
| 16:10:45 | markus_z | We have to skip in in grenade. Let me search for the Ocata-Ocata case. | |
| 16:11:04 | mriedem | oh right | |
| 16:11:17 | mriedem | this is the o-o one http://logs.openstack.org/71/347471/43/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-multinode-live-migration-ubuntu-xenial/0b45362/console.html#_2017-01-17_12_34_13_290332 | |
| 16:11:21 | mriedem | still skipped | |
| 16:11:52 | mriedem | melwitt: i'm struggling trying to get discover_hosts to work on the subnode in a multinode job http://logs.openstack.org/81/420981/5/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-multinode-full-ubuntu-xenial-nv/6767a3a/logs/subnode-2/devstacklog.txt.gz#_2017-01-17_14_49_15_138 | |
| 16:11:59 | mriedem | melwitt: please tell me there is something you know about this that i don't | |
| 16:12:11 | mriedem | the subnode nova.conf has the api_database connection and we're getting the cell mappings from the api db ok, | |
| 16:12:23 | mriedem | it's the target_cell that's failing on the non-cell0 cell | |
| 16:12:37 | mriedem | for some reason it's trying to connect to 127.0.0.1 | |
| 16:13:13 | markus_z | mriedem: That was the first run before the hook enables the serial console. After the hook we have http://logs.openstack.org/71/347471/43/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-multinode-live-migration-ubuntu-xenial/0b45362/console.html#_2017-01-17_12_35_19_716558 | |
| 16:13:56 | markus_z | mriedem: The teardown of the hook sets everything back, so we have http://logs.openstack.org/71/347471/43/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-multinode-live-migration-ubuntu-xenial/0b45362/console.html#_2017-01-17_12_36_38_329078 | |
| 16:20:19 | shaner | hi all - any idea why live-migrations won't show up when issuing 'migrations-list'? | |
| 16:20:30 | shaner | (in kilo) | |
| 16:21:07 | shaner | only those that were migrated using 'migrate' show up .. vs 'live-migration' | |
| 16:25:31 | jaypipes | shaner: pls see /topic. best to ask on ask.openstack.org or mailing list for usage questions. | |
| 16:25:53 | shaner | jaypipes, thx, will do | |
| 16:26:23 | mriedem | migrate is cold migration | |
| 16:27:27 | openstackgerrit | int32bit proposed openstack/python-novaclient: Allow multiple tag add/delete from cli https://review.openstack.org/414635 | |
| 16:28:12 | shaner | mriedem, shouldn't 'migration-list' list all types of migrations though? | |
| 16:28:59 | mriedem | i don't think until 2.23 http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/api_microversion_history.html#id21 | |
| 16:29:23 | mriedem | fwiw this is the api code in kilo https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/kilo-eol/nova/api/openstack/compute/contrib/migrations.py#L53 | |
| 16:30:00 | openstackgerrit | int32bit proposed openstack/nova: Choose VMware datastore by the least provisioned space https://review.openstack.org/402632 | |
| 16:36:36 | mriedem | shaner: was the migration in progress or complete? if the migration was complete i wonder if the migration record was deleted | |
| 16:36:50 | mriedem | at this point kilo is pretty far eol so it would take some investigating | |
| 16:37:47 | shaner | mriedem, it seems either way, in-progress/complete, it doesn't show up | |
| 16:37:58 | shaner | I've tested it several times to no avail | |
| 16:38:13 | shaner | appreciate the info! | |
| 16:38:46 | mriedem | have you looked at the migrations table in the nova db? | |
| 16:39:07 | mriedem | are there any records where deleted = 0? | |
| 16:39:39 | shaner | mriedem, let me check | |
| 16:43:13 | mriedem | melwitt: hmm this is interesting | |
| 16:43:28 | mriedem | the db connection for the cell0 mapping in this failed run has localhost in it http://logs.openstack.org/81/420981/5/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-multinode-full-ubuntu-xenial-nv/6767a3a/logs/devstacklog.txt.gz#_2017-01-17_14_43_53_943 | |
| 16:43:44 | mriedem | nova-manage cell_v2 map_cell0 --database_connection 'mysql+pymysql://root:secretmysql@127.0.0.1/nova_cell0?charset=utf8' | |
| 16:45:15 | mriedem | when we call simple_cell_setup the transport_url has a valid ip in it nova-manage cell_v2 simple_cell_setup --transport-url rabbit://stackrabbit:secretrabbit@10.20.124.3:5672/ | |
| 16:45:40 | andreykurilin | mriedem: hi! I remember you spent a bit of time investigation an issue with novaclient's gate failures (which was fixed by blocking openstacksdk 0.9.12). If you have any details please share them here - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/418663 | |
| 16:47:28 | mriedem | andreykurilin: done | |
| 16:47:34 | andreykurilin | mriedem: thanks | |
| 16:50:12 | mriedem | hmm wtf http://logs.openstack.org/81/420981/5/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-multinode-full-ubuntu-xenial-nv/6767a3a/logs/devstacklog.txt.gz#_2017-01-17_14_27_19_600 | |
| 16:50:19 | mriedem | BASE_SQL_CONN=mysql+pymysql://root:secretmysql@127.0.0.1 | |
| 16:53:18 | alaski | mriedem: yesterday was a holiday for me so I missed your message. Thanks for not letting a national figure distract from the important birthday | |
| 16:54:07 | mriedem | alaski: you're MY national figure | |
| 16:54:13 | shaner | mriedem, all items in migrations db are cold migrations and indeed have 'deleted = 0' | |
| 16:54:44 | shaner | I don't see any from the past live-migrations I've done, so it seems, a live-migration isn't updating this table? | |
| 16:54:45 | alaski | mriedem: :) | |
| 16:54:50 | mriedem | DATABASE_HOST=MYSQL_HOST=SERVICE_LOCAL_HOST=127.0.0.1 blarg! | |
| 16:54:56 | alaski | mriedem: I see there was a question of naming, did that get resolved? | |
| 16:55:17 | mriedem | shaner: would have to check if live migrations were tracked with migrations records in kilo | |
| 16:55:52 | mriedem | alaski: sort of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/420439/ | |
| 16:55:58 | mriedem | there was much gnashing of teeth | |
| 16:56:12 | mriedem | alaski: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/420439/5/nova/cmd/manage.py@1122 | |
| 16:56:37 | mriedem | basically we weren't sure about the original intent of using the api_database.connection for the cell0 netloc and name | |
| 16:56:53 | mriedem | but all agreed that nova_api_cell0 was a confusing db name for a db that is not using the api db schema | |
| 16:57:18 | alaski | yep | |
| 16:57:19 | mriedem | but also agreed that cell0 might not be on the same host as the api db, or main db, | |
| 16:57:38 | mriedem | and finally agreed that us trying to guess is a bad idea and people should just provide the value explicitly | |
| 16:57:45 | alaski | right, in a large deployment I expect all dbs to be separate | |
| 16:57:58 | mriedem | we probably need to make a note in our docs for ^ | |
| 16:58:16 | mriedem | i.e. .. note:: we'll guess, but might be wrong, and then cell0 won't work, don't say we didn't tell you | |
| 16:59:02 | mriedem | sdague: so in devstack, if you're not on the subnode DATABASE_HOST isn't set, | |
| 16:59:13 | mriedem | sdague: and on the api (primary) node, it gets defaulted to localhost: DATABASE_HOST=MYSQL_HOST=SERVICE_LOCAL_HOST=127.0.0.1 | |
| 16:59:23 | alaski | yeah. the simple_cell_setup command seems to sit in the same place as something like devstack, i.e. it'll get you setup and show you what needs doing but probably isn't what you want for production | |
| 16:59:42 | mriedem | sdague: but the devstack docs say that DATABASE_HOST=$SERVICE_HOST by default if not set, and that's also what's used for the MQ host URL | |
| 16:59:49 | mriedem | sdague: so anything you know of that would be bad for me trying to fix that? | |
| 17:00:33 | alaski | mriedem: so the original reason for colocating cell0 with the api db vs the main db is that there is only ever expected to be one api db and one cell0 db, but there could be multiple "main" dbs. So thinking of where cell0 is gets confusing when there's multiple | |