| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-09-09 | |||
| 18:27:07 | gmaan | yeah, i am finding that solution a better one. My solution of shifting the start_task is not perfect and does not solve issue when dest's pre live migration is successful but vif plugged event can cause rollback on source - | |
| 18:34:30 | gmaan | dansmith: bauzas i commented in gerrit about going for 'listing it as a known bug' path (please check), we can wait for gibi on his opinion and i can proceed accordingly | |
| 20:31:52 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add Hibiscus prelude section https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004927 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-09-10 | |||
| 06:33:56 | simondodsley | gibi: Is there any chance that this patch (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/973750) be relooked at again. It's a really simple fix for a big issue. Already have one +2 | |
| 07:32:56 | gibi | simondodsley: I've approved it. I hope I did not risk RC1 with it. But I'm in a good mood so I taking my chances here. Btw next time feel free to ping me eariler if I reviewed someting before and never showed up re-reviewing the patch | |
| 09:15:26 | bauzas | gibi: would you agree with gmaan's comment on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1003386 that we go for a known bug reno instead of fixing it ? | |
| 09:15:57 | bauzas | I'm cool with that and if you look at the irc logs we discussed a nice alternative | |
| 09:53:06 | gibi | let me check | |
| 09:59:07 | gibi | I'v read the review comments. I'm OK to keep as a known bug for now. I agree that it is not fatal thing to have this task leaked as it only slows down the shutdown, does not prevent it | |
| 10:01:20 | gibi | Uggla: thanks I will jump there | |
| 10:02:24 | gibi | but I also need to read the tc channel logs to get the full context | |
| 10:42:57 | bauzas | given the lack of consensus yet, I'd propose to defer the application of nova-reviewers until a consequent discussion can happen (before PTG or in it) for at least being all of up agreeing for find some policy how to use this new group | |
| 12:23:14 | sean-k-mooney | ls | |
| 12:23:38 | sean-k-mooney | :) | |
| 12:25:30 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: gmaan: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004687/1 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/966479/5 update nova next to ubuntu 26.04 and nova-alt-config to to debian 13, the latter was ment ot be done in 2026.1 so it woudl be nice if we can proceed with both this cycle, can ye take a look when ye have time | |
| 12:51:51 | gibi | Uggla: thanks for the email, I responded there and commented on the https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986141 as well | |
| 12:52:01 | gibi | we need to start figure out a the way forward | |
| 13:04:40 | opendevreview | Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Fix pickling error that forces oslo.service to fall back to fork https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000956 | |
| 13:06:12 | gablan | hi gibi! I'm backporting the graceful shutdown work from master to stable/2026.1 downstream, and I hit the TODO you left in Host.cleanup() in `nova/virt/libvirt/host.py` about `stopping _event_handler` and `the _conn_event_thread` loop. do you have anything planned for it, or can I propose a patch for it? | |
| 13:17:35 | gibi | gablan: check master I think gmaan recent changes there are addressing it | |
| 13:19:34 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: are you sure this is save to do on the day of RC1? If yes then we can land it but I need you to react and revert if something breaks on the gate after landing | |
| 13:19:40 | gibi | /save/safe/ | |
| 13:19:59 | gibi | cc gmaan, Uggla | |
| 13:20:18 | sean-k-mooney | so i think so but im ok to wait until after rc1 is cut and backport if reqruied. | |
| 13:20:24 | sean-k-mooney | i coudl also flip the order | |
| 13:20:35 | sean-k-mooney | the debian 12->13 change for alt config | |
| 13:20:52 | sean-k-mooney | shoudl be safe because our ceph jobs have been on debina 13 all cycle | |
| 13:21:24 | sean-k-mooney | we just didnt get aroudn to movaing nova-alt-conig last cycel or eailar becasue i forgot the patch was still open/in merge conflict | |
| 13:21:56 | gibi | when gmaan is up we can make the call I think | |
| 13:22:18 | gibi | I will be around for longer today to accomodate that (and due to other unrelated reasons) | |
| 13:22:25 | sean-k-mooney | unless we have a strong reason not to i woudl perfer to have some py3.14 testign on stable 2026.2 but im ok if perpoel prefer not too | |
| 13:22:35 | sean-k-mooney | ack works for me | |
| 13:39:50 | dansmith | my reasoning would be that we didn't go all of the cycle with that testing on, so flipping it right now seems much riskier than necessary | |
| 14:02:37 | bauzas | is it me or the level of changes we plan to deliver so close to RC1 is high today ? | |
| 14:03:14 | bauzas | as a reminder, we can make RC2 if there are some regressions that need to be fixed asap | |
| 14:04:00 | bauzas | but on the graceful shutdown case, I think we agreed yesterday to just amend the existing relnotes with a known bug file so people would know about the existing and decide whether to opt-in or not | |
| 14:05:14 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add Hibiscus prelude section https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004927 | |
| 14:08:54 | Uggla | bauzas, gibi just to let you know I have updated the highlight with latest input from gmann/bauzas https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1004465 also reflect that change to the prelude patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004927 | |
| 14:09:07 | bauzas | ack | |
| 14:09:50 | Uggla | and sorry it comes later than I what I expected. | |
| 14:10:33 | dansmith | bauzas: what else is proposed? we agreed to punt on the graceful shutdown one for sure | |
| 14:12:08 | bauzas | dansmith: I maybe misunderstood the above discussion, I thought two different things were discussed, the one about graceful shutdown leaking threads and the other one being a nova-next change | |
| 14:13:06 | dansmith | bauzas: oh yeah, the shutdown one is punted, and I agree, the nova-next change should wait.. I thought you meant something else | |
| 14:17:52 | gibi | Uggla: ack | |
| 14:37:09 | gibi | bauzas: this needs second code (max microversion) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004872 | |
| 14:37:18 | gibi | s/code/core/ | |
| 14:37:22 | bauzas | oh I forgot that one | |
| 14:39:03 | gibi | Uggla: bauzas: what should we do with translation? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980544 | |
| 14:39:44 | bauzas | we ship them by a single approver | |
| 14:40:05 | gibi | OK then I approve it | |
| 14:40:15 | gibi | ohh you did it good | |
| 14:40:15 | bauzas | I did it | |
| 14:40:16 | gibi | thanks | |
| 14:40:19 | bauzas | nw | |
| 14:40:33 | bauzas | and fwiw the i18n team works on a change from zanata | |
| 14:40:38 | bauzas | I dunno where they are | |
| 14:48:06 | opendevreview | Gabin Lanore proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: stop the event dispatch loops on cleanup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1005022 | |
| 14:50:20 | gablan | gibi: thanks! Checked both of gmaan's patches 1003386 is the task-registry leak, 1001572 is the executor ownership refactor. Neither seems to touch Host.cleanup(), so I pushed a patch for it :D | |
| 14:51:56 | gibi | gablan: thanks cc gmaan ^^ | |
| 15:27:08 | opendevreview | Clif Houck proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: perf(ironic): eliminate O(N²) ProviderTree deepcopy at startup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1005073 | |
| 15:48:51 | opendevreview | Grzegorz Grasza proposed openstack/nova master: Mask password-like content in exception notifications https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1005074 | |
| 16:09:42 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Mark 2.104 as maximum API version for 2026.2 Hibiscus https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004872 | |
| 16:09:55 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980544 | |
| 16:14:24 | gibi | Uggla: I've approved the prelude as the highlights laned. Are we done? :) | |
| 16:14:32 | gibi | s/laned/landed/ | |
| 16:15:01 | gibi | ahh we are not doen | |
| 16:15:02 | gibi | done | |
| 16:15:21 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004430 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004424 are still need to land to have RC1 | |
| 16:16:04 | gibi | but then every patch from the tracking etherpad are approved now | |
| 16:16:09 | gibi | so we only need to wait for the gate | |
| 16:16:40 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I guess the discussion about about the job changes went into the direction that we should not risk it now | |
| 16:17:12 | sean-k-mooney | did i miss that | |
| 16:17:30 | sean-k-mooney | were there comemtns on the patches | |
| 16:17:46 | sean-k-mooney | because i tought we were landing the other way | |
| 16:17:51 | sean-k-mooney | that htis was low risk | |
| 16:18:13 | gibi | I think bauzas and dansmith discussed above | |
| 16:18:37 | sean-k-mooney | ah ok i was in a watcher irc meetign when we were chatting about it so i had swapped back to that | |
| 16:19:16 | sean-k-mooney | the debian change i feel really shoudl be done this cycel becase it was propsed 10 months ago and was defered lat cycel for similar reasons | |
| 16:19:37 | sean-k-mooney | the ubuntu 24.04->26.04 change for nova next is more a nice ot have | |
| 16:20:01 | sean-k-mooney | anyway i guess we can do them right after we cut rc1 | |
| 16:20:44 | zigo | I get it for the 2 nova patches above that needs to land, but anything preventing placement to be released ? | |
| 16:20:44 | zigo | Hi team ! | |
| 16:21:25 | sean-k-mooney | im not directly aware of anything pending on that side beyond perhaps a release not prelude | |
| 16:21:35 | sean-k-mooney | but im not sure that is strictly requried | |
| 16:21:38 | Uggla | gibi, thanks I think we are done. We just need to wait the latest SHA to put it into the RC1 release | |
| 16:21:57 | sean-k-mooney | we didnt really have any placmeent feature so the normal release notes i sproably enough | |
| 16:22:38 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: anyway so looking at the service version patchs they are now approved so i think thats all good | |
| 16:25:31 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: for context on the ubuntu change i proght it up at FF and i was asked to wait to RC1 which is why i put it up yesterday | |
| 16:26:09 | sean-k-mooney | we can wait again but i woudl like to get that testign in place early in 2027.1 | |
| 16:27:24 | sean-k-mooney | the base testing of nova on 26.04 has been runing in devstack for several months now which is why i was not expecting this to be contoversial | |
| 16:29:29 | sean-k-mooney | https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-08-24-16.00.log.html#l-217 | |
| 16:30:04 | gmaan | sean-k-mooney: gibi: same here, i would not prefer to touch the testing bit at this stage, let's have master rc-1 cut and then we can do those for 2027.1 | |
| 16:30:11 | gmaan | gibi: gablan thanks, will check | |
| 16:30:39 | gmaan | sean-k-mooney: for py3.14 testing on 2026.2 you mean unit/functional test or tempest job? | |
| 16:31:03 | sean-k-mooney | i ment moving nova-next to ubuntu 26.04 to test with 3.14 in tempest | |
| 16:31:18 | sean-k-mooney | that what i propsed a few weeks ago in the irc meeting | |
| 16:31:30 | sean-k-mooney | specifcly for advance testing in 2026.2 | |
| 16:32:05 | sean-k-mooney | gibi asked i do it after FFs and i asked to do it before RC1 | |
| 16:32:17 | sean-k-mooney | so i proposed the patches this week to do that | |
| 16:33:00 | gmaan | yeah i know we discussed it on IRC to do it after FF but seeing gate unstability over last month, i agree to do it after rc-1. | |