Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2026-08-20
18:27:33 gmaan melwitt: yeah, i think i got it. this schema is for list server in-progress live migration and most of time it may be empty so passing but this time it catch the in-progress live migration and hit the schema bug
18:27:45 melwitt ahhh
18:28:09 melwitt makes sense
18:28:16 gmaan here https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/master/tempest/api/compute/admin/test_live_migration.py#L477C9-L477C31
18:28:46 gmaan will fix it but happy that this test is catching some in-progress live migration :)
18:29:26 melwitt yeah agreed
18:29:59 melwitt so yeah looks like in that case the tempest schema is wrong ... it should be server_uuid for the migrations API
18:32:27 gmaan yeah fixing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/1001722
19:12:24 gmaan btw added these gate failures in this etherpad https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal
19:18:51 melwitt ++
19:19:06 melwitt (aside: looks like i need to clean up some really old stuff on there)
20:16:56 opendevreview Brian Haley proposed openstack/nova master: Change neutron API calls to use project_id https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994321
20:32:18 gmaan Gmaan@openrh28
20:33:09 gmaan oops :)
21:11:13 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Unify the thread pool executors into a central factory https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/998571
21:13:10 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Add doc and release notes for the graceful shutdown task tracking https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997141
#openstack-nova - 2026-08-21
02:35:39 opendevreview Brian Haley proposed openstack/nova master: Change neutron API calls to use project_id https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994321
05:37:48 opendevreview Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Support cold migration with virtiofs shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989633
05:37:48 opendevreview Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Extract share management from ComputeManager https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999349
07:38:58 antia gmaan: Thanks for reviewing the TDX series. I replied to some of the comments and will make changes to address the rest.
13:13:13 sean-k-mooney antia: are you expecting to push new version of the patches today. i had hoped you would have prepared them on wednesday orginally?
13:14:26 antia sean-k-mooney: yes, just finalizing now
13:28:58 sean-k-mooney ack ill try an loop back to them so before i drop fo rthe weekend
13:41:16 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add Intel TDX host capability detection https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994421
13:41:17 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add memory encryption config for TDX https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/998608
13:41:17 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Generalize memory encryption config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/998466
13:41:18 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Add documentation for Intel TDX https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000081
13:41:18 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Launch security Intel TDX https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999249
13:41:19 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add os_firmware_secure https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000472
13:41:19 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: reject_mem_enc_instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000082
13:41:20 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Check only x86_64 arch for Intel TDX https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000805
13:41:49 antia sean-k-mooney: submitted a new version of the patches now, but this is without moving the os_firmware_secure patch
13:42:06 sean-k-mooney ack
13:42:16 sean-k-mooney that order is ok was well
13:42:36 sean-k-mooney its a littel cleaner the other way but it shoudl be fien as is
13:42:49 sean-k-mooney the how woudl be to merge the full series before FF in anycase
13:44:12 sean-k-mooney ill need to to do one or two things before i have tiem to re reivew but ill try an do a pass over them in an hour or so
13:47:00 antia thanks!
13:51:31 opendevreview Clif Houck proposed openstack/nova master: perf(ironic): eliminate O(N²) ProviderTree deepcopy at startup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980676
13:51:32 opendevreview Clif Houck proposed openstack/nova master: Parallelize per-node resource updates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980679
14:01:41 sean-k-mooney antia: one thing to keep in mind, in openstack we try to ensure that every commit is indepently correct
14:01:52 sean-k-mooney because we want master to be constaly deployable into production
14:02:16 sean-k-mooney so we allow follow up patches but only when they are not requried for correctness
14:02:30 antia that makes sense
14:02:52 sean-k-mooney that why even if its fixed in a later patch if its a correctness issue we as for it to be fixed in teh relevent patch that intoduced the issue just as wider context
14:03:25 sean-k-mooney that partly because we use gerrit but more because we do not belive in squash merging series
14:16:27 dansmith gmaan: looks like we're in good shape on the graceful patches.. I'll try to hit the last one today
14:56:42 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Generalize memory encryption config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/998466
14:56:42 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add Intel TDX host capability detection https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994421
14:56:43 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add os_firmware_secure https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000472
14:56:43 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add memory encryption config for TDX https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/998608
14:56:44 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Add documentation for Intel TDX https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000081
14:56:44 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Launch security Intel TDX https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999249
14:56:45 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Check only x86_64 arch for Intel TDX https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000805
14:56:45 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: reject_mem_enc_instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000082
15:03:16 gmaan antia: thanks, will check today. i finished till doc yesterday but that is most of the key thing and last two were good maybe,
15:03:23 gmaan dansmith: ack, thanks
15:03:59 gmaan dansmith: and this doc/releasenotes one is last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997141/10
15:09:35 dansmith gmaan: yep, I know
15:10:37 gmaan dansmith: k. I will fix this if i re-spin it otherwise sometime later https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000211/comment/734dd672_9a340618/
15:10:50 gmaan or you want to push me a followup in thtis series?
15:12:18 dansmith not critical, see what other people think
15:15:01 gmaan ack
15:17:33 dansmith ugh, I can't put my finger on it right now.. Uggla when is FF?
15:18:09 Uggla Thursday next week
15:18:18 gmaan Aug 28, end of next week
15:18:19 dansmith duh, linked from the top of the H page
15:18:35 sean-k-mooney the non client lib freze shoudl have been yesterday i think as well
15:18:53 sean-k-mooney i was about to check if the os-tirat release we are waitign on happend?
15:18:57 sean-k-mooney Uggla: do you know?
15:18:57 dansmith ack, so I think we have plenty of time for gouthamr to at least try for a follow-up patch for reconciling missed share access rules
15:19:20 dansmith Uggla: I assume you would be up for a FFE if necessary to get that over the line if the rest of it is landed?
15:19:42 gmaan antia: sean-k-mooney on TDX one, before you both goes offline. one thing to discuss. i have to check the updated series but i cannot see VM create is rejected if os_secure_boot=required and TDX requested, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999249/5/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#7967
15:19:56 Uggla dansmith yes if we have a chance to do it.
15:19:58 gmaan is update/re-aranging series done or shoud i wait
15:20:49 sean-k-mooney Uggla: looks like the last release was 2 months ago so im going to go request a new release now
15:20:51 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/openstack/releases/blob/master/deliverables/_independent/os-traits.yaml#L115-L118
15:21:27 Uggla sean-k-mooney, I don't know. But things are probably lagging a bit because Elod is on pto
15:22:09 dansmith Uggla: AFAIK we're now just waiting for you to circle back on the exception handling comment here: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999349
15:22:23 sean-k-mooney well sylvain is the release liason so they would have been teh one to propeose it normally but they are also on pto
15:22:28 sean-k-mooney rather then elod
15:22:30 dansmith otherwise I think I'm +2 on both assuming gouthamr will propose a followup for a periodic resync of the share access rules
15:24:50 gmaan antia: this one https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999249/3..5/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#b7976
15:25:25 gmaan i was expecting we reject the request when we find os_secure_boot is required and tdx-requested otherwise it still ignore it. no?
15:26:04 Uggla dansmith, thanks I'm gonna answer. Did you test with nfs or cephfs ?
15:26:14 dansmith nfs
15:27:39 antia gmaan: There is a follow up patch, which I now moved to be in front, which solves the secure boot interaction with TDX
15:27:39 dansmith Uggla: I put notes in the comments about the things I tested (although notably left out which driver I was using)
15:27:43 Uggla ok I have just setup a cephfs devstack for testing it. That should not fundamentally change. But it will be another check.
15:28:17 dansmith very good
15:28:20 antia https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000472 with this it shouldn't be required to reject on os_secure_boot=required for TDX
15:29:32 gmaan antia: ok, let me go through the whole series again, will do after sometime. btw which TZ you are in?
15:29:33 sean-k-mooney did gibi or you have time to test that secure boot actully worked in that version
15:30:06 antia gmaan: UTC+2, so just about to head off for the weekend :)
15:30:09 Uggla dansmith, I would have progressed more without yesterday escalation.
15:30:14 gmaan i did not have HW access, gibi had. i asked him about it but we will get to know on monday.
15:30:28 gmaan antia: ack
15:30:38 gmaan or antia may have tested?
15:30:42 sean-k-mooney gmaan: sorry that question was to antia
15:30:47 antia both me and gibi tested it

Earlier   Later