| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-07-17 | |||
| 14:37:57 | tkajinam | I don't have actual number but feel like nova-multi-cell and nova-next are more flaky these days | |
| 14:38:20 | tkajinam | though the failure sometimes looks related to infra rather than actual service logics | |
| 14:40:19 | gibi | tkajinam: funnily i haven't seen the same error happening twice in my patch. the not nice situation to die due to 1000 cuts | |
| 14:40:53 | sean-k-mooney | that was the same when i was testing the alternitve cirrors image | |
| 14:41:13 | sean-k-mooney | i hit everfy random failure the gate has but never twice | |
| 14:41:40 | gibi | can we just turn off CI? and replace it with an LLM and a prompt? :D | |
| 14:41:47 | gibi | (very bad joke, sorry) | |
| 14:42:05 | sean-k-mooney | na that too much effort just push to master it will be grand | |
| 14:42:45 | sean-k-mooney | cannel that vc sartup energy, what could possibel go wrong :) | |
| 14:44:54 | tkajinam | gibi, maybe zuul doesn't like me throwing too many patches :-P | |
| 14:45:34 | tkajinam | the most annoying thing so far is that the base change quite frequently hits the error only in gate, which causes a lot of +2 in the chain ... | |
| 14:46:07 | gibi | we should try to bribe zuul, with more, jucier CPU cores | |
| 14:46:07 | tkajinam | anyway I'll monitor CI results and attempt to push these to main... so that we can more easily work on tdx part, which may be rebased on top of sev-snp | |
| 14:46:34 | tkajinam | lol | |
| 15:02:40 | dansmith | gibi: man, you are in rare form today :) | |
| 15:16:39 | gibi | then I stop on the top of my career (at least for this week). I bow to the crowd and let myself out :) | |
| 15:16:51 | gibi | see you all next week | |
| 15:17:34 | dansmith | jeez, all the way to the door.. have a good weekend :) | |
| 16:36:05 | gmaan | tkajinam: yeah, oslo.policy changes were up but it needed to wait for requirement change to be in. or i could have seperate them from requirements.txt change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994950 | |
| 16:38:08 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Revert "disable ovn based testing of test_live_migration_with_trunk" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997768 | |
| 16:41:16 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Remove disabling the scope enforcement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994950 | |
| 16:41:45 | gmaan | rebased it, I think it will pass the requirements job now | |
| 16:53:56 | sean-k-mooney | kleini: yes the data we expose on x86 leakes the version of openstack that is in use allowign you to target it for unpatch vlunermableity and the cloud init comutintiy decied to break the core contract of there utility by makeign it depend on an internal implemntatoin detail that is not intedned to be used like that | |
| 16:54:23 | sean-k-mooney | kleini: basiclly that smbiors/dmiinfo is only exposed by the libvirt driver on x86 | |
| 16:54:53 | sean-k-mooney | it is not possibel to do that for ironic and as far as im aware it was not done in vmware or hyperv | |
| 16:55:21 | sean-k-mooney | so cloud init shoudl never have used that to detect if its on openstack | |
| 16:57:08 | sean-k-mooney | they broke the openstack supprot to "fix" a security report that was arguable invlaide as it required a network where there was the ablity to spoof the non routable 169.... adresses via arp poising or similar | |
| 16:58:51 | sean-k-mooney | kleini: as far as im aware you can renabel the ec2/openstack supprot explcity in your cloud images | |
| 16:59:41 | sean-k-mooney | that woudl generally be my recomendation, you can also force enabel config drive in nova | |
| 18:21:07 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Remove disabling the scope enforcement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994950 | |
| 18:21:45 | gmaan | tkajinam: ^^ updated it as per your review comment. | |
| 18:24:27 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Check service_ref before destroy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996793 | |
| 18:27:56 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Detect AMD SEV-SNP support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994764 | |
| 19:10:45 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Support launchSecurity element for SEV-SNP https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994920 | |
| 21:42:20 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Remove redundant version check for remote managed ports https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/995160 | |
| 21:58:50 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Omit optional fields for SEV/SEV-ES https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994921 | |
| 22:00:45 | gmaan | melwitt gibi sean-k-mooney these release notes for enforce_scoope are ready now https://review.opendev.org/q/hashtag:%22remove-enforce-scope-flag%22+hashtag:%22nova%22status:open | |
| 22:26:59 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Drop sev capability check in launch instance flow https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994929 | |
| 22:27:13 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: AMD SEV: omit iommu='on' for virtio devices https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/909635 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-07-18 | |||
| 03:04:48 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: GMR: Omit signal handlers in wsgi app https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/906279 | |
| 03:21:37 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Drop redundant case to str in python 3 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997810 | |
| 03:24:43 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Drop redundant cast to str in python 3 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997810 | |
| 04:27:07 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Launch instances with SEV-SNP memory encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994930 | |
| 04:27:21 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Update documentations for AMD SEV-SNP support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/995090 | |
| 04:35:11 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Remove [libvirt] num_memory_encrypted_guests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/995120 | |
| 04:44:09 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Remove [DEFAULT] vcpu_pin_set https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996016 | |
| 04:45:24 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Remove [DEFAULT] vcpu_pin_set https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996016 | |
| 05:00:32 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Do not report SEV capability for non kvm virt_type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996498 | |
| 06:32:21 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Report virtio-fs support for only qemu/kvm virt_type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997818 | |
| 06:35:08 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Remove redundant version check for remote managed ports https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/995160 | |
| 10:45:03 | opendevreview | Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Create specs directory for 2027.1 Indri https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/997820 | |
| 10:47:15 | opendevreview | Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/nova master: Update contributor guide for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961896 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-07-19 | |||
| 10:30:19 | opendevreview | Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/nova master: Update contributor guide for 2026.2 Hibiscus https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997870 | |
| 12:02:59 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Do not use format string in logs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/987016 | |
| 15:53:09 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Drop redundant check of VIR_CONNECT_BASELINE_CPU_EXPAND_FEATURES https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997878 | |
| 15:54:31 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Remove tpm support detection for libvirt < 8.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952308 | |
| 15:54:38 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Drop redundant chown of tpm data directory https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962446 | |
| 16:08:42 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Drop redundant check of VIR_CONNECT_BASELINE_CPU_EXPAND_FEATURES https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997878 | |
| 17:12:18 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Drop redundant check of VIR_CONNECT_BASELINE_CPU_EXPAND_FEATURES https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997878 | |
| 18:53:52 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Support cold migration with virtiofs shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989633 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-07-20 | |||
| 10:20:49 | tkajinam | gibi, hi, are you around ? | |
| 11:56:23 | gibi | tkajinam: not right now but I will be back from a call hopefully in an hour | |
| 11:56:39 | gibi | tkajinam: feel free to leave me some stuff to answer :) | |
| 12:05:19 | gibi | I see that SNP is mostly landed so I'm not worrying about that any more :) | |
| 12:05:31 | gibi | more worried about the TDX work | |
| 12:43:21 | tkajinam | yeah | |
| 12:44:42 | tkajinam | gibi, I tested https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996316 in my local env and verified it. I wonder if you agree with merging it (unfortunately the node is in a bit secured space so I can't bring logs easily from there) | |
| 12:45:18 | tkajinam | assuming testing in real hardware is the only pending work item | |
| 12:46:59 | tkajinam | once that and a few follow-up tests are merged, I can help rebasing and implementing the rest of TDX bits according to what I've implemented for snp, if that could be helpful | |
| 13:55:52 | tkajinam | antia, hi. around ? | |
| 13:57:36 | antia | hi yes | |
| 13:58:39 | antia | Saw your comment, sounds reasonable to have it be one version bump | |
| 13:58:51 | tkajinam | yeah | |
| 13:59:04 | tkajinam | antia, I wonder if you managed to rebase your change on top of current master | |
| 14:00:19 | tkajinam | I pulled your change and rebased on top of the latest master. If not, then I can push it from my end. | |
| 14:00:31 | tkajinam | I can also rebase again the change on top of a few remaining sev-snp change to pull base structure for functional tests you likely have to add | |
| 14:01:03 | tkajinam | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997635 is the one I'm talking about | |
| 14:01:46 | tkajinam | If you are ready to submit an updated version then I'll leave it to you. | |
| 14:03:52 | antia | I was just working on it, since I had it previously rebased against your patch. Mine has a second version bump though. Would yours be with one version bump? | |
| 14:03:59 | gibi | tkajinam: re https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996316 I trust your verification. I will push the necessary buttons.. | |
| 14:04:42 | tkajinam | gibi, thanks ! | |
| 14:05:23 | tkajinam | antia, my local rebase is yet to do another version bump but we can revert that part. maybe we want to discuss that during the upcoming meeting | |
| 14:07:35 | gibi | antia: tkajinam: any progress on intel TDX is very welcome we have 5 weeks left to land it and I have dedicated review cycles promised to get it reviewed as fast as I can | |
| 14:08:00 | gibi | so even if a half done series pushed up would help me help you :) | |
| 14:08:36 | antia | tkajinam, yes that sounds reasonable. Regarding https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997635, atleast the changes to LibvirtReportTraitsTestBase will be relevant so I think it is good to rebase against it already | |
| 14:10:31 | antia | gibi, yes apologies I had to take PTO for personal reasons last week. I am now fully back and will work full time on it until the deadline. | |
| 14:11:32 | antia | will push what I have today so we have something to start with | |
| 14:14:57 | gibi | antia: sounds good. thanks | |
| 14:20:25 | tkajinam | bauzas, thanks for approving the remaining patches ! | |
| 14:20:51 | bauzas | tkajinam: sorry was pretty packed with other stuff downstream but I reviewed the whole series :) | |
| 14:21:04 | bauzas | thanks for the hard work ! | |
| 14:42:56 | gmaan | gibi: i replied on the security group name (trailiing/leading whitespace) issue, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/995073 | |
| 14:43:48 | gibi | gmaan: thanks | |
| 14:44:01 | gmaan | it seems we need to fix it with microverison. If so then i know we said every API change need spec but this seems straight forward issue to fix so not sure if we can wave off the spec requirement here and fix as specless BP or just bug tracking | |
| 14:45:04 | gmaan | for me, we do not need to do spec here and can just review/merge the fix but would like to know what other things | |
| 14:45:44 | gmaan | i can add it in today meeting agenda though | |
| 14:45:48 | gibi | gmaan: yeah. I'm a bit sad about this needed a new microversion. It feels our microversion rules are too strict regarding bugs. But I'm not dying on this specific bugfix hill. | |
| 14:46:34 | gmaan | i know sometime microversion are overkil but that is what we have | |
| 14:46:41 | gibi | regarding fixing in specless bp we need the core team's overall agreement but I'm OK if it is really just changing the schema to allow what neutron allows | |
| 14:47:36 | gibi | gmaan: "that is what we have" I feel like we are fully in charge to decide what we have as a rule :) | |