Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2026-07-13
16:01:03 elodilles o/
16:02:00 gibi lets wait a bit to see if others show up
16:02:17 gibi I know that Uggla and bauzas are off today
16:03:26 gibi #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:03:32 gibi any bugs to talk about?
16:04:08 gibi #topic Gate status
16:04:21 gibi anything worth mentioning about the gate?
16:04:31 tkajinam nothing I'm aware of, though we might need to be careful about gate status for a while after mass m-2 releases of libraries
16:04:40 gibi good heads up
16:05:08 tkajinam removal of enforce_scope is one of the upcoming big changes.
16:05:41 gibi we also landed major functional test changes to support threading, the threading job is non voting at the moment and hopefully the change does not affect the eventlet job
16:06:03 gibi but if you see strange things in functional test then let me know
16:06:10 elodilles oh, btw, there was a cross-nova job failure in oslo.concurrency release
16:06:11 sean-k-mooney o/
16:06:21 gibi elodilles: do you have a link?
16:06:33 elodilles this is the patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/996809
16:06:46 elodilles and this is the job: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/9c3d2302c2dc453092804e0db538deb3
16:07:03 elodilles i've already pinged the oslo team
16:07:08 elodilles on IRC
16:07:19 gibi the failing test called test_concurrent_server_delete so I feel relavance here :)
16:07:28 sean-k-mooney hum
16:07:30 elodilles just popped into my mind now that tkajinam mentioned the mass m-2 releases o:)
16:07:31 gibi anyhow I can take a deper look tomorrow
16:08:09 tkajinam I wasn't aware of any functional changes we recently merged into oslo.concurrecy so that looks a bit strange
16:08:34 tkajinam ping me in case you need hands from oslo side (and I'm aware of some discussions about slow futurist between gibi and sean-k-mooney but am not following it fully)
16:08:39 sean-k-mooney that test hevially depens on lock machanics
16:08:55 gibi tkajinam: thanks.
16:09:09 gibi anyhow moving on, we can handle that async
16:09:12 gibi #topic Release Planning
16:09:15 tkajinam yup
16:09:33 gibi so other than the m-2 lib releases anything else about the release schedule?
16:10:04 elodilles nothing else from me
16:10:31 gibi #topic Review priorities
16:10:42 gibi any important patch is stuck?
16:11:28 gibi #topic Stable Branches
16:11:34 gibi elodilles, your turn
16:11:41 elodilles thanks o/
16:11:42 elodilles so
16:11:45 elodilles #info placement stable/2025.1 is blocked - workaround: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/992299
16:11:57 elodilles #info nova stable/2025.1 branch is unstable due to nova-ceph-multistore job
16:12:04 elodilles this is new now ^^^ :/
16:12:17 elodilles see details here:
16:12:24 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:12:42 elodilles there is a bug fix backport from sean-k-mooney
16:12:54 elodilles and i've commented on it
16:13:05 elodilles need nova stable core's opinion about the way forward
16:13:11 sean-k-mooney it passed on 2025.1 by the way but there are 3 paths forward
16:13:23 elodilles yepp
16:13:37 elodilles and that's all from me
16:13:52 elodilles back to you gibi
16:14:11 sean-k-mooney just a short tldr, we can backport melwitt's adress space confituraiton patch
16:14:19 gibi https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2116852%22
16:14:22 gibi this one I assume
16:14:31 sean-k-mooney we can change stablle 2025.1 ceph jobs to use debian 12
16:14:38 sean-k-mooney or we can tweak the regex
16:15:01 sean-k-mooney and if we do backprot then we have a chocie of the defautl config value
16:15:03 sean-k-mooney but yes
16:15:05 sean-k-mooney its that bug
16:15:18 gibi OK
16:15:25 fwiesel o/
16:15:28 melwitt why not let 1G be default on stable and tweak the job for stable to use 2G? that would seem more standard to me as to what real life operator would do
16:15:30 gibi so I see elodilles had some backportability concrens and sean-k-mooney replied
16:15:49 sean-k-mooney i dont really ahve a stong opion on what approch we take
16:15:52 elodilles melwitt: that's another good option, imo, too
16:15:58 sean-k-mooney i just create the backport to confirm they actully work
16:16:10 gibi I'm fine with melwitt's proposal if that helps accepting the backport on stalbe
16:16:13 gibi stable
16:16:24 melwitt yes thanks for doing that sean-k-mooney
16:16:25 elodilles +1
16:16:28 melwitt (I'm replying on gerrit also)
16:16:32 gibi cool
16:16:41 gibi I think we can continue this on the review
16:16:49 melwitt ++
16:16:52 elodilles +1
16:16:52 sean-k-mooney mechaniclaly would you like me to update them or will melwitt do it
16:16:55 sean-k-mooney but ya we can move on
16:17:26 sean-k-mooney we can decied that after the meeting
16:17:30 gibi OK
16:17:33 gibi any other stable business?
16:18:11 gibi #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights
16:18:18 gibi fwiesel: any news?
16:18:28 fwiesel Added some gating as changes in tempest and devstack caused some regressions.
16:18:46 fwiesel But we are still not back to the old working state.
16:19:05 fwiesel Still Debugging what else needs to get fixed.
16:19:14 fwiesel That's from my side
16:19:34 gibi thanks. do you need help?
16:19:57 fwiesel gibi: thanks, but I'm fine
16:20:10 gibi cool
16:20:12 gibi #topic Kamil's news about eventlet removal
16:20:17 gibi I'm filling in
16:20:32 gibi so we landed the functional test changes to support threading mode
16:20:50 gibi the job is still non voting. we have couple of follow ups to stabilize and speed it up
16:20:56 gibi then we will make it voting
16:21:15 gmaan ++
16:21:17 gibi but the tox -e functional-py313-threading target is already usable if needed
16:22:24 gibi there are two patches that is reviewable https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996793
16:22:41 gibi (and ^^ its parent)
16:23:05 gmaan will check today
16:23:23 gibi Kamil started working on futurist enhancements on Executors to support some of our advanced use cases. This might need coordianation with sean-k-mooney effort of fixing the slow shutdown bug in futurist
16:23:56 sean-k-mooney ack, i did a bunch of general performacne improment in followups

Earlier   Later