| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-05-11 | |||
| 16:13:06 | gibi | tkajinam: I filed that indeed. It is not a CI issue | |
| 16:13:22 | gibi | and I saw that oslo.service merged some related change recently | |
| 16:13:25 | tkajinam | ok | |
| 16:13:41 | tkajinam | that's the only one I found from the bug notifications. | |
| 16:13:47 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.service/+/981849 | |
| 16:13:55 | tkajinam | (from the "recent" bug notifications, actually | |
| 16:13:57 | gibi | so I will check with ^^ applyied | |
| 16:14:15 | tkajinam | makes sense | |
| 16:14:52 | Uggla | ok the gate seems not on fire, so moving on. | |
| 16:14:59 | Uggla | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:15:04 | Uggla | #link https://releases.openstack.org/hibiscus/schedule.html | |
| 16:15:04 | mattcrees | Hi, hopefully this is the right time to raise. I have a bugfix up for review, I was hoping someone could take a look please? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/982660 | |
| 16:15:11 | Uggla | #info Nova deadlines are set in the above schedule | |
| 16:15:16 | Uggla | #info PTG etherpad for 2026.2 is available: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.2-ptg | |
| 16:15:39 | Uggla | nothing special here | |
| 16:15:41 | Uggla | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:15:49 | Uggla | #link New file for Hibiscus https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.2-status | |
| 16:15:56 | Uggla | #info I have updated Launchpad and the above doc. Please ping me if you spot something missing. | |
| 16:16:07 | Uggla | #info I have flagged the current priorities in bold. | |
| 16:16:17 | Uggla | #info Starting: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.2-status#L16 interesting bugs to review. | |
| 16:16:24 | Uggla | #info Urgent 987704: Fix resize to unpermitted flavors | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/987704 (Dan) (Security) (review + backport) | |
| 16:16:53 | Uggla | ^ is a request from dansmith, it needs some kind of prio as related to security | |
| 16:17:00 | dansmith | ? | |
| 16:17:05 | dansmith | it's fixed and merged | |
| 16:17:38 | gibi | dansmith: does it need backport for stable branches? | |
| 16:17:43 | Uggla | it needs to be backported am I wrong ? | |
| 16:18:22 | dansmith | perhaps, but ... okay, just not what I interpreted from "request from dansmith" but... | |
| 16:18:42 | dansmith | it's mostly workaroundable so not super high priority, IMHO | |
| 16:18:47 | dansmith | I can propose some backports | |
| 16:21:45 | gibi | I can help landing them | |
| 16:22:14 | Uggla | Note the unpin-az has just been approved. | |
| 16:22:33 | elodilles | you can ping me for review, too o/ | |
| 16:23:12 | Uggla | Will it be possible to review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/984384 as Phil seems in the starting block for the implementation. | |
| 16:23:49 | Uggla | as well as https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/471815, not to miss it | |
| 16:23:56 | dansmith | so I missed this section at the PTG and I have questions.. I guess I'll review that spec | |
| 16:24:21 | Uggla | thx dansmith | |
| 16:24:55 | Uggla | note: the second one is already +2 by sean-k-mooney. | |
| 16:26:07 | Uggla | I think we are good for that topic, moving on | |
| 16:26:13 | Uggla | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:26:27 | gmaan | I will check the RPC one, I think phil updated it as per PTG discussion | |
| 16:26:28 | elodilles | thanks Uggla | |
| 16:26:45 | elodilles | maybe this is more to the Release Planning part: | |
| 16:26:48 | elodilles | Uggla: note, that this week is Hibiscus-1 milestone week | |
| 16:27:09 | elodilles | and we have 1 release patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/988061 | |
| 16:27:50 | elodilles | (osc-placement and python-novaclient don't have any merged / relevant code changes yet) | |
| 16:28:15 | elodilles | and now about stable branches o:) | |
| 16:28:28 | elodilles | #info placement's stable/2025.1 gate is blocked, workaround: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/980761 | |
| 16:28:40 | elodilles | this needs a 2nd stable core review ^^^ | |
| 16:28:53 | elodilles | thanks for the +2 gibi o:) | |
| 16:29:00 | elodilles | #info rest of the stable gates should be OK | |
| 16:29:16 | elodilles | * i am not aware of any issue | |
| 16:29:25 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:29:41 | elodilles | and that's all from me about stable | |
| 16:29:51 | Uggla | thx elodilles | |
| 16:29:54 | elodilles | np | |
| 16:30:30 | Uggla | btw I'm printing the schedule to have it close to me. 👍 | |
| 16:30:53 | Uggla | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:31:03 | Uggla | fwiesel something to share ? | |
| 16:31:36 | fwiesel | Hi, so the pipeline broke because our OS is too old. I am finally updating to ubuntu 24.04. It should work hopefully tomorrow again | |
| 16:31:48 | fwiesel | That's it from my side. | |
| 16:32:22 | fwiesel | @Uggla back to you then. | |
| 16:32:46 | Uggla | thx fwiesel | |
| 16:33:08 | Uggla | and thx for fixing this pipeline | |
| 16:33:59 | Uggla | #topic Gibi's news about eventlet removal | |
| 16:34:09 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:34:30 | gibi | eventlet mode deprecation patch merged | |
| 16:35:20 | gibi | and I have a not too complex patch about poisoning eventlet import https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986282 if somebody has review time | |
| 16:35:45 | gmaan | its in my list, will check today | |
| 16:35:50 | gibi | thanks | |
| 16:35:56 | gibi | I have nothing else | |
| 16:36:04 | Uggla | thx gibi | |
| 16:36:43 | Uggla | Skipping Layos's topic because he is off. | |
| 16:36:53 | Uggla | #topic Ironic review priorities | |
| 16:37:05 | Uggla | cardoe something you'd like to highlight this week ? | |
| 16:37:41 | cardoe | Nothing specific | |
| 16:37:55 | Uggla | cardoe, ok no worries. | |
| 16:37:58 | cardoe | Same patches from last week are still opened | |
| 16:38:13 | Uggla | ok | |
| 16:38:24 | cardoe | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/471815 for the trunk spec for example | |
| 16:39:03 | Uggla | yep I mentioned it before | |
| 16:40:50 | cardoe | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/985785 & https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955685 for the optimization ones | |
| 16:41:03 | cardoe | Which are roughly doing the same thing but tested differently. | |
| 16:41:59 | dansmith | ...why does Uggla have a competing implementation there? | |
| 16:43:10 | Uggla | dansmith I did not know about the previous implementation and it was not linked to the bug. As it looked no too difficult I did a patch. | |
| 16:43:42 | dansmith | okay I think it'd be better to not have the duplication, and you help the other patch by improving the tests | |
| 16:45:41 | Uggla | I agree, but that's assuming I knew about it. | |
| 16:45:55 | dansmith | I'm saying.. now that you know... | |
| 16:47:47 | gibi | I can review whatever patch remains :) | |
| 16:48:11 | Uggla | Sean’s comment is a bit ambiguous. I get the impression he prefers my version, but regardless, I’m going to try to move things forward. | |
| 16:48:57 | dansmith | so they are actually competing? | |
| 16:49:27 | dansmith | I mean if that's the case, then fine, but let's figure out which one we want and close the other.. having two proposed without active management towards a decision is just asking for them to be ignored, IMHO | |
| 16:50:32 | Uggla | yes sure. | |
| 16:51:05 | Uggla | #topic Bug scrubbing | |
| 16:51:12 | Uggla | #info up to 193 (+2) | |
| 16:51:19 | Uggla | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:51:24 | Uggla | #link https://truc.uggla.fr/ to follow the trend. | |
| 16:51:29 | Uggla | #info New bugs assigned. | |
| 16:51:35 | Uggla | Next meeting (this week): [public] Upstream bug triage. Wednesday, May 13 · 15:30 – 16:00 UTC. Video call link: meet.google.com/qdd-fwzs-tje | |
| 16:52:11 | gibi | I'm affraid I have to skip it again. I promise I'm not intentionally avoiding it | |
| 16:53:05 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: if its the one im thinking of you had better testing but i prefer there version | |