| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-04-27 | |||
| 16:29:24 | sambork | tests effort progresing, consol proxy patch landed, client testing patch is ready for review: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984036 | |
| 16:29:40 | Uggla | #topic Nova using openstack sdk for neutron | |
| 16:29:48 | Uggla | lajoskatona, something to report ? | |
| 16:30:54 | Uggla | I guess lajoskatona is not available too. so mobing on | |
| 16:31:00 | Uggla | #topic Bug scrubbing | |
| 16:31:07 | Uggla | #info up to 200 (+3) | |
| 16:31:15 | Uggla | #link: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:31:21 | Uggla | #link: https://truc.uggla.fr/ to follow the trend. | |
| 16:31:46 | Uggla | I have scheduled a new bug triage session for this week. | |
| 16:32:00 | Uggla | This week [public] Upstream bug triage. Wednesday, April 29 · 15:30 – 16:00 UTC. Video call link: https://meet.google.com/fdz-phux-cnc | |
| 16:32:56 | Uggla | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:33:06 | Uggla | nothing on the agenda for today. | |
| 16:33:39 | Uggla | But if someone wants to discuss something, please tell me. | |
| 16:35:27 | sean-k-mooney | noting form me | |
| 16:35:35 | sean-k-mooney | im still reflecting on the ptg dicussions | |
| 16:37:12 | Uggla | keeping this open 5 more mn, for people to react. | |
| 16:41:17 | tkajinam | nothing from me | |
| 16:41:26 | tkajinam | a calm week after the busy PTG week :-) | |
| 16:41:26 | gibi | sorry folks | |
| 16:41:39 | gibi | nothing extra. sambork thanks for the summary | |
| 16:41:41 | bauzas | . | |
| 16:43:21 | Uggla | tkajinam, sure, lots of things have been discussed at the PTG. | |
| 16:43:25 | Uggla | so if nothing else, I think we are good. | |
| 16:44:41 | Uggla | Time to close, thanks for joining this meeting. Have a nice day/evening and see you next week or Wednesday for the triage. | |
| 16:44:49 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-04-27-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:44:49 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-04-27-16.00.txt | |
| 16:44:49 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-04-27-16.00.html | |
| 16:44:49 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Mon Apr 27 16:44:49 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:44:49 | Uggla | #endmeeting | |
| 16:45:02 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 16:45:52 | tkajinam | thx | |
| 16:46:09 | elodilles | Uggla: i've +2'd the nova schedule patch, let me know if you think it is ready to merge and i'll +W it - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/985791 | |
| 16:46:58 | Uggla | elodilles, I just would like Sean to confirm it is ok for him. | |
| 16:47:17 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney if you can have a look ^ | |
| 16:47:18 | sean-k-mooney | i think tis ok yes | |
| 16:47:27 | Uggla | 👍 | |
| 16:47:56 | sean-k-mooney | it perhaps over pivitot a bit but i think the overall intent that the spec freze appleis to both specs and blueprints is captures | |
| 16:49:02 | Uggla | elodilles so I think you can go ahead. | |
| 16:49:13 | elodilles | ACK, on my way :] | |
| 19:34:07 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Spec for the graceful shutdown part2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/986447 | |
| 21:29:53 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM test ceph ipv6 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984623 | |
| 22:23:53 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM test ceph ipv6 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984623 | |
| 23:22:51 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM test ceph ipv6 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984623 | |
| 23:47:41 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Increase wait retries for resize reschedule with qos port test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986468 | |
| 23:50:12 | melwitt | gibi: same issue except in a different test class :/ not sure if there is some better non whack-a-mole way we would rather deal with this ^ | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-04-28 | |||
| 00:42:09 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM test ceph ipv6 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984623 | |
| 00:53:02 | opendevreview | Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: doc: clarify SEV/SEV-ES behavior with locked_memory https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971300 | |
| 02:18:59 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional test for cleanup_host cancelling queued live migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986477 | |
| 02:44:48 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test removal of enforce_scope https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986479 | |
| 04:33:39 | gibi | melwitt: I will take a look | |
| 04:35:14 | gibi | melwitt: the only other option I see on the code level is to change the default of wait_for_state_change | |
| 04:35:37 | gibi | maybe just change it in the coverage job via an env var passed? | |
| 04:41:03 | gibi | we have OS_TEST_TIMEOUT as an example for a similar thing. We can have another var like OS_SLOW_ENV_WAIT_FACTOR that defaults to 1 and we can set it to 2 in the coverage env. Then this var can be multiplied in any sleep or retry count we see impacted by the slowness in the coverage env | |
| 08:20:17 | opendevreview | Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron subnets https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962190 | |
| 08:20:28 | opendevreview | Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron extensions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962270 | |
| 08:20:50 | opendevreview | Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron floating IPs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962604 | |
| 10:14:00 | lajoskatona | Uggla, bauzas: Hi, if you have few minutes I have a small doc update patch for mdev_class: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/983089 (just a follow-up for bp/generic-mdevs https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp/generic-mdevs%22) | |
| 12:46:29 | opendevreview | Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Change nova-alt-configurations job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/983179 | |
| 13:28:43 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Doc: add short doc section for mdev_class https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/983089 | |
| 13:39:40 | opendevreview | Florian proposed openstack/nova master: Add check for PCIe devices attach limit for volume and ports https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955584 | |
| 13:59:58 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add unpin-az spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/986539 | |
| 14:27:36 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add unpin-az spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/986539 | |
| 14:31:48 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova-specs master: add pci passthrough groups spec for 2026.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/975635 | |
| 15:12:47 | melwitt | gibi: yeah I kinda thought about a wait multiplier too | |
| 15:20:14 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM test ceph ipv6 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984623 | |
| 16:43:03 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM test ceph ipv6 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984623 | |
| 16:55:22 | melwitt | gmaan: another unit test stabilization for CI testenv:cover https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986468 not sure if this will likely be the last "one-off" but if it's a more widespread problem, there are a couple of review comments in there with idea | |
| 17:33:39 | gmaan | melwitt: lgtm, thanks | |
| 17:49:09 | melwitt | thanks gmaan | |
| 17:51:17 | melwitt | sean-k-mooney: was finally able to prove that ipv6 brackets in ceph mon addrs passed to libvirt without stripping the brackets, would fail https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984623/18 | |
| 17:52:38 | melwitt | I will likely need your help to figure out where and how the proper place to propose all of this ipv6 stuff haha .... for my test I crammed most of it into a pre-run script as you could see | |
| 17:54:39 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: oh cool | |
| 17:55:02 | sean-k-mooney | i mean that works. it shoudl get added into the devstack roels | |
| 17:55:12 | sean-k-mooney | but we can figure that out now that we have a working baseline | |
| 17:56:01 | melwitt | yeah that was my thinking. hack it for the POC but then propose them in the proper places if it got to working | |
| 17:57:01 | sean-k-mooney | as long as we are calling it a hack im ok with it if we call it a tempory solution it will out live cochroaches | |
| 17:57:06 | melwitt | claude thought some of it should go under openstack/zuul-jobs so maybe that's true, maybe it isn't haha | |
| 17:57:14 | sean-k-mooney | tempory colution that work never get fixed | |
| 17:57:23 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: yes some of it should | |
| 17:57:44 | sean-k-mooney | we do the multi node bridge configuraiton in zuul/zuul-jobs | |
| 17:58:10 | sean-k-mooney | https://opendev.org/zuul/zuul-jobs/src/branch/master/roles/multi-node-bridge | |
| 17:58:16 | melwitt | yeah. I just didn't want to make the depends-on web really big while I was trial-and-erroring on it | |
| 17:58:18 | melwitt | yes exactly what it was saying | |
| 17:58:21 | sean-k-mooney | so we shudl proably make that proply do ipv6 as well | |
| 17:58:30 | melwitt | yes exactly | |
| 17:58:46 | sean-k-mooney | https://opendev.org/zuul/zuul-jobs/src/branch/master/roles/multi-node-bridge/tasks/switch.yaml | |
| 17:59:09 | sean-k-mooney | same for the host file https://opendev.org/zuul/zuul-jobs/src/branch/master/roles/multi-node-hosts-file/tasks/main.yaml | |
| 18:00:00 | melwitt | I cloned all of the relevant repos and claude knew where stuff should go, which was really cool considering I would have zero idea. I know you told me first but I also had claude look at all of it locally and it made all of the connections between them | |
| 18:00:27 | sean-k-mooney | so if you want to see a beautful hack that i have not updated in a long time | |
| 18:00:50 | melwitt | sure | |
| 18:00:54 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/SeanMooney/ard/tree/master/molecule | |
| 18:01:03 | sean-k-mooney | so i dont know if you knwo what molecule is | |
| 18:01:09 | sean-k-mooney | btu its how you test ansible | |
| 18:01:19 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/SeanMooney/ard/blob/master/molecule/default/molecule.yml | |
| 18:01:33 | sean-k-mooney | i defiend a moluel role using vagrnat/libvtr/qemu | |
| 18:01:35 | JayF | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/983753 this is a high quality change to the Ironic virt driver which would have a significant impact on Ironic users, it's also simpler and easy to understand than most ironic virt driver changes. Your attention would be appreciated :D | |
| 18:01:51 | sean-k-mooney | that create a contoler and comptue and then runs the devstack ansible playbooks form the ci jobs on them | |
| 18:02:23 | melwitt | no I didn't know what molecule is. I had heard you say it before but I never knew what you were talking about haha | |
| 18:02:24 | sean-k-mooney | so you can do molecule up adn it will use the ci roles to deploy a 2 node devstack | |
| 18:02:45 | melwitt | ahh that's pretty cool | |