| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-03-03 | |||
| 20:36:48 | sean-k-mooney | the last 3 timeout were all on rax clasic on the old xen hardware | |
| 20:36:50 | sean-k-mooney | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=openstack-tox-cover&project=openstack/nova | |
| 20:37:33 | melwitt | ahhh heheh. "classic" and "old xen" | |
| 20:38:09 | sean-k-mooney | as were the next 8 | |
| 20:38:32 | sean-k-mooney | so all the one sthat imes out seam to be on the xen vms | |
| 20:40:34 | melwitt | that's good to know. glad there appears to be some explanation | |
| 20:41:35 | sean-k-mooney | tehre are some success there too but my guess is the the xen cloud was flying a bit to close to the sun in terms fo the timeout | |
| 20:41:48 | sean-k-mooney | so if it end up on a busy host it failed | |
| 20:48:01 | melwitt | on wings made of pastrami | |
| 21:22:41 | rm_work[m] | so hey, re: native threads... I see there's a chain of patches that IS required for some stuff to work properly. any chance of backports to like 2025.2 at least? | |
| 21:22:44 | rm_work[m] | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956091 | |
| 21:22:53 | rm_work[m] | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/965466 | |
| 21:22:58 | rm_work[m] | at a minimum it seems these two, not sure if more | |
| 21:45:23 | rm_work[m] | I would love to just be running 2026.1 :D | |
| 21:45:35 | rm_work[m] | just need it to be April | |
| 22:17:24 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: [openstack-tox-cover]Increase timeout https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978652 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-03-04 | |||
| 00:49:22 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925771 | |
| 00:49:23 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add late check for supported TPM secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956975 | |
| 00:49:23 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: test live migration between hosts with different security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952629 | |
| 00:49:24 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM vtpm tempest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957477 | |
| 00:49:24 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: enable conversion of secret security modes via resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962052 | |
| 00:49:25 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: fixup for bump service version documentation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978836 | |
| 02:34:19 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add nova-vtpm-live-migration job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978841 | |
| 02:35:43 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add nova-vtpm-live-migration job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978841 | |
| 07:49:47 | nicolairuckel | I just realized that it would make sense to also backport the vTPM patch (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955657) because my NVRAM patch (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959682) builds on that. Can I backport them together or should they be separate merge requests? | |
| 08:48:24 | gibi | openstack-tox-cover seems to be healthy now https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=openstack-tox-cover&project=openstack/nova | |
| 08:49:12 | gibi | the max runtime is around 75mins our current limit is 90mins | |
| 10:02:14 | bauzas | awesome | |
| 10:12:58 | opendevreview | Marius Leustean proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add spec for handling orphan BDMs from late RPC processing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/975698 | |
| 10:43:52 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: Regression test for Placement allocations remaining during failed schedule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969251 | |
| 10:43:53 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: Remove Placement allocations in the broken build cleanup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/968446 | |
| 10:53:11 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA Topology with Resource Providers: Object changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978209 | |
| 10:55:32 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA Topology with Resource Providers: Scheduler changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971176 | |
| 11:01:30 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA Topology with Resource Providers: Libvirt NUMA Migrate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971177 | |
| 11:48:06 | sean-k-mooney | nicolairuckel: they shoudl be serpate commit but you can propose both yourself. please do not squash them into one | |
| 11:58:06 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Enable sysmon core https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978738 | |
| 11:58:06 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Migrate coverage configuration to pyproject https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978737 | |
| 11:58:26 | nicolairuckel | sean-k-mooney: okay, I'll do that. Thank you. | |
| 14:37:11 | cardoe | gibi: can I get your re-review on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/972601 ? I added sean-k-mooney's ask for validating the exact exception message. | |
| 14:39:48 | gibi | cardoe: done | |
| 14:40:17 | cardoe | thank you | |
| 14:43:17 | opendevreview | Samuel Kunkel proposed openstack/nova master: enable smbios for arm64/aarch64 for cloud-init https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978883 | |
| 14:58:11 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Reproduce OSPRH-25388: NUMA cell sorting bug for non-PCI VMs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978885 | |
| 15:24:06 | bauzas | can I could have eyes for a very long vGPU bugfix : https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/845757 ? | |
| 15:25:07 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Fix UEFI config test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978894 | |
| 15:30:26 | bauzas | gibi: do you want to run the eventlet meeting ? | |
| 15:34:19 | tkajinam | dansmith, thanks for that fix... and I suspect I did some wrong vim edit but I don't know when I made that ... | |
| 15:34:57 | dansmith | tkajinam: yeah I figured it was just meant to be a change to the test right below it.. nobody caught it on review either, so no worries | |
| 15:46:08 | tkajinam | nicolairuckel, hi. I saw your -1 on 978894 but I'm afraid you are confused by a different review | |
| 15:46:43 | dansmith | yeah, was wondering :) | |
| 15:46:46 | tkajinam | this first needs to go for master and may need to be ported into your backport. | |
| 15:46:51 | tkajinam | after it is merged into master | |
| 15:47:18 | tkajinam | so I don't think that needs to be blocked now | |
| 16:18:10 | nicolairuckel | oh | |
| 16:18:12 | nicolairuckel | sorry | |
| 16:18:16 | nicolairuckel | you're right | |
| 16:23:54 | nicolairuckel | dansmith: So should I backport that one first once it's merged? Then I'd do that, then the vTPM patch, and finally my NVRAM patch. | |
| 16:24:24 | dansmith | you can't have it go first without making conflicts.. you generally need to go in the order they appeared, | |
| 16:24:33 | dansmith | so stack them vTPM, NVRAM, test fix | |
| 16:24:58 | dansmith | they should all be on top of each other, they'll update in gerrit together and show as a sequence for proper merge dependencies | |
| 16:26:00 | nicolairuckel | got it | |
| 16:26:28 | tkajinam | dansmith, nicolairuckel I guess you don't need it for 2025.2, though. I think these all patches for firmware selection was merged bot after the fixes to preserve vTPM and NVRAM were merged | |
| 16:26:40 | tkajinam | but it needs to be double-checked. | |
| 16:26:57 | nicolairuckel | I think so too but I added it to my todo list to check it. | |
| 16:27:06 | dansmith | oh, could be | |
| 16:27:30 | tkajinam | I remember I had to resolve conflict caused by that preserve NVRAM patch | |
| 16:27:37 | dansmith | I actually backported the nvram fix to a much older version myself, and that test was failing (and I couldn't figure out why it wasn't failing on master) | |
| 16:27:50 | tkajinam | ok | |
| 16:30:31 | opendevreview | Nicolai Ruckel proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Preserve vTPM state between power off and power on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978908 | |
| 18:28:11 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Fix NUMA cell sorting for non-PCI VMs with pack strategy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978954 | |
| 19:49:16 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Migrate coverage configuration to pyproject https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978737 | |
| 22:50:41 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add nova-vtpm-live-migration job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978841 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-03-05 | |||
| 03:41:15 | manideep | #openstack-neutron | |
| 03:58:37 | opendevreview | Nope proposed openstack/nova master: scheduler: optional re-query on claim failure https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/977908 | |
| 08:41:14 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: Regression test for Placement allocations remaining during failed schedule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969251 | |
| 08:41:38 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: Remove Placement allocations in the broken build cleanup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/968446 | |
| 10:36:52 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: Regression test for Placement allocations remaining during failed schedule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969251 | |
| 10:37:41 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: Remove Placement allocations in the broken build cleanup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/968446 | |
| 10:38:15 | opendevreview | Nicolai Ruckel proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Preserve vTPM state between power off and power on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978908 | |
| 13:04:12 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA Topology with Resource Providers: Scheduler changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971176 | |
| 14:31:45 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Update compute rpc alias for Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979008 | |
| 14:57:11 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add service version for Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979016 | |
| 15:19:49 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add Gazpacho prelude section https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979023 | |
| 15:35:24 | opendevreview | Nicolai Ruckel proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Preserve vTPM state between power off and power on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978908 | |
| 15:54:39 | nicolairuckel | How much am I allowed to deviate from an original patch for a backport? I needed to make two small adjustments that were not part of the original patch but came from some earlier patches. | |
| 16:05:50 | dansmith | nicolairuckel: as little as possible | |
| 16:06:01 | dansmith | call out the fixes in the commit message | |
| 16:06:14 | elodilles | nicolairuckel: as little as possible o:) if the conflict is due to another bug is not backported, then the easiest is to backport that as well | |
| 16:06:15 | dansmith | if it's too invasive, that's grounds for saying "maybe this isn't suitable for backporting" | |
| 16:06:17 | elodilles | jinx | |
| 16:47:27 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: objects: Remove unnecessary type aliases, exceptions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/738240 | |
| 16:47:28 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: objects: Remove wrappers around ovo mixins https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/738019 | |
| 16:47:28 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: objects: Use imports instead of type aliases https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/738018 | |
| 16:47:29 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: objects: Remove 'NovaObjectDictCompat' from 'Service' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/835595 | |
| 16:54:53 | stephenfin | gmaan: sean-k-mooney: What do we want to do about the failures on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/978254? | |
| 16:56:10 | stephenfin | nova docs state that nova only supports the 'default' quota class set and the JSON schemas now enforce this. However, based on that now-failing test, it looks like this wasn't enforced previously and non-'default' quota class sets were allowed even if they did nothing | |
| 16:56:41 | stephenfin | My guess is that we need to back out the schema restriction that prevents us using non-default values but I just wanted to check you were happy with me doing so | |
| 17:00:41 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Don't restrict return value of quota class set name https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979031 | |
| 17:00:50 | stephenfin | gmaan: sean-k-mooney: ^ | |
| 17:02:28 | stephenfin | ah, tkajinam already beat me to it https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978494 | |