Posted	Nick	Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-10-21
16:34:03	gibi	in the normal slots
16:34:19	bauzas	and then we can let people indicate their interest
16:34:24	sean-k-mooney	gibi: i think we will wnat to do that in either case
16:34:29	bauzas	yup
16:34:40	Uggla	bauzas sure, I hope they will get in touch with me soon. If not I'll try to ping.
16:34:58	Uggla	So I could update the schedule.
16:35:10	bauzas	having PTG right after Summit doesn't help, in particular when most of attendees take a few days off after the latter
16:35:35	gibi	sean-k-mooney: yes
16:35:47	bauzas	sure, and please people let mention your interest if you wanna speak up on those topics
16:36:51	Uggla	can we move on ?
16:37:23	gibi	+
16:37:32	Uggla	next topic
16:37:33	Uggla	#topic OpenAPI
16:37:39	Uggla	#link: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22openapi%22+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement)+-status:merged+-status:abandoned
16:37:45	Uggla	#info still 28 remaining atm.
16:37:52	Uggla	#topic Stable Branches
16:38:10	elodilles	thanks
16:38:18	elodilles	#info stable branches (stable/2025.* and stable/2024.*) seem to be in OK state
16:38:29	elodilles	#info final stable 2024.1 Caracal release (and all other stable/202*.* release patches) are proposed: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/964471
16:38:45	elodilles	#info 2024.1 Caracal (stable/2024.1) is planed to move to Unmaintained in less than a week
16:39:05	elodilles	and that's all for now about stable from me
16:39:23	Uggla	thx elodilles
16:39:37	Uggla	#topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights
16:39:50	Uggla	fwiesel anything you'd like to tell us ?
16:39:51	fwiesel	#info Cinder VMware bug fixed for reimaging volume
16:40:00	fwiesel	#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/961357
16:40:21	fwiesel	Took a while, but that was blocking me from fixing the last two failing tempest tests.
16:40:28	fwiesel	That and the still broken CI
16:40:36	fwiesel	But that's it from my side
16:41:02	fwiesel	Uggla: back to you
16:41:04	Uggla	thanks fwiesel, thx correting this
16:41:29	Uggla	#topic Gibi's news about eventlet removal.
16:41:36	Uggla	gibi anything to report ?
16:42:47	gibi	o/
16:42:52	gibi	basically the same as last week
16:43:06	gibi	* please look at the topic in the PTG etherpad
16:43:43	gibi	* you can review things on the eventlet-removal topic, we have couple of smallish green patches on the unittest side
16:44:17	gibi	+ I finally get back to the rally job patch and iterating on it https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960130
16:44:21	gibi	that is is
16:44:23	gibi	it
16:45:42	Uggla	gibi, fyi I gave some ad about eventlet testing at the end of my presentation.
16:46:10	Uggla	Explaining that if folks want to test it that would be hihgly appreciated.
16:46:21	gibi	Uggla: thanks
16:46:30	gibi	was there any further question about it?
16:46:59	Uggla	yes, just one about the overall plan : If all the services will remove eventlet.
16:47:38	Uggla	and I explained quickly our approach for nova. 2 steps phases and current services "migrated"
16:48:11	Uggla	Then I got a question about python 3.14 support for us, from Canonical guys.
16:48:39	gibi	yeah I have no comment on 3.14. That is too far ahead
16:49:02	gibi	I would assume that with GIL mode and threading we will work in 3.14 without issues
16:49:07	Uggla	yep I said that and explain that it will probably happen after eventlet removal.
16:49:14	gibi	the GILles mode is a different beast probably
16:49:56	Uggla	sure, tbh I did not have the time to speak about GIL.
16:50:47	gibi	:)
16:50:51	Uggla	Especially because at the same time I noticed that someone took my bag. Hopefully it was just a mistake, and I managed to find it quickly.
16:51:00	gibi	ohh
16:51:06	gibi	anyhow thanks for the advertisment
16:51:29	Uggla	moving on because we are almost at the top of the hour
16:51:36	Uggla	#topic Open discussion
16:51:45	Uggla	reminder:
16:51:46	Uggla	(Uggla) Pool for the new schedule of upstream meeting: https://framadate.org/ao12zK6wR3K3nfbF
16:51:55	Uggla	#linkAnnonce : https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/H5PBFZJ4X3TSGSC4YF6E4WTV43CBOVS6/
16:52:04	Uggla	the trend seems to go on Monday
16:52:27	nicolairuckel	I iterated on my NVRAM patch (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959682) but there's still an open issue regarding the file permissions.
16:53:36	nicolairuckel	Also, I heard that it would be a good idea to bring that up for the PTG as a crossproject topic, so I'll add that to the etherpad later.
16:54:02	Uggla	nicolairuckel, yep please do
16:54:35	Uggla	crossproject with cinder ?
16:55:09	nicolairuckel	I think so
16:55:25	nicolairuckel	I was told it was related to image encryption
16:55:43	Uggla	more glance though
16:55:50	nicolairuckel	tbh, I'm still quite new to openstack so I'm not *that* sure about the scope yet.
16:56:32	Uggla	ok I'll look at that and try to find the appropriate slot.
16:56:38	nicolairuckel	thank you
16:56:40	Uggla	Any expected duratio, ?
16:56:46	Uggla	*duration
16:56:48	sean-k-mooney	gibi: supporting freethread pytyon is defeintly a post eventlet topic.
16:57:44	Uggla	r-taketn I think you would like to share something, aren't you ?
16:57:55	sean-k-mooney	nicolairuckel: the nvram patch is not related to the image encyption work
16:57:57	nicolairuckel	I'm not sure yet. I'll think about that and add it to the Etherpad if that's okay.
16:57:58	r-taketn	yes. Thank you. I have one quick request. Could someone please check this spec and give some feedbacks later?
16:58:10	r-taketn	#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/962578
16:58:19	r-taketn	I have proposed this spec for generalizing sev/sev-es code to add new confidential computing from other architecture(Intel TDX,Arm CCA)
16:58:25	r-taketn	I have re-written the spec. In particular, I detailed the problem description about current sev/sev-es code.
16:58:25	sean-k-mooney	but we shoudl dicuss the imange encyption work in the nova/glance slot.
16:58:42	sean-k-mooney	r-taketn: i have not had time yet but ill tray and look at that again
16:58:56	r-taketn	I have this topic on ptg slot, but I'd appreciate if you give some feedbacks in advance
16:59:04	r-taketn	sean-k-mooney: Thank you
16:59:27	sean-k-mooney	the real goal of this work is to enabel you to supprot arm CCA and SEV-SNP more eaisly in the future right
16:59:44	r-taketn	yes
16:59:51	sean-k-mooney	this is prepareing the memory encyption logic to be more generic and extensible in advance of the hardware
17:01:10	sean-k-mooney	r-taketn: ok small comment initally . most of tghe work items shoudl be experses in pros in the proposed changes section and the work ites shoudl be a very short list of the thing that need to be deliverd
17:01:59	gibi	sorry folks I have to drop.
17:02:01	gibi	I will read back
17:02:14	Uggla	gibi no pb about to close
17:02:16	sean-k-mooney	r-taketn: so if you look at the sev-es spec form last cycle https://github.com/openstack/nova-specs/blob/master/specs/2025.2/implemented/amd-sev-es-libvirt-support.rst?plain=1#L287
17:02:34	Uggla	Anything else you'd like to share ?
17:02:39	sean-k-mooney	you can see more or less what is expected for that section vs proposed changes https://github.com/openstack/nova-specs/blob/master/specs/2025.2/implemented/amd-sev-es-libvirt-support.rst?plain=1#L50
17:03:18	sean-k-mooney	r-taketn: the sev spec is a good example fo what level of detail ectra is expected that you can use as a guide
17:03:18	r-taketn	sean-k-mooney: ok. sorry. I'll fix it.
17:03:19	bauzas	we're overtime :)
17:03:59	Uggla	bauzas atm reasonable overtime

Earlier   Later