| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2025-10-19 | |||
| 10:29:53 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: rpc: Mark attributes as private https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/792803 | |
| 10:37:39 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: api-ref: Fix server topology API docs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952274 | |
| 10:38:33 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: db: Remove legacy tables from main DB https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/889087 | |
| 10:38:33 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: db: Remove legacy placement tables from API DB https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/889086 | |
| 10:38:34 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: db: Remove legacy columns from main DB https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/889088 | |
| 10:38:47 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: conf: Deprecate AggregateImagePropertiesIsolation opts https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/783396 | |
| 13:23:58 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Remove unused 'shutdown_terminate' flag https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/773156 | |
| 14:32:03 | opendevreview | Nicolai Ruckel proposed openstack/nova master: Preserve UEFI NVRAM variable store https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959682 | |
| 14:33:49 | opendevreview | Nicolai Ruckel proposed openstack/nova master: Preserve UEFI NVRAM variable store https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959682 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2025-10-20 | |||
| 08:15:51 | gibi | hi fellow cores, I have two small and simple patches as follow ups from the placement perf optimization bug | |
| 08:16:15 | gibi | * nova doc patch pointing to the new placement tuning options https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963281 | |
| 08:17:02 | gibi | * nova func test change that runs our pci in placement tests with the new placement tunings enabled https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963036 | |
| 09:19:33 | nicolairuckel | could not convert string to float: b'8.5e-'" | |
| 09:19:33 | nicolairuckel | Can someone explain the py3 tests to me? Tox says they fail but I can't make sense of the error message: "py3: commands[0]> stestr run | |
| 09:27:53 | gibi | nicolairuckel: could you post a bit more context to https://paste.opendev.org/ or point to a gerrit review where you have this issue? | |
| 09:30:18 | ierdem__ | hi, database.connection parameter points to cell0 by default in nova.conf when deployed with kolla-ansible. Should not it point to nova db instead of cell0? I use single cell architecture (cell v2). Should I remove cell0 and set it to nova db? | |
| 09:40:43 | nicolairuckel | gibi: This is the Gerrit review although there another pipeline fails: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959682 | |
| 11:03:48 | gibi | nicolairuckel: I only see nova-multi-cell failing there. Which job you get the above error from? | |
| 11:11:22 | nicolairuckel | The error above was from locally running `tox -e py3` (or just `tox` of course). | |
| 11:24:49 | gibi | that feels like something in your local env as the unit test CI job passed on that review. | |
| 11:44:46 | nicolairuckel | I guess then I have to look into nova-multi-cell instead. :D | |
| 11:44:48 | nicolairuckel | thanks | |
| 11:54:23 | frickler | nicolairuckel: for the local failure, I would guess at some localization issue. can you try running with LANG=C.utf8? otherwise please show more context of the error on paste | |
| 12:01:22 | nicolairuckel | frickler: this is the full output https://paste.opendev.org/show/bbTfG5OFaJ2XvXSLyFIN/ | |
| 12:18:46 | frickler | nicolairuckel: hmm, that looks like a previous run may have produced broken data? try removing (or move away at first only) the .stestr directory | |
| 12:55:19 | gibi | yeah that looks like the stestr repository on disk is corrupt | |
| 13:45:31 | nicolairuckel | frickler: that soled it, thanks | |
| 13:46:28 | opendevreview | Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: nova-conductor puts instance in error state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961774 | |
| 14:28:39 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.2: nova-conductor puts instance in error state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961951 | |
| 15:01:10 | jlejeune | gibi: hello, as requested I've rebased my change over parent change: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961774 Can you have a look please ? | |
| 15:03:23 | gibi | jlejeune: done :) | |
| 15:14:49 | jlejeune | thanks :) | |
| 17:53:06 | opendevreview | Nicolai Ruckel proposed openstack/nova master: Preserve UEFI NVRAM variable store https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959682 | |
| 20:06:26 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `host` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941483 | |
| 20:06:26 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add vtpm_secret_(uuid|value) to LibvirtLiveMigrateData https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952628 | |
| 20:06:27 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support instances with `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942021 | |
| 20:06:27 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: bump service version and require it for live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962051 | |
| 20:06:28 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: test live migration between hosts with different security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952629 | |
| 20:06:28 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925771 | |
| 20:06:29 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add late check for supported TPM secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956975 | |
| 20:06:30 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add documentation and reno for live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962889 | |
| 20:06:30 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: opt-in to new TPM secret security via resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962052 | |
| 20:06:32 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM vtpm tempest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957477 | |
| 20:42:22 | opendevreview | Nicolai Ruckel proposed openstack/nova master: Preserve UEFI NVRAM variable store https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959682 | |
| 22:27:43 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Dump conf to debug log later in the WSGI app pipeline https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963619 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2025-10-21 | |||
| 06:18:24 | opendevreview | Ahmad Hassan proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Offline VM migration using https https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/964444 | |
| 06:33:33 | opendevreview | Ahmad Hassan proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Offline VM migration using https https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/964444 | |
| 06:55:17 | opendevreview | Ahmad Hassan proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Offline VM migration using https https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/964444 | |
| 07:32:35 | jlejeune | elodilles: hello, as requested, now my change has been merged on 2025.2, is it ok for you for moving on 2025.1 ? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961774 | |
| 07:39:05 | elodilles | jlejeune: sorry, i was at OpenStack Summit in the past days and was traveling yesterday, but yepp, i'm adding the patch to my TODO list ;) | |
| 07:44:38 | gibi | elodilles: welcome back o/ | |
| 07:45:24 | gibi | hope you did not get croissant overdose (/me jealous) | |
| 07:55:33 | elodilles | gibi: thanks :] we ate just enough croissant ;) | |
| 08:15:39 | jlejeune | elodilles: I was also there, I missed you... | |
| 08:17:06 | elodilles | jlejeune: good to hear that you were there! maybe next time we'll meet :] | |
| 08:18:02 | elodilles | i hope you had great talks with other openstackers! | |
| 08:19:16 | jlejeune | yeah, and I saw bauzas, Uggla and sean-k-mooney[m] :) | |
| 08:19:41 | Uggla | jlejeune o/ | |
| 08:19:57 | jlejeune | hi :) | |
| 08:20:53 | Uggla | jlejeune I hope you had a nice trip back to britany. | |
| 08:22:21 | jlejeune | a bit long by train but it was ok and you ? | |
| 08:26:40 | Uggla | Not bad except my train was delayed 15mn because someone forgot a bagage inside the previous one. | |
| 08:27:53 | jlejeune | classic... | |
| 08:29:41 | bauzas | my own train line was blocked in between Lyon and Grenoble, the train I was in went back to Lyon and then I had to use another train to Grenoble :) | |
| 08:31:15 | jlejeune | :/ | |
| 08:34:40 | bauzas | well, I'm used to it :) I had the exact same issue last time for the OpenInfra Paris Day in Palaiseau as well, that's why I took a stayover this time on Sunday just to make sure I couldn't have this issue around 11pm :) | |
| 08:36:39 | jlejeune | so, I hope for the next summit in Paris it won't be there anymore :) | |
| 08:38:58 | bauzas | long story short, easier to travel by flight | |
| 09:14:41 | jlejeune | thanks elodilles :) | |
| 09:15:43 | elodilles | np! thanks too o/ | |
| 09:19:57 | jlejeune | and if you have time, I would really appreciate that my topics (bug-2044235 and bug/2085135) moved forward until 2024.1 before that release is set to 'unmaintained' :) | |
| 09:32:37 | elodilles | jlejeune: i'm planning to review all stable patches that are ready to merge, but on the other hand we are very late already with the final stable release of 2024.1 Caracal, so I don't think we have time to merge there any more patches :/ | |
| 09:33:09 | elodilles | jlejeune: note that bug fixes can land to unmaintained/2024.1 after the transition | |
| 09:34:05 | elodilles | jlejeune: though i understand that it is less comfortable for consumers as the releases have to be cut downstream by themselves from unmaintained/2024.1 branches | |
| 09:40:02 | jlejeune | ok understandable, so I would need to repush my change on new unmaintained/2024.1 branch later and abandon my changes over stable/2024.1 branches | |
| 09:58:15 | elodilles | jlejeune: yes, that will be the way forward | |
| 10:05:11 | jlejeune | ok got it | |
| 10:39:46 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Adds regression test for bug LP#2044235 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961601 | |
| 10:43:18 | gibi | dansmith: could you add back your +2 on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/937275 ? The devstack dependency landed finally so we can good to go and test the placement optimization stuff in nova-next permanently | |
| 10:43:32 | gibi | s/can/are/ | |
| 10:44:27 | gibi | and if you are around that then there is a similar patch that enables such optimizations in some of the nova func tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963036 | |
| 10:44:53 | gibi | cores, there is a super easy doc patch that needs a second +2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963281 | |
| 10:54:18 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: o/ still gong thorugh my email but ill take a look in a bit, i think i looked at the docs patch before while traveling but didn leave a review | |
| 11:16:34 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.1: nova-conductor puts instance in error state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961774 | |
| 11:17:51 | opendevreview | Nicolai Ruckel proposed openstack/nova master: Preserve UEFI NVRAM variable store https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959682 | |
| 11:20:56 | nicolairuckel | sean-k-mooney: I changed my patch according to your comments. The patch is now a lot smaller but it still only works if I set the permissions manually. I was hoping that just letting libvirt do its thing would solve that. :/ | |
| 11:22:28 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Rally job for eventlet-removal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960130 | |
| 11:27:31 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Rally job for eventlet-removal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960130 | |
| 11:32:05 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Rally job for eventlet-removal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960130 | |
| 11:37:34 | sean-k-mooney | nicolairuckel: thats odd. i guess we can try and replicate the behvior and see if we can avoid this but. did you test this with a new vm? is it possibel that you previous attempet left the files in a non standard state? | |
| 11:43:11 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: by the way the numa in placemetn talk was very good. they also appremntly foudn hand fixed the placment scaling issue in there work | |
| 11:43:13 | nicolairuckel | Ah, that could be the problem. | |
| 11:43:20 | nicolairuckel | I didn't create a new VM. | |
| 11:55:16 | opendevreview | Ahmad Hassan proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Offline VM migration using https https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/964444 | |
| 11:58:41 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: [doc]PCI in Placement tuning https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963281 | |
| 12:11:46 | opendevreview | Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: nova-conductor puts instance in error state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961775 | |
| 12:16:56 | opendevreview | Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: Update start_service() function in test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963848 | |
| 12:16:57 | opendevreview | Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: Adds regression test for bug LP#2085135 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963849 | |
| 12:16:58 | opendevreview | Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: Reset the mapped field of nodes at service deletion https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963850 | |
| 12:36:45 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I looked at their slidset. What I decoded form there is that they found something similar but maybe not exactly the same as they mentioned same_subtree which was not part of our problem or our solution for the PCI case | |