| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2025-10-14 | |||
| 16:05:27 | Uggla | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:05:36 | Uggla | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:05:53 | Uggla | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:06:05 | Uggla | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:06:11 | Uggla | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | |
| 16:06:20 | Uggla | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&branch=stable%2F*&branch=master&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:06:36 | Uggla | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:06:42 | Uggla | #info Please try to provide a meaningful comment when you recheck | |
| 16:06:56 | Uggla | shame on me I have not looked at the gate. | |
| 16:07:19 | Uggla | Have you seen something bad with it ? | |
| 16:08:38 | bauzas | I saw some failures but the ones I was knowing | |
| 16:08:55 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: volume issue and kernel panics? | |
| 16:09:12 | bauzas | ssh timeout at least | |
| 16:09:15 | gibi | I saw guest ssh timeouts in couple of times in different test cases but did not dig deep | |
| 16:09:16 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:09:30 | bauzas | eg. https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/83dac09bed7947dead180357cb14d357 | |
| 16:09:31 | gibi | ohh we have matching observation | |
| 16:09:53 | sean-k-mooney | that ocationaly happens but if its increaseing we may need to debug | |
| 16:10:09 | bauzas | we'll see with my rechecks :) | |
| 16:10:42 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: was the issue with some vms geting multipel port fixed do you know? | |
| 16:11:00 | sean-k-mooney | im not saying that related but just wondering if you new | |
| 16:11:01 | gibi | I don't recall the issue | |
| 16:11:03 | sean-k-mooney | *knew | |
| 16:11:09 | sean-k-mooney | ack no worries | |
| 16:11:26 | gibi | anyhow or the guest ssh I will keep an eye on it | |
| 16:11:34 | sean-k-mooney | one of the provider was allcoating mulitple port to nodpoolvms which sometimes broke the network connectivy on the computes | |
| 16:11:41 | sean-k-mooney | i assume that has been fixed | |
| 16:11:53 | gibi | ohh now I recall it. I haven't see that appearing recently | |
| 16:11:53 | sean-k-mooney | it wasnt a nova problem | |
| 16:11:58 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:12:23 | sean-k-mooney | that job only has one port as expected so as i said not related | |
| 16:13:50 | sean-k-mooney | we can proably move on unless anyone else has somethign | |
| 16:14:10 | gibi | jepp, lets move on | |
| 16:14:17 | Uggla | I agree | |
| 16:14:25 | Uggla | Skipping next point, as I want gmaan to come back smoothly. | |
| 16:14:35 | Uggla | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:14:46 | Uggla | #link https://releases.openstack.org/gazpacho/schedule.html | |
| 16:14:57 | Uggla | #info PTG etherpad for 2026.1 is available: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.1-ptg | |
| 16:15:11 | Uggla | #info Please add the topics you would like to discuss in the above document. | |
| 16:15:21 | Uggla | #info PTG meetings (to be confirmed) will happen room grizzly 15:00UTC -> 17:00UTC from Tuesday to Friday | |
| 16:16:03 | Uggla | Note, I'm currently crafting the PTG etherpad defining the timeslots. | |
| 16:16:11 | gibi | Uggla: 15-16, 16-17, or also 17-18? | |
| 16:16:36 | gibi | I mean the last starting time is 17UTC or the finish time is 17 UTC? | |
| 16:16:39 | sean-k-mooney | yep ^ its an inclusive range of startimes | |
| 16:16:52 | sean-k-mooney | so its really 15:00-18:00 | |
| 16:17:05 | gibi | ack, so 3 hours for 4 days | |
| 16:17:05 | Uggla | yep 15:00 --> 18:00 CET | |
| 16:17:11 | gibi | works forme | |
| 16:17:15 | sean-k-mooney | based on https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html | |
| 16:17:34 | Uggla | yep as usual, starting (Tue) | |
| 16:17:52 | sean-k-mooney | well you need to adjust that actully | |
| 16:18:03 | sean-k-mooney | it curernly show all 5 hours not just the fine 3 in the slot | |
| 16:20:01 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney yes I reserved a bit larger at the first shot | |
| 16:21:29 | bauzas | at least the slots are booked | |
| 16:21:39 | Uggla | yep :) | |
| 16:21:53 | bauzas | if we need to continue to discuss, we can book another slot... or we can unbook another one :) | |
| 16:22:28 | Uggla | I'will arrange that in the coming days | |
| 16:24:57 | Uggla | ok moving on | |
| 16:25:03 | Uggla | #topic OpenAPI | |
| 16:25:13 | Uggla | #link: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22openapi%22+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement)+-status:merged+-status:abandoned | |
| 16:25:20 | Uggla | #info still 28 remaining atm. | |
| 16:25:43 | Uggla | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:26:12 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 16:26:20 | elodilles | #info stable branches (stable/2025.* and stable/2024.*) seem to be in OK state | |
| 16:26:26 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:26:40 | elodilles | #info 2024.1 Caracal (stable/2024.1) moves to Unmaintained at the end of next week - final stable Caracal release should be proposed and merged ASAP | |
| 16:26:56 | elodilles | #info elod will propose the release patches tomorrow | |
| 16:27:06 | elodilles | and a question: | |
| 16:27:13 | elodilles | does anyone have any important patch to land to stable/2024.1 before we release? (list of open patches: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-caracal-eom ) | |
| 16:27:30 | Uggla | - | |
| 16:27:36 | gibi | - | |
| 16:27:40 | elodilles | thanks for the reviews so far, btw! | |
| 16:28:37 | elodilles | Uggla: gibi: ACK, then i'll propose the review patches right away (flamingo, epoxy, dalmatian, caracal) | |
| 16:28:51 | elodilles | (though caracal is the most important for now o:)) | |
| 16:29:07 | elodilles | and that's all from me about stable for now | |
| 16:29:10 | gibi | poor caracal, I will miss it | |
| 16:29:15 | Uggla | rip caracal | |
| 16:29:15 | elodilles | :] | |
| 16:29:37 | elodilles | you don't have to dig it, it won't go to EOL, just Unmaintained o:) | |
| 16:29:55 | elodilles | so people can still backport bug fixes to unmaintained/2024.1 ;) | |
| 16:30:01 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: as an aside there is only ment to be one unmtianed slurp release at a time | |
| 16:30:14 | gibi | yeah basicaly kicked out to the streets nice elodilles :) | |
| 16:30:23 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: im fine with not enforce that as long as you still care about the rest | |
| 16:30:49 | sean-k-mooney | but in thory 2023.1 is ment to go eol when 2024.1 moves to unmainted | |
| 16:30:49 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: in case there is no volunteer to keep open unmaintained/2023.1 | |
| 16:31:09 | gmaan | antelope is still unmaintained, any plan to move to EOL before caracal moving to unmaintained ? | |
| 16:31:18 | gmaan | sean-k-mooney: yeah | |
| 16:31:38 | sean-k-mooney | so i think elodilles is still interested in keeping it alive | |
| 16:31:44 | gmaan | because based on that we need to see if we can continue running grenade job on unmaintained caracal | |
| 16:31:46 | sean-k-mooney | so as long as the gates are green that is fine | |
| 16:32:10 | sean-k-mooney | well grenade is not ment to test upgrades form unmaintained | |
| 16:32:46 | gmaan | as long as it run green then no harm to test it but if previous base relaese is not maintained or broken then yes we can remove | |
| 16:32:48 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: yes, i want to step up as a volunteer to keep it open | |
| 16:33:04 | sean-k-mooney | or rahter the oldest stable is not ment to test upgrading form unmaintaiend but you coudl run it your self i guess | |
| 16:34:53 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: yes, the oldest stable is officially not supported, so can be disabled, though if it works then i'd rather ask for keeping it, and also help maintaining it as long as it possible | |
| 16:35:24 | sean-k-mooney | well the counter point to that | |
| 16:35:38 | sean-k-mooney | is we want to evntually be able to remove old disto images and mirrors | |
| 16:36:11 | sean-k-mooney | so im not objecting to keepign it for a release or two bvut we shoudl nto keep it indefinetly | |
| 16:36:18 | elodilles | of course if it blocks the gate then it can be removed (though i'd rather set it as non-voting if not completely unfixable or broken forever) | |
| 16:36:49 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: +1 | |