| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2025-09-09 | |||
| 16:21:49 | elodilles | \o/ | |
| 16:22:54 | Uggla | elodilles, I think only the prelude is missing from a "process" point of view. | |
| 16:23:13 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Select appropriate image for stateless firmware https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959988 | |
| 16:23:26 | elodilles | Uggla: yes, i think that's correct | |
| 16:23:40 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Select appropriate firmware for stateless firmware https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959988 | |
| 16:23:42 | elodilles | as cycle highlights have merged | |
| 16:23:50 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: you proposed that? last week corect or whas that the cycle highlights | |
| 16:23:53 | Uggla | I guess we might still land some bugs too. | |
| 16:24:23 | elodilles | Uggla: before RC1? | |
| 16:24:30 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959188 | |
| 16:25:20 | elodilles | Uggla: because in that case please add a -1 to the RC1 patch so that the release team will wait for an update there | |
| 16:25:52 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney cycle highlights patch was merged, but the prelude is just a "copy" of the highlights. | |
| 16:26:38 | Uggla | elodilles, I will do it, we discussed a patch I need to check | |
| 16:26:59 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Ignore unsupported firmware architectures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959985 | |
| 16:27:01 | elodilles | ACK, thanks o/ | |
| 16:27:03 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney, not sure I answered you question.. | |
| 16:27:16 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: its fine i foudn the review | |
| 16:27:26 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney thx | |
| 16:27:32 | sean-k-mooney | i see bauzas has a -1 | |
| 16:27:34 | Uggla | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:27:36 | sean-k-mooney | but i have not looked at why | |
| 16:27:45 | fwiesel | #info fwiesel back from PTO | |
| 16:27:58 | Uggla | fwiesel anything you want to discuss ? | |
| 16:28:09 | fwiesel | That's it from my side. Didn't had the time yet to look into anything except my backlog of e-mails. | |
| 16:28:39 | fwiesel | Uggla: So, back to you | |
| 16:28:40 | Uggla | fwiesel, thx, I just hope you pto were good. ;) | |
| 16:29:12 | Uggla | #topic Gibi's news about eventlet removal. | |
| 16:29:20 | Uggla | #link Blog: https://gibizer.github.io/categories/eventlet/ | |
| 16:29:23 | gibi | no news | |
| 16:29:37 | gibi | or rather no actionable new | |
| 16:29:39 | gibi | news | |
| 16:29:45 | gibi | I'm waiting for master to open for G | |
| 16:30:01 | Uggla | 👍 | |
| 16:30:09 | gibi | in the background I'm brewing a rally job that might be able to compare the performance of nova between eventlet and threading | |
| 16:30:09 | dansmith | gibi: I was trying to get my s-g patch set revised yesterday | |
| 16:30:17 | dansmith | the tooling was making that hard, but I'm hoping to be able to get that up soon in G | |
| 16:30:29 | gibi | dansmith: cool. I will review when it is up | |
| 16:31:02 | gibi | that is it from me | |
| 16:31:32 | Uggla | thx gibi | |
| 16:31:41 | Uggla | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:32:09 | Uggla | I know bauzas wants to discuss about open infra topic. | |
| 16:32:16 | Uggla | bauzas please go ahead. | |
| 16:33:05 | bauzas | nothing important, this was a question whether we would want Nova presence at the OIF Summit pavilion https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/MM4OJO5CCC4GHMYUN3OJBDHTSZNB32H2/ | |
| 16:35:14 | gibi | I cannot be there | |
| 16:35:43 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/osc-placement stable/2025.2: [CI] Drop unsupported py39 based functional job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/959874 | |
| 16:36:37 | Uggla | bauzas, I don't manage to open the link is it something we could do ? | |
| 16:36:59 | stephenfin | Uggla: The OpenInfra Summit 2025 will host an Open Source Pavilion booth space where open source projects can book an hour or two to showcase their work, engage with attendees, and share updates on their latest developments at the Summit. If you are interested in taking advantage of this opportunity for your project please fill out this form [0] and the event planners will get back to you with scheduling details. | |
| 16:37:00 | bauzas | gibi: I'll be there, my question was whether you were wanting me to represent the Nova project | |
| 16:37:04 | stephenfin | That's the bulk of it | |
| 16:37:14 | stephenfin | (It took ages to load for me too) | |
| 16:37:16 | gibi | bauzas: ahh I see | |
| 16:37:32 | stephenfin | bauzas: What are you thinking? Something AI/GPU-flavoured? | |
| 16:37:39 | gibi | bauzas: showing the latest updates might make sense | |
| 16:37:41 | Uggla | thx stephenfin | |
| 16:37:45 | bauzas | previously we were providing project updates | |
| 16:37:54 | gibi | yeah someting like that^^ | |
| 16:37:56 | bauzas | looks like the pavilion is the new form | |
| 16:38:08 | stephenfin | Ah, nice one | |
| 16:38:23 | bauzas | cool, then that's settled | |
| 16:38:37 | bauzas | and Uggla, will you be at the summit ? | |
| 16:38:46 | Uggla | yes | |
| 16:38:47 | bauzas | fancy co-presenting ? | |
| 16:38:58 | gibi | bauzas: if you could also mention to the folks that we are removing eventlet and ask them to try threading mode and report any issues that would be awesomej | |
| 16:39:16 | dansmith | gibi: yeah, definitely | |
| 16:39:16 | bauzas | gibi: that will certainly be part of the project updates :) | |
| 16:39:24 | Uggla | gibi 👍 | |
| 16:39:35 | dansmith | definitely try to get some people on board for testing and providing feedback | |
| 16:39:43 | Uggla | bauzas, will be happy to copresent with you | |
| 16:40:11 | bauzas | cool, settled as I said | |
| 16:40:12 | gibi | ahh I see it will be in France hence we will have nice representation | |
| 16:40:14 | bauzas | moving on ? | |
| 16:41:04 | Uggla | anything else you want to discuss ? | |
| 16:41:20 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:41:22 | gibi | pyroute2 | |
| 16:41:39 | Uggla | sure, sorry I was about to forget about it! Thx | |
| 16:42:08 | gibi | so the previous issue about async loops are reproduces with 0.9.4 as well | |
| 16:42:27 | gibi | so the supposed fix wasn't a real fix, it probably decreased the chance of happening | |
| 16:42:54 | gibi | I pinged the release channel asking if we can revert back to 0.8.x so late in the cycle. I got no answers yet | |
| 16:43:19 | tkajinam | you mean requirements channel ? | |
| 16:44:01 | gibi | I pinged the release channel I'm not aware of having a separate channel to requirements | |
| 16:44:14 | elodilles | #openstack-requirements o:) | |
| 16:44:20 | tkajinam | yeah | |
| 16:44:26 | elodilles | but i think i pinged the release folks | |
| 16:44:26 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: is there a workaround | |
| 16:44:31 | elodilles | on release channel | |
| 16:44:32 | sean-k-mooney | beyond downgrading | |
| 16:44:46 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: try again and it will succeed | |
| 16:44:56 | elodilles | (yeah, i did ping them) | |
| 16:45:02 | gibi | the issue happens pretty infrequently | |
| 16:45:34 | gibi | https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-vif/+bug/2109396 | |
| 16:45:37 | sean-k-mooney | i guess you could also use the legacy vsctl driver if we have not deleted that yet | |
| 16:45:40 | gibi | this is the bug it has the links | |
| 16:45:55 | sean-k-mooney | oh actully no | |
| 16:46:25 | gibi | I also don't have clear answer if we can revert the requirements | |
| 16:46:28 | gibi | later on stable | |
| 16:46:47 | tkajinam | though I've been struggling to get any feedback there. Maybe sending an email to ml would be a good option, hoping that Tony and Sean may be reading it. though I know release team has full +2 access to requirements, too. | |
| 16:47:03 | tkajinam | I mean I've been struggling to get any feedback in #openstack-requirements | |
| 16:47:25 | gibi | I will drop a mail to the ML | |
| 16:47:26 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: i guess the reals concern with the cap | |
| 16:47:32 | tkajinam | frickler has been the only one there for some time (though he is not a req team member but a release team member) | |