| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2025-03-25 | |||
| 16:10:59 | Uggla | #topic PTG planning | |
| 16:11:06 | Uggla | #info Next PTG will be held on Apr 7-11 | |
| 16:11:11 | Uggla | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.2-ptg | |
| 16:11:45 | Uggla | Please add the topics you want to discuss in the pad. | |
| 16:12:24 | Uggla | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:12:30 | Uggla | #info stable gates seem to be healthy | |
| 16:12:41 | Uggla | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:13:03 | Uggla | elodilles, if you want to add something please go ahead. | |
| 16:13:14 | elodilles | yepp, one thing maybe: | |
| 16:13:17 | elodilles | #info stable/2025.1 branch was cut for nova as well last week | |
| 16:13:24 | elodilles | that's all from me | |
| 16:13:36 | elodilles | back to you Uggla | |
| 16:13:53 | Uggla | thanks elodilles | |
| 16:13:58 | elodilles | np | |
| 16:15:22 | Uggla | I skip the vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights as fwiesel is ooo this week. | |
| 16:15:54 | Uggla | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:16:16 | Uggla | anything to discuss ? | |
| 16:16:47 | keerthivasan86[m] | Just quick question why https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1766387 ( why tx_queue_size is not getting implemented in vhost , any specific reason ) | |
| 16:16:52 | gibi | just to double check | |
| 16:17:14 | gibi | we do not track anything for RC2 | |
| 16:17:17 | sean-k-mooney | keerthivasan86[m]: if i recall corectly its only supproted in vhost-user but not kernel vhost | |
| 16:17:19 | gibi | is it corr4ect? | |
| 16:18:02 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: not that im aware of | |
| 16:19:04 | keerthivasan86[m] | sean-k-mooney: As part of vhost-net able to see rx_queue_size is implemented at vm level as well. It works for vhost-net as well | |
| 16:19:10 | Uggla | gibi, not yet. Do you think about FUP for vfio pci migration ? | |
| 16:19:43 | sean-k-mooney | keerthivasan86[m]: when it was implented there was a specific reaosn why we didnt enabled it | |
| 16:20:12 | gibi | Uggla: it is going to land on master probably today. I'm not advocating for pusing for an RC2 tomorrow just for that single thing. (it is not an Epoxy regression) | |
| 16:20:25 | sean-k-mooney | keerthivasan86[m]: that may haved chnted but the current code was becasue of how qemu/libivrt worked at the time we implemtned https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/rocky/implemented/libvirt-virtio-set-queue-sizes.html | |
| 16:21:30 | keerthivasan86[m] | sean-k-mooney: if you are ok , can i work on to implement tx_queue_size for vhost-net ? | |
| 16:22:11 | sean-k-mooney | sure but we need to know when it started to be supported, and we need to take accound of upgrades | |
| 16:22:13 | dansmith | the only PCI FUP that should be backported is doc stuff right? | |
| 16:22:19 | dansmith | Uggla: gibi ^ | |
| 16:22:31 | dansmith | the test and cleanliness things should not be backported, IMHO, but definitely not hold up rc2 | |
| 16:22:44 | Uggla | gibi, this is what I have in mind as well. Waiting for GA as this is the only thing. | |
| 16:22:48 | sean-k-mooney | keerthivasan86[m]: so im not sure fi it needs a spec or if a specless blueprint woudl be enough. | |
| 16:23:06 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: the doc is the one that really should be | |
| 16:23:15 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: some of the others are nice to have but not required | |
| 16:23:39 | dansmith | backporting test cleanliness doesn't make sense to me unless it's needed for an actual fix | |
| 16:23:57 | gibi | dansmith: for RC2 prespective only https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/944105/5 in interesting | |
| 16:24:04 | sean-k-mooney | right the doc i could see for an RC2 but at this point i woudl just wait and do that after the release | |
| 16:24:27 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: oh right to make numa work | |
| 16:24:40 | gibi | dansmith: but as I wrote above it is not an E regression and will only land today | |
| 16:24:43 | dansmith | gibi: ah I missed that one.. that's not really a regression i t seems, but.. | |
| 16:24:49 | dansmith | ack yeah okay | |
| 16:25:00 | gibi | yeah I would not spin an RC2 just for thish | |
| 16:25:10 | gibi | but if there are other things forcing an RC2 ... | |
| 16:25:11 | sean-k-mooney | so we can do a stable release basifcally right after the actual release | |
| 16:25:17 | dansmith | right | |
| 16:25:23 | Uggla | +1 | |
| 16:25:27 | gibi | yeah doing stable backports is the way to go if nothing else forces RC2 | |
| 16:25:27 | sean-k-mooney | so i think RC2 is overkill for any of those | |
| 16:25:44 | sean-k-mooney | sounds like we are all in violent agreement | |
| 16:26:38 | gibi | yepp | |
| 16:26:40 | bauzas | yup | |
| 16:26:46 | bauzas | (sorry, meeting was over) | |
| 16:27:01 | Uggla | bauzas, no still in the meeting | |
| 16:27:17 | bauzas | as a reminder, any new release candidate impacts our distros | |
| 16:27:34 | bauzas | so we definitely only need to provide a RC2 if this is a regression | |
| 16:27:47 | elodilles | (with my release core hat on) anyway, let me know if an RC2 is needed (or not needed) as this week is when we can release a final RC as i said o:) | |
| 16:28:53 | elodilles | (i'll generate final RC patches (where there are merged and unreleased stuff on stable/2025.1) somewhere around 2nd half of the week fwiw) | |
| 16:29:18 | bauzas | ack thanks | |
| 16:29:22 | elodilles | np | |
| 16:30:36 | dansmith | are we done? | |
| 16:30:56 | Uggla | keerthivasan86[m], are the answer of sean ok for you ? | |
| 16:31:29 | Uggla | any other topic ? | |
| 16:31:56 | masahito | question for the ptg topic selection and timeslot | |
| 16:32:29 | Uggla | masahito, the current topic are in the etherpad above. | |
| 16:32:49 | masahito | thank. ah, yes. I added some. | |
| 16:33:06 | Uggla | I think not all of them are available. I know new ones will come. | |
| 16:33:22 | Uggla | Then we will organize the timeslot to discuss all of them. | |
| 16:33:29 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: i assume masahito wanted to ask about when there topics will be scheduled | |
| 16:33:39 | sean-k-mooney | or perhaps suggest when tehy are aviable | |
| 16:33:51 | masahito | my question is the ptg time slot is limited so i don't think the ptg can't cover all topics. so i want to know when and how it's decided. | |
| 16:34:13 | sean-k-mooney | masahito: we dont have many topics currently | |
| 16:34:20 | masahito | s/ptg can't/ptg can/ | |
| 16:34:22 | sean-k-mooney | i woudl be surrprised if we didnt cover them all | |
| 16:34:52 | Uggla | I think for the time slot it will be almost ok next week. | |
| 16:35:04 | keerthivasan86[m] | yes Uggla As sean-k-mooney suggested specless blueprint or fresh blueprint to implement tx_queue_size | |
| 16:35:27 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/placement master: improve test logging and replace psycopg2 with psycopg2-binary https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/945487 | |
| 16:35:35 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: ^ | |
| 16:35:50 | keerthivasan86[m] | can i create fresh blueprint to implement tx_queue_size for vhost-net feature ? | |
| 16:35:55 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: ack | |
| 16:36:00 | Uggla | Masahito, we’ll try to accommodate your schedule so you can join. | |
| 16:36:13 | masahito | i got it for the next week meeting. | |
| 16:36:54 | Uggla | any other topic ? | |
| 16:36:55 | masahito | thanks. I prefer 14:00UTC or later slot because of family reason as it's remote session :) | |
| 16:37:28 | Uggla | masahito, sure I'll keep that in mind. | |
| 16:38:31 | Uggla | looks we can close the meeting | |
| 16:39:22 | Uggla | thanks all | |
| 16:39:27 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-03-25-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:39:27 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-03-25-16.00.txt | |
| 16:39:27 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-03-25-16.00.html | |
| 16:39:27 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Mar 25 16:39:27 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:39:27 | Uggla | #endmeeting | |
| 16:39:41 | elodilles | thanks Uggla o/ | |
| 16:39:48 | masahito | thank you o/ | |
| 16:39:50 | Uggla | elodilles, ty | |
| 16:42:10 | bauzas | Uggla: bravo for your first meeting :) | |
| 16:44:28 | Uggla | bauzas, ty | |
| 16:46:23 | gibi | Uggla: thanks | |