Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-02-17
18:20:18 sean-k-mooney bauzas:... i didn hit reply on my comment this morning
18:20:33 sean-k-mooney but ill check if they are stilll relevent or not
18:21:17 sean-k-mooney sort of but not worth a respin unless your fixing somethign else
18:22:53 sean-k-mooney bauzas: if its after FF then it would be a seperate releae note anyway because the behavior would differ across release
18:23:01 sean-k-mooney but amending it is fine IMO
18:23:26 sean-k-mooney as long as its i nthe same release i think that is preferable
18:23:41 bauzas I need to hardstop now, I'm basically fried
18:23:53 bauzas but I'll look at your comments tomorrow for sure
18:24:19 bauzas and yeah for the reno, it was just a tradeoff : if we merge both, that's simplier than an additional note
18:24:44 bauzas if we can only merge the bottom patch, then I'll respin for not breaking our release notes
18:25:07 sean-k-mooney i think im +2 on the first patch as well but im goign to step away for a sec and ill reivew both properly when i get back and leave +w then to gibi
18:52:05 sean-k-mooney dansmith: i commeted on teh normailzeation for what its worth i think the code is correct
18:54:55 dansmith I don't think the code is wrong as-is, it's just not what I was expecting
18:55:10 dansmith I think it's also not wrong to normalize the actual ratio values
18:55:56 dansmith totally independent of the cross-weigher normalization that happens
18:56:12 sean-k-mooney correct but there is also intra weigher nomralistaion
18:57:05 sean-k-mooney before the corss weigher nomalisation hapens we normaliase the wighet for each whost within a weigher
18:57:25 sean-k-mooney this was added for the disk weigher orgianlly but we did it geneically for all weighers
18:58:50 dansmith um, maybe I'm missing something
18:59:35 dansmith if I set os_distro=5000 then it will score os_distro on the same scale as like disk usage or any other weigher in this situation, no?
18:59:48 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/weights.py#L144-L146 takes all the final restuls for a given wieher and normaises them in a range of -1 to 1
19:00:00 sean-k-mooney no it wont
19:01:02 sean-k-mooney for that host it that was all that was set 5000 would be the result of the wight for tha host
19:01:34 sean-k-mooney then we will get the min/max values fo the weigher and normalise the weighte to the range for 0-1.0
19:01:36 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/weights.py#L144-L146
19:02:16 dansmith okay I didn't think it worked that way, but that's good.. why can't we just use integers for the per-property weights then? Just seems cleaner than floats (as I noted on an earlier patch)
19:02:28 sean-k-mooney we can
19:02:42 sean-k-mooney it does not need to be a flot but it was for the metrics weigher
19:02:54 sean-k-mooney so that you could exprss 0.5
19:03:06 sean-k-mooney if you wanted to make someting half as impronat
19:03:16 sean-k-mooney you can obviouly just invert that and multiple the other value by 2
19:03:44 sean-k-mooney so "to be the same as the metric weigher" is the only reason to allow floats
19:04:03 dansmith yeah, integers would just be better, but it doesn't matter that much
19:04:28 sean-k-mooney it was copied form here https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/weights.py#L144-L146
19:05:00 sean-k-mooney so i dont really have a stong opipion on that point so what ever works for you, gibi and sylvian is fine by me
19:08:36 sean-k-mooney in case you care about hte history of the normalisation change it was done in https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/e5ba8494374a1b049eae257fe05b10c5804049ae but that not really impoant
19:14:47 mikal Morning
19:14:56 sean-k-mooney o/
19:17:38 mikal Apart from people being generally time poor, is there anything blocking the SPICE API changes right now that I should know about? I feel with the tempest test and devstack changes merged we should probably try and merge the matching API microversion sooner rather than later.
19:19:34 sean-k-mooney so https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/940418 is still pending and we are coming up to the non client lib freeze so the followup serise for sound and usb is at risk. i think that an easy review ot land IMO but i dont knwo if melwitt will have time to revisit teh patch or if others will
19:19:42 sean-k-mooney i have not looked at the rest in a few days
19:21:10 mikal I think the API changes are more important as they're the most painful bit to keep rebasing, but I would link to try and land all of them if possible. I've been rebasing these things for over a year now.
19:23:46 melwitt sean-k-mooney: for the os-traits patch I don't have an opinion about since I don't really know anything about that stuff. I asked questions in case it could spark yalls memory whether anything was missing or needed to be changed. so if no one else finds any problem about it I think I can +W with your SME +2 on there
19:26:04 melwitt I will look at the API changes again. it can be more challenging if past comments are not addressed yet and we have to keep going back and forth on that. if that's all squared away and the tempest test is done and passing, that's good and helps a lot
19:28:34 sean-k-mooney ack
19:28:54 sean-k-mooney so on the testing font we have a few related patches
19:29:27 sean-k-mooney i have patches up to move the nova-ovs-hybrid-plug job to debain and enabel spice (including speice testing in tempest)
19:29:50 sean-k-mooney that involes change to nova and devstack and tempest
19:30:29 sean-k-mooney melwitt: mikal split there serise in 2 1 for spice direct, and a second indepently mergable vid series for the usb/soudn devices
19:31:08 sean-k-mooney in the spice serise they have a depends on agains the tepmest change and my ci testing series so that pulls everything toghter and showe it working end to end
19:32:05 melwitt sean-k-mooney: ok cool. my understanding is we are focusing on the spice direct, the first 3 patches
19:32:15 sean-k-mooney so https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924844/36 is the patch that pulls everythign togheter and depend on the rest
19:32:22 sean-k-mooney yes
19:33:18 melwitt right, cool
19:34:34 sean-k-mooney so one thing we might need to do is change the depns on order
19:35:04 sean-k-mooney the devstack and tempest changes have merged
19:35:37 sean-k-mooney so i shoudl proably merge my 2 jobs changes into one and rebase it on mikal's series
19:36:00 sean-k-mooney actuly no
19:36:05 sean-k-mooney it can merge as is
19:36:15 sean-k-mooney in my serise i dont update the regex to enabel the new test
19:36:21 sean-k-mooney that only happens in mikal's
19:36:27 mikal sean-k-mooney: at least one of your patches needs a recheck too I think.
19:36:46 sean-k-mooney i have a pep8 issue
19:36:47 melwitt ack
19:36:55 sean-k-mooney so i need to update mine anyway
19:37:14 sean-k-mooney releasenotes/notes/make-virtio-the-default-spice-video-model-fff5189fa637d4bd.yaml:8: supprot ==> support
19:37:24 sean-k-mooney i have a typo in the release note
19:39:03 sean-k-mooney its in the bottom of my two paches so ill update them both now
19:42:45 sean-k-mooney hum odd that was already fixed
19:43:50 sean-k-mooney ill just rebase them and check again
19:52:46 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Dont deploy n-spice on compute nodes. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940873
19:52:46 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: move nova-ovs-hybrid-plug to deploy with spice and fix qxl default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940835
19:55:35 sean-k-mooney gerrit rejected my rebase as identical
19:55:55 sean-k-mooney so i just reflowed the release note to be less then 80 cols
19:56:08 mikal Oh they typo one? I pushed a fix for that to your review a week or so ago IIRC.
20:04:32 sean-k-mooney ya for some reason pep8 didnt run again?
20:04:36 sean-k-mooney it super odd
20:07:31 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Drop dependency on netifaces https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/931582
20:07:42 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Reproduce bug/2097359 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940603
20:07:49 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Update InstanceNUMACell version after data migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940604
20:45:50 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Update InstanceNUMACell version in more cases https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940953
20:46:02 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Add support for showing image properties in server show response https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/939649
20:46:08 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Disable the heal instance info cache periodic task https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/939476
23:05:16 sean-k-mooney mikal: since https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/939649 was landed we will unfortunlty need to bump the microversion for the spice direct patch
23:19:52 opendevreview Doug Goldstein proposed openstack/nova master: ironic: fix logging of validation errors https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942019
23:26:34 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Add [libvirt]default_tpm_secret_security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940194
23:26:35 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Add [libvirt]supported_tpm_secret_security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940195
23:26:36 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Add hw:tpm_secret_security extra spec validation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940197
23:26:36 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Add hw_tpm_secret_security image property https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940196
23:26:37 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: TPM: support instances with `host` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941795
23:26:37 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Ensure secret security policy for TPM instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941062
23:26:38 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Modify vTPM LM block to block legacy instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941483
23:26:38 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Allow vTPM live migration for `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925771
23:26:39 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: TPM: support instances with `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942021
23:32:43 mikal sean-k-mooney: ummm, that will require a new tempest change as well then. That's very disappointing.
23:33:20 sean-k-mooney ya i really didnt want ot merge that until your patch was in
23:40:31 mikal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/942023 is the tempest renumbering. gmann you'll need to take a look at that one soonish please.
23:41:00 mikal We wont see an end-to-end run though until I get a chance to renumber the nova API changes as well.
23:41:13 sean-k-mooney strictly speakign that should have a depends on against the nova change
23:41:24 sean-k-mooney the tempest changes are only ment to merge after the nova api change

Earlier   Later