| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2024-10-29 | |||
| 16:00:22 | bauzas | anyway, let me start the meeting | |
| 16:00:38 | bauzas | fungi: sorry I was on another meeting, I can provide you the exact email I got | |
| 16:00:46 | bauzas | (after the meeting, of course) | |
| 16:00:53 | bauzas | anyway, starting now | |
| 16:00:57 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:00:57 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:57 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Oct 29 16:00:57 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:57 | bauzas | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:00:59 | bauzas | what's up folks ! | |
| 16:01:11 | bauzas | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting | |
| 16:01:14 | tkajinam | o/ | |
| 16:01:14 | bauzas | who's around ? | |
| 16:01:15 | dansmith | o/ | |
| 16:01:59 | bauzas | let's try to have a very short but productive meeting, since we had the PTG last week | |
| 16:02:45 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:02:54 | bauzas | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:03:01 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:03:16 | bauzas | any important bug you'd like to raise ? | |
| 16:03:55 | bauzas | okay moving on so | |
| 16:04:02 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:04:09 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:04:14 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | |
| 16:04:21 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:04:28 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:04:38 | bauzas | #info Please try to provide meaningful comment when you recheck | |
| 16:04:57 | bauzas | I looked at some changes this week, but I haven't seen any problem so far | |
| 16:05:09 | bauzas | anything people saw on our gate ? | |
| 16:05:52 | Uggla | o/ | |
| 16:06:01 | sean-k-mooney | o/ | |
| 16:06:14 | tkajinam | nothing I'm aware of | |
| 16:06:28 | fwiesel | o/ | |
| 16:06:29 | bauzas | before moving on, I'm still awaiting the results of the periodic checks | |
| 16:06:35 | bauzas | gosh, it takes a while | |
| 16:07:04 | tkajinam | py38 was removed from master u-c so now py38 job may be completely broken in master, but we believe we already bumped the min version of all nova deliverables so no job may still run in py38 for master | |
| 16:07:13 | bauzas | ah, got it, all periodics in green except nova-emulation on 2023.2 stable branch | |
| 16:07:18 | tkajinam | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/925201 | |
| 16:07:20 | tkajinam | just fyi | |
| 16:07:48 | tkajinam | next big event may be switch to noble, I expect | |
| 16:07:55 | bauzas | tkajinam: thanks for the note, I'll mention something about that in the next topic | |
| 16:08:11 | bauzas | tkajinam: when is planned that big change ? | |
| 16:08:45 | tkajinam | I saw gmann started submitting a few patches for it but I've seen a few projects have problems when run in noble so it may take some time | |
| 16:08:47 | sean-k-mooney | it should happen in the next few weeks | |
| 16:09:05 | sean-k-mooney | so ideally before m1 perhaps m2 at the very latest | |
| 16:09:12 | tkajinam | yeah | |
| 16:09:32 | sean-k-mooney | nova-next has been on it since last cycle | |
| 16:09:40 | tkajinam | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/932648 | |
| 16:09:41 | sean-k-mooney | i breifly looked at the docs failure | |
| 16:09:47 | sean-k-mooney | nova is in a pretty good state | |
| 16:10:00 | tkajinam | probably https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22migrate-to-noble%22 is a better link | |
| 16:10:05 | sean-k-mooney | i think we just need to add the right dep for pcr2 to bindep | |
| 16:10:13 | bauzas | yeah I'm not afraid of the noble change in the gate, but I'd like somehow to get noticed when it happens | |
| 16:10:30 | sean-k-mooney | well its for us to review | |
| 16:10:42 | sean-k-mooney | there are two parts | |
| 16:10:49 | sean-k-mooney | one is devstack will change its default nodeset | |
| 16:10:57 | sean-k-mooney | the other is we need to update our in repo jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/932648 | |
| 16:11:00 | sean-k-mooney | does the latter | |
| 16:11:46 | frickler | there's an ML thread on the noble upgrade https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/message/JOMDY26TCW7OX3NXRGOYQCIDXNNJ4E25/ | |
| 16:11:51 | bauzas | ok, I'll cc myself on gmann's patch | |
| 16:11:56 | frickler | I assume gmann will update once ready | |
| 16:12:35 | sean-k-mooney | yep so at the momp[ent the only blocker on teh nova side that im aware of is including the correct package for prce.h | |
| 16:12:42 | sean-k-mooney | in the docs jobs (api ref ectra) | |
| 16:12:58 | frickler | ack, lots of other projects look much worse off | |
| 16:13:04 | bauzas | hence the failure | |
| 16:13:18 | sean-k-mooney | yep so in my devstack i have pcre 2 and 3 and maybe 1 installed | |
| 16:13:32 | sean-k-mooney | we just need to see which one actully provides the correct dep | |
| 16:13:35 | bauzas | ack | |
| 16:13:41 | sean-k-mooney | the packaging of that is a bit weired and may have changed | |
| 16:13:49 | bauzas | I guess we're cool then | |
| 16:13:58 | sean-k-mooney | more or less | |
| 16:14:02 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Refactor obj_make_compatible to reduce complexity https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928590 | |
| 16:14:10 | sean-k-mooney | i think we can just review this as normal | |
| 16:14:17 | sean-k-mooney | and check in each week until merged | |
| 16:15:05 | bauzas | ok, moving on then | |
| 16:15:57 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:16:03 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/epoxy/schedule.html | |
| 16:16:09 | bauzas | #action bauzas to add Epoxy nova deadlines in the schedule | |
| 16:16:41 | bauzas | if you were not present at the PTG, you need to know that we'll have a spec soft freeze by mid-Dec | |
| 16:16:54 | bauzas | plan in advance to write your spec accordingly | |
| 16:17:10 | bauzas | the earlier the better as always | |
| 16:17:24 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:17:30 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.1-status | |
| 16:17:55 | bauzas | I moved some stuff, but I need to do a scan check of all the items in there | |
| 16:18:19 | bauzas | #topic PTG summary | |
| 16:18:27 | bauzas | for those who were not able to attend : | |
| 16:18:36 | bauzas | #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/HZZPADKTWNMBGRSOEMSPLN432DXZYYTL/ | |
| 16:18:52 | bauzas | feel free to raise questions or remarks in that thread | |
| 16:19:05 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:19:18 | bauzas | hah, elodilles_pto is on PTO as the nick says | |
| 16:19:40 | bauzas | let's move on then to the next topic unless someone wants to raise something about stable branches | |
| 16:19:45 | zigo | FYI (about this link): We'd love to have "vTPM live migration" implemented... :P | |
| 16:20:01 | bauzas | zigo: make a wish | |
| 16:20:31 | sean-k-mooney | many woudl and there is at least some hope that it will be doen in epoxy | |
| 16:20:57 | sean-k-mooney | its non trivial however without wekening security | |
| 16:20:58 | bauzas | there is already some code there so the wish wouldn't be too hard to do | |
| 16:21:49 | sean-k-mooney | yes and no the current code is not accpabel as is as it wont work in the general case without custom policy | |
| 16:21:52 | bauzas | zigo: if you really like the case, please review the spec then once it's uploaded | |
| 16:22:05 | sean-k-mooney | but that is why we are goign to have a spec and try and delvier a better generic solution | |
| 16:22:40 | bauzas | zigo: as sean-k-mooney is explaining, we discussed about user bond of trust with admins | |
| 16:22:57 | bauzas | so I'd like your op voice to be shared on that spec | |
| 16:23:49 | bauzas | anyway, let's not derail the meeting into a technical discussion about a specific feature | |