Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2024-07-16
16:25:47 gibi :)
16:26:04 sean-k-mooney but we can likely od that in the next weeek or so
16:26:25 sean-k-mooney i think the last patch to stable/2023.1 landed friday
16:26:36 bauzas #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights
16:26:43 fwiesel #info No updates
16:26:44 bauzas fwiesel: want to say anything ?
16:26:49 bauzas cool with me
16:26:55 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:27:02 bauzas anything from me, anything anyone ?
16:27:16 tkajinam I have one thing
16:27:51 tkajinam I have a few items pending on os-traits change. I wonder if I can ask for an early release (probably right after spec freeze) so that I can start pushing patches early
16:28:04 tkajinam See https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/os-traits+status:open
16:28:39 elodilles +1 for early release o:)
16:28:58 bauzas that's always a good idea (to release os-traits release way earlier than milestone-3)
16:29:06 bauzas ditto with os-vif if required
16:29:41 tkajinam ok, that's nice. :-)
16:30:08 bauzas once the spec is approved, I don't see any reason to hold a os-traits patch
16:30:36 bauzas tkajinam: accordingly, please ping me if you want once your both specs are validated
16:30:47 sean-k-mooney i dont see why not
16:31:10 bauzas I just can't remember the state of both specs :)
16:31:22 bauzas so I'll first look whether they're accepted or not
16:31:54 tkajinam the SEV-ES work still needs spec approval but the other two have specs approved
16:32:14 tkajinam I'll update the status after the meeting
16:32:46 bauzas thanks
16:32:59 bauzas (yeah I remembered about the firmware one)
16:33:15 sean-k-mooney im not sure if we need the es trait
16:33:27 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/os-traits master: Add a new trait for stateless firmware support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/908885
16:33:32 sean-k-mooney didnt we say we would use a seperate resouce class for that
16:33:45 bauzas for SEV-ES ?
16:33:50 sean-k-mooney yep
16:34:03 sean-k-mooney oh no we didnt
16:34:10 sean-k-mooney its the same resouce class
16:34:12 tkajinam sean-k-mooney, we agreed using trait, not resource class to distinguish SEV and SEV-ES, IIUC
16:34:13 sean-k-mooney just with a triat
16:34:18 sean-k-mooney it been a while since i looked
16:34:19 tkajinam yes
16:34:25 sean-k-mooney ya ok
16:34:54 bauzas yeah https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-dalmatian-ptg#L498
16:35:04 bauzas (I was looking at the etherpad)
16:35:24 bauzas we didn't wanted to differentiate all the SEV supports
16:35:37 bauzas s/supports/types
16:35:46 bauzas anything else to discuss ?
16:36:07 sean-k-mooney not on this topic at least not form me
16:36:39 tkajinam nothing else from me
16:41:13 bauzas sorry, I looked at other stuff
16:41:19 bauzas thanks folks
16:41:23 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-07-16-16.00.log.html
16:41:23 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-07-16-16.00.txt
16:41:23 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-07-16-16.00.html
16:41:23 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Jul 16 16:41:23 2024 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:41:23 bauzas #endmeeting
16:41:33 fwiesel thank you too, bye
16:41:35 elodilles thanks o/
16:42:10 tkajinam thanks !
16:43:01 tkajinam bauzas, if you have a moment, could you approve https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-stateless-firmware ? its spec was already merged https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/908297
16:43:10 tkajinam I remember we discussed the missing bp link which was fixed by https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/920612
16:43:26 bauzas tkajinam: as I said, I'll update Launchpad for all approved specs
16:43:49 bauzas I was on PTO last 10 days, so I'll both check the open specs but also the new merged ones
16:44:11 bauzas (and then update the status etherpad for adding series of the accepted specs)
16:44:13 tkajinam ah, ok. I'll recheck it after that "batch update"
16:48:28 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-traits master: Add traits for TPM models https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/909107
19:07:15 melwitt thanks sean-k-mooney and bauzas for the spec reviews 🙏
#openstack-nova - 2024-07-17
02:03:37 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: nova-manage: Add flavor scanning to migrate_to_unified_limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924110
05:04:40 ykarel y
05:06:38 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add config option [quota]strict_unified_limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924025
05:29:30 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add config option [quota]strict_unified_limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924025
07:46:11 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add config option [quota]strict_unified_limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924025
09:46:45 bauzas hmmm, looks like we have a problem with the promote job https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/2024.2/approved/
09:46:48 bauzas frickler: ^
09:47:12 frickler looking
09:47:29 bauzas frickler: https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/nova-specs+status:merged as you can see, we merged more specs
09:47:56 bauzas also, I don't see the new ones in https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/2024.2/
09:50:38 frickler bauzas: yes, noonedeadpunk reported a similar issue yesterday. this may need a zuul fix which is still pending I think
09:52:05 frickler yes, same issue, see https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/6a6f5c3fff4840c29d8f9b23b3a5280a
09:54:56 bauzas frickler: okay, thjank
09:55:00 bauzas thanks*
10:31:33 opendevreview Shu Juan Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Fix the 409 error false alarm for instance resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924318
10:31:36 opendevreview zhou zhong proposed openstack/nova master: nova-manage: modify image properties in request_spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924319
10:32:54 opendevreview zhou zhong proposed openstack/nova master: nova-manage: modify image properties in request_spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924319
11:43:01 opendevreview zhou zhong proposed openstack/nova master: nova-manage: modify image properties in request_spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924319
12:01:37 opendevreview zhou zhong proposed openstack/nova master: nova-manage: modify image properties in request_spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924319
12:05:13 opendevreview zhou zhong proposed openstack/nova master: nova-manage: modify image properties in request_spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924319
12:52:46 opendevreview zhou zhong proposed openstack/nova master: nova-manage: modify image properties in request_spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924319
13:08:40 sean-k-mooney bauzas: on the flip side the next time the promote job runs it will promote all prior content too
13:08:57 sean-k-mooney bauzas: so its not really that much of a concern
14:53:25 bauzas can some nova-core look at this simple fix ? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/914761
14:57:12 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-traits master: Add a new trait for stateless firmware support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/908885
15:29:39 jlejeune bauzas: hello, I just see your comment on my small fix in unit tests: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924148, yesterday you told me a launchpad bug report is useless as it's just internal changes, do I really need to create one for that ?
15:39:48 bauzas jlejeune: because when you asked me, I wasn't knowing it was due to a specific enviroment usager
15:39:51 bauzas usage*
15:40:05 bauzas hence now I'd like to exactly know the exception we get
15:40:43 bauzas but if you want, just reply to me in the gerrit patch with an example of the exception we return, and then I'll tell you to add a larger comment then on our patch
15:41:13 bauzas but like I said, we try to not `except Exception` unless this is really needed
15:49:17 jlejeune yeah yeah I understand that of course, like I said I've juste copied/pasted what someone else did on other patchs for the same exception :)
15:49:36 jlejeune *on other tests
15:50:53 jlejeune I will check what's the exact exception, it raised when calling subprocess.execute() function
16:01:23 bauzas jlejeune: thanks :)
16:29:35 bauzas can someone just ping me quickly ? that's for a test
16:29:46 frickler bauzas: ping
16:29:59 bauzas frickler: thanks

Earlier   Later