Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2023-11-29
20:19:34 melwitt I think I can do it given the examples you linked. but yeah sounds good, if I do it wrong feel free to redo it or whatever tomorrow
20:21:12 sean-k-mooney we in theory have nested virt capablity for 2 vexhost clouds and ovh so i dont really feel as bad about using in in nova next as i did whne it was only one provider
20:22:53 melwitt ah ok
#openstack-nova - 2023-11-30
03:01:08 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Use split kernel/initramfs Cirros UEC image by default in jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902217
06:40:30 melwitt sean-k-mooney: there was an attempt ... https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902217 but it's super not working 😆
06:40:30 melwitt sean-k-mooney: there was an attempt ... https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902217 but it's super not working 😆
07:54:29 opendevreview alisafari proposed openstack/nova master: Fix traits to cpu flags mapping https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902183
09:26:14 dvo-plv gibi, dansmith Hello, gentlemens? Maybe you will have a time to review spec and code
09:26:18 dvo-plv https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/895924
09:26:22 dvo-plv https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/876075
09:34:12 gibi bauzas: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/901656 merged so I bobcat point release is good to go for me :)
09:34:26 bauzas cool
09:34:37 bauzas elodilles: can you please update the bobcat release patch then ,
09:36:43 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Do not manage CPU0's state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/901567
09:36:56 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Allow enabling cpu_power_management with 0 dedicated CPUs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/901660
09:37:24 gibi elodilles: fixed your comment in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/901567
09:50:44 dvo-plv gibi, thanks. Should I do something else to get +1 workflow for patch ?
09:50:47 frickler melwitt: yes, you need to add more things to your nodeset definition, let me update
09:51:59 gibi dvo-plv: I'm waiting for the spec to land
09:52:03 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose using VirtIO PackedRing Configuration support for 2024.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/895924
09:52:30 dvo-plv I see
10:17:44 elodilles bauzas: done: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/899602
10:17:55 elodilles gibi: ACK, will review it again then :)
10:19:29 opendevreview Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/nova master: Use split kernel/initramfs Cirros UEC image by default in jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902217
10:20:22 frickler sean-k-mooney: melwitt: ^^ fwiw I would rather not depend on the nested virt nodes, maybe just changing the image type would be good enough already?
10:22:38 bauzas elodilles: -1 for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/899602
10:22:42 bauzas looks you squashed two things
10:34:42 opendevreview alisafari proposed openstack/nova master: Fix traits to cpu flags mapping https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902183
11:08:01 sean-k-mooney[m] frickler: the concern is we dont want to change the image type everywhere we want to have at least one full disk image
11:08:35 sean-k-mooney[m] from a nova perspective its testing two very slightly different code paths
11:09:28 sean-k-mooney[m] so we would only be enabling nested virt on nova-next which would be the only job to test the full disk image that we are using today
11:12:46 sean-k-mooney[m] frickler: if we can have the ci stable without nested virt, either with tweaks to the image or the flavor (adding swap for exampel) we could do that instead for that job or use a diffent full disk image in that job
11:35:20 frickler all jobs should have swap already, or are you talking about swap for the cirros instance?
11:40:11 sean-k-mooney[m] yep swap for the cirros image. i dont think it reasonable to keep bumping the ram we keep allocating to cirros
11:40:20 sean-k-mooney[m] espically if its a very minor failure
11:40:42 sean-k-mooney[m] but we can add a small amount of swap to the flavor say 64 mb
11:41:11 sean-k-mooney[m] cirroz has zswap too so a small amount will go a long way
11:46:00 frickler hmm. will it activate that while still in initramfs phase? but I guess it can't hurt trying it out. I'll make a devstack patch
11:57:26 elodilles bauzas: oh, uh, sry :S i've updated the patch now
11:59:01 elodilles bauzas: btw, i hesitated a bit about the version bump, whether the last patch worth a MINOR bump (28.1.0), but I think we are still good with PATCH bump (28.0.1)
12:12:04 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Packed virtqueue support was added. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/876075
13:00:31 opendevreview alisafari proposed openstack/nova master: Fix traits to cpu flags mapping https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902183
13:07:27 sean-k-mooney frickler: looking at the console output it at least loads zswap, wether swapon has been done or not i have no idea. it could be added to the init script i guess if its not already being done but ya you might be right that it will be too early for swap to have any impact
13:22:18 opendevreview alisafari proposed openstack/nova master: Fix traits to cpu flags mapping https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902183
13:25:52 alisafari sean-k-mooney: Would you possibly recheck this? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902183
16:33:56 dvo-plv sean-k-mooney, gibi If you are aroung and have some time, glance patch, last one from the packed ring story already pass zuul
16:33:57 dvo-plv https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/882133
16:36:33 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: vgpu: Allow device_addresses to not be set https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902084
16:37:52 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: vgpu: Allow device_addresses to not be set https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902084
16:53:39 bauzas JayF: heh, any news about ironic-shards for Caracal timeframe ? I see john's not connectedc
16:54:50 JayF bauzas: https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/message/EUP3AITYONBPAMGZHXWT7TXLF7DYKC4Y/ we basically plan on doing it, and trying to fix some bugs in ironic/nova driver
16:55:12 JayF bauzas: I personally will be doing some of that work, but have been extremely busy; essentially my entire december for upstream is pointed at this :)
16:56:42 bauzas ++:)
16:56:44 bauzas awesome !
16:56:55 JayF https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/900831 is up to resolve the bug mentioned there already, has no reviews, I was not going to recheck-spam to get it V+1 without any review feedback though; failures are not-ironic-related
17:04:25 bauzas JayF: feel free to add your patches up in https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-caracal-status#L47 I'm confused about the exact paperwork we may need for this release
17:05:01 bauzas I'll sort out the right section to put those patches, whether those are bugfixes or features
17:05:35 bauzas but I want to be sure I'm able to track that effort for this release, and that etherpad is basically my braindump
17:05:40 JayF It's in there, that one patch is a bugfix for sure
17:05:50 JayF put it in proposed at the bottom
17:05:52 bauzas ++
17:06:16 bauzas I'll then move it to approved bugfixes once I just check that the patch is ready for reviews
18:36:08 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Use split kernel/initramfs Cirros UEC image by default in jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902217
18:38:21 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Use split kernel/initramfs Cirros UEC image by default in jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902217
21:18:15 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Use split kernel/initramfs Cirros UEC image by default in jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902217
23:25:41 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Use split kernel/initramfs Cirros UEC image by default in jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902217
23:47:57 opendevreview Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/nova master: Update contributor guide for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/896305
#openstack-nova - 2023-12-01
01:48:53 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Update contributor guide for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/896305
14:48:20 dvo-plv https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/882133
14:48:20 dvo-plv Hello sean-k-mooney gibi dansmith Maybe you will have a time to review last patch from packed ring series
15:13:51 opendevreview Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: reenable greendns in nova. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833437
21:37:50 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Use split kernel/initramfs Cirros UEC image by default in jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902217
#openstack-nova - 2023-12-04
10:44:39 jras Hello - A recent update to Nova (Yoga release) removed the default value for cputune shares from libvirt driver. This results in out of bounds values for flavors with more than 10 vCPU. Libvirt uses cgroups v2 which allows a maximum of 10k for this value. We see values >10k being added now.
10:46:37 jras I am unsure whether I should open a bug for this. Please advise.
11:05:37 alisafari ratailor_ Hey man, Could you check this out whenever you have the time? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902183
11:17:05 ratailor_ alisafari, done. Thanks!
11:40:22 alisafari ratailor_ Thanks, Appreciate your time and effort
11:57:52 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: enforce remote console shutdown https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/901824
12:38:39 alisafari sean-k-mooney Do you think this is good to be merged or requires further changes? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902183
12:44:55 sean-k-mooney others need to review it
12:45:09 sean-k-mooney it need 2 core reviewers to approve it
12:45:38 sean-k-mooney bauzas: ^ its a pretty trivial review if you want to take a look
12:46:06 sean-k-mooney its a clear bug with a simple fix
12:52:58 alisafari sean-k-mooney Thanks, And also sorry. I didn't know that.
12:53:06 sean-k-mooney no worries
13:57:44 dvo-plv Hello sean-k-mooney gibi
13:57:56 dvo-plv Could you pelase review last patch from packer ring series https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/882133 ?
13:58:23 sean-k-mooney sure i can do it again
13:58:31 sean-k-mooney i was previously fine with it
13:58:44 dvo-plv great, thanks
14:04:12 LarsErikP is there any SRU planned to include this in zed? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/882914
14:04:39 sean-k-mooney this is not thr correct place to ask that
14:04:52 LarsErikP ok. where should I ask? =)
14:05:15 sean-k-mooney that a question for cannoical we do not generally discuss that in this irc channel
14:05:25 LarsErikP ok
14:06:17 sean-k-mooney assumign they have a similar import process form upstream as redhat it will probaly get pulled into a future update
14:06:25 LarsErikP Another related question.. It seems like there is no tagged version of nova in zed which includes that fix. But - it is tagged and released for Yoga.. Which means that whne you upgrade from yoga to zed, the bug is reintroduced..
14:06:49 LarsErikP is that something that kan be adressed here? :P
14:07:05 sean-k-mooney yep we just did a yoga release as awe are moving it to unmaintaiend
14:07:16 sean-k-mooney we normally do a release of all the new branches first

Earlier   Later