| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-10-06 | |||
| 12:15:13 | noonedeadpunk | hey everyone. I have weird issues with castellan when attaching encrypted volumes. So it fails on nova-compute on attach attempt with smth like this: https://paste.openstack.org/show/bLY6qE339z2dD5eZntFM/ | |
| 12:15:37 | noonedeadpunk | We've start catching that right after upgrade to 2023.1 | |
| 12:16:50 | noonedeadpunk | I'm just not sure really where to start looking into - if it's smth related to nova or keystone or castellan itself... So just checking if you might heard about smth like that before | |
| 12:19:18 | frickler | noonedeadpunk: which version of castellan are you using? there were some last-minute reverts for 2023.2 because of compatibility issues https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:revert-castellan-bobcat | |
| 12:19:42 | frickler | not sure though whether it is really the same issue you are seeing | |
| 12:22:59 | noonedeadpunk | let me see.... | |
| 12:23:21 | noonedeadpunk | As I was looking into secret users already but not sure that's it | |
| 12:24:10 | frickler | hmm, the errors in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/883141 look different, but that's for func tests only | |
| 12:27:49 | noonedeadpunk | 4.1.0 | |
| 12:28:08 | noonedeadpunk | so it shouldn't have any of these I assume | |
| 12:28:20 | noonedeadpunk | (some win from u-c usage at least | |
| 12:33:09 | noonedeadpunk | I have some feeling it is related to service tokens... But visually everything is in place... | |
| 12:33:41 | noonedeadpunk | as it fails in self.service_auth.get_token | |
| 12:33:53 | noonedeadpunk | (for keystoneauth1) | |
| 12:42:58 | noonedeadpunk | `service_user` section is in place, with all auth and `send_service_user_token = True`, service_token_roles_required = True in keystone_authtoken... | |
| 13:06:25 | zigo | FYI, as an operator, we are SUPER HAPPY about the BDM sync feature of Bobcat, thanks to whoever worked on that, it's going to make our lives a way less miserable !!! :) | |
| 13:07:04 | zigo | We had so many issues with the attachments in nova/cinder not being in sync ... | |
| 13:07:26 | zigo | So: thanks... ! | |
| 13:13:57 | sahid | o/ | |
| 13:13:59 | noonedeadpunk | Ok, my issue was related to missing barbican_service_user section... | |
| 13:14:05 | sahid | hey bauzas thanks for your comment on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/896512 | |
| 13:14:22 | sahid | I will create a launchpad bp and update the change | |
| 13:14:26 | bauzas | ++ | |
| 13:14:47 | bauzas | sorry for the paperwork but I wanted to have it tracked correctly for the operators | |
| 13:15:18 | bauzas | looks to me more a feature than a bugfix | |
| 13:15:26 | bauzas | (but I could be wrong) | |
| 13:15:54 | sahid | I don't know, it's an improvment I guess | |
| 13:16:26 | sahid | that fixes a bug reported | |
| 13:16:45 | sahid | s/bug/limitation | |
| 13:17:17 | bauzas | yup, hence my point | |
| 13:17:32 | bauzas | anyway, we'll see what others say | |
| 13:18:03 | bauzas | sahid: if you create a blueprint, could you please be in a next nova meeting for discussing it ? | |
| 13:18:19 | bauzas | (Tuesdays 16UTC) | |
| 13:39:54 | dansmith | bauzas: I think you owe me a response on my alias spec about mdevs? specifically about mdevs not yet being attachable at runtime (like ports and disks)? | |
| 13:40:13 | bauzas | did I forget anything ? shit if so | |
| 13:40:33 | bauzas | -ETOOMANYGERRITEMAILS | |
| 13:41:02 | dansmith | bauzas: well you left it as "yeah then we can do mdevs too" and I said "I want to do all attachable devices, but I think that's just disks and ports" and then we had a private convo about it | |
| 13:41:24 | dansmith | and I think we decided that it was probably just ports and disks in that category, but you said you'd circle back | |
| 13:42:07 | dansmith | unrelated, gibi I wrote up this patch we discussed, can you have a look? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/897076 | |
| 13:42:54 | dansmith | gibi: there's another assertion patch above that that came from a real-world situation and I think it'd probably be good to have that in a scenario where you're moving cell databases around :) | |
| 13:43:07 | bauzas | dansmith: okidoki, so I'll add a comment and review it again | |
| 13:43:37 | dansmith | bauzas: well, I just want to close the loop so it doesn't look like it's waiting for a change :) | |
| 13:45:06 | bauzas | dansmith: correct, hence my new comment needed :) | |
| 13:45:23 | bauzas | you explained me that it would only be for attach/detach calls | |
| 13:45:30 | bauzas | that mdevs don't do | |
| 13:45:47 | bauzas | that said I said I should look at other devices, if we do this | |
| 13:45:59 | bauzas | but I think I found none of them | |
| 13:46:04 | dansmith | yep, cool :) | |
| 14:12:26 | dansmith | bauzas: thanks for that | |
| 14:13:05 | gibi | dansmith: thanks I will take a look | |
| 14:13:11 | dansmith | gibi: thanks | |
| 14:24:18 | sahid | bauzas: sure I will do | |
| 17:23:58 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: add healthcheck manager to manager base https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/827844 | |
| 17:23:58 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: add initial healthcheck support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825015 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2023-10-09 | |||
| 08:40:08 | opendevreview | Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/nova master: scheduler: AggregateMultitenancyIsolation to support unlimited tenant https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/896512 | |
| 08:40:24 | sahid | o? | |
| 08:40:26 | sahid | o/ | |
| 08:40:33 | sahid | bauzas: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/aggregatemultitenancyisolation-to-support-unlimited-tenant the bp related :-) | |
| 08:40:46 | bauzas | cool | |
| 08:41:05 | bauzas | sahid: are you able to join tomorrow's nova meeting at 6pm our time ? | |
| 08:43:20 | sahid | bauzas: 6pm our time, probably no but I will try :/ | |
| 08:43:39 | bauzas | yeah, it's unfortunately late | |
| 08:43:50 | bauzas | in one month, it will be at 5pm | |
| 08:43:55 | bauzas | 1600UTC :) | |
| 08:44:10 | sahid | yes and the mardi is not good time for me | |
| 08:44:19 | sahid | yes that will be better :-) | |
| 08:44:26 | bauzas | so if you want, I can ask if people are okay with this blueprint to be a specless one | |
| 08:44:49 | bauzas | and I'll tell you on wed | |
| 08:44:52 | sahid | bauzas: yes please do and let me know, if needed I can certainly write one | |
| 08:45:04 | bauzas | col | |
| 08:45:07 | sahid | thanks a lot | |
| 08:45:08 | bauzas | cool even | |
| 08:45:19 | bauzas | np, hth | |
| 08:51:28 | bauzas | sahid: oh, you would want to backport the filter change upstream ? | |
| 08:52:04 | bauzas | sahid: if so, I'll rather ask if people think that your change is a bugfix or rather a feature | |
| 08:52:28 | bauzas | if this is a feature, we can't backport it upstram (but you can do what you want :p ) | |
| 08:52:54 | bauzas | (what you want internally*) | |
| 09:13:44 | dvo-plv | bauzas, Hello, Maybe you will have a chance to review it https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/895924 ? | |
| 09:14:03 | bauzas | yup, I promised it, I will once I'm free | |
| 09:14:17 | dvo-plv | great, thank you | |
| 09:14:32 | bauzas | it just needs myself to ramp up on a few new names :) | |
| 09:22:25 | dvo-plv | yes, sure, I will wait | |
| 09:22:31 | dvo-plv | sean-k-mooney[m], Hello, are you here ? | |
| 14:08:08 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Warn if we find compute services in cell0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/897246 | |
| 15:03:34 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Clean up service_get_all() https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/897674 | |
| 15:40:38 | gibi | dansmith: thanks for the updates I'm +2 all the way ^^ | |
| 15:40:49 | dansmith | gibi: i saw, thanks | |
| 15:41:00 | dansmith | and thanks for pointing out my n00b n^2 code ;P | |
| 15:43:52 | sean-k-mooney | i can add that to my list fo things to reveiew | |
| 15:44:08 | sean-k-mooney | procedural question do we need a specless blueprint or bug for those | |
| 15:45:18 | sean-k-mooney | i dont think there is any intent to backprot https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/897076 ? | |
| 15:46:32 | dvo-plv | sean-k-mooney, Hello | |
| 15:46:54 | sean-k-mooney | dvo-plv: o/ | |
| 15:47:11 | dvo-plv | I would like to discuss out blueprint regarding NT NIC support. But it too late today, can we talk tomorrow? | |
| 15:47:34 | dvo-plv | when it will be comfortable for you ? | |
| 15:51:05 | sean-k-mooney | honestly i need to reload context. | |
| 15:51:36 | sean-k-mooney | so we can chat during the week but im not sure when ill be free. ping me durnign the week when your around | |
| 16:23:49 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: I'm calling it a followup to the original BP, which is why I tagged it as such | |
| 16:40:20 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:41:10 | sean-k-mooney | i didnt sleep great last night so i may not get to it today but if i dont ill review them tommorow if someone else does not review them in the interim | |