Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2023-08-10
18:36:01 dansmith melwitt: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/890439
18:36:16 dansmith I adjusted the interval and the deadline so I think it *should* be okay
18:36:28 dansmith although that wouldn't explain nova just not logging anything after the hang
18:37:00 melwitt yeah.. 🤔
18:37:00 melwitt yeah.. 🤔
18:54:24 sean-k-mooney ok the issue i mentioned might be fixed
18:55:29 sean-k-mooney i configured my keepalive interval in the kernel to 10 secodn i think but ovs is expecting probes every 5 seconds
18:55:48 melwitt yeah, I was just looking at it again and n-cpu hadn't reported a heartbeat in 14 minutes and never came back after the hang
18:57:15 melwitt bizarre
19:00:13 melwitt libvirt log activity also stops for the most part at the same time n-cpu stops https://zuul.openstack.org/build/e7c306fad21e4057a3af40720049482a/log/controller/logs/libvirt/libvirt/libvirtd_log.txt
19:00:52 melwitt not sure if anything near the end of that log is unusual or problematic
21:16:31 melwitt finally found that on those failures, at the same time that n-cpu freezes, ceph starts logging WRN (warn) health status such as "osd.0 47 get_health_metrics reporting 1 slow ops, oldest is osd_op(client.15524.0:32 4.1e 4:7cf325a3:::rbd_header.3c6ebb6b8706:head [watch ping cookie 140317856977664] snapc 0=[] ondisk+write+known_if_redirected+supports_pool_eio e47)"
21:16:45 melwitt example https://zuul.openstack.org/build/4884721dbf764b33995d71c990f65dfe/log/controller/logs/ceph/ceph/7f57d687-6678-46f4-ae09-7e6faa476d1a/ceph-osd.0_log.txt#11752
21:17:35 melwitt log_channel(cluster) log [WRN] : 1 slow requests (by type [ 'delayed' : 1 ] most affected pool [ 'vms' : 1 ])
22:50:41 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM test ephemeral encryption + resize: qcow2, raw, rbd https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/862416
#openstack-nova - 2023-08-11
08:19:13 auniyal Hey gibi, can you please have a look on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/882920 mostly good just a backpot for yoga
09:03:06 tobias-urdin two small doc/log fixes when somebody has some seconds to review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/880819 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873846
09:22:33 opendevreview Danylo Vodopianov proposed openstack/nova master: Napatech SmartNIC support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/859577
09:24:29 opendevreview Danylo Vodopianov proposed openstack/os-vif master: Openvswitch driver was extended https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/859574
09:24:44 tobias-urdin another one https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/874083
10:20:21 auniyal thanks gibi
11:33:32 opendevreview Danylo Vodopianov proposed openstack/os-vif master: Openvswitch driver was extended https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/859574
11:53:33 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/yoga: Have host look for CPU controller of cgroupsv2 location. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/882920
12:54:55 opendevreview Viktor Křivák proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add availability zone-aware affinity filter to the scheduler https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/890779
13:15:19 opendevreview Viktor Křivák proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add availability zone-aware affinity filter to the scheduler https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/890779
14:56:23 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Support glance's new location API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891036
14:56:52 dansmith abhishekk: ^ untested, but that's part of your patch but with some new-or-old logic in it and less change overall as I think we can just ignore the return from that operation
14:57:10 dansmith we'll see how that goes, not sure I'll have a change to test locally today but we can iterate from that
14:57:25 abhishekk looking
15:00:18 abhishekk I didn't understood raise exc part at line #571
15:03:09 dansmith abhishekk: oh that was supposed to end up under the badrequest thing
15:03:20 dansmith ah right but I need to test
15:03:45 dansmith so the goal is to try each of those interfaces, but if neither work, raise the error we got from the last one
15:04:23 dansmith so we might be able to just raise the badrequest whenever we get it, but I need to test glance's behavior with each of the new stuff missing and the old stuff disabled
15:04:49 abhishekk ack, so you need another plain Exception block as well
15:04:50 abhishekk ?
15:04:52 dansmith so that _reraise was supposed to be a pass and replace the raise below
15:05:06 dansmith no, I think we want to try both and raise the last one
15:05:34 dansmith and we need to catch whatever expected exceptions will come from trying the new interface if it's missing
15:05:36 abhishekk ack, because what I understood is lien #571 might express as raise None
15:05:40 dansmith should just be notfound right?
15:06:14 dansmith oh, two notfounds could raise none, yeah you're right
15:06:25 dansmith anyway, like i said, untested, just kinda what I'm thinking :)
15:06:37 abhishekk :D
15:07:21 abhishekk I am not sure client will be updated today to raise Notfound if version is less than 2.17
15:07:43 dansmith if glance is not updated, the URL should generate a notfound, no?
15:08:02 dansmith you think glanceclient will translate that into something else?
15:08:42 abhishekk NO, as you added depends on in commit message, it will call add_image_location, right?
15:09:05 dansmith right, but we need to handle the case where glance is not upgraded
15:09:28 abhishekk yes,
15:09:45 dansmith so actually, let me change this so it's clearer
15:09:59 abhishekk that needs to be there in client patch, but since your patch has glance and client dependency it will call new API i guess
15:10:55 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test glance new location api https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891207
15:10:55 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Support glance's new location API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891036
15:11:00 dansmith this stack needs to work ^
15:11:17 dansmith er, well, actually,
15:11:32 dansmith the glanceclient depends-on should go in the first patch I guess.
15:11:40 dansmith we can require glanceclient version, but we can't require glance version
15:11:50 abhishekk right
15:13:58 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test glance new location api https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891207
15:13:58 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Support glance's new location API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891036
15:14:19 dansmith first depends on glanceclient, second depends on glance
15:17:03 abhishekk This looks good now
15:17:23 abhishekk thank you for your time !!
15:17:40 dansmith ack, I'll try to poke more at it on monday
15:17:56 abhishekk Cool, will be around as well
17:35:52 abhishekk dansmith, nova-ceph-multistore passed on both the patches
17:36:55 dansmith yeah I saw
17:37:09 dansmith did you confirm in the glance log that it's hitting the new one?
17:40:51 abhishekk looking for it now,
17:40:58 abhishekk https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/9c045d22dee34b08bb8767a1f972db09/log/job-output.txt#22303 this is the test right?
17:42:08 dansmith I see location_import task running so I assume that means it is
17:42:22 dansmith abhishekk: any server snapshot task should trigger it
17:42:38 abhishekk yeah
17:42:40 abhishekk me too
17:44:07 abhishekk location_import-CalculateHash
17:45:11 abhishekk at least some positive signs :D
17:47:06 dansmith yup, I definitely expected more fails for sure
17:52:41 abhishekk on that note, I am stepping in the weekend mood
17:53:02 dansmith enjoy ;)
17:53:07 abhishekk See you monday, happy weekend o/~
19:42:59 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: testing py3.11 job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891228
19:43:31 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: DNM: testing py3.11 job not running on 2023.1 template https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891113
20:43:23 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: testing some zuul template config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891235
20:43:41 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: DNM: testing some zuul template config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891114
20:50:07 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Use futurist.ThreadPoolExecutor in scatter_gather_cells https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/650172
21:14:23 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: testing some zuul template config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891235
21:14:37 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: DNM: testing some zuul template config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891114
21:34:40 opendevreview Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/nova master: Update contributor guide for 2023.2 Bobcat https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/876447
#openstack-nova - 2023-08-12
00:39:42 opendevreview Jay Faulkner proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Testing against oslo.messaging change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891245
01:03:12 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Use OSC in run-evacuate-hook instead of novaclient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891247
01:08:33 melwitt gmann, dansmith: ^ fix (hopefully) for nova-live-migration, nova-live-migration-ceph, and nova-ovs-hybrid-plug POST_FAILURE
01:12:09 gmann melwitt: thanks, I hope we do not need this devstack fix/workaround after your fix right? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/891230
01:12:46 gmann melwitt: devstack one failed in gate so thinking if your fix solve the issue then we do not need to recheck that
01:17:49 melwitt gmann: oh, I had missed that patch, sorry. I only looked for nova patches 😣 yeah we shouldn't need it after my patch (but let's see if it passes 😛) but either way we can land the devstack one and if my patch works we can revert later
01:17:49 melwitt gmann: oh, I had missed that patch, sorry. I only looked for nova patches 😣 yeah we shouldn't need it after my patch (but let's see if it passes 😛) but either way we can land the devstack one and if my patch works we can revert later
01:27:42 gmann melwitt: ok, sounds good. waiting for gate result
01:43:56 gmann melwitt: you missed to pass server in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891247/1/roles/run-evacuate-hook/files/test_negative_evacuate.sh#b20
01:44:10 gmann it is failing in live migration job https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/aef77238f1d24785825165f8bd2ca913/console
01:44:12 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Use OSC in run-evacuate-hook instead of novaclient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891247

Earlier   Later