Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2023-04-07
08:49:37 kashyap bauzas: "Bugs increase to fill the available time" ;-)
08:50:14 kashyap Original quote: "Work expands to fill the available time"
11:12:30 opendevreview Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Cleanup old resize instances dir before resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864730
11:15:37 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Run the lower constraints jobs as periodics https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/879886
11:15:37 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add lower-* unit and functional jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/879885
11:15:38 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: show that lower-* jobs has no false positives https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/879888
11:15:38 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: example bug that caught by lower-* jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/879887
12:03:45 songwenping_ bauzas, sean-k-mooney: hi guys, i have attach gpu to the vm with 'virsh attach-device --persistent --live' , i can find the gpu in the vm with lspci, but nvidia-smi cnanot find the gpu, with the error 'NVRM: GPU 0000:05:00.0: RmInitAdapter failed! ', is there any advices?
12:46:03 dansmith kashyap: I assume you saw this that tobias-urdin cc'd you on? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/879021
13:08:48 kashyap dansmith: Looking; no, I didn't see it. Thanks for notifying me :)
13:09:31 kashyap Okay, yes, it is indeed a long-term TODO that I left to remove it that Tobias has done, nice -- https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/879021/2/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py
13:21:34 kashyap tobias-urdin: Thanks for the above code! It looks good to me, I just like a double-check from another reviewer about the code-removal in this method, check_can_live_migrate_source()
15:08:05 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: show that lower-* jobs has no false positives https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/879888
15:08:05 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: example bug that caught by lower-* jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/879887
15:57:31 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add lower-* unit and functional jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/879885
15:57:32 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: example bug that caught by lower-* jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/879887
15:57:32 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Run the lower constraints jobs as periodics https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/879886
15:57:33 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: show that lower-* jobs has no false positives https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/879888
16:18:11 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Populate ComputeNode.service_id https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/879904
16:18:12 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Online migrate missing Instance.compute_id fields https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/879905
19:23:09 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add compute_id columns to instances, migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/879499
19:23:09 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Populate ComputeNode.service_id https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/879904
19:23:10 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add compute_id to Instance object https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/879500
19:23:10 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add dest_compute_id to Migration object https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/879682
19:23:11 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Online migrate missing Instance.compute_id fields https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/879905
#openstack-nova - 2023-04-08
03:45:06 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Configure and teardown ephemeral encryption secrets https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826754
03:45:07 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Support create with ephemeral encryption for qcow2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870932
03:45:07 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: imagebackend: Add support to libvirt_info for LUKS based encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/826755
03:45:08 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add encryption support to convert_image https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870934
03:45:08 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Support resize with ephemeral encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870933
03:45:09 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add encryption support to qemu-img rebase https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870936
03:45:09 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add hw_ephemeral_encryption_secret_uuid image property https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870935
03:45:10 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Support snapshot with ephemeral encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870937
03:45:11 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update driver BDMs with ephemeral encryption image properties https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870939
03:45:11 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Support rescue with ephemeral encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873675
03:45:13 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Introduce support for qcow2 with LUKS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/772273
03:50:55 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM test ephemeral encryption + resize: qcow2, raw https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/862416
#openstack-nova - 2023-04-09
19:35:10 opendevreview Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Add debug log for scheduler weight calculation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/879405
#openstack-nova - 2023-04-10
06:37:02 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add cleanup flag to remove dangling volumes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/878757
21:10:48 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Make scheduler lazy-load the placement client https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/878238
22:46:16 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Support rescue with ephemeral encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873675
22:46:17 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Introduce support for qcow2 with LUKS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/772273
22:46:17 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update driver BDMs with ephemeral encryption image properties https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870939
#openstack-nova - 2023-04-11
08:07:46 opendevreview Konrad Gube proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose using extend volume completion action for 2023.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/877233
10:05:50 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Fix trivial doc issues https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/878779
12:03:42 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Fix trivial doc issues https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/878779
12:50:54 gibi bauzas: sean-k-mooney: dansmith: gmann: here is my take on the limited lower constraint job https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:limited-lower-constraints-jobs it already can catch the issue I want to catch (see the example DNM patches)
12:50:58 gibi https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:limited-lower-constraints-jobs
12:51:52 bauzas gibi: ack, will look
12:52:29 sean-k-mooney gibi: is there a reason you are stating which packages to restrict
12:52:37 sean-k-mooney gibi: instead of everything in requirements.txt
12:53:15 gibi sean-k-mooney: yes, I wanted to limit the scope of the lower constraint jobs as we know that pulling everythin back can be tricky
12:53:40 gibi we can try to pull back all our direct depts
12:53:42 sean-k-mooney ok so now its only testing other nova deliverables
12:54:03 sean-k-mooney honsetly those are the ones i was the least worried about
12:54:25 gibi funnily in Zed we delivered nova with a wrong os-traits dept
12:54:38 gibi and that triggered my thinking about this job
12:54:52 gibi *wrong minimum os-traits dept
12:55:12 sean-k-mooney for which feature
12:55:20 gibi let me dig it out
12:55:32 sean-k-mooney there was one that i expicty didint want to bump it for shice it was optional
12:55:56 sean-k-mooney although that was os-brick i think not os-traits
12:56:22 gibi sean-k-mooney: this was the fix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/858280
12:56:59 gibi we released RC2 due to this ^^
12:57:23 gibi and we only detected that in time because zigo was eager to package the RC1
12:57:39 sean-k-mooney did it cause failusre when pci in placment was disabeld
12:57:49 sean-k-mooney becaus if it did not we should not have released an rc2 for that
12:58:30 sean-k-mooney in zed we had already stop including lower constraits in the PTI
12:59:39 zigo gibi: And it's out of luck that I found it (ie: because using sbuild + git-buildpackage with the experimental as overlay only, which takes packages from unstable unless there's a strong hint that the experimental version is needed...)
13:00:00 sean-k-mooney i guess given it broke unit tests it could break packagers workflows
13:00:08 sean-k-mooney but high seams a strech to me
13:01:38 sean-k-mooney gibi: https://github.com/openstack/governance/blob/584e06b0c186d4355d1d51f2d6df96e822253bef/resolutions/20220414-drop-lower-constraints.rst happend in zed
13:02:23 gibi sean-k-mooney: and we dropped lower-constraints as a blanket lower constraints job is very hard to do right do to lack of tooling support
13:02:30 gibi hence my take on a limited scope
13:03:38 sean-k-mooney well to me its value was in direct depencies on things like oslo or any other package we directly use
13:03:58 gibi sean-k-mooney: as I said we can try to extend the current proposal to more direct deps
13:04:22 gibi I'm not sure it will be correct if there as cross dependencies between our direct depts
13:04:29 gibi but we can try
13:04:29 sean-k-mooney well if its not everythign in requiremetns.txt i find it hard to trust that it works
13:04:46 gibi I proved it works for os-traits. see the DNM patch on the top
13:05:05 sean-k-mooney yep but what if we start usign a feature in oslo-utils
13:05:18 sean-k-mooney like the imageinfo json output for the vmdk cve
13:05:57 sean-k-mooney to me the real benifit of lower constraits was to ensure we catch issues when backporting
13:06:00 gibi the possible fault we want to catch with the lower constraint is generic for all our direct (or even indirect) depts. I'm not disagreeing there
13:07:00 sean-k-mooney it also has benifit on master to ensure we are intentional when increaseing version and call it out in release notes
13:07:22 sean-k-mooney well if required like swapping to sqlacmey 2.0
13:11:39 gibi so I would do a blanket lower constraint job if I could. But I know that it is impossible to do that right. So I started from a small set of depts. If you have suggestions what else to add to the set like oslo-utils or sqlachemy. Then we can try. I think blindly add all the direct dept can lead to problems
13:17:13 bauzas gibi: sean-k-mooney: I think we somehow agreed on last weekly meeting that the job should only check the existing packages by pinning their versions
13:17:58 gibi bauzas: "existing packages" <- this is not well defined.
13:19:21 bauzas gibi: I mean, all of the packages from reqs.txt
13:19:43 gibi see above. I think that is bigger than what we can chew. but we can try
13:20:30 gibi as soon as we have cross dependencies between our direct debt the same problem will appert than what we had with the blanket lower constraint job
13:23:21 sean-k-mooney i would almost prefer to take the opisite approch
13:23:27 sean-k-mooney have an exclude list
13:23:39 sean-k-mooney which we filter out
13:23:53 sean-k-mooney so include all the package by default and then exclude ones we have issues with
13:24:03 sean-k-mooney for example cryptography
13:26:07 gibi sean-k-mooney: I have to think about how can we effectively decide what to filter out
13:27:27 sean-k-mooney for me it would be anything that is normally isntalled form the package manager
13:27:41 sean-k-mooney although with tox we might be abel to avoid that

Earlier   Later