| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-02-28 | |||
| 16:03:28 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:03:41 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: can you be the next bug baton owner ? | |
| 16:03:46 | Uggla | bauzas, no nothing special | |
| 16:03:50 | bauzas | ack | |
| 16:04:04 | sean-k-mooney | i guess so | |
| 16:04:23 | bauzas | cool ta | |
| 16:04:27 | bauzas | #info bug baton is being passed to sean-k-mooney | |
| 16:04:31 | bauzas | moving on so | |
| 16:04:36 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:04:41 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:04:47 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures | |
| 16:05:01 | bauzas | I'll be honest, I didn't had a lot of time to look at the failures | |
| 16:05:11 | bauzas | have you seen some CI failure ? | |
| 16:05:24 | dansmith | definitely improving | |
| 16:05:39 | bauzas | indeed | |
| 16:05:42 | dansmith | the volume detach on cleanup failures have all but gone away except for the live mgiration tests, | |
| 16:05:48 | dansmith | and I have a patch up for that right now | |
| 16:06:15 | dansmith | both of those are failures in cinder tests that have gone on for years without getting proper attention | |
| 16:06:29 | dansmith | but they've been spiking a lot lately, so hopefully this will really improve things | |
| 16:06:36 | bauzas | ok | |
| 16:06:42 | gibi | glad to hear that | |
| 16:07:01 | elodilles | btw, can we expect the same for stable branches with this fix as well? (less volume detach and cleanup failures) | |
| 16:07:14 | dansmith | elodilles: the fixes were in tempest | |
| 16:07:24 | dansmith | elodilles: so that's branchless and should apply to stable right? | |
| 16:07:28 | bauzas | I don't see a lot of failures for the same job | |
| 16:07:29 | elodilles | so it means that where the tempest is not pinned | |
| 16:07:37 | elodilles | (non-EM branches) | |
| 16:07:37 | dansmith | ah, right | |
| 16:07:50 | elodilles | cool, thanks! | |
| 16:08:26 | bauzas | ok, let's then move on | |
| 16:08:53 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:08:56 | bauzas | all greens | |
| 16:09:01 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:09:05 | bauzas | #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures | |
| 16:09:25 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:09:30 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/antelope/schedule.html | |
| 16:09:34 | bauzas | #info Antelope-rc1 is in 0.2 weeks | |
| 16:09:40 | bauzas | (which is on Thursday) | |
| 16:09:46 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-antelope-rc-potential | |
| 16:09:49 | elodilles | even the rc1 patches are generated! ;) | |
| 16:10:00 | elodilles | * release patches | |
| 16:10:31 | bauzas | elodilles cool but we need to update at least the nova one | |
| 16:10:53 | elodilles | ack, that is expected | |
| 16:11:03 | elodilles | don't forget to signal this (if not yet done) | |
| 16:11:10 | elodilles | with a -1 on it | |
| 16:11:33 | bauzas | at least we need to merge first https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/874932 (min servion version), https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873584 (logging revert) and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/875380 (reno prelude) | |
| 16:11:41 | elodilles | (and thanks in advance o:)) | |
| 16:11:58 | bauzas | elodilles: indeed, doing it now | |
| 16:12:39 | bauzas | so | |
| 16:13:20 | bauzas | about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/874932 I think we are OK with how to use rolling upgrades with SLURP and non-SLURP releases | |
| 16:14:12 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney had a concern with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/875380 but we'll discuss it tomorrow | |
| 16:14:45 | bauzas | anything people want to discuss with RC1 ? | |
| 16:15:22 | gibi | bauzas: will you add a reno for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/874932 | |
| 16:15:47 | gibi | bauzas: it now allows Antelope to support Yoga computes | |
| 16:15:53 | bauzas | gibi: I provided a new phrase in the prelude | |
| 16:15:54 | gibi | which is N-2 | |
| 16:16:18 | bauzas | gibi: but like you said, we could also modify the rolling-upgrade doc | |
| 16:16:48 | gibi | yeah, my point is we either do a proper documented N-2 support, or we keep the N-1 check for now | |
| 16:16:51 | bauzas | prelude patch is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/875380 | |
| 16:17:03 | gibi | but right now the code patch allows N-2 while our doc says otherwises | |
| 16:17:22 | bauzas | gibi: okay, then I'll add a new change before we create the RC1 | |
| 16:17:34 | gibi | in the current form I cannot +2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/874932 | |
| 16:17:49 | gibi | as it is inconsistent with our doc | |
| 16:18:15 | gibi | but as I said I'm OK to move the doc to match with the code or move the code to match with the doc | |
| 16:18:16 | bauzas | gibi: so you want me to modify https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/admin/upgrades.html#rolling-upgrade-process ? | |
| 16:18:51 | gibi | bauzas: I would like to see a consistent documentation about Antelope supports regarding old compute service versions | |
| 16:19:13 | gibi | if we go with Antelop supporting Yoga computes then yes https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/admin/upgrades.html#rolling-upgrade-process needs a change | |
| 16:19:45 | gibi | (or we just fall back to only support N-1 and modify https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/874932 to only support Zed computes in Antelope) | |
| 16:19:56 | bauzas | cool, then I'll just add a doc modification for it in https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/admin/upgrades.html#rolling-upgrade-process | |
| 16:20:00 | bauzas | shit | |
| 16:20:11 | bauzas | add a doc modif in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/874932 | |
| 16:20:23 | gibi | OK | |
| 16:20:55 | bauzas | do people prefer here to only support Zed instead of Yoga ? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/874932 | |
| 16:21:00 | bauzas | dansmith: sean-k-mooney: ^ | |
| 16:21:25 | dansmith | for bobcat or antelope? | |
| 16:21:51 | bauzas | MHO is that I'd prefer to modify the rolling upgrade document and say yes, we can support Yoga computes for Antelope services | |
| 16:21:55 | dansmith | as I think I've mentioned, for antelope I think it would be nice to have a best-effort trial run of N-2 support, so antelope would support yoga | |
| 16:22:04 | dansmith | yeah that ^ | |
| 16:22:14 | sean-k-mooney | ya i think yoga makes sense | |
| 16:22:33 | bauzas | dansmith: yeah, gibi asked either to modify the doc or not modify it but only support Zed computes with Antelope conductors | |
| 16:22:44 | bauzas | I'd prefer the former | |
| 16:22:48 | dansmith | yeah | |
| 16:22:49 | sean-k-mooney | with that said for bobcat technially it should be antelope but i assume dansmith would prefer zed | |
| 16:23:09 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: I'd prefer we just try to do N-2 always unless we come up with a blocking reason we can't yeah | |
| 16:23:22 | bauzas | that's another change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/875621/ that needs to be merged *after* RC1 | |
| 16:23:23 | dansmith | I think we'll be able to do it | |
| 16:23:35 | sean-k-mooney | right whihc is not strictly requried by the governance resolution but im ok to try that until it breaks | |
| 16:23:48 | gibi | then modify the upgrade doc to state that in Antelope we support N-2 (Zed) computes as best effort | |
| 16:23:48 | bauzas | but looks like dansmith prefers to support Zed computes with Bobcat so meh | |
| 16:23:53 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: if nothing else, it'll highlight the thing(s) that prevent us from doing it, which are good for planning | |
| 16:24:21 | dansmith | gibi: best effort is the right terminology yeah | |
| 16:24:27 | bauzas | ok, so let's try to make the grenade-skip-level job voting | |
| 16:24:48 | dansmith | s/make/keep/ right? | |
| 16:24:56 | bauzas | it's n-v as I speak | |
| 16:25:05 | sean-k-mooney | voting based on 22.04 wiht zed ->bobcat | |
| 16:25:06 | bauzas | and only in check | |
| 16:25:08 | dansmith | oh, I thought I looked | |
| 16:25:20 | bauzas | only in check pipeline | |
| 16:25:21 | dansmith | okay, I see.. yeah "make" then | |
| 16:26:01 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: cool then I can modify https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/875621/ to make grenade-skip-level *voting* | |