| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-12-13 | |||
| 16:20:58 | bauzas | just sayin' | |
| 16:22:58 | bauzas | movin' on | |
| 16:23:05 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:23:10 | bauzas | elodilles: your time | |
| 16:23:18 | elodilles | in short: nothing to report :) | |
| 16:23:22 | bauzas | \o/ | |
| 16:23:23 | elodilles | in more length: | |
| 16:23:28 | elodilles | #info stable branches seem to be unblocked / OK | |
| 16:23:33 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:23:42 | elodilles | and that is all | |
| 16:23:42 | bauzas | cool thanks | |
| 16:23:44 | bauzas | quick and loving | |
| 16:23:51 | elodilles | indeed | |
| 16:23:57 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:24:00 | bauzas | last topic | |
| 16:24:06 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:24:10 | bauzas | first, I have a question | |
| 16:24:16 | bauzas | (bauzas) We're entering the Christmas period. Would we want to skip some meetings ? | |
| 16:24:37 | gibi | I will be off from next Monday so I vote to skip it | |
| 16:24:41 | bauzas | at least for me, I'll be working on next Tuesday | |
| 16:24:59 | bauzas | but if we don't have a quorum, then I'd prefer to punt this meeting | |
| 16:25:22 | bauzas | I know sean-k-mooney won't be there too | |
| 16:25:36 | bauzas | I don't know for others, but if 3 main folks aren't around... | |
| 16:25:50 | Uggla | I guess we should not a lot of people in the next 2 weeks. | |
| 16:25:53 | bauzas | #info Skip the two next Nova meetings | |
| 16:25:56 | opendevmeet | Removing item from minutes: #info Skip the two next Nova meetings | |
| 16:25:56 | bauzas | #undo | |
| 16:25:59 | gmann | +1 on skipping | |
| 16:26:10 | bauzas | #info Skip the two next Nova meetings on Dec 20 and Dec27 | |
| 16:26:15 | opendevmeet | Removing item from minutes: #info Skip the two next Nova meetings on Dec 20 and Dec27 | |
| 16:26:15 | bauzas | #undo | |
| 16:26:24 | bauzas | #info Skip the two next Nova meetings on Dec 20 and Dec 27. See you next year ! | |
| 16:26:35 | bauzas | ok was quick | |
| 16:26:41 | bauzas | I'll send an email | |
| 16:26:48 | bauzas | second question | |
| 16:26:53 | bauzas | (bauzas) Document the volume detach issue | |
| 16:27:17 | bauzas | as a reminder, this volume detach issue we have is related to a specific libvirt release | |
| 16:27:35 | bauzas | so, I don't know how we could document it | |
| 16:27:57 | bauzas | but I'd like to have a way to explain our users that they need to make sure to ask to detach once they can ssh | |
| 16:28:10 | bauzas | and ideally attach as well | |
| 16:28:38 | bauzas | thoughts on that ? | |
| 16:29:31 | bauzas | hah | |
| 16:30:00 | bauzas | you know what ? | |
| 16:30:26 | bauzas | let's discuss this once more people are around like next year :) | |
| 16:30:42 | gibi | I guess you are not happy with a simple reno | |
| 16:31:02 | bauzas | gibi: yes, because this is not related to our repository, right? | |
| 16:31:09 | bauzas | I mean, this isn't a nova bug | |
| 16:31:09 | gibi | right | |
| 16:31:18 | bauzas | by a specific release | |
| 16:31:36 | gibi | it is only a nova bug if we assume nova should prevent the attach / detach | |
| 16:31:39 | bauzas | we can track this in Launchpad and I'd be okay | |
| 16:31:56 | bauzas | that's one way of documenting an open issue | |
| 16:31:56 | gibi | but we never promised to prevent such attach / detach | |
| 16:32:03 | bauzas | gibi: correct | |
| 16:33:05 | bauzas | you know what ? | |
| 16:33:13 | bauzas | lemme repropose this topic next year | |
| 16:33:17 | gibi | OK | |
| 16:33:27 | bauzas | (gmann) updates on switching the RBAC(scope and new defaults) defaults in nova | |
| 16:33:29 | clarkb | as an end user I look at your api docs when tryingto understand expectations | |
| 16:33:42 | clarkb | if anything is done I would suggest adding a note to the api docs for attach and detach | |
| 16:33:46 | bauzas | clarkb: that's a solutioon | |
| 16:34:17 | bauzas | which lgtm btw. | |
| 16:34:20 | bauzas | I can propose this | |
| 16:34:28 | bauzas | and people can vote on it | |
| 16:34:53 | bauzas | gmann: you had a thought | |
| 16:34:58 | gmann | for RBAC, | |
| 16:35:05 | bauzas | on the RBAC defaults, yeah | |
| 16:35:08 | gmann | I have added a new tempest job enabling the new defaults for Nova, neutron, cinder, glance and it is working fine #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-enforce-scope-new-defaults&skip=0 | |
| 16:35:33 | gmann | and this patch which need more work on functional tests flipping the defaults in nova #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/866218 | |
| 16:35:55 | gmann | just a info, nova patch is not ready to review as I need to fix functional tests there | |
| 16:36:18 | gmann | especially on admin to be changed from context.is_admin to roles['admin'] | |
| 16:36:23 | gmann | I should be ready by this week | |
| 16:36:28 | gmann | that is all | |
| 16:36:48 | gmann | there were few neutron bugs we found during tempest testing and all are fixed | |
| 16:38:32 | gmann | that's it from me unless any question on rbac defaults | |
| 16:38:50 | bauzas | gmann: ++ | |
| 16:39:02 | bauzas | thanks for working on it, that's good to know it works :) | |
| 16:39:31 | bauzas | gmann: you can ping me once you're done with the functests | |
| 16:39:38 | gmann | sure, will do | |
| 16:41:37 | bauzas | ok, then we're done | |
| 16:41:54 | bauzas | any other item anyone wants to discuss ? | |
| 16:42:24 | gibi | - | |
| 16:42:44 | bauzas | thanks all | |
| 16:42:49 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-12-13-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:42:49 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-12-13-16.00.txt | |
| 16:42:49 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-12-13-16.00.html | |
| 16:42:49 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Dec 13 16:42:49 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:42:49 | bauzas | #endmeeting | |
| 16:42:50 | gmann | thanks | |
| 16:42:54 | Uggla | thx | |
| 16:43:26 | gibi | thanks bauzas | |
| 16:47:14 | elodilles | thanks bauzas o/ | |
| 16:48:13 | clarkb | bauzas: to clarify a bit more on the tox stuff I'm trying to keep on top of it from a high level and in shared library tooling like the ensure-tox role. But I'm not planning to edit all the various tox.ini files to make them work :) | |
| 16:48:25 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/xena: Retry attachment delete API call for 504 Gateway Timeout https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/866083 | |
| 16:48:26 | bauzas | ok | |
| 16:48:27 | clarkb | but nova's actually looks really clean and if that test change passes then you are probably fine | |
| 17:04:14 | gmann | elodilles: gibi: clarkb: bauzas: on tox. we have pinned it in devstack side for tox based job also https://github.com/openstack/devstack/blob/master/playbooks/tox/pre.yaml#L14 | |
| 17:04:56 | gmann | so ensure-tox role unpinning on dev 21 should not impact devstack based tox job. but yes we need to move master to tox 4.0.0 soon | |
| 17:05:48 | clarkb | right I think the main concern at this point is developers aren't going to want to maintain different versions of tox for different projects. Generally keeping up with latest avoids this problem. We pinned to stop the bleeding and now we can take a controlled approach to adding compatibility | |
| 17:06:28 | gmann | yeah | |