| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-12-06 | |||
| 16:09:00 | bauzas | https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/975 | |
| 16:09:08 | elodilles | thx :) | |
| 16:09:14 | bauzas | it was simple to find https://docs.openstack.org/python-openstackclient/latest/#contributing | |
| 16:09:43 | bauzas | elodilles: ok, I'll then let you triage this bug | |
| 16:09:50 | bauzas | and thanks for it | |
| 16:10:03 | elodilles | np | |
| 16:10:43 | bauzas | moving on then | |
| 16:10:53 | bauzas | #info bug baton is being passed to bauzas | |
| 16:11:05 | bauzas | I'll try to triage it, but I have a lot of other priorities | |
| 16:11:13 | bauzas | anyway | |
| 16:11:20 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:11:28 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:11:33 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:11:39 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/866049 proposal to add more delay for centos9s-fips job | |
| 16:11:52 | bauzas | I'd appreciate if some people like sean-k-mooney or others could review this change ^ | |
| 16:12:48 | bauzas | mkopec had a thought to skip some tests for this job instead of adding more delays | |
| 16:16:17 | bauzas | anyway, moving | |
| 16:16:24 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:16:31 | bauzas | #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures | |
| 16:16:35 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:16:41 | bauzas | tick-tock | |
| 16:16:47 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/antelope/schedule.html | |
| 16:16:51 | bauzas | #info Antelope-2 is in 4 weeks | |
| 16:16:58 | bauzas | 4 weeks and in between a xmas period | |
| 16:17:06 | bauzas | so you know. | |
| 16:17:37 | bauzas | I forgot to write the email for next week's review day, I'll do it tomorrow hopefuly | |
| 16:17:46 | bauzas | moving on ? | |
| 16:18:49 | bauzas | looks so | |
| 16:18:57 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:19:03 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2) | |
| 16:19:08 | bauzas | #info As a reminder, cores eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for committing to the review | |
| 16:19:15 | bauzas | anything to discuss about priorities ? | |
| 16:20:07 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Reproducer for bug 1951656 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/866157 | |
| 16:20:08 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Handle mdev devices in libvirt 7.7+ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/866158 | |
| 16:20:34 | bauzas | nevermind the above ^ (doing two things at same time) | |
| 16:20:39 | bauzas | looks not, moving on | |
| 16:20:47 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:21:03 | bauzas | elodilles: you could have an opportunity to not lemme discuss alone :) | |
| 16:21:17 | elodilles | :) | |
| 16:21:18 | elodilles | yepp | |
| 16:21:29 | elodilles | actually stable gates were quiet | |
| 16:21:37 | elodilles | i mean patches merged :) | |
| 16:21:41 | bauzas | correct, I worked on the stable branches | |
| 16:21:46 | elodilles | #info stable branches seem to be unblocked / OK | |
| 16:21:50 | bauzas | and I haven't seen any problems so far | |
| 16:21:52 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:21:59 | elodilles | neither have i | |
| 16:21:59 | bauzas | down to wallaby at least | |
| 16:22:23 | elodilles | i've seen merged patches even older than wallaby | |
| 16:22:29 | bauzas | you know, nothing to tell is better than saying anything here in this section :) | |
| 16:22:37 | elodilles | yepp :) | |
| 16:22:46 | bauzas | moving on then, and profit. | |
| 16:22:49 | elodilles | ++ | |
| 16:22:52 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:22:52 | elodilles | :) | |
| 16:23:04 | Kirill_ | can someone review this: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/863773 . sean-k-mooney already reviewed and and set +1, need more reviews for setting +2, right? | |
| 16:23:07 | bauzas | I had a question but I don't see a quorum | |
| 16:23:24 | bauzas | Kirill_: nod, lemme see | |
| 16:23:41 | bauzas | ah that one | |
| 16:23:41 | Kirill_ | thanks | |
| 16:23:50 | bauzas | sure, I'll do some review | |
| 16:23:56 | sahid_ | o/ then, i have one regarding review priority | |
| 16:24:14 | bauzas | sahid_: sure, shoot | |
| 16:24:40 | sahid_ | thanks | |
| 16:24:51 | sahid_ | it's just to know, we have this that had the bit Review-Priority | |
| 16:24:52 | sahid_ | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/857838 | |
| 16:25:09 | sahid_ | I'm wondering whtehr the impl can I have also that bit, or if it's a different process? | |
| 16:25:12 | sahid_ | :-) | |
| 16:25:27 | bauzas | sahid_: surely, you can ask for it :) | |
| 16:25:42 | bauzas | sahid_: ping us tomorrow and we'll see | |
| 16:25:53 | bauzas | looks there are not a lot of people around atm | |
| 16:26:08 | sahid_ | yeah... no worries, will see that tomorrow | |
| 16:26:10 | sahid_ | thanks a lot | |
| 16:27:02 | bauzas | np | |
| 16:27:36 | bauzas | so let's end this meeting for now, I'll ask about which meetings to skip during the xmas period next week | |
| 16:27:55 | bauzas | anyone having anything to raise before we say it's a wrap ? | |
| 16:28:34 | bauzas | looks not, | |
| 16:28:39 | bauzas | thanks all | |
| 16:28:43 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-12-06-16.01.html | |
| 16:28:43 | bauzas | #endmeeting | |
| 16:28:43 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-12-06-16.01.log.html | |
| 16:28:43 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-12-06-16.01.txt | |
| 16:28:43 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Dec 6 16:28:43 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:29:23 | elodilles | thanks bauzas o/ | |
| 16:29:51 | elodilles | that sounds fun :D | |
| 16:29:51 | sean-k-mooney | kgube: we generally do not like tracking changes to nova in other projects specs | |
| 16:30:31 | sean-k-mooney | kgube: if you are chaing the sematics or the extend voluem external event even if that does not change the content passed to the api we shoudl still have a spec to dicuss that | |
| 16:30:47 | kgube | sean-k-mooney, alright! | |
| 16:30:57 | sean-k-mooney | Kirill_: i wanted gmann or other to confirm my reasoning on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/863773/10/specs/wallaby/approved/nova-vnc-support-for-ironic.rst#134 | |
| 16:32:03 | sean-k-mooney | Kirill_: i.e. that we do not need a microversion for this change and there is no other upgrade impact for the reasons is stated in the commnet | |
| 16:35:11 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: I kept it open but somehow got distracted. It is in my list. | |
| 16:35:57 | Kirill_ | per my understanding, we don't need any miniversions cause if nova does not support my changes the result will be the same as now, if ironic does not support - again we will catch error - vnc is unsupported. i'll try such scenarios tomorrow. | |
| 16:36:54 | sean-k-mooney | Kirill_: ya so part of what im wondering is changing form a 400 to a 200 ok | |
| 16:37:15 | sean-k-mooney | and i think it is because if it was a libvirt instance then a 200 would have been valid | |
| 16:37:31 | sean-k-mooney | or possible for the same api request | |
| 16:37:46 | sean-k-mooney | so to me there is no need for a microverion | |
| 16:38:55 | Kirill_ | ++ | |
| 20:22:51 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Test aborting queued live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/841483 | |
| 20:22:57 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Add functional tests to reproduce bug #1960412 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/841760 | |
| 20:48:58 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Clean up when queued live migration aborted https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/841736 | |