Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-11-15
16:09:26 bauzas given today is a spec review day, I'd like to skip this check
16:09:40 bauzas people can ping us on IRC for reviews, surely
16:09:46 bauzas #info As a reminder, cores eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for committing to the review
16:10:24 bauzas elodilles: floor is yours
16:10:24 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:10:24 bauzas moving on
16:10:30 elodilles #info stein, rocky and queens moved to End of Life, branches were deleted (last branch state can be found with tags: stein-eol, rocky-eol, queens-eol): https://review.opendev.org/862520
16:10:35 bauzas \o/
16:10:40 elodilles ~o~
16:10:43 elodilles #info all open stable branches should be OK
16:10:52 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:11:05 elodilles and that's it (to be quick :))
16:12:09 bauzas thanks
16:12:09 bauzas nice
16:12:15 elodilles np
16:12:25 bauzas last topic with a good question
16:12:32 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:12:36 bauzas (takashi) Release python-novaclient 18.2.0
16:12:50 bauzas (sorry takashi, if you read the meeting notes, I don't know your IRC nick)
16:12:59 bauzas https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/861360
16:13:06 bauzas The nova supports microversions 2.93 in the Zed release. However the support for microversions 2.93 has not been included in the python-novaclient 18.1.0 (the Zed release).
16:13:18 bauzas Add support for microversions 2.93 in the 18.2.0.
16:13:24 bauzas that's it from him
16:13:31 bauzas I'm not opposed to a .y release
16:13:36 bauzas any concerns ?
16:13:54 bauzas before I +1 the releases patch ?
16:14:30 elodilles no concern, should be OK, especially as we are at Antelope-1
16:14:59 bauzas elodilles: yeah but we usually have a tradition to release client changes around milestone-1
16:15:20 gibi 18.2.0 works for me
16:15:26 bauzas said +1d
16:15:35 bauzas should get the PTL-vote then
16:15:49 bauzas thanks takashi for your efforts, btw.
16:15:56 bauzas greatly appreciated
16:16:16 gibi ^^ +1
16:16:32 bauzas I haven't looked at our libs recently
16:16:57 bauzas milestone-1 is maybe premature but we could release some libs updates like os-vif if that helps
16:16:59 dvo-plv Hello, All could you please review our blueprint: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/859290
16:17:04 sean-k-mooney milestone 1 already... this will be a very short cycle
16:17:29 bauzas sean-k-mooney: yup, I said it loudly in the antelope release schedule patch
16:17:50 elodilles yepp, this is a 24 weeks long cycle
16:18:15 bauzas dvo-plv: we're on meeting now, but be sure we'll look at all specs today as this is a day prioritized for it
16:18:27 bauzas anyway, I guess we're done
16:18:35 bauzas like I said, no libraries need for release ?
16:18:53 bauzas disclaimer, I can check the git repos, I'm just lazy to do so
16:19:05 elodilles i haven't checked, but were there merged patches there?
16:19:13 bauzas that's my question :)
16:19:37 bauzas anyway, we're not constrained by the milestone, we can release whenever we want
16:19:45 bauzas that's it then for me today
16:19:56 bauzas any other topic to address before we end the meeting ?
16:20:34 bauzas thanks all, appreciated your presence while you all are quite busy this day
16:20:46 bauzas have a good day and let's continue our effort
16:20:49 bauzas #endmeeting
16:20:50 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-11-15-16.00.log.html
16:20:50 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-11-15-16.00.txt
16:20:50 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-11-15-16.00.html
16:20:50 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Nov 15 16:20:49 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:20:58 elodilles thanks o/
16:21:26 gibi o/
16:21:50 elodilles bauzas: the release patches were generated for Antelope-1, but I see only python-novaclient, so I guess no other lib release is needed: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:antelope-milestone-1
16:22:28 elodilles bauzas: wrong, there's os-vif: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/864527
16:22:36 elodilles sean-k-mooney: ^^^
16:23:26 bauzas I don't think we need to tag it 3.1.0
16:23:33 bauzas per the commit msg
16:24:02 elodilles we need to bump at least MINOR versions between series
16:24:04 sean-k-mooney elodilles: before we proceed with that i just want to make sure we have landed the tox/gitreview patches
16:24:32 elodilles sean-k-mooney: ++, thanks in advance for taking care of that!
16:24:35 sean-k-mooney oh never mind we dont need too
16:24:41 sean-k-mooney we only change them on stable to aovid that
16:24:45 elodilles then even better :)
16:25:13 sean-k-mooney i saw the email come in for the release this mornign but didnt open the patch yet
16:26:06 elodilles the generated patches on master branch seem to be merged
16:26:14 sean-k-mooney looking at the oneline summery i think this makes sense and i agree a feature bump is correct
16:26:29 elodilles ++
16:26:51 sean-k-mooney so there was os-vif and novaclient if i rememebr correctly
16:27:06 bauzas ok, then I'll +1 it
16:27:09 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/864536
16:28:00 bauzas sean-k-mooney: that's a duplicate of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/861360
16:28:01 sean-k-mooney both have the swap to the new testing runtime merged and not much else so i think we can release that too
16:28:40 sean-k-mooney yes and no
16:28:49 sean-k-mooney the release was being doen for different reasons
16:29:15 sean-k-mooney but sure we can go with the takashi's patch
16:29:16 bauzas surely, but the result is the same even if the gerrit topics are different
16:34:22 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/placement master: Policy defaults improvement spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/864385
16:34:56 gmann bauzas: sean-k-mooney dansmith ^^ updated placement spec also for RBAC to add admin-or-service default what we discussed on IRC
16:35:07 dansmith ack
16:39:43 bauzas ack
16:48:38 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Policy service role spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/864379
17:27:47 bauzas sean-k-mooney: gibi: thanks for having commented out the CPU spec
17:27:51 bauzas will update it tomorrow
17:28:17 sean-k-mooney cool ill take a look then
17:28:19 gibi bauzas: no worries. feel free to ping me later and I cen re-review
17:51:13 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/placement master: Policy defaults improvement spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/864385
17:52:30 gmann sean-k-mooney: ^^ updated the upgrade impact and scope_type change.
18:37:05 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose spec for ephemeral storage encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/864138
18:38:29 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose spec for ephemeral encryption for libvirt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/864147
18:42:40 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add stable-compute-uuid spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/863152
23:42:24 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Add service role in nova policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864594
#openstack-nova - 2022-11-16
02:34:05 opendevreview Nobuhiro MIKI proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: fix typo in test_config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864641
03:44:26 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Add service role in nova policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864594
04:49:37 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: api-ref update: Move the service APIs in a separate section https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864655

Earlier   Later