| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-09-06 | |||
| 16:15:41 | bauzas | yeah, the test shouldn't be assuming we could | |
| 16:15:57 | sean-k-mooney | no this is a job config issue | |
| 16:15:59 | bauzas | if we would want a test, this would have to be negative | |
| 16:16:05 | sean-k-mooney | you cant tell if its cross cell form the api | |
| 16:16:09 | bauzas | like "I know this can't work" | |
| 16:16:12 | sean-k-mooney | so tempest cannot detech that | |
| 16:16:20 | sean-k-mooney | so this has to be done via job config | |
| 16:16:24 | bauzas | ahah true | |
| 16:16:47 | bauzas | anyway, bug report is still open, feel free to comment it out for resolution | |
| 16:16:50 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:16:57 | opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Clarify client changes in rebuild spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/856164 | |
| 16:17:00 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1988482 Proposed patch on the fly https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855658 | |
| 16:17:13 | bauzas | as said, reviews are welcome ^ | |
| 16:17:23 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: shoudn't the test be using an az? | |
| 16:17:25 | bauzas | I exceptionally relaxed my review needs | |
| 16:17:32 | dansmith | anyway, we can discuss elsewhere | |
| 16:17:42 | bauzas | so I gave +2 for a patch without testing | |
| 16:17:43 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: i dont think so be we can follow up after ya | |
| 16:18:21 | bauzas | tl;dr: the problem is with PrettyTable having a changed behavior | |
| 16:18:43 | sean-k-mooney | yes so they have now fixed this by reverting the behaivor | |
| 16:18:49 | bauzas | gibi: sean-k-mooney: wants to address this issue now ? | |
| 16:18:56 | sean-k-mooney | i tested with the previous release broken release and new release with the revert | |
| 16:19:19 | sean-k-mooney | i woudl prefer to merge and backprot https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855658 | |
| 16:19:22 | bauzas | so https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855658 wouldn't be needed ? | |
| 16:19:25 | bauzas | ack | |
| 16:19:27 | sean-k-mooney | to yoga so we never need to thnk about htis again | |
| 16:19:51 | sean-k-mooney | its not needed unless the decided to reinstate the feature or change the default | |
| 16:20:01 | sean-k-mooney | or we can hardcode the alignmend and not worry | |
| 16:20:18 | gibi | I agree we sean-k-mooney | |
| 16:20:31 | bauzas | gibi: didn't know this verb | |
| 16:20:43 | bauzas | I sean-k-mooney, you sean-k-mooney | |
| 16:20:49 | bauzas | :) | |
| 16:20:53 | sean-k-mooney | :) | |
| 16:20:57 | gibi | but as an extra: in general we don't have py39 lines in the global requirements so this can hit us with different packages | |
| 16:21:00 | gibi | bauzas: :) | |
| 16:21:17 | gibi | I think there was a discussion in relmgmt about adding those lines | |
| 16:21:40 | gibi | in yoga we should have been upper constrained | |
| 16:21:44 | sean-k-mooney | it could hit distos if the distro had 3.4.0 | |
| 16:21:45 | elodilles | (rather on requirements, but yes) | |
| 16:21:52 | bauzas | yeah | |
| 16:22:10 | gibi | elodilles: then there :) same folks :) | |
| 16:22:12 | sean-k-mooney | anyway i think we can just review this normally | |
| 16:22:14 | sean-k-mooney | not critical | |
| 16:22:18 | gibi | agree | |
| 16:22:23 | sean-k-mooney | it was just annoying as it was blocking some backports | |
| 16:22:25 | sean-k-mooney | its not now | |
| 16:23:07 | bauzas | ok, so chaning the prio to High ? | |
| 16:23:16 | bauzas | because of the requirements patch ? | |
| 16:24:04 | gibi | I agree that this is not critical now | |
| 16:24:20 | bauzas | ok, punting the prio then | |
| 16:24:35 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: please just update the bug report with your thoughts please | |
| 16:24:41 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:24:43 | sean-k-mooney | will do | |
| 16:24:47 | bauzas | moving on, we still have lots of things to discuss | |
| 16:25:12 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 9 new untriaged bugs (+2 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:25:18 | bauzas | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 26 open stories (-1 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement | |
| 16:25:24 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:25:29 | bauzas | #info bug baton is being passed to Uggla | |
| 16:25:32 | bauzas | that's it for bugs | |
| 16:25:47 | Uggla | yep I will not forget that time. | |
| 16:25:48 | bauzas | (yeah Uggla kindly offered to keep the baton for this week, thanks to him) | |
| 16:26:02 | bauzas | Uggla: no pain here | |
| 16:26:10 | bauzas | this is stretch goal | |
| 16:26:15 | bauzas | anyway, moving on | |
| 16:26:24 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:26:31 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:26:35 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status | |
| 16:26:40 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-integrated-compute-centos-9-stream&project=openstack%2Fnova&pipeline=periodic-weekly Centos 9 Stream periodic job status | |
| 16:26:45 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-emulation&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Emulation periodic job runs | |
| 16:26:50 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:27:01 | bauzas | I checked all the periodic runs and all are green | |
| 16:27:08 | bauzas | #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures | |
| 16:27:23 | bauzas | I think we discussed about the current gate bugs, we can move on | |
| 16:27:33 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:27:39 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html | |
| 16:27:45 | bauzas | #info Zed-3 was last Thursday | |
| 16:27:50 | bauzas | hereby, I declare | |
| 16:27:55 | bauzas | #info FeatureFreeze officially declared today | |
| 16:28:02 | elodilles | \o/ | |
| 16:28:05 | bauzas | #action bauzas to -2 open changes that were having an accepted spec | |
| 16:28:11 | bauzas | #action bauzas to run the script to move specs with merged implementation to 'implemented' | |
| 16:28:21 | bauzas | #link Zed tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-zed-blueprint-status | |
| 16:28:40 | bauzas | we still have some client changes that require reviews | |
| 16:29:25 | bauzas | in theory, we are in client libs freeze too | |
| 16:29:27 | bauzas | https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html#z-final-clientlib | |
| 16:29:48 | bauzas | elodilles: what do you think of that ? | |
| 16:30:13 | elodilles | just wanted to warn that we are in freeze period | |
| 16:30:13 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Follow up for the PCI in placement series https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855185 | |
| 16:30:16 | elodilles | for that as well | |
| 16:30:18 | bauzas | shall we stop merging novaclient and OSC patches until next cycle or shall we pretend this never existed and be pragmatic ? | |
| 16:30:21 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Doc follow up for PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855186 | |
| 16:30:47 | bauzas | ok, so releasing wouldn't be acceptable | |
| 16:31:01 | bauzas | but I guess merging patches doesn't create issues | |
| 16:31:09 | sean-k-mooney | we can review but proably hold +w for a week | |
| 16:31:10 | elodilles | well, if patches merges, and new release is needed, then RFE is needed | |
| 16:31:17 | sean-k-mooney | the branches will reopen at RC1 | |
| 16:31:31 | elodilles | so non critical things probably should be postponed to Antelope | |
| 16:32:18 | bauzas | I don't disagree with this, I was just wondering about the difference between holding a merge, and merging without releasing | |
| 16:32:26 | sean-k-mooney | we can alwasy do an early release of novaclient or osc in a few weeks | |
| 16:32:49 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: rc bug fixes is really the only issue | |