Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-08-29
13:56:16 sean-k-mooney in a new test
13:56:35 dansmith sean-k-mooney: we always make calls at the lowest version they need
13:56:42 sean-k-mooney and by pinning to the X.0 we meake suer we did not break it
13:56:46 sean-k-mooney ok
13:56:47 dansmith so calls that haven't changed since the last major bump are made at .0
13:57:04 sean-k-mooney ya i tought we did it the other way but that makes sense why we do it this way
13:59:34 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: refactor: remove duplicated logic https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855022
13:59:35 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Record SRIOV PF MAC in the binding profile https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855023
13:59:36 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Remove double mocking https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855024
13:59:37 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Remove double mocking... again https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855025
13:59:38 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Add compute restart capability for libvirt func tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855026
13:59:40 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: enable blocked VDPA move operations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855035
14:00:55 sean-k-mooney dansmith: by the way the 5.x support is already deprecated yes we should ensure we can drop it next cycle without being impacted by the new lifecycle
14:01:25 sean-k-mooney we dont have to drop it next cycle but i dont want to be force to keep it until BB
14:01:39 dansmith I dunno, I thought we were thinking about keeping it around for longer
14:01:43 sean-k-mooney now that we have 6.X RPCs
14:02:07 sean-k-mooney well we shoudl dicuss it i guess
14:02:21 sean-k-mooney the epecation in yoga was no new deploymets would use 5.X
14:02:43 sean-k-mooney but we were keeping the compat for zed
14:17:09 dansmith whoami-rajat: the patch underneath you has shifted again, so you should rebase *on* it before you push if possible
15:02:28 hkominos Hi guys! I have a question regarding policies that I want to ask. When we edit lets say /etc/nova/policy.json , is the nova-api process that will read these new policies or the keystone process ?
15:06:02 dansmith nova-api
15:06:13 hkominos thx !
15:24:06 gmann gibi: dansmith: please check this documentation and releasenote for RBAC change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854882
15:24:15 gibi gmann: will check sooon
15:24:20 gmann thanks
16:30:58 whoami-rajat dansmith, yep, this time i first rebased on top of it then made changes :)
16:31:07 dansmith whoami-rajat: good :)
17:36:16 sean-k-mooney gibi: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816157/14#message-b94abbc42dea06b9d989f698ffbee826a9283a19 should fix the failing unit test in the userdata update patch
17:37:45 gibi sean-k-mooney: thanks for looking into that
17:38:12 sean-k-mooney the os-traits relases happened at the weekend yes?
17:38:18 gibi I think so
17:38:36 gibi otherwise the user_data patch could not bump the os-traits req in nova successfully
17:38:39 gibi but it did :)
17:39:01 sean-k-mooney ya actully my tox env was able to pull in the traits too
17:39:09 sean-k-mooney just looking at the api check for the trait now
17:39:15 gibi yepp it was merged on fridayt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/854617
17:39:27 sean-k-mooney i think that was the last thing that needed to be updated since i last looked
17:39:39 sean-k-mooney so once the unit test is fixed i think its ready to go
17:39:48 sean-k-mooney just going to finish reviewing the rest of the change
17:40:16 gibi yes, I had the same feeling this morning
17:40:20 gibi it is fairly close
17:40:42 sean-k-mooney do we have a way to reach out to the author
17:40:56 sean-k-mooney do we know what timezone they are in?
17:42:56 gibi he was on nova before with the nick jhartkopf but I don't know him
17:43:15 sean-k-mooney looks like its a german email so emea timezones most likely
17:43:35 gibi he updated the patch over the weekend so I think he is still actively engaged with this
17:43:39 sean-k-mooney ok lets see if they update it in the morning
17:43:40 dansmith if it's a semi-trivial test fix, perhaps we could just fix it for him?
17:44:01 sean-k-mooney i mean i can do that if its ok with ye
17:44:03 dansmith like, unless it's likely he has other things pending, the risk is low ...
17:44:24 sean-k-mooney i dont think there is honestly anythign that could not be in a follow up change
17:44:29 gibi I can do the test fix earlies tomorrow morning, but sean-k-mooney if you can do it I can review it
17:44:54 dansmith it just sounded like sean-k-mooney has the fixes locally for testing, so might as well just push and update
17:46:02 sean-k-mooney yep i have ok i can push them let me see if i have any pep issue first and run the full set of unit and funcitonal tests.
17:47:32 sean-k-mooney if im pushing this do ye want me to cherry-pick the follow up patches and or rebases it to master
17:48:00 sean-k-mooney i think its relitivly up todate but i know ye were waiting on a rebase over the weekend
17:48:06 sean-k-mooney i think that was already done
17:48:27 dansmith nah, I'd just push that up and let whoami-rajat rebase on the result
17:48:37 dansmith oh, sorry,
17:48:55 dansmith the follow-ups.. I dunno, less concerned about that than just the main one which is the key in the pipeline
17:49:14 sean-k-mooney well followups i ment whoami-rajat seriese
17:49:29 sean-k-mooney but sure ill just update this one when the test finish
17:49:32 dansmith I'd let him do it, he's working on them now I htink
17:49:37 sean-k-mooney and then whoami-rajat can update there set
17:49:41 dansmith yea
17:54:37 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Factor out base class for candidate aware filters https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854929
17:54:37 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Filter PCI pools based on Placement allocation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854120
17:54:38 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Func test for PCI in placement scheduling https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854122
17:54:38 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Store allocated RP in InstancePCIRequest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854121
17:54:39 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support evacuate with PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854615
17:54:39 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support cold migrate and resize with PCI tracking in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854247
17:54:40 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support same host resize with PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854441
17:54:40 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support unshelve with PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854616
17:54:41 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Test reschedule with PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854626
17:54:42 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Allow enabling PCI scheduling in Placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854924
17:54:42 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Test multi create with PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854663
17:54:44 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Enable pci in placement feature https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854925
17:55:18 gibi sean-k-mooney, stephenfin: ^^ I managed to finish all the TODOs in the series
17:55:56 gibi from tomorrow I will start collecting the follow up from already merged patches
17:56:03 sean-k-mooney well done :) i guess i know what im doing tomorrow
17:56:35 gibi but now I need a glass of wine
17:56:44 gibi see you all tomorrow o/.
18:07:59 whoami-rajat sean-k-mooney, dansmith is there going to be an update on 2.93 patch? I'm finalizing tests and pushing changes
18:08:11 dansmith whoami-rajat: yeah, just hold on a bit
18:08:17 whoami-rajat ack
18:08:36 sean-k-mooney the functional test are almost finsihed locally and then ill push likely in the next 60 secons
18:08:44 sean-k-mooney just making sure it will pass ci
18:13:14 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: add support for updating server's user_data https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816157
18:13:23 sean-k-mooney whoami-rajat: ^ there you go
18:13:33 whoami-rajat ack
18:13:56 sean-k-mooney this was the fix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816157/14..15/nova/tests/unit/api/openstack/compute/test_server_actions.py
18:54:01 opendevreview Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for volume backed server rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820368
18:54:02 opendevreview Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add API support for rebuilding BFV instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830883
18:54:02 opendevreview Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add conductor RPC interface for rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831219
18:58:13 whoami-rajat updated the series however I'm still facing some functional test failure related to green thread queue, I figured it might be my environment so pushed to see what gate thinks
18:58:57 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Add documentation and releasenotes for RBAC change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854882
19:02:46 gmann dansmith: ^^ fixed as per review comments
20:14:54 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Add documentation and releasenotes for RBAC change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854882
20:15:27 gmann dansmith: ^^ updated, I have fixed your comments

Earlier   Later