Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-06-21
16:58:53 gibi sure still proper review on those patches but not blanket -2
16:59:02 artom gibi, nope, I'm coming away from this with the understanding that func test refactors are fair game if they help make the fixes cleaner and easier to backport (and increase confidence in the reproducer test)
16:59:02 bauzas my other point can be deferred to next week
16:59:10 gibi ack
16:59:21 gibi moving on then
16:59:22 gibi (bauzas) Opportunities for low-hanging-fruits, anyone ? (only if we have time left)
16:59:31 gibi 40 secs :)
16:59:32 bauzas no time, let's punt to next week
16:59:36 gibi ack
16:59:46 gibi any last minute issue to raise today?
16:59:50 bauzas tl;dr: think about how to help on-off contributors like interns
17:00:10 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-06-21-15.59.log.html
17:00:10 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-06-21-15.59.txt
17:00:10 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-06-21-15.59.html
17:00:10 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Jun 21 17:00:10 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
17:00:10 gibi #endmeeting
17:00:21 gibi thanks folks for joining
17:00:23 elodilles thanks gibi o/
17:00:26 bauzas thanks a lot gibi for running this one, I owe you some coin
17:00:37 gibi keerthi: sorry for the delay
17:00:50 gibi keerthi: so lets try that now
17:03:16 keerthi thanks sean
17:03:29 artom bauzas, hopefully not bitcoin
17:03:41 gibi nah it is cheap now
17:03:53 keerthi sean, this is the blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/define-max-volume-limit-at-flavor
17:03:54 artom Cheap, or worthless? :)
17:03:55 bauzas artom: just a nickel
17:05:12 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: add repoducer test for bug 1890244 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/847000
17:09:02 keerthi sean did you get chance to review the blueprint ?
17:12:09 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Remove unnecessary if condition https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/844418
18:14:57 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: ignore deleted server groups in validation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/847001
#openstack-nova - 2022-06-22
03:52:50 opendevreview OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/846876
06:09:13 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Added validation for hw machine type in host capabilities https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/847126
06:20:26 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Added validation for hw machine type in host capabilities https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/847126
07:03:28 bauzas good morning Nova
07:06:41 gibi bauzas: o/
07:06:58 bauzas gibi: thanks for having written the email about the PCI series
07:07:05 bauzas gibi: today is review day for me
07:07:26 gibi bauzas: I felt I needed to give some guide to encourage reviewers
07:10:00 bauzas :)
07:10:16 bauzas I guess we will be only a few of them
07:10:32 gibi bauzas: I have to respin the series due to a doc issue
07:10:49 gibi just I want to finish the downstream backport review first
07:10:51 bauzas gibi: ok, no worries, I'll start with Uggla series
07:11:06 bauzas after a coffee...
07:11:35 gibi sure
08:37:56 bauzas Uggla: voted on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831507/14
08:38:25 bauzas Uggla: tl;dr: yeah IMHO you could squash your patch with gibi's one but I'd also want you to modify how you use the sentinel
08:40:16 Uggla bauzas, ok I'm going to have a look and propose an updated version ASAP.
08:40:23 bauzas Uggla: thanks
08:40:41 bauzas with gibi's patch and just the thing I ask you, I don't think this is massive change
08:40:56 bauzas Uggla: one thing I also wrote, please bear with logs
08:41:27 bauzas Uggla: the point is, logs are very well appreciated, but large public clouds tend to disagree with us adding more logs :)
08:42:01 bauzas in particular when you can get information from other services, like scheduler
08:42:18 Uggla bauzas, oh ok.
08:42:34 bauzas no worries, this is something not largely known
08:42:53 bauzas but yeah, logs rotation are costly for them
08:43:13 bauzas DEBUG level is a bit different tho
08:43:23 bauzas but with INFO, we need to be cautious
08:43:56 bauzas I'll then switch to your Manila spec
08:44:16 bauzas the sooner we have it, the earlier we could merge the os-traits change
08:46:59 Uggla bauzas, anyway thx for the review
08:47:12 bauzas np pb, apologies this was that late
08:47:42 bauzas Uggla: I briefly reviewed your REST change, nothing controversial appeared
08:47:48 bauzas but I didn't vote
08:48:51 Uggla bauzas, regarding the manila one, Goutham sent comments yesterday.
08:49:18 bauzas nice
08:51:07 Uggla bauzas, remaining blocking point is the "extra spec / trait" if we want to have this explicit or not. I would rather explicit one. But we need a consensus here.
08:51:59 Uggla I would like to discuss this point with bauzas, gibi, sean-k-mooney.
08:52:30 gibi I'm around
08:53:16 Uggla gibi, o/
08:54:28 gibi o/
08:58:29 bauzas Uggla: gibi: give me 30 mins so I can recharge the context by reviewing the spec :)
08:58:52 gibi bauzas, Uggla: do we want to wait for sean-k-mooney too?
08:59:18 bauzas gibi: probably, again I need to review the spec
08:59:31 Uggla gibi, if possible yes.
08:59:31 gibi sure go ahead an review
09:00:21 bauzas gibi: Uggla: we could do some session by 14:30 our time if needed
09:10:41 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Extend device_spec with resource_class and traits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/846218
09:10:42 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reject mixed VF rc and trait config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/846436
09:10:42 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reject PCI dependent device config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/846435
09:10:43 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reject devname based device_spec config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/846466
09:10:43 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Ignore PCI devs with physical_network tag https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/846219
09:10:44 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Stop if tracking is disable after it was enabled before https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/847009
09:10:44 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support [pci]device_spec reconfiguration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/846470
09:21:08 bauzas gibi: sean-k-mooney: Uggla yeah, so we have two concerns for the Manila spec
09:21:17 bauzas 1/ about flavor vs. image
09:21:29 bauzas 2/ about how to lock a share
09:21:53 bauzas if you want, we can discuss this by 1230UTC, ie. 14:30 for me and 13:30 for sean
09:22:31 Uggla bauzas, I think 1 is more explicit / implicit trait requirement.
09:22:54 Uggla bauzas, anyway ok for 14:30.
09:23:04 gibi yepp it is about asking the user to know about all technical prereqs for attaching a manila share
09:33:17 sean-k-mooney[m] for manila shars you should not explictly need to specify any traits
09:33:28 sean-k-mooney[m] you can optionally do so but it should not be a requiement
09:33:57 sean-k-mooney[m] we want this feature to work with existing flavors and images
09:34:22 sean-k-mooney[m] so documenting that you enither need file backed memory or hugepages
09:34:34 sean-k-mooney[m] and having the api check for the same should be sufficent
09:35:09 sean-k-mooney[m] operators can use traits for the former if they want to enforce that or they can use host aggreates or az to model which host has file backed memory
09:35:28 sean-k-mooney[m] and just tell there users to select that az
09:35:58 sean-k-mooney[m] so i dont think we need to modify the flavor/image for this feature

Earlier   Later