Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-02-24
19:17:01 chateaulav ill keep watching the ci patchset though
19:44:18 opendevreview Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for volume backed server rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830894
19:50:54 opendevreview Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add API support for rebuilding BFV instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830883
19:55:44 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Follow up for nova-manage image property commands https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830895
20:03:30 sean-k-mooney chateaulav: one test failed but thats pretty good https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/3cba136d39924d73b775a2b3a8d626ba
20:07:53 chateaulav ok, ill get that
20:08:52 sean-k-mooney nova.exception.InterfaceAttachFailed: Failed to attach network adapter device to 61a0c10a-930f-4b46-8651-c8583d1d9ff7
20:09:02 sean-k-mooney caused by r libvirt.libvirtError: internal error: No more available PCI slots
20:09:17 sean-k-mooney chateaulav: so that is a simple fix
20:10:05 sean-k-mooney i suspec that just as we have to preacllocatre pcie root ports for x86 with q35 machine type
20:10:30 sean-k-mooney we likely need to do that too for aarch64 and virt machien type
20:11:08 sean-k-mooney chateaulav: for q35 we use https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#libvirt.num_pcie_ports to contol this
20:11:35 sean-k-mooney so you proably need to set that to 28
20:11:39 sean-k-mooney or similar
20:11:48 sean-k-mooney in the ci job and that should be all that is requried
20:11:51 chateaulav alright
20:12:18 sean-k-mooney its possibel we have to alter the driver slightly but it shoudl be trivial that is what i woudl try first to adress it
20:12:38 sean-k-mooney chateaulav: i approved the previous patch and rechecke the first patch
20:12:42 sean-k-mooney so they shoudl proceed
20:12:47 chateaulav great!
20:12:56 chateaulav sean-k-mooney: appreciate the help
20:13:04 sean-k-mooney no worries
20:13:15 sean-k-mooney im proably going to call it a day now
20:13:42 sean-k-mooney the failure is here by the way if you were wonderign https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/3cba136d39924d73b775a2b3a8d626ba/log/controller/logs/screen-n-cpu.txt#9219
20:14:19 sean-k-mooney looking at the xml https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/3cba136d39924d73b775a2b3a8d626ba/log/controller/logs/screen-n-cpu.txt#9035
20:14:53 sean-k-mooney i dont see any addtional pcie root ports in the xml we sent to libvirt
20:15:26 sean-k-mooney normally libvirt will allcoate 1 addtional pcie endpoint but that might only be for q35
20:15:55 sean-k-mooney anyway o/
20:16:07 chateaulav \o
20:18:39 opendevreview Jonathan Race proposed openstack/nova master: zuul-job for Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828372
20:46:11 opendevreview Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for volume backed server rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830894
20:46:11 opendevreview Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add volume-rebuild support to cinder module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830882
20:46:12 opendevreview Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add API support for rebuilding BFV instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830883
21:09:01 melwitt gmann: do you know if there is any known issue with gate failure "[ERROR] /opt/stack/devstack/lib/neutron_plugins/ovn_agent:178 Socket /var/run/openvswitch/ovnnb_db.sock not found"? I've hit it twice today
21:09:51 gmann melwitt: not i am aware of. seems new to me
21:10:02 melwitt ack
21:11:03 gmann latest i saw my rbac patches passed gate ~2hr ago
21:14:28 melwitt thanks
23:35:14 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: object/notification for Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828369
23:35:21 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: driver/secheduler/docs for Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/822053
23:50:32 sean-k-mooney melwitt: locally or in the gate
23:50:48 melwitt sean-k-mooney: gate. but looks like I was just unlucky
23:51:01 sean-k-mooney locally devstack is not always proeperly cleaning up when you unstack
23:51:03 sean-k-mooney ack
23:51:42 sean-k-mooney im not sure what would cause that on a clean install
#openstack-nova - 2022-02-25
00:10:32 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Follow up for unified limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830918
00:17:28 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Make more project level APIs scoped to project only https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828670
00:17:35 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Add volume-rebuild support to cinder module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830882
00:27:55 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Amend unified limits spec to explain "API limit" enforcement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/829413
01:48:59 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Move keypair quota error message into exception https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828186
01:49:06 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Add stub unified limits driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712137
02:10:44 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Follow up for unified limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830918
07:31:50 opendevreview Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for volume backed server rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820368
07:55:53 opendevreview Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for volume backed server rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830939
08:10:42 opendevreview Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for volume backed server rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820368
08:13:24 opendevreview Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add API support for rebuilding BFV instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830883
09:46:28 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Assert quota related API behavior when noop https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712140
10:54:50 sean-k-mooney gibi: bauzas FF also applies to docs changes?
10:54:57 bauzas no
10:55:13 sean-k-mooney ok stephen has https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:notifications-docs and i was going to go review them
10:55:39 sean-k-mooney they will need a second +2 anyway but just wonderingif they should wait until after rc1
10:56:01 sean-k-mooney if they can merge before it ill try and review them later today
10:56:18 sean-k-mooney otherwise i was going to wait and come back in a few weeks
11:12:31 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: reenable greendns in nova. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830966
11:23:46 elodilles bauzas sean-k-mooney : fyi, yesterday was the deadline for yoga-milestone-3 client library releases, python-novaclient - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/830249 , and osc-placement - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/830227
11:24:04 elodilles if you have a sec and could review them that would be awesome :)
11:24:35 sean-k-mooney ack ill look at them now
11:24:45 elodilles sean-k-mooney: thanks \o/
11:25:10 sean-k-mooney thanks for the reminder i forgot that m3 was the release deadline for client libs
11:25:25 sean-k-mooney /libs//
11:32:49 elodilles no worries :)
11:41:43 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: reenable greendns in nova. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830966
11:41:55 sean-k-mooney the nova client one looks correct so ill +1 that shortly
11:50:06 sean-k-mooney gibi: i have not reviewed this yet but do we want to try and land https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/828545
11:50:18 sean-k-mooney before we do the osc-pacement release later today
12:01:36 whoami-rajat sean-k-mooney, Hi, I'm not totally sure if which of the two reason is for the -2 on my patch (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/827163)
12:01:52 whoami-rajat 1) if it's regarding proposing changes directly to OSC (in favor of deprecation of novaclient), i can do that sure
12:02:39 whoami-rajat 2) If it's regarding client freeze (due to which my patch wouldn't land in yoga) then the patch is up for review since long time and noone provided this feedback before
12:10:08 sean-k-mooney whoami-rajat: the freeze was yesterday
12:10:32 sean-k-mooney am but as of this cycle we are nolonger addign feature to novaclients cli
12:10:38 sean-k-mooney so that is the main rason for -2
12:10:49 sean-k-mooney if you want to add helper funciton its fine
12:11:00 sean-k-mooney but in this case i think just adding it to osc is the way to go
12:12:26 sean-k-mooney im not sure is see a usecase wehre other projects will want to import nova client to trigger a rebuild but i guess heat coudl leverage that so im not againt having the libary functions in novaclient
12:12:37 sean-k-mooney the sdk woudl be better in the long run
12:13:00 sean-k-mooney but we intend to keep supporting novaclient as a python lib for a few cycles until sdk has full parity
12:15:09 sean-k-mooney whoami-rajat: i know -2 can seam a bit harsh but it was a mix of procedual and directional i would have just left a -1 if we were not past the feature freeze for the cycle
12:26:23 sean-k-mooney whoami-rajat: by the way just incase you are not aware -2 does not mean never it means the review has an objection directonaly or procerdurally beyond the content or quality of the code under review. if you recive a -2 it should always have an explaination as to why and you shoudl always feel free to reach out and discuss how to move forward as you have
13:08:39 gibi sean-k-mooney: regarding the osc-placement change, I will take that later as the lib FF happend last week
13:10:21 gibi ohh the yoga schedul has the client FF at the same time as the service FF
13:10:50 gibi still it is not super important
13:10:51 sean-k-mooney yes
13:10:59 gibi this part of placement is mostly for machine consumption
13:11:02 sean-k-mooney technially it would have been yesterday
13:11:25 sean-k-mooney ok in that case i guess this can wait till next cycle
13:11:33 sean-k-mooney and i can approve the release patch
13:17:25 gibi yes it can wait
13:17:33 gibi thanks for looking at the release patches
13:17:48 gibi I had a crazy morning so I will only start really looking at gerit now
13:18:25 sean-k-mooney thats ok

Earlier   Later