| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-12-14 | |||
| 16:00:00 | bauzas | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:00:15 | bauzas | hey everyone who is not yet on PTO :p | |
| 16:00:25 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:00:39 | gmann | o/ | |
| 16:01:26 | bauzas | let's do a quick meeting given I'm not sure we have a lot of quorum for this one :) | |
| 16:01:41 | bauzas | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting | |
| 16:01:54 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:02:31 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:02:42 | bauzas | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:02:47 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 24 new untriaged bugs (+0 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:02:52 | bauzas | #help Nova bug triage help is appreciated https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage | |
| 16:02:57 | bauzas | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 25 open stories (+0 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement | |
| 16:03:05 | bauzas | any bug in particular to discuss ? | |
| 16:03:44 | gibi | - | |
| 16:03:56 | bauzas | nice | |
| 16:04:05 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:04:10 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:04:25 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status | |
| 16:04:31 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures, file a bug, and add an elastic-recheck signature in the opendev/elastic-recheck repo (example: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/759967) | |
| 16:04:43 | bauzas | crickets for me | |
| 16:04:52 | bauzas | nothing to tell about gate bugs or placement jobs | |
| 16:04:56 | bauzas | both work | |
| 16:05:17 | bauzas | anything to discuss about our gate ? | |
| 16:05:40 | gibi | - | |
| 16:05:43 | bauzas | nice too | |
| 16:05:45 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:05:47 | gibi | I was more preoccupied with the neutron gate this week | |
| 16:05:50 | bauzas | #info Yoga-2 is due Jan 6th | |
| 16:05:56 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-2 | |
| 16:06:00 | bauzas | #info 2nd spec review day happens today on Dec 14th | |
| 16:06:13 | bauzas | so we have like 6 or 7 specs to look at | |
| 16:06:27 | bauzas | we only merged one spec which was a fast reapproval | |
| 16:06:56 | bauzas | some are quite in a good direction but maybe we will have not enough time for merging them *before* yoga-2 | |
| 16:07:25 | gibi | yeah if things are not landing this week then it will be hard | |
| 16:07:34 | gibi | to land them without cores :D | |
| 16:07:43 | bauzas | if people don't disagree, I'll propose an exceptional spec approval deadline exception during our first meeting of 2022 | |
| 16:07:54 | bauzas | exception process* | |
| 16:08:02 | gibi | sure, lets see what we will have open then | |
| 16:08:13 | bauzas | yup | |
| 16:08:28 | bauzas | not a reason to not look at the open specs | |
| 16:08:39 | bauzas | but just saying that one week more shouldn't be a problem | |
| 16:09:09 | bauzas | either way, this is what it is | |
| 16:09:09 | sean-k-mooney | yes that shoudl be workable solong as we dont let it drag out too long | |
| 16:09:46 | bauzas | anything to discuss about this ? | |
| 16:09:48 | sean-k-mooney | well not all project have a m2 spec freeze | |
| 16:09:59 | sean-k-mooney | so it may be less impactful on others | |
| 16:10:05 | sean-k-mooney | not form me | |
| 16:10:19 | gmann | yeah, its project to project | |
| 16:10:20 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: you're right, this is maybe us who haven't considered it correctly when we thought about Yoga-2 as a spec freeze | |
| 16:10:34 | bauzas | anyway, not a problmem | |
| 16:10:48 | bauzas | we'll see how things go after new year | |
| 16:10:57 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:11:02 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 | |
| 16:11:07 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816861 bauzas proposing a documentation change for helping contributors to ask for reviews, needs a second +2 | |
| 16:11:13 | bauzas | thanks gibi btw. | |
| 16:11:29 | gibi | thanks bauzas | |
| 16:11:49 | gibi | the current list of review prio looks OK to me | |
| 16:11:49 | gmann | I am ok with that, just 1 comment i added to make it clear on non-core adding +1 | |
| 16:11:51 | bauzas | about the unified limits series, I was confused with what to review but this is fixed | |
| 16:12:00 | gmann | but that is ok to add in followup also, not blocker | |
| 16:12:08 | bauzas | after discussing it with melwitt internally | |
| 16:12:23 | bauzas | gmann: ack, will look | |
| 16:12:48 | bauzas | I really want us to merge the unified limits series, this has been overdue for too long | |
| 16:12:58 | sean-k-mooney | i agree | |
| 16:13:17 | bauzas | so I'll continue to review, but given melwitt's on PTO, I guess the progress would be better after next year | |
| 16:13:18 | sean-k-mooney | unified limist assumign its readay i think would be a big win and release highlight | |
| 16:14:02 | gibi | there is a list of patches on the yoga-python-testing that we need to look at I will add them to priorities | |
| 16:14:13 | bauzas | any series or patches that people would want to highlight to the team for reviews ? | |
| 16:14:14 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: on a related note do we have a nova spec for the chagne in RBAC direction and what that means for nova | |
| 16:14:22 | bauzas | heh, jinxed by gibi | |
| 16:14:27 | bauzas | gibi: patches ? | |
| 16:14:32 | gibi | yep | |
| 16:14:37 | gibi | gmann has a list of them | |
| 16:14:40 | bauzas | gibi: I mean, links ? | |
| 16:15:09 | gmann | yeah, this is list for auditing all policy #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/rbac | |
| 16:15:11 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/819208 | |
| 16:15:15 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/819205 | |
| 16:15:18 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/819203 | |
| 16:15:21 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/821636 | |
| 16:15:25 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/819206 | |
| 16:15:30 | gmann | and we can do audit in wiki page in one shot or in code changes also. | |
| 16:15:41 | gmann | gibi: thanks | |
| 16:16:25 | bauzas | gibi: I marked the nova and placement ones with the R-P flag | |
| 16:16:33 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: that was for RBAC one, and we have BP also for that #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/policy-defaults-refresh-2 | |
| 16:16:50 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: we said on a meeting yes for a specless BP approval | |
| 16:16:54 | gmann | yeah | |
| 16:16:56 | bauzas | (for the policy thing) | |
| 16:17:01 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: ok | |
| 16:17:16 | sean-k-mooney | normally i think we shoudl treath policy like an api change | |
| 16:17:31 | sean-k-mooney | and use a spec for it but we can proceed without one for now | |
| 16:17:46 | bauzas | this is the defaults, but meh | |
| 16:17:47 | gmann | I have pushed SYSTEM reader->system admin on top of dansmith server policy changes. and I will be pushing more changes this week | |
| 16:17:58 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: well to me policy change are interop issues | |
| 16:18:09 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I don't disagree | |
| 16:18:13 | sean-k-mooney | so change default is a breaking change but lest not repoen that | |
| 16:18:27 | bauzas | but for users, those are transparent if defaults correctly scoped | |
| 16:18:36 | gmann | well policy change does not require spec always. we have fixed (new or default change) many as bug also | |
| 16:19:09 | gmann | yeah, as it is overall change in RBAC, and as described in goal we have way that users will be broken by default | |
| 16:19:23 | gmann | and migration path and plan for them to new policy in next release | |
| 16:19:45 | gmann | *user will not be broken | |