Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-10-19
14:30:14 gibi bauzas: and I think belmoreira is OK to have it tomorrow as well, so we don't need to rush, he just needs some timing so that he can join just for that discussion
14:31:05 bauzas gibi: fair point about the cell impact
14:32:37 bauzas gibi: let's target the vncproxy thing on tomorrow 15:30pm UTC
14:32:45 bauzas I'll amend the etherpad so
14:32:50 gibi belmoreira: is it OK for you ^^ ?
14:33:33 bauzas I'll put unified limits and vncproxy as a bulk for tomorrow late
14:34:21 gibi ack
14:35:28 opendevreview Pierre-Samuel Le Stang proposed openstack/nova master: Reproducer unit test for bug 1934094 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/812646
14:35:54 belmoreira thanks gibi bauzas. I will be able to join between 13:00 and 15:00 utc. Just ping me here. I can also join in other timeslots but you will need to tell me in advance
14:41:53 bauzas belmoreira: the only problem is that we also want to wait for melwitt to be there
14:42:16 bauzas belmoreira: so that's why we'd prefer to discuss the vncproxy stuff at 15:00 UTC if you don't mind
14:42:32 bauzas 15:10pm if we break before
14:43:06 belmoreira thanks bauzas. I will join today at 15:10 utc
14:46:41 bauzas belmoreira: thanks, appreciated a lot.
14:47:06 bauzas belmoreira: wait, sorry, it's 3:40pm
14:47:09 bauzas my bad
14:47:18 bauzas we have a interop discussion before
14:47:45 belmoreira ok, thanks
14:53:11 dansmith rbac session coming up in nova yeah?
14:53:29 gibi dansmith: yes
14:53:34 gibi dansmith: at the top of the hour
14:55:43 hgy This is my first session
14:56:23 dansmith I don't see a link to join in the etherpad, can someone paste it here? gibi ?
14:56:42 gibi dansmith: https://www.openstack.org/ptg/rooms/newton
14:56:49 gibi that will redirect
14:56:53 gibi to a zoom call
14:57:13 dansmith thanks, can we put that in the etherpad or is it secret?
14:57:16 gibi sure
14:57:17 gibi I can
14:57:27 dansmith thanks
14:57:30 gibi but it is already on the https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html page
14:57:54 dansmith okay, it's just easier to jump back and forth if the etherpads have them
14:58:42 gibi sure added it L49
14:59:10 dansmith sweet thanks
15:00:01 hgy Is it begin?
15:00:20 gibi hgy: you are in the good place if you are for the rbac discussion
15:00:30 gibi hgy: we will switch to that topic soon
15:01:13 hgy I almost missed it. I thought it was 16:00
15:01:16 hgy Thank you
15:25:06 hgy 1
15:26:57 gibi .11
15:31:53 bauzas I'm lost in translation too
15:32:14 bauzas wondering what to start with the rbac thing :)
15:51:40 stephenfin bauzas: can you mute?
15:51:44 dansmith bauzas: mute
15:52:28 bauzas done and sorry
15:52:33 stephenfin ta
15:52:43 bauzas I was about to mention we have 8 mins and we somehow need to wrap up
15:52:48 bauzas 8 min left*
15:53:28 dansmith bauzas: yeah I have to go to another session at the top of the hour now
15:53:45 bauzas I'll use my stick then
15:54:54 artom "super interesting discussion"
15:55:00 artom gdi the contempt is just dripping
15:55:12 artom :D
16:18:34 belmoreira bauzas it's getting late for me... I will need to leave in 5 min. I see that melwitt is OK with the change in the vncproxy. Thank you all.
16:18:46 bauzas belmoreira: cool
16:19:24 belmoreira regarding the instance move between projects, I guess it will be difficult... there is a lot of complexity
16:19:29 belmoreira see you tomorrow
16:21:07 ralonsoh sean-k-mooney, hi! https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/807359
16:21:12 ralonsoh if you have time, trivial patch
16:22:09 sean-k-mooney ya i can take a look it looks correct
16:22:14 ralonsoh thanks!
16:25:52 artom It's going to be hard to concentrate on the substance with that backdrop!
16:36:24 gibi bauzas: I lost zoom
16:36:26 bauzas NOT ME !
16:36:26 stephenfin bauzas: did you kill Zoom again?
16:36:37 sean-k-mooney sure it wasnt :P
16:36:39 stephenfin oh, it's gmann
16:36:40 artom bauzas, there are better ways to censor me ;)
16:36:42 stephenfin he was host
16:36:46 melwitt it said "the host left"
16:36:59 bauzas nah it was gmann :)
16:37:11 sean-k-mooney so can we restart the same one
16:37:33 gibi it is back
16:37:40 stephenfin https://www.openstack.org/ptg/rooms/newton
16:37:59 stephenfin for anyone rejoining (atom, melwitt, ...?) ^
16:40:28 gmann oh, did i end meeting?
16:41:13 gmann bauzas: so sorry about that. i mean to leave meeting and join horizon. sorry for mesh up
16:41:25 bauzas gmann: heh no worries at all :p
16:41:46 bauzas gmann: you helped me shutting artom's mouth when he was having an argument with me, appreciated :p
16:41:56 bauzas (just kidding)
16:41:56 stephenfin bauzas: you're unmuted again
16:42:00 gmann :)
16:42:00 stephenfin and smiling like a maniac :P
16:42:13 stephenfin stop teasing gmann :P
17:31:29 opendevreview Jan Hartkopf proposed openstack/nova master: ensure samples folder exists for microversion https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/813672
17:33:48 melwitt sean-k-mooney: sorry if I missed it but do the review priority labels prevent someone from +1ing or +2ing their own patch? I'm thinking of gibi's point that +1 shouldn't be used as a ping
17:34:43 melwitt (that's how the old manual etherpad process worked, you can only raise attention to someone else's patch)
17:38:16 gmann melwitt: sean-k-mooney i am wondering how to do that in project-config acl. I have not seen exclusive list we can n any label. or you are saying just to document that as guidlines ?
17:38:34 gmann *can add in any label
17:41:27 melwitt gmann: I don't know if it's possible to exclude self in a label, that's what I was asking sean :) is (1) is it possible? and (2) would we want to do that?
17:42:15 gmann ok
19:36:12 opendevreview Ilya Popov proposed openstack/nova master: Fix to use NUMA cell with more free memory first https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/805649
#openstack-nova - 2021-10-20
00:01:39 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Fix request path to query a resource provider by uuid https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/805004
00:31:30 melwitt stephenfin: I noticed that when I try to run a subset of unit tests for db like "tox -epy38 nova.tests.unit.db" the tests fail with "oslo_db.sqlalchemy.enginefacade.AlreadyStartedError: this TransactionFactory is already started". I assume it's related to the db migration stuff but I don't understand how. any ideas?
00:32:27 sean-k-mooney[m] isnt that the error we fixed in the past with the run once decorator
00:32:53 sean-k-mooney[m] when it was reinitalised after SIG_HUP
00:33:19 sean-k-mooney[m] im not really sure why you would see that in the unit tests however
00:34:30 melwitt sean-k-mooney[m]: yeah but this is unit tests? when you run all tests everything passes, when you run only nova.tests.unit.db you get 70+ failures ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
00:34:47 sean-k-mooney[m] melwitt regarding self +1 ill check i think it might be possible to do yes by defining on +0 as allowed for the owner

Earlier   Later