| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-09-30 | |||
| 01:58:07 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Add functional regression test for bug 1853009 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811821 | |
| 01:58:08 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Clear rebalanced compute nodes from resource tracker https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811822 | |
| 01:58:09 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Invalidate provider tree when compute node disappears https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811823 | |
| 01:58:10 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Prevent deletion of a compute node belonging to another host https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811824 | |
| 01:58:11 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Fix inactive session error in compute node creation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811825 | |
| 03:53:19 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Prevent deletion of a compute node belonging to another host https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811813 | |
| 03:53:20 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Fix inactive session error in compute node creation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811814 | |
| 04:05:03 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Prevent deletion of a compute node belonging to another host https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811818 | |
| 04:05:04 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Fix inactive session error in compute node creation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811819 | |
| 04:25:21 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Prevent deletion of a compute node belonging to another host https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811824 | |
| 04:25:22 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Fix inactive session error in compute node creation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811825 | |
| 07:18:51 | elodilles | bauzas: nova + placement RC2s are now +2+W'd, hopefully will be released soon | |
| 07:19:03 | bauzas | ++ | |
| 07:19:30 | bauzas | elodilles: we have a relnote with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811447 | |
| 07:19:52 | bauzas | elodilles: I guess we would need to create a RC3 if we backport it to stable/xena or no ? | |
| 07:24:35 | elodilles | bauzas: yes, i think so | |
| 07:29:03 | bauzas | elodilles: because release team is tagging 24.0.0 on top of the last RC, right? | |
| 07:29:14 | bauzas | and not tagging on the last patch ? | |
| 07:29:36 | bauzas | if so, we need to plan it :) | |
| 07:29:39 | lyarwood | FWIW I'm against the releasenote in Nova | |
| 07:29:45 | lyarwood | it's an os-brick regression | |
| 07:29:53 | lyarwood | it should be fixed or documented there | |
| 07:29:56 | bauzas | I don't disagree | |
| 07:30:01 | bauzas | ah | |
| 07:30:04 | bauzas | good point | |
| 07:30:13 | lyarwood | otherwise we'd end up documenting all known issues ;) | |
| 07:30:28 | bauzas | that's a very valid point | |
| 07:31:56 | bauzas | lyarwood: the problem itself is the dependencies we have | |
| 07:32:02 | elodilles | if we don't need the releasenote, then it is not relevant, but still: yes, last RC is tagged, not the last patch | |
| 07:32:44 | bauzas | lyarwood: we would need to mark this osbrick release not supported by nova, right? (I mean, once we have the new osbrick release that fixes the problem) | |
| 07:33:10 | bauzas | my concern goes to upper constraints and requirements that we have in our tree, if you prefer | |
| 07:33:28 | lyarwood | Yeah once we have the fix | |
| 07:33:37 | lyarwood | otherwise we wouldn't support Xena os-brick which could be awkward | |
| 07:33:48 | lyarwood | and this isn't a critical backend IMHO | |
| 07:58:46 | bauzas | ok, -2d the relnote | |
| 07:59:05 | bauzas | lyarwood: what I'm afraid is that I don't see efforts yet on fixing the os-brick root issue | |
| 07:59:19 | lyarwood | That's on them | |
| 07:59:27 | lyarwood | Brian has said they want to fix it | |
| 08:13:33 | gibi | if Xena nova does not work with xena os-brick but work with an older os-brick then we should tell this info to our deployers | |
| 08:16:38 | opendevreview | zhen proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Add missing __init__.py in nova/db/api https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811786 | |
| 08:18:31 | bauzas | gibi: it's a requirements question | |
| 08:18:40 | lyarwood | gibi: if it was a generic issue then sure but it's a single backend and a single usecase within that backend | |
| 08:19:08 | lyarwood | gibi: otherwise as I said before we would end up documenting all issues in our libs with each release | |
| 08:19:15 | gibi | bauzas: sure, can we ping reqs now for Xena? | |
| 08:19:24 | gibi | lyarwood: OK, so this is not a wide issue | |
| 08:19:33 | gibi | then I'm OK to let this slip | |
| 08:19:52 | bauzas | gibi: not sure, the problem is that for the moment, I don't see any work on os-brick | |
| 08:20:28 | bauzas | lyarwood convinced me it's a small issue, so we can leave it tracked as only a bug | |
| 08:20:56 | bauzas | gibi: if really we see larger problems, we could document something in our relnotes later on | |
| 08:20:58 | lyarwood | yeah lets just let them fix it and release a new version and we can then blacklist the original | |
| 08:21:09 | lyarwood | tbh we don't even need to blacklist it | |
| 08:21:26 | gibi | Ok | |
| 08:21:31 | lyarwood | as again we'd have to blacklist every previous version that contained issues later fixed lol | |
| 08:23:13 | gibi | you are right, I probably overreacted without having the context | |
| 08:57:11 | gibi | elodilles: it seems the release script is broken https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/ff6be46d117e4c229b9d45e36addbbae/log/job-output.txt#849 | |
| 09:02:30 | elodilles | gibi: indeed. it seems there was a new jsonschema release yesterday :) | |
| 09:02:48 | gibi | murphy does not like xena | |
| 10:39:12 | opendevreview | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: nova-manage: Always get BDMs using get_by_volume_and_instance https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811716 | |
| 10:39:22 | lyarwood | if anyone has time today reviews on ^ and the change below it would be appreiciated | |
| 10:39:47 | lyarwood | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bug/1943431 also | |
| 11:04:55 | gibi | lyarwood: I'm +2 on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811716 (and the parent). Can I trade this with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/810911 ? :) | |
| 11:09:03 | opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/nova master: Ensure MAC addresses are in lower case https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811947 | |
| 11:15:53 | lyarwood | gibi: ack will do | |
| 11:15:57 | lyarwood | and thanks! | |
| 11:28:59 | opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/nova master: Ensure MAC addresses characters are in the same case https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811947 | |
| 11:47:44 | gibi | lyarwood: I finished with https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bug/1943431 too. If you have still time then I could trade that with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811396 :) | |
| 11:50:47 | lyarwood | gibi: ack need to grab lunch and then sit on a call for a while but I'll review both series after that this afternoon | |
| 11:51:03 | gibi | lyarwood: thank you, enjoy your lunch | |
| 12:08:45 | bauzas | gibi: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/810909/2 gets a -1 | |
| 12:09:04 | bauzas | have you rechecked ? | |
| 12:09:19 | bauzas | hem no | |
| 12:09:25 | gibi | let me check the result | |
| 12:09:32 | gibi | I recheked it in the morning | |
| 12:11:42 | bauzas | again, grenade failing and the likes | |
| 12:12:01 | bauzas | but I'll review anyway | |
| 12:12:12 | bauzas | you're one of my r-p tagged | |
| 12:12:37 | bauzas | oh, strangely, you aren't | |
| 12:12:39 | bauzas | wtf | |
| 12:12:57 | gibi | the multicell job as two build timeout | |
| 12:13:13 | gibi | the grenade failed on a live migration test I need to look deeper | |
| 12:13:29 | gibi | probably unrelated but I don't have a matcher for that failure yet | |
| 12:13:51 | gibi | teh multicell build timeout is due to vif plug timeout | |
| 12:13:59 | gibi | that is unrelated for sure | |
| 12:16:08 | gibi | the grenade live migration failure is due to https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1912310 | |
| 12:16:36 | gibi | I hit recheck | |
| 12:59:36 | opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/nova master: Ensure MAC addresses characters are in the same case https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811947 | |
| 13:05:42 | opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/nova master: Ensure MAC addresses characters are in the same case https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811947 | |
| 13:06:51 | opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/nova master: Ensure MAC addresses characters are in the same case https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811947 | |
| 13:35:06 | bauzas | gibi: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/810909/2/nova/compute/manager.py#5642 shouldn't we also revert to the original flavor in revert_resize ? | |
| 13:35:42 | gibi | bauzas: is that missing? if yes then that is a separate bug | |
| 13:35:52 | bauzas | I dunno | |
| 13:36:06 | bauzas | I'm afraid you set a field on the instance before confirming | |
| 13:36:19 | bauzas | which means a revert needs to get back | |
| 13:36:34 | gibi | I set it earlier than before, but before it was still set during resize not resize confirm | |
| 13:37:10 | bauzas | gibi: I can't see it in the left side | |
| 13:37:11 | gibi | I'm not moving this field change from resize_confirm to resize. I move it from resize_finish (which is part of resize) to resize | |
| 13:37:20 | bauzas | oh fuck | |
| 13:37:23 | bauzas | you're right | |
| 13:37:25 | bauzas | stupid me | |
| 13:37:39 | bauzas | I confused myself with the resize methods naming | |