| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-09-28 | |||
| 14:58:16 | zigo | Sorry for not expressing myself correctly ... | |
| 14:58:19 | gmann | humm | |
| 14:58:28 | zigo | PYTHONPATH=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages oslopolicy-sample-generator \ | |
| 14:58:28 | zigo | mkdir -p $(CURDIR)/debian/nova-common/etc/nova/policy.d | |
| 14:58:28 | zigo | My package simply does: | |
| 14:58:29 | zigo | --output-file=$(CURDIR)/debian/nova-common/etc/nova/policy.d/00_default_policy.yaml \ | |
| 14:58:31 | zigo | --format yaml \ | |
| 14:58:33 | zigo | --namespace nova | |
| 14:58:38 | zigo | Nothing more ... | |
| 14:59:05 | zigo | (note: the PYTHONPATH setting is there to use the installed python3-nova package as if it was in the system) | |
| 15:13:45 | bauzas | lyarwood: seen this ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1945323 | |
| 15:13:56 | bauzas | gibi: the reporter proposes ^ for a RC3 | |
| 15:14:07 | bauzas | wondering whether it's a regression | |
| 15:14:48 | bauzas | but this sounds valid as it's due to a recent osbrick release | |
| 15:15:35 | gibi | bauzas: lyarwood: left a -1 on the fix, but I think his comments confirms that this needs to fixed | |
| 15:16:08 | bauzas | ok, so let's do a RC2 for the moment and prepare a RC3 release if so | |
| 15:17:06 | gibi | bauzas: based on the gate status we will go with RC2 :D | |
| 15:18:27 | bauzas | gibi: hmmm, because of the pipeline ? | |
| 15:18:45 | bauzas | gibi: I can only see a 2-hour delay which looks a bit busy but still ok-ish | |
| 15:19:15 | gibi | bauzas: becuase i) of apache placement break needs to be fixed from victoria to master direction then ii) nova-granade-multinode still need to be fixed with trunk port | |
| 15:19:33 | gibi | just to enable landing things on master :) | |
| 15:19:39 | bauzas | hah | |
| 15:20:03 | gibi | an we have 2 days left | |
| 15:22:29 | bauzas | gibi: could we say to not use the latest osbrick release for Xena then ? | |
| 15:23:02 | gibi | that also a patch to the requirements.txt to pin osbrick | |
| 15:23:14 | gibi | which we need to land | |
| 15:23:29 | gibi | we can say in the bug report this as a suggestion | |
| 15:23:30 | bauzas | surely | |
| 15:23:35 | gibi | and packagers can apply it | |
| 15:23:43 | bauzas | I wasn't thinking of our reqs | |
| 15:23:50 | bauzas | but rather documenting it for packagers | |
| 15:23:57 | bauzas | in reno | |
| 15:24:11 | gibi | yeah reno could work as that does not require full CI run | |
| 15:24:17 | bauzas | we have a "bugs" reno section AFAICR | |
| 15:24:34 | gibi | yepp you are right, this is a good idea | |
| 15:24:42 | gibi | to doc as known bug | |
| 15:24:52 | bauzas | let's discuss then it during the meeting | |
| 15:25:07 | bauzas | I'll be off for the next 30 mins, I have some appointment coming at home | |
| 15:25:16 | bauzas | but I'll be there for the start | |
| 15:25:30 | bauzas | gibi: ^ (fyk) | |
| 15:25:47 | gibi | bauzas: ack | |
| 15:26:34 | zigo | Had to do this: https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/services/nova/-/commit/7c55fbf4356399f96906162accb3fa80d70f9d24 | |
| 15:26:35 | zigo | :/ | |
| 15:26:48 | zigo | Should that be reported to oslo.policy? | |
| 15:27:00 | bauzas | gibi: grabbing the bug reports for the gate hold | |
| 15:27:11 | bauzas | gibi: do you have them already somewhere ? | |
| 15:27:25 | bauzas | I wanna write them for the meeting agenda | |
| 15:27:44 | gibi | bauzas: we don't have bugreport for devstack about the apache placement break | |
| 15:27:46 | bauzas | I've seen the apache issue in the ML, but I haven't seen a proper bug report yet | |
| 15:27:53 | bauzas | dang | |
| 15:28:10 | gibi | bauzas: also we don't have bugreport for the nova-granade-multinode issue either :/ | |
| 15:28:18 | gibi | (we are lazy asses) | |
| 15:28:37 | bauzas | merveilleux | |
| 15:29:33 | gibi | but at leat we are discussing that in #openstack-neutron now in their CI meeting as we suspect they broke that for us | |
| 15:32:55 | gmann | zigo: yes please, file a bug there and I will debug that | |
| 15:41:06 | lyarwood | bauzas: I wouldn't hold rc for that fix FWIW | |
| 15:41:32 | zigo | gmann: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.policy/+bug/1945336 | |
| 15:51:45 | gibi | lyarwood: fyi, during the neutron ci meeting we talked about the nova-grenade-multinode issue and slaweq point at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/793141 that might be related | |
| 15:52:23 | lyarwood | kk thanks | |
| 15:52:28 | gibi | it is in xena, and grenade just started using devstack | |
| 15:52:37 | gibi | s/devstac/xena devstack/ | |
| 15:56:29 | ralonsoh | gibi, so far, I've seen three new extensions (between jobs executed 4 days ago and today) | |
| 15:56:31 | ralonsoh | ecmp_routes | |
| 15:56:31 | ralonsoh | dns-integration-domain-keywords | |
| 15:56:31 | ralonsoh | qos-pps | |
| 15:58:01 | bauzas | nova meeting in 3 mins | |
| 15:58:06 | bauzas | *here* | |
| 16:00:10 | gibi | ralonsoh: ack | |
| 16:00:32 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:00:32 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:32 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Sep 28 16:00:32 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:32 | bauzas | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:00:41 | bauzas | hola ! | |
| 16:01:17 | bauzas | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting | |
| 16:01:40 | bauzas | thanks for being here | |
| 16:01:44 | bauzas | who's around ? | |
| 16:01:57 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:02:24 | gibi | \o | |
| 16:02:44 | bauzas | let's start | |
| 16:02:52 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:03:03 | bauzas | No Critical bug | |
| 16:03:16 | bauzas | #link 13 new untriaged bugs (+0 since the last meeting): #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New | |
| 16:03:25 | bauzas | thanks for people who triaged them :) | |
| 16:03:41 | bauzas | one open bug marked with xena-rc-potential tag #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=xena-rc-potential | |
| 16:03:42 | gibi | bauzas: was it you ?:) | |
| 16:03:51 | bauzas | gibi: shhhhhhhhtttt :p | |
| 16:04:16 | bauzas | so, https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1945323 is proposed against RC* | |
| 16:04:18 | gibi | :x | |
| 16:04:40 | bauzas | tl;dr: last osbrick release is creating problems for NVMe volumes | |
| 16:05:01 | bauzas | the fix is provided https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811413 but not yet merged | |
| 16:05:44 | bauzas | we'll discuss about RC releases in the next topic, but here the question is, should we try to merge ^ before Thursday as it's the deadline for RC | |
| 16:05:49 | bauzas | ? | |
| 16:06:01 | bauzas | lyarwood had concerns and I have an opinion | |
| 16:06:14 | gibi | I think if the fix is valid then we should aim to land it | |
| 16:06:21 | gibi | but the gate state might not allow that | |
| 16:06:37 | bauzas | given the gate is bad at the moment (again, we will discuss this later), we could try to land it but at least we should provide a releasenotes documentation | |
| 16:06:52 | bauzas | telling about the bug | |
| 16:07:25 | bauzas | so, in case we can't land the fix, operators would still see the documentation and for example packagers wouldn't use the latest osbrick if they want to support NVMe | |
| 16:07:30 | bauzas | thoughts ? | |
| 16:07:46 | bauzas | remember that we have a "bugs" section in nova relnotes | |