Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-05-20
06:32:51 openstackgerrit Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - new vnic type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/771363
06:32:53 openstackgerrit Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/758944
06:32:54 openstackgerrit Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - reject server move and suspend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/779913
06:32:55 openstackgerrit Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - functional tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/780147
06:56:11 openstackgerrit liuzhuangzhuang proposed openstack/nova master: Clean up instance allocations if the host is not in any cell https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/792322
06:56:11 openstackgerrit liuzhuangzhuang proposed openstack/nova master: Clean up instance allocations if the host is not in any cell https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/792322
07:35:03 slaweq gibi: hi, can You check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/787252 when You will have some time?
07:35:03 slaweq gibi: hi, can You check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/787252 when You will have some time?
07:35:05 slaweq thx in advance
07:36:13 gibi slaweq: sure
07:36:13 gibi slaweq: sure
07:36:21 slaweq thx
07:36:21 slaweq thx
07:36:57 gibi slaweq: sorry I have no +2 right on stable branches I will leave my +1
07:36:57 gibi slaweq: sorry I have no +2 right on stable branches I will leave my +1
07:37:09 slaweq gibi: ok, I though You have
07:37:09 slaweq gibi: ok, I though You have
07:37:39 gibi I never needed one :) I trust the stable cores in the team
07:37:39 gibi I never needed one :) I trust the stable cores in the team
07:37:55 slaweq :)
07:37:55 slaweq :)
07:38:38 yonglihe Hi, gibi, alex_xu, sean, smartnic patch set is revised per approved spec, and patch set link: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp%252Fsriov-smartnic-support%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged)
07:38:38 yonglihe Hi, gibi, alex_xu, sean, smartnic patch set is revised per approved spec, and patch set link: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp%252Fsriov-smartnic-support%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged)
07:38:44 yonglihe To make your day easy, here is a change list since last review:
07:38:44 yonglihe To make your day easy, here is a change list since last review:
07:38:58 yonglihe https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/9jnZwn6w/
07:38:58 yonglihe https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/9jnZwn6w/
07:39:09 gibi yonglihe: thanks. I will try to get to it
07:39:09 gibi yonglihe: thanks. I will try to get to it
07:40:47 yonglihe many thanks
07:40:47 yonglihe many thanks
08:07:59 bauzas I just get one half-day off and Freenode gets on fire...
08:07:59 bauzas I just get one half-day off and Freenode gets on fire...
08:08:12 bauzas man, I'm tempted to not take my usual 3 weeks PTO
08:08:12 bauzas man, I'm tempted to not take my usual 3 weeks PTO
08:12:12 kashyap bauzas: Don't be silly; are you gonna cancel your PTO because of some IRC server nonsense? :)
08:12:12 kashyap bauzas: Don't be silly; are you gonna cancel your PTO because of some IRC server nonsense? :)
08:12:26 kashyap We just move to a different server; plain and simple, and keep going.
08:12:26 kashyap We just move to a different server; plain and simple, and keep going.
08:15:18 bauzas kashyap: tbc, agreed on the consensus to move to OFTC
08:15:18 bauzas kashyap: tbc, agreed on the consensus to move to OFTC
08:15:39 bauzas this is absolutely not the right time for evaluating other products
08:15:39 bauzas this is absolutely not the right time for evaluating other products
08:15:40 kashyap bauzas: Yep; that makes sense.
08:15:41 kashyap bauzas: Yep; that makes sense.
08:15:55 bauzas the lower change, the better.
08:15:55 bauzas the lower change, the better.
08:16:06 kashyap bauzas: Sure. I've said as much. I don't know about the "absolute"; but it's always the time to change one's mind ;-)
08:16:06 kashyap bauzas: Sure. I've said as much. I don't know about the "absolute"; but it's always the time to change one's mind ;-)
08:16:11 bauzas the question, tho, is the absolute need to the move
08:16:11 bauzas the question, tho, is the absolute need to the move
08:16:25 bauzas that's unclear and I wouldn't argue for urgency
08:16:25 bauzas that's unclear and I wouldn't argue for urgency
08:16:55 bauzas the operations still continue and we should just make a reasonable transition plan to OFTC but not under pressure
08:16:56 bauzas the operations still continue and we should just make a reasonable transition plan to OFTC but not under pressure
08:17:06 bauzas nothing justifies us to move ASAP
08:17:06 bauzas nothing justifies us to move ASAP
08:17:16 kashyap Yep; I don't see any crazy urgency.
08:17:16 kashyap Yep; I don't see any crazy urgency.
08:17:35 bauzas and I'd recommend us to keep freenode chat rooms for a while
08:17:35 bauzas and I'd recommend us to keep freenode chat rooms for a while
08:17:41 bauzas in order to reroute people coming by
08:17:41 bauzas in order to reroute people coming by
08:17:51 bauzas not everyone comes everyday on the rooms
08:17:52 bauzas not everyone comes everyday on the rooms
08:18:07 bauzas and not everyone reads openinfra mailing lists
08:18:07 bauzas and not everyone reads openinfra mailing lists
08:18:28 bauzas actually, I'll reply by this
08:18:28 bauzas actually, I'll reply by this
08:18:47 bauzas * bauzas usually hates to jump on those kind of large and opiniated threads
08:25:49 kashyap Sure; what you suggest should be "obvious" for the Infra folks; and is part of clear communication to the communities.
08:25:49 kashyap Sure; what you suggest should be "obvious" for the Infra folks; and is part of clear communication to the communities.
08:36:45 aarents Morning nova!
08:36:45 aarents Morning nova!
08:37:04 aarents in this change "libvirt: Provide the backing file format when creating qcow2 disks" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/708745/ ,
08:37:04 aarents in this change "libvirt: Provide the backing file format when creating qcow2 disks" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/708745/ ,
08:37:22 aarents we ensure to add the "backing_fmt" field at qcow2 image creation due to newer libvirt constraints.(if not present newer libvirt does not start instance)
08:37:23 aarents we ensure to add the "backing_fmt" field at qcow2 image creation due to newer libvirt constraints.(if not present newer libvirt does not start instance)
08:37:44 aarents there is the Lee following quote: "Nova needs to [...] potentially handle the upgrade case where we may need to rebase existing disks in order to update the metadata."
08:37:44 aarents there is the Lee following quote: "Nova needs to [...] potentially handle the upgrade case where we may need to rebase existing disks in order to update the metadata."
08:38:01 aarents I would like to know if there is an ongoing work with the "upgrade case" ?
08:38:02 aarents I would like to know if there is an ongoing work with the "upgrade case" ?
08:38:49 openstackgerrit Lucas Alvares Gomes proposed openstack/nova master: DO NOT REVIEW: Testing new OVN as default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/792328
08:38:49 openstackgerrit Lucas Alvares Gomes proposed openstack/nova master: DO NOT REVIEW: Testing new OVN as default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/792328
08:50:15 lyarwood aarents: no as the check was removed in the next minor release of libvirt
08:50:15 lyarwood aarents: no as the check was removed in the next minor release of libvirt
08:50:49 lyarwood aarents: AFAIK UCA is still shipping the original version with the check so if you're running into this you need to raise a bug against UCA and ask them to bump their version of libvirt
08:50:49 lyarwood aarents: AFAIK UCA is still shipping the original version with the check so if you're running into this you need to raise a bug against UCA and ask them to bump their version of libvirt
08:54:50 aarents lyarwood: intersting I will double check, thank you
08:54:50 aarents lyarwood: intersting I will double check, thank you
08:57:14 lyarwood aarents: np, fixing this by rebasing every single instance disk as a result just isn't worth the effort IMHO
08:57:15 lyarwood aarents: np, fixing this by rebasing every single instance disk as a result just isn't worth the effort IMHO
09:16:25 artom Huh, http://status.openstack.org/reviews/ is broken
09:16:25 artom Huh, http://status.openstack.org/reviews/ is broken
09:56:21 admin0 hi all.. how do I rename an existing host to a new one ?
09:56:21 admin0 hi all.. how do I rename an existing host to a new one ?
09:56:41 stephenfin admin0: afaik, you can't
09:56:41 stephenfin admin0: afaik, you can't
09:56:55 admin0 the issue i have is that i started with hostname say h7 .. then at some point, it registered as h7.openstack.local and at some point its registered at h7. ( only a . with no domain at the end)
09:56:55 admin0 the issue i have is that i started with hostname say h7 .. then at some point, it registered as h7.openstack.local and at some point its registered at h7. ( only a . with no domain at the end)

Earlier   Later