| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-05-12 | |||
| 10:18:03 | sean-k-mooney | the release contiang the default change patch would have to be a major version bump | |
| 10:18:23 | sean-k-mooney | having the ablity to auto negociate is not a breaking change turning it on by default is | |
| 10:18:23 | sean-k-mooney | having the ablity to auto negociate is not a breaking change turning it on by default is | |
| 10:21:33 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: stephenfin if ye want to not revert and you make sure the next version of osc is a major version then i could proably live with that but i still think min required would be better that said i would like thinks like flavor validation to be on by default | |
| 10:21:33 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: stephenfin if ye want to not revert and you make sure the next version of osc is a major version then i could proably live with that but i still think min required would be better that said i would like thinks like flavor validation to be on by default | |
| 10:22:05 | stephenfin | this only affects osc-placement, not osc btw | |
| 10:22:05 | stephenfin | this only affects osc-placement, not osc btw | |
| 10:22:19 | gibi | * gibi lunches | |
| 10:22:27 | sean-k-mooney | oh it does? | |
| 10:22:27 | sean-k-mooney | oh it does? | |
| 10:22:44 | sean-k-mooney | i tought it was all of osc | |
| 10:22:44 | sean-k-mooney | i tought it was all of osc | |
| 10:23:06 | stephenfin | no. That's happening but separately. The change above was just for osc-placement | |
| 10:23:06 | stephenfin | no. That's happening but separately. The change above was just for osc-placement | |
| 10:23:46 | sean-k-mooney | i still woudl prefer auto negociating the min reqruied not latest but maybe i have to just live with it being unstable | |
| 10:23:46 | sean-k-mooney | i still woudl prefer auto negociating the min reqruied not latest but maybe i have to just live with it being unstable | |
| 10:24:08 | sean-k-mooney | i rarely have need to script against osc so maybe it not worth avocating for those that do | |
| 10:24:08 | sean-k-mooney | i rarely have need to script against osc so maybe it not worth avocating for those that do | |
| 10:24:33 | stephenfin | tbf, those users could simply request an explicit base version manually | |
| 10:24:33 | stephenfin | tbf, those users could simply request an explicit base version manually | |
| 10:24:48 | stephenfin | '--os-compute-api-version 2.1' or whatever | |
| 10:24:48 | stephenfin | '--os-compute-api-version 2.1' or whatever | |
| 10:24:50 | sean-k-mooney | i just dont want verizon complaining that they cant create flavor when the insitent on setting hw:numa_mem_policy that does not exist | |
| 10:24:50 | sean-k-mooney | i just dont want verizon complaining that they cant create flavor when the insitent on setting hw:numa_mem_policy that does not exist | |
| 10:26:23 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: ya i know but many dont know what microverions are or care they just want the command they always used to work | |
| 10:26:23 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: ya i know but many dont know what microverions are or care they just want the command they always used to work | |
| 10:27:27 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: gibi if the desisin to move all of osc to latest has aleready been made then dont revert the placment patch | |
| 10:27:27 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: gibi if the desisin to move all of osc to latest has aleready been made then dont revert the placment patch | |
| 10:29:39 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Enable 'vmcoreinfo' feature by default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/752912 | |
| 10:29:40 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Remove 'create_fake_libvirt_mock' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790945 | |
| 10:29:40 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Make vmcoreinfo dependent on feature flag https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/779342 | |
| 10:29:41 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: libvirt: Make vmcoreinfo checks guest arch specific https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790946 | |
| 10:33:57 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: OK, then I won't revert. | |
| 10:33:57 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: OK, then I won't revert. | |
| 10:34:10 | gibi | I honestly don't know what will be the overall osc policy | |
| 10:34:10 | gibi | I honestly don't know what will be the overall osc policy | |
| 10:35:16 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: right now i really dont like that its different per command | |
| 10:35:16 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: right now i really dont like that its different per command | |
| 10:35:27 | sean-k-mooney | as it make it much harder to use | |
| 10:35:27 | sean-k-mooney | as it make it much harder to use | |
| 10:36:09 | sean-k-mooney | that said i know ironic broke the consitency years ago so its not a new thing | |
| 10:36:09 | sean-k-mooney | that said i know ironic broke the consitency years ago so its not a new thing | |
| 10:36:10 | gibi | I think it is the same for each call . max(server,client) | |
| 10:36:10 | gibi | I think it is the same for each call . max(server,client) | |
| 10:36:35 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: not i mean nova and cinder command wont auto negociate | |
| 10:36:35 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: not i mean nova and cinder command wont auto negociate | |
| 10:36:41 | sean-k-mooney | but ironic and plamcent will | |
| 10:36:41 | sean-k-mooney | but ironic and plamcent will | |
| 10:36:47 | gibi | I see | |
| 10:36:47 | gibi | I see | |
| 10:37:04 | gibi | but if the overall osc change is coming the it will be in sync again | |
| 10:37:04 | gibi | but if the overall osc change is coming the it will be in sync again | |
| 10:37:26 | sean-k-mooney | yes if but there was never a cross project agreement to do that as far as i knew | |
| 10:37:26 | sean-k-mooney | yes if but there was never a cross project agreement to do that as far as i knew | |
| 10:37:52 | sean-k-mooney | but if its happeing then i just hope it gets done this cycle | |
| 10:37:52 | sean-k-mooney | but if its happeing then i just hope it gets done this cycle | |
| 10:38:07 | sean-k-mooney | draging it out over multiple cycle will not be a good ux | |
| 10:38:07 | sean-k-mooney | draging it out over multiple cycle will not be a good ux | |
| 10:38:39 | sean-k-mooney | which is why i was expecting this type of change to be a cross project goal | |
| 10:38:39 | sean-k-mooney | which is why i was expecting this type of change to be a cross project goal | |
| 10:38:40 | gibi | OK, then please propose a revert on the osc patch and lets bring it up on cross project levels | |
| 10:38:40 | gibi | OK, then please propose a revert on the osc patch and lets bring it up on cross project levels | |
| 10:39:04 | stephenfin | I don't think this is a serious issue | |
| 10:39:04 | stephenfin | I don't think this is a serious issue | |
| 10:39:16 | stephenfin | If people don't like it, then they'll let us know | |
| 10:39:16 | stephenfin | If people don't like it, then they'll let us know | |
| 10:39:18 | gibi | It seems it is serious for sean-k-mooney | |
| 10:39:18 | gibi | It seems it is serious for sean-k-mooney | |
| 10:39:29 | stephenfin | Otherwise 🤷 | |
| 10:39:29 | stephenfin | Otherwise 🤷 | |
| 10:41:29 | jrosser | if i put debug=True in [DEFAULT] of nova.conf (for example) should that be sufficient to then be able to see https://github.com/openstack/oslo.messaging/blob/master/oslo_messaging/_drivers/impl_rabbit.py#L608-L610 in the nova-conductor log file? | |
| 10:41:29 | jrosser | if i put debug=True in [DEFAULT] of nova.conf (for example) should that be sufficient to then be able to see https://github.com/openstack/oslo.messaging/blob/master/oslo_messaging/_drivers/impl_rabbit.py#L608-L610 in the nova-conductor log file? | |
| 10:41:37 | sean-k-mooney | i just dont want to have to explain in our downstream doc and to customer why openstack server create and openstack resource provider list work differently | |
| 10:41:37 | sean-k-mooney | i just dont want to have to explain in our downstream doc and to customer why openstack server create and openstack resource provider list work differently | |
| 10:42:24 | sean-k-mooney | jrosser: am im not sure i thought that was only for the nova log level | |
| 10:42:24 | sean-k-mooney | jrosser: am im not sure i thought that was only for the nova log level | |
| 10:42:36 | sean-k-mooney | but maybe its everything | |
| 10:42:36 | sean-k-mooney | but maybe its everything | |
| 10:43:05 | jrosser | sean-k-mooney: yeah, i'm not seeing those and am struggling to find how to enable oslo.messaging debug in the context of a nova service | |
| 10:43:05 | jrosser | sean-k-mooney: yeah, i'm not seeing those and am struggling to find how to enable oslo.messaging debug in the context of a nova service | |
| 10:44:24 | gibi | jrosser: I think you need this config https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#DEFAULT.default_log_levels | |
| 10:44:24 | gibi | jrosser: I think you need this config https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#DEFAULT.default_log_levels | |
| 10:44:46 | gibi | there the oslo.messaging is set to INFO by default | |
| 10:44:46 | gibi | there the oslo.messaging is set to INFO by default | |
| 10:44:51 | gibi | so you have to change that | |
| 10:44:51 | gibi | so you have to change that | |
| 10:45:01 | jrosser | ah! let me try that | |
| 10:45:01 | jrosser | ah! let me try that | |
| 11:18:45 | ignaziocassano1 | ralonsoh looking at this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917675 seems redhat released patches only for rhel8 ....so Think for centos8 | |
| 11:18:46 | openstack | bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1917675 in openstack-nova "Nova evacuate fails due to timeout waiting for a network-vif-plugged event for instance" [Urgent,On_qa] - Assigned to smooney | |
| 11:18:46 | openstack | bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1917675 in openstack-nova "Nova evacuate fails due to timeout waiting for a network-vif-plugged event for instance" [Urgent,On_qa] - Assigned to smooney | |
| 11:18:46 | ignaziocassano1 | ralonsoh looking at this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917675 seems redhat released patches only for rhel8 ....so Think for centos8 | |
| 11:19:19 | ignaziocassano1 | I am using centos7 | |
| 11:19:19 | ignaziocassano1 | I am using centos7 | |
| 11:20:02 | sean-k-mooney | you are using packages from RDO not form Redhat | |
| 11:20:02 | sean-k-mooney | you are using packages from RDO not form Redhat | |
| 11:20:31 | sean-k-mooney | ignaziocassano1: and RDO support train on 7 and 8 | |
| 11:20:31 | sean-k-mooney | ignaziocassano1: and RDO support train on 7 and 8 | |
| 11:21:05 | ignaziocassano1 | Yes, I wonder if they will be' released on rdo for centos 7 | |
| 11:21:07 | ignaziocassano1 | Yes, I wonder if they will be' released on rdo for centos 7 | |