Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-04-29
13:29:52 lyarwood https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/rescue.html#instance-rescue I did at least call it out in the docs
13:29:52 lyarwood https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/rescue.html#instance-rescue I did at least call it out in the docs
13:35:35 sean-k-mooney lyarwood: ok so for the bug i guess we coudl do two things. one explain how to use stabel rescue
13:35:35 sean-k-mooney lyarwood: ok so for the bug i guess we coudl do two things. one explain how to use stabel rescue
13:35:49 sean-k-mooney and second update it to track blocking it in the api with a 400
13:35:49 sean-k-mooney and second update it to track blocking it in the api with a 400
13:36:45 lyarwood yup indeed, I'll sort both out shortly
13:36:45 lyarwood yup indeed, I'll sort both out shortly
14:07:48 lyarwood sean-k-mooney: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1926375 seen this?
14:07:49 openstack Launchpad bug 1926375 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "nova-compute service failed to start up" [Undecided,New]
14:07:49 lyarwood sean-k-mooney: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1926375 seen this?
14:07:50 openstack Launchpad bug 1926375 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "nova-compute service failed to start up" [Undecided,New]
14:21:49 sean-k-mooney lyarwood: i can see why that would happen
14:21:50 sean-k-mooney lyarwood: i can see why that would happen
14:22:20 sean-k-mooney if the binding profile in the neutorn port was currupted and the pci_slot key was removed that would happen
14:22:20 sean-k-mooney if the binding profile in the neutorn port was currupted and the pci_slot key was removed that would happen
14:24:33 gibi sean-k-mooney: yeah, but we cannot really prove anyithing as the logs does not have an instance uuid or port uuid to map it back to the neutron state
14:24:33 gibi sean-k-mooney: yeah, but we cannot really prove anyithing as the logs does not have an instance uuid or port uuid to map it back to the neutron state
14:25:01 sean-k-mooney well we can see plugin='ovs',port_profile=VIFPortProfileOpenVSwitch
14:25:01 sean-k-mooney well we can see plugin='ovs',port_profile=VIFPortProfileOpenVSwitch
14:25:10 sean-k-mooney and .plug_hw_veb
14:25:10 sean-k-mooney and .plug_hw_veb
14:25:24 sean-k-mooney so this is hardware offloaded ovs which does not support trusted VF
14:25:24 sean-k-mooney so this is hardware offloaded ovs which does not support trusted VF
14:28:06 gibi ohh, so we only support trusted VF with the sriov agent?
14:28:06 gibi ohh, so we only support trusted VF with the sriov agent?
14:28:12 gibi I did not know that
14:28:12 gibi I did not know that
14:28:46 sean-k-mooney if it works with anything else its by acident wew never extended support to anything else
14:28:46 sean-k-mooney if it works with anything else its by acident wew never extended support to anything else
14:30:41 gibi it seems they are using it :)
14:30:41 gibi it seems they are using it :)
14:34:19 sean-k-mooney well im pretty sure that it wont work the way they intend
14:34:19 sean-k-mooney well im pretty sure that it wont work the way they intend
14:35:11 sean-k-mooney it might allow them to change the mac adress but ovs wont make the port promisous and the security group rules will still be enforced
14:35:11 sean-k-mooney it might allow them to change the mac adress but ovs wont make the port promisous and the security group rules will still be enforced
14:40:52 sean-k-mooney gibi: ok i have marked it as incomplete for now https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1926375
14:40:54 openstack Launchpad bug 1926375 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "nova-compute service failed to start up" [Undecided,Incomplete]
14:40:54 sean-k-mooney gibi: ok i have marked it as incomplete for now https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1926375
14:40:54 openstack Launchpad bug 1926375 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "nova-compute service failed to start up" [Undecided,Incomplete]
14:41:10 gibi sean-k-mooney: ack, thanks
14:41:10 gibi sean-k-mooney: ack, thanks
15:49:39 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Fix bond_mode enum 802.1ad -> 802.3ad https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/788790
15:49:39 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Fix bond_mode enum 802.1ad -> 802.3ad https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/788790
15:49:59 gibi sean-k-mooney: could you double check that I understood this right ^^ ?
15:50:00 gibi sean-k-mooney: could you double check that I understood this right ^^ ?
15:52:24 gibi nova meeting starts in 8 minutes in #openstack-meeting-3
15:52:24 gibi nova meeting starts in 8 minutes in #openstack-meeting-3
15:57:49 gibi dansmith: regarding yesterday service version check discussion. You said that you think the version alias is wrong. I've double checked and I don't see the problem. 54 was the first Wallaby service version. 52 is the first Victoria service version
15:57:49 gibi dansmith: regarding yesterday service version check discussion. You said that you think the version alias is wrong. I've double checked and I don't see the problem. 54 was the first Wallaby service version. 52 is the first Victoria service version
15:58:21 sean-k-mooney gibi: am sure
15:58:22 sean-k-mooney gibi: am sure
15:58:48 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: zuul: Replace grenade and nova-grenade-multinode with grenade-multinode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778885
15:58:48 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: zuul: Replace grenade and nova-grenade-multinode with grenade-multinode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778885
15:59:24 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: zuul: Remove nova-dsvm-multinode-base https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778908
15:59:25 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: zuul: Remove nova-dsvm-multinode-base https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778908
16:00:28 lyarwood \o/
16:00:28 lyarwood \o/
16:00:33 sean-k-mooney gibi: ya 802.3ad is lacp bonding 802.1 is QinQ
16:00:33 sean-k-mooney gibi: ya 802.3ad is lacp bonding 802.1 is QinQ
16:00:39 gibi lyarwood: ++
16:00:39 gibi lyarwood: ++
16:00:43 gibi sean-k-mooney: thanks
16:04:23 sean-k-mooney it shows how frequetly people use the network jsone templating if we are only seeing this now
16:04:23 sean-k-mooney it shows how frequetly people use the network jsone templating if we are only seeing this now
16:05:51 sean-k-mooney this is used to validate https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#DEFAULT.injected_network_template right
16:05:52 sean-k-mooney this is used to validate https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#DEFAULT.injected_network_template right
16:06:39 gibi sean-k-mooney: ooh, I did not know about that
16:06:39 gibi sean-k-mooney: ooh, I did not know about that
16:06:42 gibi but I guess yes
16:06:42 gibi but I guess yes
16:07:41 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: testing bionic drop https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/788791
16:07:41 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: testing bionic drop https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/788791
16:07:46 sean-k-mooney well im not sure what we might be using the network.json for other then the network metadta consumed by cloud init which i think is generated by that template
16:07:46 sean-k-mooney well im not sure what we might be using the network.json for other then the network metadta consumed by cloud init which i think is generated by that template
16:10:54 gibi it make sense
16:10:54 gibi it make sense
16:11:44 gibi btw sean-k-mooney you promised on the PTG to add periodic jobs for placement and then we can look at the results in regularly on the nova meeting
16:11:44 gibi btw sean-k-mooney you promised on the PTG to add periodic jobs for placement and then we can look at the results in regularly on the nova meeting
16:12:00 gibi let me know if you need help adding them
16:12:00 gibi let me know if you need help adding them
16:12:21 sean-k-mooney oh i should be in the meeting didn realise it started
16:12:22 sean-k-mooney oh i should be in the meeting didn realise it started
16:12:30 gibi :)
16:13:03 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/787508
16:13:03 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/787508
16:13:12 sean-k-mooney you looked at the patch already
16:13:13 sean-k-mooney you looked at the patch already
16:14:39 gibi sean-k-mooney: lol, I totally forgot
16:14:39 gibi sean-k-mooney: lol, I totally forgot
16:15:02 gibi thanks again
16:15:02 gibi thanks again
16:26:31 elod lyarwood: I've checked the placement patch meanwhile and +2+W'd as it looks appropriate
16:26:31 elod lyarwood: I've checked the placement patch meanwhile and +2+W'd as it looks appropriate
16:26:52 gmann elod: lyarwood its base patch too -https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/787525/2
16:26:52 lyarwood ack thanks
16:26:52 gmann elod: lyarwood its base patch too -https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/787525/2
16:26:52 lyarwood ack thanks
16:29:35 gibi and if you are reviewing placement already could you please hit this too https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/787508 ?
16:29:35 gibi and if you are reviewing placement already could you please hit this too https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/787508 ?

Earlier   Later