Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-02-03
18:01:03 sean-k-mooney and i though that was put in the the instace_system_metatadata table
18:01:12 sean-k-mooney although it could be in instance_extra
18:01:15 lyarwood sean-k-mooney: the system_metadata issue I was talking about downstream comes from https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/fefd984fd1294f23677e3df4390e37c7664883a0/nova/utils.py
18:01:27 melwitt isn't instance.metadata public?
18:01:34 sean-k-mooney melwitt: yes
18:01:36 sean-k-mooney with a nova show
18:01:42 sean-k-mooney i think
18:01:43 lyarwood ops that didnt link correctly
18:01:50 melwitt so the novnc password shouldn't be put in there, right?
18:01:54 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Add a routed networks scheduler pre-filter https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/749068
18:01:54 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Add requested_networks field to RequestSpec object https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/749977
18:01:55 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Rename ensure_network_metadata to amend requested_networks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/773955
18:01:56 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Add network and utils methods for getting routed networks and segments https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/773976
18:02:08 sean-k-mooney melwitt: correct
18:02:12 lyarwood https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/fefd984fd1294f23677e3df4390e37c7664883a0/nova/utils.py#L752-L778 was what I wanted to link to
18:02:19 sean-k-mooney if its there i belive it will be avaiable via the metadata service
18:02:25 sean-k-mooney allowing anyone in the project ot get it
18:02:25 melwitt if it goes in system_metadata I guess that's ok, IIUC
18:02:45 melwitt but not metadata, that will be public to all in the project like you said
18:02:52 lyarwood melwitt: so the issue then is it would show up as an image metadata property
18:03:05 sean-k-mooney yep and the feature is ment to make it so only the user that created the instace can log in
18:03:14 sean-k-mooney via vnc with the password they set
18:03:15 melwitt oh system_meta gets reflected out of metadata? oh, I didn't know that :\
18:03:24 lyarwood neither did I until a few hours ago
18:03:34 sean-k-mooney or i
18:03:35 lyarwood slightly weird behaviour tbh, I can't think why
18:03:36 melwitt hrm
18:03:46 sean-k-mooney i though it was only stuff with the image_ prefix or img_
18:04:04 sean-k-mooney not everything becase we store stuff for tpm there too
18:04:11 melwitt yeah I had thought system_meta was like internal system info that wasn't put out there
18:04:28 melwitt ok so you're saying a subset of it is reflected out
18:04:55 sean-k-mooney no i thouhg only a subset shoudl be relected out via the image
18:05:04 lyarwood my reading of https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/fefd984fd1294f23677e3df4390e37c7664883a0/nova/utils.py#L752-L778 and what I've seen when stashing hw_machine_type in there is that it ends up being reflected in the image metadata properties
18:05:10 sean-k-mooney but lyarwood seams to have found all of it might be in a specific case?
18:05:29 melwitt oh
18:05:46 sean-k-mooney so SM_IMAGE_PROP_PREFIX
18:05:56 sean-k-mooney was ment to be filtering to just the image ones right
18:06:20 lyarwood you would assume so
18:07:12 sean-k-mooney so key = key[len(SM_IMAGE_PROP_PREFIX):]
18:07:17 sean-k-mooney is striping the key
18:07:21 sean-k-mooney i think that is the issue
18:08:21 lyarwood and spawns
18:08:21 lyarwood I'm only updating it in system_metadata while n-cpu starts
18:08:21 lyarwood so in my case I've not even set it in the image metadata
18:08:21 sean-k-mooney because you have img_hw_machine_type that matches hw_machine_type which you added
18:08:22 lyarwood and it's still showing up as an image prop
18:08:36 lyarwood let me write a func test to show this
18:10:01 sean-k-mooney can you include your new key with a prfix too
18:10:13 sean-k-mooney e.g. abi_hw_machine_type
18:10:27 sean-k-mooney i think adding an abi prefix or simialr would stopp it being included
18:10:57 lyarwood it wouldn't, that's just trimming off SM_IMAGE_PROP_PREFIX from any matching keys
18:11:20 lyarwood L771-774 will still include it
18:12:11 sean-k-mooney oh i see
18:12:27 sean-k-mooney we shoudl be looping over the known filed in the image metadata object
18:12:33 lyarwood brb
18:12:34 sean-k-mooney not everything in the dict
18:12:47 sean-k-mooney so for key, value in system_meta.items(): is wrong
18:13:26 sean-k-mooney well that woudl work but we need to check " if key not in imageMeta.fields(): continue
18:13:28 sean-k-mooney or similar
18:36:06 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/placement master: policy: Suppress policy deprecation warnings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/771852
18:36:42 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/placement master: policy: Don't persist default rule changes in tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/772508
18:38:23 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/placement master: Implement secure RBAC for resource providers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/760240
18:38:56 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/placement master: Implement secure RBAC for aggregates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/760235
18:39:03 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/placement master: Implement secure RBAC for allocations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/760236
18:44:27 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/placement master: Implement secure RBAC for allocation candidates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/760237
18:48:12 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/placement master: Implement secure RBAC for inventories https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/760238
18:48:16 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/placement master: Implement secure RBAC for resource classes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/760239
18:49:03 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/placement master: Implement secure RBAC for traits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/760241
18:49:13 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/placement master: Implement secure RBAC for usage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/760242
18:50:33 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/placement master: policy: Remove the deprecated 'placement' rule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/772333
19:50:50 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Use subqueryload() instead of joinedload() for (system_)metadata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/761810
19:56:05 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/victoria: Prevent archiving of pci_devices records because of 'instance_uuid' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/758837
20:23:00 melwitt ci passed on 3 patches of mine in a row
20:26:33 sean-k-mooney lol
22:52:09 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor and rename test_tcp_rst_no_compute_rpcapi https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/741351
22:54:58 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor and rename test_tcp_rst_no_compute_rpcapi https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/741351
22:58:21 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/train: Handle disabled CPU features to fix live migration failures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/758763
23:18:38 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor and rename test_tcp_rst_no_compute_rpcapi https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/741351
23:19:36 melwitt prometheanfire: this should hopefully work ^ you're already cc'd on the review but in case you miss the gerrit notification
23:20:11 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam proposed openstack/placement master: DNM: testing direct l-c https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/773813
#openstack-nova - 2021-02-04
00:45:47 prometheanfire melwitt: thanks :D
06:34:22 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] harden image metadata storage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/774044
08:02:12 gibi good morning
08:21:26 openstackgerrit Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/758944
11:39:02 lyarwood stephenfin: morning, do you know if there's a standard way of checking the config of an instance in the libvirt func tests before I go looking or hacking around?
11:39:51 stephenfin wdym the "config"?
11:40:05 stephenfin As in the XML generated by nova or attributes of the instance?
11:40:30 lyarwood stephenfin: well that or the GuestConfig (?) objects we generate that in turn create the XML
11:40:49 lyarwood stephenfin: I don't really want to assert things in the XML if we have objects that work just as well tbh
11:41:20 lyarwood LibvirtConfigObjects is what I mean sorry
11:41:35 lyarwood np if there's no prior art, I'll hack something up now
11:41:50 stephenfin Hmm, I don't think so. The only example I can think of is the NUMA live migration tests, but that intercepts the live migration API call to validate the XML
11:42:22 lyarwood cool yeah I think that's the one I saw yesterday, I'll hack something up now
11:43:00 lyarwood _get_guest_config should work tbh
12:14:50 sean-k-mooney lyarwood: there isnt really one
12:15:01 sean-k-mooney unless you have a reference to the driver
12:15:17 sean-k-mooney normally the funct test start the services
12:15:53 sean-k-mooney and there is no rpc call that you can make to teh compute manager to get it so you need to use teh service instance ot get teh driver an then call functions on it.
12:16:01 sean-k-mooney but what you can do is use the logs
12:16:18 sean-k-mooney and you can technically get teh domain xmls form that if you had too

Earlier   Later