Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2020-12-11
15:09:17 kashyap Heh; that's quite some storage
15:19:54 sean-k-mooney i have 3TB of steam games and i want to move my windows gaming pc to a vm on openstack
15:20:35 sean-k-mooney so i wanted at least 20TB of addtional storage got 80 after hotspare and raid i should have 64 usable for cinder
15:21:21 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: I assume you used parcel motel for delivery?
15:21:26 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: yep i also have a 4TB external usb hardrive that ehy used to be on but i cant passthough though to a vm
15:21:35 stephenfin To avoid the £150 postage fee
15:21:36 sean-k-mooney nope its coming on a pallet
15:21:47 sean-k-mooney it ways 96KG
15:21:53 stephenfin oh
15:21:56 stephenfin well then
15:22:14 stephenfin that's more than I weigh
15:22:20 sean-k-mooney ya its over the wight limit
15:22:33 stephenfin 150 doesn't sound so bad now, heh
15:23:20 sean-k-mooney yep also the server the drives cost more then the server i would have been over 3500 for the same capasity in dirves
15:24:11 gibi sean-k-mooney: you passthrough a physical GPU for the windows gaming VM?
15:24:28 sean-k-mooney that is my plan yes
15:24:37 sean-k-mooney i did before but its currenly in my desktop
15:24:48 gibi interesting
15:24:55 sean-k-mooney jsut using pci passthoough in the flavor not the vgpu support
15:25:28 sean-k-mooney gpus that support vGPU are still $$$$
15:26:29 gibi yeah, and I guess you don't need multiple gpus in your openstack cluster
15:26:46 sean-k-mooney it might be nice but ya i dont
15:27:21 sean-k-mooney if amd or intel add it to a consume gpu that would be a huge add value to me
15:27:40 sean-k-mooney but im not spendign 3000 on a nvida gpu + lisciening
15:28:19 gibi yeah
15:34:37 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Disable qos resize tempest test for nova-multi-cell job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/766474
15:36:04 gibi lyarwood: I've backorted ^^ so we can even chose to redo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/765749 by squashing ^^ into it and remove making nova-multi-cell non-votin
15:36:23 gibi but I'm OK keeping it as is
15:36:58 lyarwood gibi: it's just in the check queue at the moment so feel free to if you have time
15:37:14 gibi lyarwood: OK, the I will respin it quikly
15:37:28 melwitt gibi: np, just checked it (master change) finally merged, geesh
15:37:41 gibi melwitt: yeah, we are making progress.. :)
15:38:55 gibi melwitt: I will drop an update to the ML thread about where we are before I leave for today
15:39:04 melwitt ++
15:40:27 openstackgerrit Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose "Secure Boot support for KVM & QEMU guests" for Wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/759731
15:40:30 kashyap gibi: Fixed the nit
15:41:00 gibi kashyap: re-applied my badge
15:41:14 kashyap Thanks! :)
15:41:20 gibi I thank you
15:47:49 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: lower-constraints: Bump packaging to 20.4 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/765749
15:47:54 gibi lyarwood: ^^
15:48:16 lyarwood gibi: awesome thanks
15:48:47 gibi melwitt: could you babysitt ^^ during your day if needed?
15:49:06 melwitt gibi: yep
15:49:20 gibi thanks
15:49:29 sean-k-mooney gibi: fungi raised an interesting point regarding the usefullness of lower constriants. personlly i only found it use full to detect when we use a new feature that is not in the version used by lower constraits
15:49:48 sean-k-mooney it has some other uses but do we want to discuss if we ant to keep supporting it
15:50:48 gibi sean-k-mooney: I don't have to much past knowledge about why we added lower constraints in the first place
15:51:04 sean-k-mooney in principal i do like the idea of tracking you min requirements and testing it but on the other hand i dont know if distos actully use this
15:51:23 sean-k-mooney gibi: it was mainly for distos to tell them what the min version they could use was
15:51:33 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: lower-constraints: Bump packaging to 20.4 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/765749
15:51:45 gibi OK, then we need to see if distros are depending on this information or not
15:52:00 gmann sean-k-mooney: gibi yeah that is very open thing to discuss on how we should test it and whether we should test it or not
15:52:29 gmann one place it is helpful is while upgrade
15:52:55 sean-k-mooney only partly
15:52:58 melwitt gibi: were you meaning to write more on this line or is it just a typo? "and bug" at the end https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/765749/7//COMMIT_MSG#15
15:53:07 sean-k-mooney knowing that there is an overlap is useful yes
15:53:21 gibi melwitt: typo, I've pushed a new ps
15:53:26 sean-k-mooney but in a none conatienrised env it get complicated bwtween multipel serivces
15:53:46 gibi melwitt: my editor moved the #<bugnumber> ot the beginning of the next line and git ignored that line as a comment :)
15:54:15 melwitt gibi: that was nice of it :)
15:54:18 sean-k-mooney :) hehe helpful editors strike again
15:54:47 gibi I'm not even mad, it is soo friday and soo many fires
15:57:06 sean-k-mooney ya if that is the most pressing problem on a friday its not bad. hopefully the rest wont take you too long or can wait till monday
15:59:20 gibi sean-k-mooney: master is unblocked and the stable/v unblocking patch is going forward again. So yeah I will sleep well tonight
16:03:03 melwitt bauzas: could you take a look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/765749 ? gate unblock patch for stable/victoria has gotten a new patch squashed into it
16:03:13 bauzas melwitt: sure
16:04:11 melwitt thanks
16:04:31 bauzas melwitt: when squashing, should we add the cherry-picked SHA1s for all the squashed backports ?
16:04:33 bauzas gibi: ^
16:04:56 bauzas fortunately, we have the gerrit IDs within the commit msg, so it's more a procedural question
16:05:04 gibi bauzas: I can do that
16:05:14 gibi give me 5
16:05:16 bauzas it's an open question, I dunno
16:05:39 melwitt good question, I can't remember if we normally do. will do a quick gerrit search
16:05:41 bauzas we very rarely squash commits when backporting
16:06:55 bauzas eyes at https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#proposing-fixes
16:08:04 gibi it says cherry-pick with -x
16:08:12 gibi and that does include that hash
16:08:14 melwitt yeah. I find examples of both in the gerrit search
16:08:42 gibi bauzas: if you feel that the commit hash is helpful then I can add that no problme
16:09:00 bauzas I'm not *that* opiniated
16:09:12 bauzas gibi: but if you feel OK with it, please do
16:09:14 bauzas it doesn't harm
16:09:25 bauzas the more the better in this case
16:12:18 gibi oops, we need to merge
16:12:19 gibi
16:12:23 gibi https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/766720
16:12:26 gibi to master first
16:12:57 gibi as now it is part of the squashy commit on stable/v
16:13:15 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: lower-constraints: Bump packaging to 20.4 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/765749
16:13:23 gibi bauzas: could you look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/766720 please?
16:13:27 bauzas done
16:13:40 gibi thanks
16:32:00 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/train: [stable-only] Cap bandit to 1.6.2 and raise hacking to 1.1.0 in LC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/766171
16:33:56 lyarwood okaas~.
16:34:42 lyarwood gah sorry ssh died
16:45:19 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: [stable-only] lower-contraints: Bump hacking to 3.0.1 and amqp to 2.5.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/766738
16:45:37 lyarwood ^ so I can't actually build these lower-constraint venvs locally thanks to virtualenv pulling in weird versions of setuptools
16:46:03 lyarwood I'm going to go afk for a few hours to deal with some childcare stuff and then attack this again later, with beer.

Earlier   Later