| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-05-04 | |||
| 15:46:48 | bauzas | leave it for now, I'll chase up another stable-core | |
| 15:47:04 | bauzas | gibi: but this isn't normal you can't +2 on stable/ussuri | |
| 15:47:15 | gibi | and I have to leave so talk to you tomorrow | |
| 15:47:22 | bauzas | gibi: np, \o | |
| 15:47:27 | gibi | o/ | |
| 15:51:18 | gmann | bauzas: gibi thanks. ttyt | |
| 15:57:49 | kashyap | bauzas: Here's the 'nova-next' in-progress job :) -- https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708701/ | |
| 15:58:01 | kashyap | Need to dig into the Ubuntu-based failures | |
| 16:00:05 | dansmith | jsuchome: I'll put up some code as an example of a path forward in a bit | |
| 16:00:47 | jsuchome | dansmith: thanks! | |
| 16:13:25 | kashyap | gibi: When you get time tomm, please have a gander at point-166 here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-victoria-ptg (Cc: bauzas) | |
| 16:34:31 | dansmith | jsuchome: do you want me to mangle the existing patch a bit to show what I think needs to happen? it'll take it into WIP state, but should be able to form a basis for moving forward | |
| 16:58:39 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Remove deprecated nova.image.download hook https://review.opendev.org/725338 | |
| 17:07:40 | elod | bauzas dhellmann : the releasenotes job works now, but the links seem incorrect in the generated docs: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/725301/ ... or do I miss something? | |
| 17:10:04 | dhellmann | elod : you're right | |
| 17:10:15 | dhellmann | I probably messed up the link syntax | |
| 17:11:31 | openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: use more distinct link references in release notes https://review.opendev.org/725301 | |
| 17:11:32 | openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Add nova-status upgrade check and reno for policy new defaults https://review.opendev.org/725146 | |
| 17:11:38 | dhellmann | elod : let's try ^ | |
| 17:11:53 | dhellmann | if that doesn't work, then we will want `Upgrade Notes <#unique-value>`__ | |
| 17:13:57 | ygk_12345 | hi | |
| 17:14:02 | ygk_12345 | can someone look into this please | |
| 17:14:10 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1876769 in openstack-ansible "Failed to create resource provider" [Undecided,New] | |
| 17:14:10 | ygk_12345 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1876769 | |
| 17:16:56 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1876772 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Failed to create resource provider" [Undecided,New] | |
| 17:16:56 | ygk_12345 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1876772 | |
| 17:18:51 | elod | dhellmann: thanks for fixing! I will look into to generated docs whenever it's ready (or at least tomorrow morning (my morning, CEST timezone), as for me it's already end-of-day-ish :)) | |
| 17:19:54 | dhellmann | elod : +1, thanks for noticing the issue | |
| 17:20:16 | jsuchome | dansmith: I still have hopes that most of the patch could stay as it already it, it "just" needs to be put the some different place. If you have some time of it, great, but I may just need only some good pointer/// | |
| 17:21:28 | dansmith | jsuchome: the download() method of the module being relocated, and the removal of all the module scaffolding is what I'm talking about doing | |
| 17:21:34 | dansmith | jsuchome: is that what you mean? | |
| 17:23:08 | jsuchome | I think so, yeah. So we need the right place for relocation is | |
| 17:24:54 | jsuchome | (sorry for my sentence structure, I'm doing too many things in paralel) | |
| 17:27:09 | dansmith | jsuchome: yeah, I think it's pretty clear where it can go, so let me mangle the patch to something untested but demonstrative and then we can go from there | |
| 17:35:37 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Add ability to download Glance images into the libvirt image cache via RBD https://review.opendev.org/574301 | |
| 18:00:54 | jsuchome | +1 | |
| 18:02:58 | dansmith | jsuchome: so I have nothing pre-existing to test with in order to finish this out.. can you take that from here? | |
| 18:09:13 | jsuchome | thanks, I'm gonna look at it (tommorow, now it's 8pm here) | |
| 18:09:48 | dansmith | cool | |
| 18:29:05 | openstackgerrit | Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: use more distinct link references in release notes https://review.opendev.org/725301 | |
| 18:33:37 | openstackgerrit | Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Add nova-status upgrade check and reno for policy new defaults https://review.opendev.org/725146 | |
| 19:15:19 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Moving functional jobs to Victoria testing runtime https://review.opendev.org/725372 | |
| 22:40:18 | openstackgerrit | Sean McGinnis proposed openstack/nova master: Remove monotonic usage https://review.opendev.org/725425 | |
| 23:10:42 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova stable/train: DNM: testing what all grenade jobs running https://review.opendev.org/725147 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2020-05-05 | |||
| 00:27:55 | gmann | melwitt: dansmith can any of you approve the policy reno backport (is passing now) - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/725146/ | |
| 00:34:06 | melwitt | gmann: yeah I'll get | |
| 00:34:20 | gmann | melwitt: thanks | |
| 00:35:56 | melwitt | done | |
| 02:41:41 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova stable/ussuri: use more distinct link references in release notes https://review.opendev.org/725301 | |
| 03:35:23 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Add nova-status upgrade check and reno for policy new defaults https://review.opendev.org/725146 | |
| 06:02:26 | ygk_12345 | hi all | |
| 06:03:03 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1876772 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Failed to create resource provider" [Undecided,New] | |
| 06:03:03 | ygk_12345 | I have OSA rocky 18.1.2 setup and I raised a bug regarding the placement https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1876772 | |
| 06:03:16 | ygk_12345 | how do I install osc-placement utility in OSA now ? | |
| 06:03:22 | ygk_12345 | cn someone help me ? | |
| 08:10:28 | gibi | bauzas: hi! do we want to include this into RC2 as well? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/723884/ | |
| 08:23:14 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1876772 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Failed to create resource provider" [Undecided,New] | |
| 08:23:14 | gibi | ygk_12345: replied in the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1876772 | |
| 08:27:26 | bauzas | gibi: sorry was on 'teacher' mode for my daughters | |
| 08:48:11 | gibi | bauzas: no problemo :) | |
| 08:48:24 | bauzas | gibi: well, it could be nice to have it | |
| 08:48:41 | bauzas | gibi: also I found why you can't +2 on stable/ussuri | |
| 08:48:55 | bauzas | not because you aren't nova-stable-corte | |
| 08:48:56 | bauzas | core* | |
| 08:49:17 | bauzas | but rather b/c the release mgmt team stopped changing ACLs | |
| 08:49:38 | bauzas | eg. https://github.com/openstack/project-config/commit/72b4071c8206586afa6a1ec2ec40f63a104c1550 | |
| 08:50:24 | gibi | I see. I did not know we had such rule changes in the past | |
| 08:50:44 | gibi | I'm fine not having a stable hat now. And so far we managed without it | |
| 08:51:34 | bauzas | gibi: fwiw, stephenfin proposed to just have nova-stable-core == nova-core | |
| 08:51:40 | bauzas | in the PTG etherpad | |
| 08:51:50 | bauzas | so we will discuss this in June anyway | |
| 08:52:14 | gibi | bauzas: yepp, we can discuss that and I'm not having anything right now against a simpler structure | |
| 08:52:14 | bauzas | (honestly, I'm +1 with this) | |
| 08:52:38 | bauzas | actually | |
| 08:52:50 | bauzas | nova-stable-core = nova-core + other people | |
| 08:53:09 | bauzas | (ie. just adding nova-core as a subteam for nova-stable-core) | |
| 08:54:08 | gibi | yepp | |
| 09:09:51 | bauzas | gibi: sent https://review.opendev.org/#/c/723884/ to the gate | |
| 09:10:14 | gibi | bauzas: ack, thanks. I will propose a backport to stable/ussuri after it merges | |
| 09:10:27 | bauzas | gibi: since this one was tagged for ussuri, yeah we could do a RC2 | |
| 09:10:34 | bauzas | gibi: that said, it's not a regression | |
| 09:10:46 | bauzas | gibi: so we could just merge it *after* RC1 | |
| 09:10:48 | gibi | yepp, I just want to have clean do in the release if possible | |
| 09:10:50 | bauzas | it's docs | |
| 09:10:58 | gibi | s/do/doc/ | |
| 09:11:09 | bauzas | so having it either for 20.0.0 or 20.0.1 doesn't change | |
| 09:11:21 | gibi | it changes when we release that. | |
| 09:11:30 | bauzas | not really, this is docs | |
| 09:11:37 | gibi | if we can add the doc in RC2 then it will be part of the next week release | |
| 09:11:48 | gibi | if not then the doc will be part of a later point release | |
| 09:11:51 | bauzas | gibi: say we merge it 1 second after GA | |
| 09:12:03 | bauzas | we won't need to tag a .z version | |
| 09:12:10 | bauzas | as it's a doc | |
| 09:12:59 | gibi | bauzas: do you mean it does not matter as the doc is alwas generated to the web from the tip of the stable branch? | |
| 09:16:13 | bauzas | gibi: what I mean is that the docs website will be changed by a zuul post pipeline once the change is merged | |
| 09:16:16 | bauzas | (AFAIK) | |
| 09:16:31 | bauzas | (I'm an infra specialist) | |
| 09:16:54 | gibi | OK, I think I see your point. Then I propose the RC2 release now | |
| 09:18:24 | bauzas | (the fact that the docs website is changed by a post pipeline without needing to tag a stable version) | |
| 09:18:25 | gibi | bauzas: https://review.opendev.org/725517 RC2 patch | |