| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-04-06 | |||
| 15:04:17 | sean-k-mooney | but ya i guess i should join intrenal call | |
| 15:04:21 | stephenfin | yup, since Grizzly (thanks, Intel) | |
| 15:04:40 | bauzas | that bears me (joke) | |
| 15:05:34 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: yep i made sure those fileter would still work in the spec review | |
| 15:05:51 | sean-k-mooney | sicne they used to be used for dpdk/numa stuff alot | |
| 15:05:56 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: DNM - Test stable device rescue tests with BFV instances https://review.opendev.org/710050 | |
| 15:06:48 | bauzas | honestly, that's now 4 hours we're discussing over this and I'm out of steam now | |
| 15:07:21 | dansmith | bauzas: wait until people start asking about how to do this in osc in a year :) | |
| 15:07:24 | bauzas | so, again, either we make this permissive now or we just punt this for now | |
| 15:08:01 | bauzas | ... | |
| 15:08:20 | stephenfin | johnthetubaguy: so in this permissive for unknown namepaces only model, would we reject e.g. every unrecognized 'hw:' extra spec? | |
| 15:08:28 | bauzas | dansmith: I just feel we made too many gifts in the past with custom and in-tree filters | |
| 15:08:39 | johnthetubaguy | stephenfin: I think that is a yes, to prevent the most obvious typos | |
| 15:08:40 | bauzas | we should ask for some return | |
| 15:08:57 | johnthetubaguy | stephenfin: or rather, for the user to know things are validated if its in a known namespace | |
| 15:09:48 | stephenfin | johnthetubaguy: okay, in that case do we need to continue to provide a way to disable validation in case there are people there with e.g. 'hw:something_custom' right now? | |
| 15:09:54 | johnthetubaguy | stephenfin: bonus, we would only need a microversion to add a new namespace | |
| 15:10:03 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Remove MIN_LIBVIRT_MULTIATTACH https://review.opendev.org/710238 | |
| 15:10:10 | johnthetubaguy | stephenfin: I think we would just drop that flag for now, and see how people take it | |
| 15:10:44 | johnthetubaguy | I like the simpler API of there being a list of validated namespaces | |
| 15:10:59 | johnthetubaguy | stops all the mess of migrating people towards "custom" something | |
| 15:11:26 | stephenfin | okay, so unless our hand was forced we'd be essentially saying "you need to change this if you ever want to use this microversion" | |
| 15:12:03 | johnthetubaguy | I think so, yes | |
| 15:12:44 | johnthetubaguy | well, you can use the new API version to add your new key, and delete the old bad key | |
| 15:12:46 | stephenfin | Cool. Last one. Do we still need strict in this model (or that parameter in general), seeing as we are effectively strict for all recognized namespaces | |
| 15:12:58 | johnthetubaguy | I don't think so | |
| 15:13:03 | johnthetubaguy | at least not to start with | |
| 15:13:09 | stephenfin | Okay, so I can drop that parameter | |
| 15:13:25 | johnthetubaguy | you could typo the namespace... but, hey, at least we are helping you more now | |
| 15:13:52 | stephenfin | That all works for me. gibi, bauzas, sean-k-mooney, dansmith: any significant concerns with that before I do the needful ^ ? | |
| 15:14:25 | stephenfin | (last 15 lines or so of scrollback) | |
| 15:14:59 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Microversion 2.86 - Stable device boot from volume rescue https://review.opendev.org/714956 | |
| 15:15:08 | johnthetubaguy | stephenfin: for completeness, the old microversions are still unchanged, no validation at all there | |
| 15:15:22 | stephenfin | Yeah, agreed | |
| 15:16:25 | johnthetubaguy | sorry that all took so long, but I think what we have at the end is better | |
| 15:16:43 | johnthetubaguy | and easier to document and use :) | |
| 15:16:49 | sean-k-mooney | ill read back in a few minutes. | |
| 15:17:13 | lyarwood | stephenfin: ah, both of us are going for 2.86 again, want me to move to 2.87? | |
| 15:17:45 | stephenfin | lyarwood: Yup :) Your call but it might make sense | |
| 15:18:55 | lyarwood | stephenfin: yup no issues, I wasn't paying attention | |
| 15:20:42 | bauzas | stephenfin: pardon my French but I may have misunderstood the agreement in between you and johnthetubaguy | |
| 15:21:14 | bauzas | what's the outcome when it's said "drop this flag" ? drop the microversion ? | |
| 15:21:39 | stephenfin | keep the microversion, but drop the '?validate' argument | |
| 15:21:50 | bauzas | and the default being ? | |
| 15:22:12 | bauzas | permissive as I can understand crom 'I don't think so' from johnthetubaguy ? | |
| 15:22:17 | bauzas | from* | |
| 15:22:32 | stephenfin | strict for all known namespaces (hw:, os:, vmware:, ...) | |
| 15:22:39 | stephenfin | don't care for anything outside that set | |
| 15:24:09 | bauzas | I'm cool with this | |
| 15:24:15 | bauzas | stephenfin: ^ | |
| 15:24:30 | bauzas | no upgrade impact, pretty clear | |
| 15:24:47 | bauzas | stull leaves nothing unchanged except for already-defined namespaces | |
| 15:24:50 | bauzas | that works for me | |
| 15:59:35 | gibi | stephenfin: and if you have out of tree hw:xxx key then add a custom validator? | |
| 15:59:46 | gibi | or use the old microversion | |
| 15:59:59 | stephenfin | yes | |
| 16:00:16 | gibi | so custom validators can add to in-tree name spaces? | |
| 16:00:55 | stephenfin | they shouldn't but they could, yes | |
| 16:00:58 | gibi | OK | |
| 16:01:15 | stephenfin | we just prevent overriding specific extra specs e.g. 'hw:cpu_policy' | |
| 16:01:33 | gibi | OK, cannot override in-tree defined validators | |
| 16:01:51 | melwitt | gmann: we have a minor emergency regarding the policy warning logging (see the -infra channel). it's melting the logstrash indexing | |
| 16:02:05 | gibi | what if I have namespaced out of tree keys today? like ericsson:awesome_feature_flag ? | |
| 16:02:28 | stephenfin | nothing happens until you add a validator | |
| 16:02:35 | stephenfin | we ignore all unknown namespaces | |
| 16:02:40 | gibi | OK, make sense | |
| 16:02:50 | openstackgerrit | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Update quota_class APIs for db and api limits https://review.opendev.org/712143 | |
| 16:02:51 | stephenfin | (and those without namespaces, fwiw) | |
| 16:03:12 | openstackgerrit | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Add stub unified limits driver https://review.opendev.org/712137 | |
| 16:03:23 | openstackgerrit | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Assert quota related API behavior when noop https://review.opendev.org/712140 | |
| 16:03:30 | gibi | stephenfin, johnthetubaguy: seems like a good idea. | |
| 16:03:35 | openstackgerrit | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Make unified limits APIs return reserved of 0 https://review.opendev.org/712141 | |
| 16:03:47 | openstackgerrit | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Add logic to enforce local api and db limits https://review.opendev.org/712139 | |
| 16:03:59 | openstackgerrit | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Enforce api and db limits https://review.opendev.org/712142 | |
| 16:04:16 | openstackgerrit | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Update quota_class APIs for db and api limits https://review.opendev.org/712143 | |
| 16:05:31 | johnthetubaguy | melwitt: oops :/ | |
| 16:05:43 | johnthetubaguy | probably means the same for our users | |
| 16:05:49 | melwitt | yeah :( we were just talking about this the other day but I didn't realize how intense it is | |
| 16:06:03 | johnthetubaguy | does it mean almost every API call? | |
| 16:06:14 | johnthetubaguy | or just a massive storm on restart? | |
| 16:06:23 | melwitt | we need to get it removed asap. we were already talking to gmann about it and he was cool with removing it and doing a reno-only announcement re: policy changes | |
| 16:06:41 | johnthetubaguy | melwitt: is there a patch up? | |
| 16:06:45 | melwitt | looks like every API call | |
| 16:07:05 | johnthetubaguy | yeah, that isn't right :/ | |
| 16:07:46 | melwitt | no not that I know of, no patch yet | |
| 16:14:45 | openstackgerrit | Alexandre arents proposed openstack/nova master: Calculate disk_over_committed for raw instances https://review.opendev.org/717037 | |
| 16:14:52 | johnthetubaguy | its probably all system only API calls... as our tests probably don't have a system admin user yet | |
| 16:16:10 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add microversion for extra spec validation https://review.opendev.org/708436 | |
| 16:16:11 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Drop concept of '?validation' parameter https://review.opendev.org/717789 | |
| 16:16:11 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Add documentation for flavor extra specs https://review.opendev.org/710037 | |
| 16:16:12 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Add 'nova' domain and include extra specs in it https://review.opendev.org/717791 | |
| 16:16:12 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Move description of groups to document itself https://review.opendev.org/717790 | |
| 16:16:45 | stephenfin | johnthetubaguy: I think that matches up with what you were expecting ^ | |
| 16:17:06 | stephenfin | gibi: Also, I retooled the docs. It's _much_ nicer now (we can cross-reference!) | |
| 16:17:31 | gibi | stephenfin: will look but sounds awesome! | |
| 16:19:47 | openstackgerrit | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Update limit APIs https://review.opendev.org/712707 | |
| 16:23:56 | gibi | bauzas: o/ sorry I could not get to the vgpu series of yours | |
| 16:24:01 | gibi | maybe tomorrow | |
| 16:24:08 | bauzas | gibi: thanks and no worries | |
| 16:24:33 | bauzas | gibi: in the meantime, I'll write to provide a func change for seeing the behaviour | |