| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-04-02 | |||
| 10:33:09 | stephenfin | brinzhang_: Actually, in the setUp, is there any reason not to configure 'self.req' with a version argument? | |
| 10:33:32 | stephenfin | You're testing policy, not microversion support, so you'll always want to use a known working version, right? | |
| 10:33:52 | brinzhang_ | yes | |
| 10:35:45 | brinzhang_ | stephenfin: you mean I should change self.req to req in setup()? | |
| 10:35:52 | stephenfin | no | |
| 10:36:24 | stephenfin | instead of self.req = fakes.HTTPRequest.blank('') | |
| 10:36:33 | stephenfin | do self.req = fakes.HTTPRequest.blank('', version='2.85') | |
| 10:36:49 | stephenfin | here https://review.opendev.org/#/c/711194/12/nova/tests/unit/policies/test_volumes.py@78 | |
| 10:37:19 | brinzhang_ | no, it dosenot only for v2.85 | |
| 10:37:35 | brinzhang_ | so I just used req in v2.85 policy tests | |
| 10:37:36 | stephenfin | ah, I see now, this is only for the 'update_volume' case | |
| 10:37:41 | brinzhang_ | yes | |
| 10:37:49 | stephenfin | gotcha | |
| 10:37:57 | brinzhang_ | req.environ['nova.context'] = self.system_foo_context | |
| 10:38:11 | stephenfin | yup, that'll do so ^ | |
| 10:38:13 | brinzhang_ | I added this, it run ok now, will update | |
| 10:38:18 | brinzhang_ | thansk stephenfin, gibi | |
| 10:47:28 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Separate update and swap volume policies https://review.opendev.org/711194 | |
| 10:47:33 | brinzhang_ | gibi, stephenfin: done thanks | |
| 10:48:43 | brinzhang_ | stephenfin: can you +A for this patch https://review.opendev.org/#/c/693828/25? it's ready for everything, that comment inline, I will fixed by FUP | |
| 10:50:39 | stephenfin | brinzhang_: I haven't looked at that in a while so I'll need a while | |
| 10:50:52 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add framework for extra spec validation https://review.opendev.org/704643 | |
| 10:50:53 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add microversion 2.85, extra spec validation https://review.opendev.org/708436 | |
| 10:50:53 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add support for new cyborg extra specs https://review.opendev.org/716222 | |
| 10:50:54 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Add documentation for flavor extra specs https://review.opendev.org/710037 | |
| 10:51:35 | stephenfin | gibi: addressed the comments from Sundar and removed those errant prints from the last doc patch ^ | |
| 10:51:38 | brinzhang_ | stephenfin, gibi, gmann: thanks, hope you have a greate day ^^ | |
| 10:52:47 | openstackgerrit | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Provide the parent pGPU when creating a new vGPU https://review.opendev.org/715489 | |
| 10:52:48 | openstackgerrit | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Support different vGPU types per pGPU https://review.opendev.org/715490 | |
| 10:52:53 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: ^ | |
| 11:03:45 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Add new default roles in remote console policies https://review.opendev.org/716484 | |
| 11:38:31 | gibi | stephenfin: ack, will look shortly | |
| 11:41:27 | gibi | stephenfin: I'm all the way +2 on that series. Do you have a novaclient change as well? | |
| 12:25:26 | stephenfin | bauzas: You think you could review https://review.opendev.org/#/c/710037/8/doc/ext/extra_specs.py ? It's not the least bit complicated, if that helps :) | |
| 12:25:38 | bauzas | oh yeah | |
| 12:25:42 | stephenfin | Happy to trade reviews | |
| 12:34:20 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: at the moment i assume you are not allowing multiple vGPU types on a single pGPU | |
| 12:34:41 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: there is noting in princiapl that prevents that form working even if nvida does not support that | |
| 12:35:21 | sean-k-mooney | the vfio mediated device framework fully support using multiple mdev_types on the same devcie concurrnetly | |
| 12:35:26 | alex_xu | anyone know why we can swap the same volume before https://review.opendev.org/#/c/693828/25/nova/api/openstack/compute/volumes.py@495... | |
| 12:36:35 | sean-k-mooney | alex_xu: lyarwood is on pto i think but i think we can may do that for a volume retype on the cinder side | |
| 12:36:38 | alex_xu | oh, I guess we can't, that will fail at later voluem status check | |
| 12:36:53 | alex_xu | sean-k-mooney: ah, thanks | |
| 12:37:25 | sean-k-mooney | alex_xu: im not sure if my guess above was correct by the way. we could very well just fail later as you said | |
| 12:37:41 | alex_xu | yea | |
| 12:38:13 | sean-k-mooney | but i think cinder allows use to retype a voule while its attached to an instance and this is the only way i can think if for it to tell nova that it has updated | |
| 12:39:20 | alex_xu | sean-k-mooney: ok, thanks | |
| 12:41:26 | sean-k-mooney | alex_xu: i didnt review the rest of that patch but just -1'd it since its aliasing the id builtin fucntion and using id as a varible which is wrong | |
| 12:41:44 | sean-k-mooney | in this context it wont break anything but we should never do that | |
| 12:51:28 | alex_xu | sean-k-mooney: I'm not sure we can check that, I need to check the api code. we use 'id' in many API. but I agree that seems wrong | |
| 12:53:22 | sean-k-mooney | im not sure we call id directly in nova since we normally dont care about the objects address in memory | |
| 12:53:42 | sean-k-mooney | but its just not good practic to alias builtins in general | |
| 12:54:20 | sean-k-mooney | it would only really be an issue if you did "id=dir" or something at module scope | |
| 12:54:47 | sean-k-mooney | inside a function it will jsut make id unavialbel in that function body | |
| 12:57:37 | sean-k-mooney | but if you do python3 -c "id=dir; help(id)" it will show the help for dir so if you do that at module scope anything that uses id after will get dir instead | |
| 12:58:16 | alex_xu | yea, agree with that | |
| 12:58:39 | alex_xu | sean-k-mooney: this is where id coming from https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/api/openstack/compute/routes.py#L820 | |
| 13:00:12 | sean-k-mooney | ah i see ya we proably shoucl change that to <resouce>_id for all of the usages and add a hacking check. | |
| 13:00:33 | sean-k-mooney | that is a seperate change however so ill remove my -1 | |
| 13:00:46 | sean-k-mooney | this is an existing bug | |
| 13:02:43 | openstackgerrit | Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: Add support for 'hw:cpu_dedicated_mask' extra spec https://review.opendev.org/714706 | |
| 13:02:43 | openstackgerrit | Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: Introduce the 'CPUAllocationPolicy.MIXED' enum https://review.opendev.org/716267 | |
| 13:02:44 | openstackgerrit | Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: Introduce 'pcpuset' field for InstanceNUMACell https://review.opendev.org/716984 | |
| 13:19:44 | artom | stephenfin, could you take a look at the bottom patch in the NUMA LM series? Dan Smith is +2, if you agree, we can at least get the first 2 patches in that series in the gate | |
| 13:19:54 | stephenfin | sure | |
| 13:20:06 | artom | The rest can wait until after FF I guess, since there are probably more important series to review | |
| 13:20:26 | artom | stephenfin, err, link: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/714228/2 | |
| 13:21:43 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: that's a correct assumption, I prevent such thing (supporting multiple types concurrently for *each* pGPU) | |
| 13:22:38 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: ok. well that is not limitation of mdevs just of the nova/nvida usage | |
| 13:22:52 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: that is fine for now in anycase | |
| 13:22:53 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: like I also doesn't want to support yet asking for multiple allocations using groups | |
| 13:23:16 | bauzas | i limit to only one allocation for the VGPU resource class | |
| 13:23:25 | bauzas | I mean, people can ask VGPU>1 | |
| 13:23:29 | bauzas | (of course) | |
| 13:23:40 | bauzas | but not with numbered request groups | |
| 13:23:45 | sean-k-mooney | ya that is fine | |
| 13:24:04 | sean-k-mooney | i dont think we shoudl use numbered request groups in teh flavor anyway so im fine with that | |
| 13:24:50 | bauzas | I don't return an exception for this | |
| 13:24:54 | bauzas | I just take the first one | |
| 13:25:25 | sean-k-mooney | that could be an improvement to add as a followup | |
| 13:25:39 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: its documented which is the important thing | |
| 13:25:46 | bauzas | yup | |
| 13:28:21 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: yeah I know the mdev framework does that | |
| 13:28:41 | bauzas | (I mean having multiple vGPU types per pGPU= | |
| 13:29:13 | bauzas | but then if you create one mdev with the nvidia driver, then automatically and magically the available instances of vGPU for the other types turn to 0 :D | |
| 13:29:28 | bauzas | (at least GRID10 AFAIK) | |
| 13:30:23 | bauzas | anyway, rushing to finish my change so that I can decently review stephenfin's extra spec validation thingies https://review.opendev.org/#/c/704643/20 | |
| 13:53:36 | openstackgerrit | jayaditya gupta proposed openstack/nova master: Support for nova-manage placement heal_allocations --cell https://review.opendev.org/714459 | |
| 13:54:57 | nightmare_unreal | mriedem: if you get some time can you see this : https://review.opendev.org/#/c/714459/ . I can't seem to figure out the issue with the unit test case I wrote. Thank you :) . I have fixed rest of the points you mentioned | |
| 14:15:16 | mriedem | nightmare_unreal: this? "Exception: This test uses methods that set internal oslo_db state, but it does not claim to use the database. This will conflict with the setup of tests that do use the database and cause failures later." | |
| 14:15:40 | mriedem | that means the unit test class is using NoDBTestCase or whatever it's called, which means something in the test is trying to make a database connection and isn't allowed, | |
| 14:16:10 | mriedem | so either move that test to the functional test class where there is a DB connection, or you have to mock out the DB call to raise the NotFound error or whatever for the test | |
| 14:16:46 | mriedem | your test can mock objects.CellMapping.get_by_uuid to raise CellMappingNotFound | |
| 14:17:59 | mriedem | @mock.patch('nova.objects.CellMapping.get_by_uuid', side_effect=exception.CellMappingNotFound('uuid') | |
| 14:18:05 | mriedem | something like that as a decorator to the test case method | |
| 14:20:19 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Combine the limits policies in single place https://review.opendev.org/715678 | |
| 14:28:28 | nightmare_unreal | Thanks !! | |
| 14:35:11 | openstackgerrit | jayaditya gupta proposed openstack/nova master: Support for nova-manage placement heal_allocations --cell https://review.opendev.org/714459 | |
| 14:35:37 | dansmith | brinzhang_: are you working on feedback on the PUT patch? | |
| 14:41:43 | francoisp | stephenfin, just to draw your attention, I answered your last question on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/669674/10 - thanks! | |